<root>
<clog_course_details>
<clog_member>agrigoreva</clog_member>
<clog_password>y25agrigoreva</clog_password>
<clog_last_update>20250416</clog_last_update>
<clog2dbdetails>
<courseid_ofl>131</courseid_ofl>
<mbzfile2restore></mbzfile2restore>
<mbzsessions2restore>2</mbzsessions2restore>
<mooshcli_offline>
</mooshcli_offline>
<courseid_onl>63</courseid_onl>
</clog2dbdetails>
<clog_notes>
<![CDATA[
vim cheat sheet
:setlocal spell spelllang=ru_yo en_gb fr
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href=""></a>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="http://www.ictnle.com/tmp_pdf/"></a>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="">(send the link to your google doc (in edit mode!)</a>
<img src="pix/icons8-reading-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icons8-reading-100.png">
<img src="pix/icons8-quiz-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="quarterly test"> Prepare for quarterly test
<img src="pix/icons8-dictionary-100.png" width="30em" border="0" alt="vocab pre teach" />
<img src="pix/icons8-hammer-100.png" width="30em" border="0" alt="functional language"> 
<img src="pix/icons8-automation-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="grammar focus" />
<img src="pix/icons8-smartphone-tablet-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="smartphone or tablet device"> <img src="pix/icons8-listen-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="listening"> Download onto your phone or tablet and listen carefully.

<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-reading-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-frisbee-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-jump-rope-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-lecturer-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-listen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-magazine-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-metronome-filled-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-microscope-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-people-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-reading-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-soccer-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-training-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-treadmill-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-worker-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>collaboration</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>people</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>communicating</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>vocab</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>listening</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>presentation</activity_icon>
<activity_icon>in_detail</activity_icon>
]]>
</clog_notes>
<clog_format></clog_format>
<clog_plugins>
sbook_plugins/wordlist_generated_from_xml_clog_sbook_for_sbook_session.inc
sbook_plugins/payment_history_generated_from_xml_clog_sbook.inc
</clog_plugins>
<clog_company>
<clog_company_name></clog_company_name>
<clog_course_name>BE C2 iAGR 2025</clog_course_name>
<email></email>
<notes>
</notes>
<phone>+79195897859</phone>
<account_number01></account_number01>
<account_number02></account_number02>
<account_number03></account_number03>
</clog_company>
<clog_list_of_students>
<clog_student>
<clog_name></clog_name>
<clog_surname></clog_surname>
<clog_entry_level></clog_entry_level>
<email></email>
<phone></phone>
<notes><![CDATA[
Topics - subject to approval
    Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin
    How I figured out the Achilles heel of Vladimir Putin | William Browder | TEDxBerlin, 14 Aug 2018 (origins of the Magnitksy Act)
    The Russian spy boss humiliated by Putin
    Chemical burns, poisoning and prison: the persecution of Alexei Navalny (The Guardian)
    Reasons behind mobilisation &amp; possible scenarios
    Why will nobody win the war in Ukraine?
    How to end the war in the Ukraine?
    What future for Russia - scenarios
    Can Europe afford to set a precedent by reallocating Russian frozen assets?
    Trump vs Zelensky negotiation plans to reach truce agreement w/ Russia
    Reasons behind Trump and Zelensky's shouting match
    ✓ Rationale for a common European military defence policy

    ✓ What makes some economies larger and more attractive than others?
    ✓ A European Federation instead of European Union?
    ✓ Pros and cons of the EAEU

    Should Scotland leave the UK to help the labour party rebuild trade agreements with the EU?
    How will the UK recover from Brexit, the energy crisis, the loss of confidence in the (Tories) government, the immigration crisis?
    Is Great Britain still 'great'?
    Why is Denmark so happy?
    Slavic lives matter
    Hofstede cultural dimensions - How to use power distance, restraint &amp; indulgence

    Big Bang of the Russian gas
    ✓ Fallacies of the Russian gas market 
    The Russian electricity market: liberalised but paralysed?

todo?
    White House mistakenly shares Yemen war plans with a journalist at The Atlantic 

climate refugees



now 2nd masters' degree
policy making
integration of refugees
→ PhD

https://www.ictnle.com/mod/mootimeter/view.php?id=10347

Needs assessment - orig

1. What political topics interest you the most?  
International relations and diplomacy  
Political ideologies and philosophy  
Electoral systems and governance  
Political discourse and rhetoric  
Global conflicts and resolutions  

2. What are your main communication goals in political discussions?  
Expressing complex political opinions clearly  
Debating effectively with structured arguments  
Understanding political jargon and idioms  
Writing analytical essays and reports  
Engaging in formal and informal political conversations  

3. Which language skills do you want to improve most?  
Speaking persuasively in debates  
Understanding political speeches and news reports  
Writing policy briefs and academic essays  
Expanding political vocabulary and terminology  
Listening to and comprehending native speakers in political contexts  

4. What difficulties do you face when discussing politics in English?  
Finding precise words to express political ideas  
Understanding fast-paced political debates  
Following nuanced or satirical political commentary  
Structuring persuasive arguments effectively  
Responding quickly and confidently in discussions  

5. Do you prefer to participate in formal or informal political discussions? Why?  
I prefer to take part in formal discussions, as they require structured reasoning.  
Engaging in informal discussions helps me practise spontaneous speaking.  
I want to improve in both settings to develop flexibility.  
Taking part in formal debates prepares me for academic or professional settings.  
Participating in informal discussions makes learning politics more engaging.  

6. Which types of political media do you engage with most?  
Reading news articles and opinion pieces  
Watching political speeches and debates  
Listening to podcasts and interviews  
Taking part in social media discussions  
Studying academic journals and research papers  

7. Do you find it difficult to understand political humour or satire?  
Yes, because understanding satire often requires cultural knowledge.  
Sometimes, especially when interpreting idioms or metaphors.  
No, but analysing it more deeply would be helpful.  
I understand it, but responding appropriately can be difficult.  
I prefer to focus on serious discussions rather than interpreting political humour.  

8. What writing skills do you want to develop in politics?  
Writing persuasive essays or opinion pieces  
Summarising political events concisely  
Crafting formal reports or policy papers  
Analysing and critiquing political speeches  
Structuring arguments logically in written debates  

9. How confident are you in public speaking on political issues?  
Very confident, I enjoy debating and presenting.  
Somewhat confident, but I struggle with fluency.  
Not very confident, I need more practice.  
I prefer writing rather than speaking.  
I need more exposure to formal debate styles.  

10. What kind of vocabulary do you find challenging in political discussions?  
Technical terms related to government and policy  
Abstract concepts in political philosophy  
Legal and constitutional language  
Slang or informal expressions in political discourse  
Economic and financial terminology in political contexts  

11. What kind of exercises or activities would help you improve?  
Debating with structured arguments  
Analysing and summarising political speeches  
Writing opinion pieces on current events  
Watching and discussing political documentaries  
Participating in model UN or parliamentary debates  

12. What is your preferred learning approach for political language?  
Immersing myself in news and political programmes  
Taking part in interactive debates and role-playing exercises  
Studying structured lessons on political terminology and analysis  
Working independently with research and writing assignments  
Combining all methods to create a balanced learning experience  

Introduce yourself in 150-200 words (education, background, current position, professional aspirations)


AG 20250403

1. What political topics interest you the most?  
International relations and diplomacy  
Political ideologies and philosophy  
Electoral systems and governance  
Political discourse and rhetoric  
Global conflicts and resolutions  

Answer: all of the above. I am mostly interested in politics and policies concerning refugees


2. What are your main communication goals in political discussions?  
✓ Expressing complex political opinions clearly  
✓ Debating effectively with structured arguments  
Understanding political jargon and idioms  
✓ Writing analytical essays and reports  
✓ Engaging in formal and informal political conversations  


3. Which language skills do you want to improve most?  
✓ Speaking persuasively in debates  
Understanding political speeches and news reports  
✓ Writing policy briefs and academic essays  
✓ Expanding political vocabulary and terminology  
Listening to and comprehending native speakers in political contexts  

4. What difficulties do you face when discussing politics in English?  
✓ Finding precise words to express political ideas  
Understanding fast-paced political debates  
Following nuanced or satirical political commentary  
✓ Structuring persuasive arguments effectively  
✓ Responding quickly and confidently in discussions  

5. Do you prefer to participate in formal or informal political discussions? Why?  
I prefer to take part in formal discussions, as they require structured reasoning.  
Engaging in informal discussions helps me practise spontaneous speaking.  
✓ I want to improve in both settings to develop flexibility.  
✓ Taking part in formal debates prepares me for academic or professional settings.  
Participating in informal discussions makes learning politics more engaging.  

6. Which types of political media do you engage with most?  
✓ Reading news articles and opinion pieces  
Watching political speeches and debates  
✓ Listening to podcasts and interviews  
Taking part in social media discussions  
✓ Studying academic journals and research papers  

7. Do you find it difficult to understand political humour or satire?  
Yes, because understanding satire often requires cultural knowledge.  
Sometimes, especially when interpreting idioms or metaphors.  
✓ No, but analysing it more deeply would be helpful.  
✓ I understand it, but responding appropriately can be difficult.  
I prefer to focus on serious discussions rather than interpreting political humour.  

8. What writing skills do you want to develop in politics?  
✓ Writing persuasive essays or opinion pieces  
✓ Summarising political events concisely  
✓ Crafting formal reports or policy papers  
Analysing and critiquing political speeches  
Structuring arguments logically in written debates  

9. How confident are you in public speaking on political issues?  
Very confident, I enjoy debating and presenting.  
✓ Somewhat confident, but I struggle with fluency.  
Not very confident, I need more practice.  
I prefer writing rather than speaking.  
I need more exposure to formal debate styles.  

10. What kind of vocabulary do you find challenging in political discussions?  
✓ Technical terms related to government and policy  
✓ Abstract concepts in political philosophy  
Legal and constitutional language  
Slang or informal expressions in political discourse  
Economic and financial terminology in political contexts  

11. What kind of exercises or activities would help you improve?  
✓ Debating with structured arguments  
Analysing and summarising political speeches  
✓ Writing opinion pieces on current events  
✓ Watching and discussing political documentaries  
Participating in model UN or parliamentary debates  

12. What is your preferred learning approach for political language?  
Immersing myself in news and political programmes  
Taking part in interactive debates and role-playing exercises  
Studying structured lessons on political terminology and analysis  
Working independently with research and writing assignments  
✓ Combining all methods to create a balanced learning experience  

]]></notes>
</clog_student>
</clog_list_of_students>
</clog_course_details>

<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250430</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>12:00-13:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>1500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance>-1500 + 0 = -1500</clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>tbc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>
→ watch the video


optional homework
(Rescheduled from previous lesson)
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist 
→ watch the video
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>

If time available, prepare the role play below:
<img src="pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> You have been invited to debate about the glass ceiling in politics.


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>56</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions>You have been invited to debate about the glass ceiling in politics.
→ practise the subjunctive
→ recycle new expressions and language</instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You don't believe the glass ceiling is still a reality in the 21st century</task>
<ans>✓ the G20 is such an intergovernmental organisation! 
✓ surely it must be a role model
✓ going back to the drawing board
✓ find an inclusive environment isn't such a gurelling process any more
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You have witnessed multiple cases of gender discrimination in international organisations, including politics.</task>
<ans>✓ you'd expect remuneration be more transparent but...
✓ it is advisable boards review their policies
✓ equal rights are not a given, even in politics!
✓ whoever you are, you'd still need to elbow your way in
✓ pick your fights
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>55</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
Trans-Tasman relations = foreign relations between neighbouring countries Australia and New Zealand
to be a given = something that is certain to happen or to be
to pick one's fights = to choose which conflicts or issues are truly worth your time, energy, and effort instead of fighting every little wrong or injustice; also means knowing when to raise issues versus letting them go
gruelling = very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time
back to the drawing board = used to indicate that an idea, scheme, or proposal has been unsuccessful and that a new one must be devised
to haunt = to continue to cause problems for sb for a long time
to bite the bullet = to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>54</mdlid>
<activity_id></activity_id>
<activity_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<em>2,318,076 views  Oct 19, 2022  HOUSE OF COMMONS
The prime minister, Liz Truss, and the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, went head-to-head in Wednesday's PMQ's with a number of fiery exchanges.
Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub

Starmer gave a list of the government's recent U-turns after the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's mini-budget. 'Why is she still here?' he asked. The prime minister responded: 'I'm not a quitter, I'm a fighter'.

PMQs verdict: combative performance keeps Liz Truss safe – for a few hours ► https://www.theguardian.com/global/20...

Liz Truss says she is ‘completely committed’ to pensions triple lock as Keir Starmer calls her ‘opposition in waiting’ – live ► https://www.theguardian.com/politics/...</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
A book is being written about the prime
minister's time in office
apparently it's going to be out by
Christmas is that the release date or
the title
well Mr Speaker
Mr Speaker
I have been in office for just under two
months and I have delivered the energy
price guarantee
alarm paying six thousand pound bills
this winter I've reversed the National
Insurance increase and I've also taken
steps and we will be taking steps to
crack down on the militant unions now
what what Mr Speaker I think Mr Speaker
that is more of a record of action than
the honorable gentleman in his two and a
half years in the job foreign
Mr Speaker last week the Prime Minister
ignored every question put to her
instead she repeatedly criticized
Labor's plan for a six-month freeze on
energy bills this week the chancellor
made it her policy
to be held to account when she's not in
charge
[Applause]
our policy is to protect the most
vulnerable for two years foreign
because of the economic situation to
adjust our policies I somebody who's
prepared to front up I'm prepared to
take the tough decisions unlike The
Honorable gentleman who hasn't done
anything on businesses he's done nothing
to say or protect people after one year
he's got no plan
[Applause]
Mr Speaker last week the Prime Minister
stood there and promised absolutely no
spending reductions they all cheered
this week the chancellor announced a new
wave of cuts what's the point of a prime
minister whose promises don't even last
a week
[Applause]
you're the right honorable gentleman
that that spending will go up next year
and it will go up the year after but of
course we need to get value for
taxpayers money the labor party has
pledged hundreds of billions of spending
pledges none of which they've retracted
The Honorable gentleman needs to reflect
the economic reality and his policy
[Applause]
Mr Speaker those spending cuts are on
the table for one reason and one reason
only because they crashed the economy
working working
people working people are going to have
to pay 500 quid more a month on their
mortgages and what's the prime
minister's response
to say she's sorry
what does she think people will think
and say that's all right I don't mind
Financial ruin at least she apologized
prime minister
I do think there has to be some
reflection of economic reality from the
party
interest rates are rising across the
world and the economic conditions have
worsened and we are being honest we're
leveling with the public unlike The
Honorable gentleman who simply won't do
it and what is the honorable gentleman
doing about the fact that workers train
workers are again going on strike the
fact is he refuses to condemn the
workers we are bringing forward policies
Mr Speaker we are bringing forward
policies that are going to make sure our
Railways are protected people going to
work are protected he backs the strikers
we back the Strivers
Mr Speaker she's asking me questions
because we're a government in Waiting
there's no
exactly there's no getting away from
this millions of people are facing
horrendous mortgage repayments and she's
admitted it's her fault she shouldn't
have conducted an economic experiment on
the British public but it's not just her
they put her there they're keeping her
there why on Earth would anyone trust
the tourists with the economy ever again
well I noticed Mr Speaker he's not
actually objecting to a single Economic
Policy but the chancellor announced on
Monday
he's refusing to condemn the strikers
we're on the side of working people
we're going to legislate to make sure we
keep our Railways open The Honorable
gentleman refuses to do anything
[Applause]
Mr Speaker the only mandate she's ever
had is from Members opposite yeah it was
a mandate built on fantasy economics and
it ended in disaster the country's got
nothing to show for it except the
destruction of the economy and the
implosion of the Tory party I've got the
list here 45p tax cut gone corporation
tax cut gone 20p tax cut gone two-year
energy freeze gone tax-free shopping
gone economic credibility gone
and her supposed best friend the former
Chancellor he's gone as well they're all
gone so why is she still here
Mr Speaker
[Applause]
Mr Speaker I am a fighter and not a
quetter
I have acted in the National interest to
make sure that we have economic
stability order
order I'm going to hear the Prime
Minister I suggest that all members need
to hear the answer prime minister
[Applause]
[Music]
I am a fighter
[Music]
delivered on the energy price guarantee
we have we delivered on the energy price
guarantee we've delivered on National
Insurance we are going to deliver to
stop the militant trade unions
disrupting our Railways The Honorable
gentleman has no idea he has no plan and
he has no alternative
[Music]

</key>
<qa>
<qs></qs>
<ans>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>53</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>52</mdlid>
<activity_id></activity_id>
<activity_title>The Speech That Brought Down Margaret Thatcher &amp; Kick-Started Brexit</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> The Speech That Brought Down Margaret Thatcher &amp; Kick-Started Brexit
<em>On the 13th November 1990, Sir Geoffrey Howe stood up in the House of Commons to make a speech that would change the state of British politics. 
His speech would imminently lead to the end of Margaret Thatcher's time as Prime Minister after eleven years. 
But there could hardly have been a less likely candidate. Not only was Howe a long-term ally of Thatcher, but he was also so boring that he had been referred to as a "dead sheep." 

Playwright Jonathan Maitland explains why his resignation statement was so important, how it has impacted the current world of politics and why Howe decided to take down one of his former allies.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwrQ4txIX-Q">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwrQ4txIX-Q</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
That conflict of loyalty has become all
too great this speech changed the course
of history it's rather like sending your
opening batsman to the priest only for
them to find their bats have been broken
before the game by the team captain this
speech was the start of brexit this laid
the fault line the time has come for
others to consider our own response to
the tragic conflict of loyalty with
which I have myself wrestled for perhaps
too long
so the year is
1990 Jeffrey how the supposed dead sheep
of British politics because he's so
boring and such a bad speaker that was
his nickname is about to make a speech a
totally unexpected speech that is going
to bring down the most powerful woman in
Britain Margaret Thatcher the Prime
Minister after 11 years in power and
after three election victories and I
think it's right to say her grip on
power was was fraying there had been
pole tax rights in the streets this is
big violent Mass
demonstrations over a new way of um
paying local taxes which were really
unpopular and it was civil unrest on a
scale that Britain really hadn't
experienced for years but she was still
there but she'd been in power for 11
years and that's a really long time
she'd won three elections so the timing
for Jeffrey house speech was just
Thatcher &amp; Howe.
perfect it's been suggested even indeed
by some of my right honorable friends
that I decided to resign solely because
of questions of style and not on matters
of substance at all indeed if some of my
former colleagues are to be believed I
must be the first minister in history to
have resigned because he was in full
agreement with government
policy the relationship between Jeffrey
how and Mrs Stater was I I think
absolutely extraordinary which is why I
wrote a play about it I mean initially
Jeffrey was her friend without Jeffrey
Mrs Thatcher wouldn't have
become arguably the most iconic
politician in Britain of the last 70
years Jeffrey saved her because he knew
all about economics and they thought as
one when it came to the
economy
and he was her Chancellor to begin with
then her foreign secretary and then
finally her Deputy Prime Minister
however their proper friendship I mean
they really were allies and and if it
wasn't for Jeffrey Mrs thater wouldn't
have lasted more than two or three years
that's how important he was to
her their relationship deteriorated very
badly by the time of the
speech Mr satcher was really annoyed
with Jeffrey because basically he was
boring and pompus went on too long and
kept banging on about Europe and Jeffrey
how was very upset with Mrs Stater
because she used to belittle him in
cabinet meetings humiliate him in public
by undermining things that he' just said
and also crucially how was really pro-
Europe I mean he he was your original
remainer he loved the idea of Europe he
wanted more Europe whereas Mrs stater in
public was very anti-europe she played
to the gallery and how just thought that
was wrong
Why It Changed History.
for the future of the country we commit
a serious error if we think always in
terms of surrendering sovereignty and
seek to stand Pat for all time on a
given deal by proclaiming as my right
honorable friend the Prime Minister did
two weeks ago that we have surrendered
enough the European Enterprise is not
and should not be seen like that as some
kind of Zero Sum game so Winston Church
Churchill put it much more positively 40
years ago and he said is it not possible
and not less agreeable to regard this
sacrifice or merger of national
sovereignty as the gradual assumption by
all the nations concerned of that larger
sovereignty which can alone protect
their diverse and distinctive customs
and characteristics and their National
Traditions I have to say Mr Speaker that
I find Winston Churchill's perception a
good deal more convincing and more
encouraging for the interest of our
nation than the nightmare image
sometimes conjured up by my right
honorable friend this speech changed the
course of history it was unbelievable
for two reasons number one it brought an
end to Mrs Thatcher within days of
Jeffrey H making this speech she was
gone secondly it was incredible because
it was so unexpected how was famously
boring he was known as the dead sheep
because uh an opposition politician said
being attacked by Jeffrey how was like
being Savaged by a dead sheep he was
that boring so
to make such an incredible speech that
was so unexpected it was headline news
all over the world and thirdly most
importantly I would contend and I don't
think many historians or playwrights or
writers or political observers would
disagree with me this speech was the
start of brexit this laid the fault
line it was out in the open at last
previously everybody knew that there
were two sides of the Tory party one was
against the other when it came to Europe
they were pro-europeans and
anti-european okay before Jeffrey house
speech it wasn't really
official my goodness when Jeffrey how
made this speech it
exploded into the open and from that day
on I think
brexit was predetermined it was always
going to happen how on Earth are the
THAT Cricket Metaphor.
chancellor and the governor of the bank
of England commending the hard acur as
they strive to do to be taken as serious
participants in the debate against that
kind of background
noise Mr
Speaker Mr Speaker I believe that both
the chancellor and the governor are
cricketing
enthusiasts so I hope there's no
Monopoly of cricketing
metaphors it's rather like sending your
opening batsman to the crease only for
them to find the moment the first balls
are bowled that their bats have been
broken before the game by the team
captain the most famous bit in the
speech was a reference to Cricket um now
uh people remember it because it was so
beautifully uh coined by Jeffrey he
expressed it very well what a lot of
people don't know actually is that it
was suggested by jeffy's wife elth who
was a very formidable public speaker
elth couldn't stand Mrs Thatcher elth
was also a big Cricket fan okay she was
Captain of her school cricket team would
you believe
and she was watching the news the night
before with Jeffrey and they saw on the
news Mrs thater saying the bowling's
going to get hit all around the
ground That's My Style and so eleth said
why don't you throw that metaphor back
in her face and use a cricketing
metaphor yourself and he said yeah good
idea so he did and the beautiful thing
about that little bit of the speech
is Jeffrey says I hope there's no know I
mean you he said it very boringly it's
hilariously at odds with the kind of
exciting content of the speech he said
in his kind of snan
way I hope there is no Monopoly on
cricketing metaphors he flung it back in
her face and when he said it everyone
burst out laughing a cuz it was funny
and B the audacity of it I mean he was a
dead sheep roaring like a lion it was
incredible and so unexpected
The Conflict Of Loyalty.
Mr Speaker in my letter of resignation
which I tended with the utmost sadness
and dismay I said that cabinet
government is all about trying to
persuade one another from within that
was my commitment to government by
persuasion persuading colleagues and the
nation I've tried to do that as foreign
secretary and since but I realize now
that the task has become futile of
trying to stretch the meaning of words
beyond what was credible of trying to
pretend there was a common policy when
every step forward risked being
subverted by some casual comment or
impulsive
answer the conflict of
loyalty of loyalty to my right honorable
friend the Prime Minister and after more
than two decades together that instinct
of loyalty is still very real and of
loyalty to what I perceive to be the
true interest of this nation that
conflict of loyalty has become all too
great I no longer believe it possible
to resolve that conflict from within
this government that is why I have
resigned in doing so I've done what I
believe to be right to my party and my
country the time has come for others to
consider their own response to the
tragic conflict of loyalties with which
I have myself wrestled for perhaps too
long do you know the whole speech is so
brilliant but if I have a favorite bit
it's it's funny enough it's one
word it's the perhaps when he says it is
a conflict of loyalty with which I have
perhaps
wrestled too
long that perhaps just modulates it and
gives it Nuance it's so
considered and so beautifully kind of
rendered it's not a kind of allout
attack he's just saying in such an
English
way you know maybe I've had to put up
with this crisis of conscience for too
young but maybe maybe I haven't maybe I
have I think I really like it also cuz
it signaled what was to come the moment
he said it is a conflict of loyalty
which my God it was and that's what he
called his autobiography by the way a
conflict of loyalty it is a conflict of
loyalty with which I have perhaps
wrestled too long once he said that you
knew there were fireworks coming but he
lit the fuse very gently if you like and
then I think the legacy of this speech
Howe's Legacy.
is just just unbelievable because if
there's one thing that has changed the
nature of this country and the course of
history of recent history more than
anything it's brexit right us leaving
the European Union I think few people
would dispute that it
set two parts of the the the two
European Parts if you like of the Tory
party head on against each other in a
way they hadn't been before that speech
gave birth if you like to lots of mini
fares
and and Richard tyes and and all the
other
anti-european and and just split the
Tory party so massively into I don't
think it's ever really recovered so it
Legacy it Legacy just cannot be
underated Jeffrey how's Legacy is really
interesting actually um when he's
depicted in things like the crown he's
just seen as a boring little pompous fat
traitor a bit like Captain maning from
Dad's Army who spoke like this and was
rather boring and brought down Mrs
Stater because he was jealous and wanted
to be prime minister that is absolutely
not the case and when he
died um I think it was
2016
17 the the eulogies and the obituaries
were uh quite kind he he was regarded as
a great Statesman a great pro-european
Statesman um almost comically devoid of
Charisma but he was he served his
country he believed in in service he
believed in Europe he will always be
remembered primarily for being the dead
sheep that became a roaring lion um in
that speech but he did a lot more lot
lots lots more besides
</key>
<qa>
<qs></qs>
<ans>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>51</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>50</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>


<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250423</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>12:00-13:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>1500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit>1500</clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance>-1500 + -1500 = -3000</clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech | Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist 
→ watch the video
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>


If time available, practise oral delivery below:
<img src="pix/icons8-treadmill-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher

If time available, prepare the role play below:
<img src="pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> <em>Should our government abide to supranational regulations?</em>

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<!-- todo - set as assignment -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>49</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-treadmill-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<functional_language>Delivering a political speech</functional_language>
<activity_lead_in>How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_02.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

→ watch the video again [03:53-04:32]
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ highlight keywords in bold
→ mark the text with pauses |
→ annotate rhetorical questions with (?)
→ show assertiveness with (!)
→ practise oral delivery of this extract
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[<div contenteditable="true"><em>
Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF to a central bank.
The fact is they have no competence on money no competence on the economy
so yes the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</em></div>]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency, to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF, to a central bank.
The fact is, they have no competence on money, no competence on the economy,
so, yes, the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling,
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</key>
</clog_activity>

<!-- freer practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>48</mdlid>
<activity_id>6</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[You have been invited to debate with a panel of experts at a political TV show. This is prime time on the first channel.
<strong><em>Should our government abide to supranational regulations?</em></strong>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/bbc_tv_debate_01.jpg" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

Recycle new expressions and language
→ express complex political opinions clearly
→ speak persuasively in the political arena
e.g. use rhetorical questions, negative adverbial phrases, be occasionally theatrical
→ use technical terms related to government and policy  
e.g. neo-liberalism, supranationality
→ practise abstract concepts in political philosophy  
e.g. Thatcherism
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You are in favour of a stronger role of the European Union in home affairs. You want your opposition to square with the urge to work together. You will not be accommodating.</task>
<ans>In the light of world economic pressure ought we not to make alliances with our closest neighbours?
Only together can we achieve a cohesive military defence strategy!
Haven't we denigrated the dangers of guns vs butter? Yes, we have...
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You are known to be an iron lady. You are against supranational governance which threatens sovereign interests of your country. Taunt decisions of your opposition in the light of recent political events.</task>
<ans>We don't want to be denuded of our powers!
Would you accept another cabinet's views to prevail over our own insights? 
Shall we allow bureaucrats to belittle our spirit of innovation and freedom? Shall we? No, we shan't!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>47</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to wane = to become gradually weaker or less important; (of the moon) to appear slightly smaller each day after being round and full
to denude = to make sth bare
denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc

to square (sb/sth) with = to be compatible or fit with something; to induce someone to accept or approve of something
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>46</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Gender gap in politics</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Is gender gap still a reality among white collars?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img src="pix/christine_lagarde_you_have_to_pick_your_fights_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>
Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What could explain the gender gap in politics in the 21st century?
</qs>
<ans>✓ traditions
✓ prejudice in the filed of decision-making
✓ glass ceiling
✓ cultural values (e.g. in Japan)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you believe women have any traits that are more relevant to politics than men's?</qs>
<ans>✓ empathy
→ better facilitator
✓ determination
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What would you expect to learn from prominent female politicians such as M.Thatcher, U.von der Leyen, C.Lagarde?</qs>
<ans>✓ both anecdotic hurdles and success stories
✓ evidence of disparate gender roles
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>45</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 A</activity_id>
<activity_title>G20 - IMF facts</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
g20_imf_facts_01.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
G20 is an intergovernmental forum comprising {~19 =20 ~21} sovereign countries, the European Union (EU), and the {=African Union ~EuroAsian Economic Union ~South American ~Trans-Tasma Economic Area}. It works to address major issues related to the global economy, such as international financial stability, climate change {~eradication ~facilitation =mitigation} and sustainable development.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a major financial agency of the {~USA =United Nations ~European Union}, and an international financial institution funded by {~18 ~21 =191} member countries. It is regarded as the global {=lender ~borrower ~collateral} of last resort to national governments, and a leading supporter of exchange-rate stability. 

The IMF stated mission is "working to foster global {~fiscal ~military =monetary} cooperation, secure financial stability, {=facilitate ~strictly regulate ~deregulate} international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce {~taxes ~military conflicts =poverty} around the world.
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>44</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 B</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target vocab</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
a_given_gruelling_biting_the_bullet_01.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
something that is certain to happen or to be {=to be a given ~to be taken ~to be a written}

very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time {=gruelling ~grumbling ~grafting} 

to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over {=to bite the bullet ~to kick the bullet ~to swallow the bullet}
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>43</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune
<em>Christine Lagarde on the challenges encountered and lessons learned becoming the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Introduction
well good evening we are so delighted to
have m madame lagard um and I we've
tried a few times before and I want to
give a good shout out to our mutual
friend Ambassador Sue Schwab for
convincing you to
come so Andy shared with us obviously
needless to say there's a lot of
financial crisis issues that we have to
deal with um in this conversation but as
is our prerogative at most powerful
Women's Summit we want to get to know
you a little bit first and Andy started
that process and of course everybody
knows the firsts about you the first
chair of bigam mcken Law Firm first uh
uh Finance Minister of a G8 country
first female IMF um director but there
are a lot of little known facts about
your time here in America um you did
work for William Cohen where you you
opened mail during the Watergate period
uh where you got to from French Canadian
citizens from Maine and you had to do
impeach Nixon don't impeach Nixon that
was sort of your job um the other
interesting thing about about you is
that you spent a year at Holton arms you
were pretty daring you smoked cigarettes
you use chamomile in your hair to make
it
blonder um you ate copia amounts of
yogurt but here's the most interesting
fact to me you hated math and in
fact in the yearbook you said please no
more
math how did someone who hates math
become the most important woman on the
International Financial
[Laughter]
scene well thank you very much for the
Interview process for IMF job
introduction uh I did and actually I
think I still do um but I think the way
math was taught both at Halton and prior
to that in in in French school was
certainly not conducive to uh you know
people not so inclined to actually like
math um when I when I then studied law
and and economics actually a bit um
there are lots of things that things
that I liked about having a more
scientific approach but I still don't
like math to this day and uh I'm
delighted that I have really fantastic
econometrist experts in modeling people
who know it all about math and I listen
to them and I pick their brain it gives
us all hope as math
haters so you know when you went to
interview for this the IMF job it wasn't
just a given I mean you went through a
pretty grueling process can you describe
that
well the process had to do with um
having the support of as many countries
as possible and um there were a few
competitors to begin with the most
serious one was my friend Austin Ken who
is now the governor of the Central Bank
of Mexico so he was zigzagging the world
in One Direction and I was zigzagging
the world in the other direction to make
sure that we did not meet uh and yet we
had to cover the same essentially the
same authorities and the same countries
around the world so I never traveled as
extensively as I did at that time and
then that was followed once the sort of
the short list was was arrived at that
was followed by an interview with with
members of the board which was quite
quite an experience because that board
still today only has one it's a board of
24 members and there is only one woman
on the board who is there are a few
alternates but as far as members are
concerned there's only one female member
and that's the US Representative but
that day uh Meg had to attend the
article for review with Treasury and and
fed so she was not sitting at the table
as a result of which I was interviewed
by 24
men which was you know an interesting
phenomenon when you are yourself
Minister of Finance you've handled the
presidency by front of the G20 you've
gone through the crisis of 2008 2009 and
there you are facing you know 24 very
cous respect respectful and nice men um
it came as a shock yeah and was did you
have to cram I mean was it a difficult
learning process to get through
that it was exhausting because prior to
the 24 U board setting I had to spend
half an hour with each of the 24 over a
course of two two days so that was that
was a bit so nothing comes easy even in
your life no no no and it's interesting
I some career choice choices have been
made or at least one was made for you in
that the male dominated um French school
that and I that that turns out French
politicians and and bureaucrats and so
forth you were turned down twice by that
school um talk about that but also some
career choices that decisions that
you've had to make along the way and
what was the best advice you ever
got well I think having been turned down
twice first time for incompetency the
second for um for having missed the
deadline what do you mean by that
incompetency in what well I was I wasn't
prepared enough I hadn't studied hard
enough and I was I was in love that year
so I spent a lot more
time
so and the second time around I I missed
the deadline and I think that was a you
know missed you know whether that was
a good turnout of of things or not I
don't know but fce to say that I went
back a few years later and uh I was
asked to give a speech to those young
bright kids from Ina and I have to say
that that day I felt really really
powerful you know I had flunked and
there I was coming to tell them about
the uh legalization of society or some
really obscure matter that they had no
interest in actually um but you know two
things that I take away from that is you
failed
somewhere you know bounce back get on
with it have a few drinks or whatever uh
takes you away from that but move on
don't don't don't don't you know start
um don't feel sorry about yourself don't
lose confidence just move on move to
something else um the second time I felt
exactly the same is when I I interviewed
in Paris at the time for one of the top
uh law firms and and I had all the
credentials and I had done all the right
things and the resume was fine and I was
behaving properly and all the rest of it
and the hiring partner who was also the
managing partner said to me well we'll
we'll we'll take you we'll take you as
an associate but don't expect ever to
make partnership and that was a really
really very high standing you know
excellent law firm and I said well why
is that that was back in 7 in 79 and he
said well because you're a woman
so again you know I packed my things and
I just run I didn't want to have
anything to do with these people so
sometimes you have to pick your fight
and and really persist but on other
occasions if people don't deserve you
just go move on
yeah did you get advice along the way or
Advice from mentors
did you create your advice
you know in those days uh there were not
many uh not much by way of mentoring
coaching and and support so I had uh I
had my mother to support me and she was
a she was an extraordinary uh support I
and you lost your father when you were
just 16 yeah and I constantly opposed my
mother but she was nonetheless a great
support and I didn't really know it but
she was a role model and I constantly
had my fights with her but that's we we
often do that daughters and mother's
relationships are complicated
um but then I was hired by a a female
partner at Becka McKenzie and she was a
role model for me she was uh she was a
strongest she was in my view the best
lawyer in the uh in the firm and she was
always discreetly in those days you had
to do things quite discreetly she would
support the young female Associates and
elegant I think you said she was she was
yeah yeah always yeah um you I'm going
to let you say this in French you've
referred to this that sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile so that's a phrase
I I believe you learned during
synchronized swimming a sport that you
took up which is interestingly enough
you took it up in 1968 when the schools
were shut down over a student protest
right um but you went into synchronized
swimming right um you've also said that
as a woman you have to Elbow your way in
what's an example in recent years or
especially at the IMF where you've had
to apply both those or either of those
precepts you know I'm not sure I would
say elbow your way in because I in that
there is something of you know sort of
push people out of your way I think you
can very much uh progress and and make
your way as hton would say in
wakam if you remember yeah um for those
Stand your ground
who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day
basis it's you know I'll I'll I'll find
my way if I don't find it I will make it
so I think you can actually make your
way you can you can um Follow Your
Destiny without necessarily being
aggressive without pushing people you
can you can let other people progress as
well along the way but you should not
shy away from the things that you are
you feel strongly about and I'll give
you an example when we had um you know
we had to deal with Greece uh quite a
lot in the last few years and back two
years ago we had great difficulties is
about you know what was the next step
and was the debt sustainable or not and
over what period of time would it become
sustainable and there was a lot of
um a lot of disagreement a lot of
controversy a lot of political ganging
uh on on that particular topic but I
knew we we were right I knew we had
checked the numbers times and and again
and I knew that the debt sustainability
analysis that we were producing was
sound solid and and and was a good
principle on which to build to help that
country restore it the situation so I
stood my ground and when Angela Merkel
said oh Christine you know how can you
be so certain a debt sustainability
analysis is only a debt sustainability
analysis after all and I said yeah but
that's what where you want to Anchor
everything you do and if you throw you
know zillion in a country you want to
have a good anchoring point so that to
me was a bit of a defining moment when
we stood our ground other members of the
troa were not necessarily as convinced
as we were but it wasn't elbowing my way
it was saying we've done it we've
reviewed it it's it's solid in terms of
analysis and we have to build around it
and you got some heat for that and you
got some heat for suggesting that the
Greek um the Greek style of paying taxes
probably wasn't up to enough and you got
some heat when you said that the
European Banks were under capitalized
let's take that sharp eye to Europe
right now and tell us what needs to be
done a lot needs to be done but I want
to because it's easy to do to to go for
the Euro bashing that that's that's been
the game for the last two years and uh
they have done an awful lot for people
who don't understand Europe they don't
they don't understand what they've done
but you know I've been Finance Minister
for four years and they have done a lot
what they need to do today is keep up
keep up the work keep up the reform that
they have started doing you know that's
the case for product and service Market
it's the case for labor market it's the
case particularly uh in the uh in in the
banking sector there's a lot of uh
fragmentation still going on there is
not a good monetary transmission going
on they have to work on that they have
to continue the job that they have
started they will be doing a lot of um
what they call balance sheet assessment
asset quality review stress testing and
all the rest of it I don't think we
should start from the basis that then
they're going to do a bad job we should
give them the credit of wanting to do it
seriously wanting to coordinate the work
from the ECB where Mario Mario dragy has
done an extraordinary job to rescue that
zone but now that they they want to do
it it's going to be messy there will be
obstacles there will be uh hiccups on
the way there will be bumps on the road
the media will say how terrible it is at
the end of the
day they will make it I'm convinced of
it and I think that there is the
political will the political urge to
actually keep it together those people
some of them have suffered in their
flesh in their family from what's
happened uh back 70 years ago they're
not going to let it drop like that
because of lack of Courage their courage
will be eventually there to to respond
to the uh the challenge it's a huge
challenge you bring 18 countries
together I'm talking about the Euro Zone
here you bring 18 countries with 18
different flags 18 different national
anthems 18 different defense and you ask
them to have one single currency one
single set of fiscal policies that are
compatible with each other and to bring
their banking system Under One Roof with
one resolution system it's a a job yeah
Time is short
I I'd love to go beyond this there's so
much more to say about this but um time
is short so we do have to uh turn your
attention a little closer to this town
um I thought of your turn your your
precept uh grit my teeth when you had
all the ministers here this weekend and
you watched what was going on on the
hill um I wonder you know but you've
also spent a lot of time here and
understand the political system here
were you not sure explaining it or
tearing your hair out or you don't you
don't you don't understand it go
ahead you know what what was complicated
Unconventional monetary policy
this week actually is that we had about
300 Ministers of finance and governance
of Central Bank from all all around the
world and we had you know we had a focus
which was essentially unconventional
monetary policy and consequences for the
rest of the world how do we develop
anchor the recovery how do we make sure
that Emerging Markets are going to
continue to do well without suffering
from tapering and d d d and and the only
thing that was on their mind was when is
this going to end what what is this
discussion about the debt ceiling and it
was it it really uh completely
overwhelmed the discussion and it's it's
Debt ceiling
believe me it's it's difficult to
explain u i mean you can explain the the
the the sort of direct fiscal
consequences you can try to imagine what
the indirect consequences will be you
can try to speculate about what a
message will be on the markets you can
imagine the accident you can assume that
it's going to be worse than previous
events but it's difficult to explain the
rationale behind it and you've warned of
course over the last couple days of
massive disruption if Thursday passes
and um there isn't a deal but what if
there is a deal which most likely will
happen where the deadlines just pushed
off for another two months another three
months doesn't that create an
uncertainty in the markets in and of
itself what's the danger of putting off
the deadline what going to be to put
Susan Collins and her friends back back
US economy
and Senator kobar yes uh back to the
drawing board yet again because I think
that uh it it will reactivate the same
sort of trepidation anxiety and and
worries what's amazing is that the
United States of America first largest
economy in the world is still and will
probably continue to be regarded as a as
a safe heaven to which can flow back
when there is trouble now you know it's
a bit like a rubber band when you you
pull you pull you pull you pull it works
it works it works and but who wants to
take the risk of that breaking so again
so there's danger to even putting off
the deadline till a January or you just
reactivate the same debate over right
and is there a danger to the economy the
US economy and the world economy by not
addressing the
debt
US debt
mean and I don't mean like I don't I
mean like not not you know taking steps
to address the US debt did you consider
that a a a damper on the economic
growth yeah that that's I mean it's it's
a it's the most serious thing that could
happen if if it is not addressed if it's
not um tackled tackled it it
will it will be
um very very damaging and not just for
the US economy for for all economies I
guess I mean like in you know reform to
you know bring spending and and and and
borrowing into line do you consider that
is the well that's that's another debate
you know I think the most critical one
is the issue of the debt sealing okay
that's the issue of you know default no
default what's a technical default
what's a real default and so on and so
forth but so that's what you're talking
that's the most urgent matter the rest
the fiscal policy of the United States
of America I summarize it for my simple
as um you know slow down but hurry
Fiscal policy
up and describe that well slowdown means
um no brutal um heavy duty uh fiscal
consolidation in the short run because
you're going to prevent recovery from
taking roots and and cons and and
strengthening but hurry up to take the
measures now that are going to deal with
the um the the long-term liabilities
that will come to haunt the United
States back in 2020 whether it's
entitlement or whether it's high
interests that will come to haunt the
economy in the in in 2020 if nothing is
done before so that's why we say hurry
up do do it now because it will produce
results in the years to come and it will
address the situation that would
otherwise be very difficult in 2020
there's a lot of talk about a new normal
in the US and in frankly in the global
economy where we're going to have um
even when we have econ economic growth
it's not going to be followed by job
growth do you see unemployment rates
getting to pre-recession
levels and at what
Unemployment
point if you look at numbers in this
country and if you look at unemployment
numbers it has progressed enormously
it's gone from the highest at 10% down
to 7.3% so take granted the
participation rate is probably lower and
the number that we should also look at
is employment numbers
uh but there has been progress and and
jobs are being created it's the same in
other countries not very fast in in
Europe and in the Euro Zone in
particular but U you know there are
signs of of Hope where those jobs will
be what will be the job content how the
economic model is going to change uh to
you know to what uh business model are
we heading to I think we we are facing
huge transitions at the moment and um
that better have because otherwise we're
not just facing economic problems we'll
be facing social problems and you've
warned about um a rush to the exit for
the fed's what you call unconventional
monetary policies $85 billion a month in
in the QE program um is that something
you communicated to Ben banki before
their decision to stay the
course you know central banks are
Central Banks
independent um but what I have said
including in Jackson Hall where all
Central bankers get together is
that given that the fed's decisions has
impact across the world it would be
appropriate not just to communicate well
uh not just to gradually phase out but
also to cooperate with other Central
Bankers so that they understand what
precautions they have to take uh what
consequences uh it will be for them and
they can prepare better so so I'm not
sure they all happy to to cooperate I
think I think they would be well advised
to do so but and I know you wanted to
mention um the IMF came out with a
gender study which is the first time I
believe that you've looked at the impact
of gender in the world economy um can
you talk about Japan in particular was
an interesting case study of what for
cultural reasons women aren't in that
economy to the level they are other in
other industrialized countries what has
that done to growth in Japan
I'm looking at it the other way what
Growth in Japan
could it give to growth uh in Japan and
we we just recently published for the
first time a study that is called women
work and the economy but we also did a
special chapter on Japan because Japan
has a very specific issue they have an
aging population they're not
particularly um immigration prone they
say the least and currently Japanese
women are not participating in society
as much as the average oecd country so
the resources that the Japanese people
can tap into are the Japanese women but
for all sorts of reasons including
cultural lack of um institutions that
can help with uh child care and uh and a
general sort of attitude of society
towards uh female participation it's not
happening now as a follow-up to that
study that we published exactly a year
ago I'm pleased to report that maybe not
attributable to us but prime minister
Abbe has made it part of his budget and
commitment to actually really fund child
care centers in Japan and to encourage
women to join the workforce they are far
better educated than Japanese male uh
they really can contribute to uh the
growth of society and by our account and
I don't claim the math credit to it but
the teams are are doing it the the GDP
of Japan could increase by about 9% just
as a result of their participation and
that before the end of the decade so
that's really help important two more
Quotas
quick questions before we get the cane
um you and quick answer to this you've
gone from describing quotas for women in
EUR in terms of Europe uh for women
board members is offensive to saying it
should be a temporary measure at least
correct what should be a temporary
measure I'm sorry quotas for um women
and board members yes sorry on you
Europe we're back to Europe real quick
yeah yeah yeah so you think they're
important as a temporary measure but
look it's it's working um when when I
was Finance Minister we uh supported a a
bill that went through uh that requires
that there be at least 20% women on the
board of companies uh by 2014 and that
they be
20% um 40% by 2020 theyve ex exceeded
the threshold of 20% already so I think
quotas should not be a longlasting
feature because we can do better than
that uh but at least in the first stage
when you have such a big step uh to to
to take yes temporarily I think it's
it's very helpful and we should use it
it will be used by the way on the
paneuropean basis since you won't answer
this last question I'll ask the audience
to answer it um Madame lagard is French
president
oh thank thank you so much it's been an
honor thank you thank
[Applause]
you
</key>
<qa>
<qs></qs>
<ans>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Would you be surprised if C.Lagarde said otherwise?
<em>When you went to interview for this IMF job it wasn't just a given.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is C.Lagarde suggesting by the following?
<em>He was zigzagging the world in one direction, and I was zigzagging the world in the other direction to make sure that we did not meet. And yet, we had to cover essentially the same authorities and the same countries around the world</em>
]]></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why was it shocking? How would you have reacted in such a situation?
<em>I was interviewed by 24 men, which was - you know - an interesting phenomenon 
when you are yourself Minister of Finance,
you've handled the presidency by front of the G20,
you've gone through the crisis of 2008 2009
and there you are, facing - you know - 
24 very respectful and nice men, it came as a shock.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What was C.Lagarde stance? What does she advise doing?
<em>We'll take you as an associate but don't expect ever to make partnership,
and that was a really, really very high standing - you know - excellent law firm,
and I said 'Well, why is that?'
That was back in '79 and he said:
'Well, because you're a woman'
So, again - you know - I packed my things 
and I just ran, 
I didn't want to have anything to do with these people.
So, sometimes, you have to pick your fight,
and really persist, but on other occasions,
if people don't deserve you, just go - move on!</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>
✓ no time or energy to fight every little wrong or injustice
→ choose wisely which battles are worth time and energy to engage in
✓ if would take too much effort for relatively little gain
→ might be better letting it go and finding a more worthy battle to fight
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<!--
<qa>
<qs>sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile </qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
-->
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[How is C.Lagarde poking fun?
<em>I'm not sure I would say elbow your way in, 
because in that there is something of - you know -
sort of push people out of your way.
I think you can very much progress and make your way as hton would say in wakam 
if you remember - for those who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day basis,
Stand your ground</em>
]]></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is meant by a 'good anchoring point' in the following extract?
<em>When Angela Merkel said:
Oh, Christine, you know! 
How can you be so certain? A debt sustainability analysis is only a debt sustainability analysis after all!
And I said: 'Yeah, but that's what where you want to anchor everything you do.
And if you throw - you know - a zillion in a country,
you want to have a good anchoring point!
So, that to me was a bit of a defining moment when we stood our ground.
Other members of the board were not necessarily as convinced as we were
but it wasn't elbowing my way!
It was saying: 'We've done it, we've reviewed it,
it's solid in terms of analysis and we have to build around it.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why are findings in Japan quite astonishing?
<em>The resources that the Japanese people can tap into are the Japanese women 
but for all sorts of reasons, 
including cultural, lack of institutions that can help with child care,
and a general sort of attitude of society towards female participation.
Prime minister Abbe has made it part of his budget and commitment to actually really fund child care centres in Japan,
and to encourage women to join the workforce.
They are far better educated than Japanese male,
they really can contribute to the growth of society,
and by our account - and I don't claim the math credit to it but the teams are doing it -
the GDP of Japan could increase by about 9% just as a result of their participation,
and that before the end of the decade.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ smallest share of female employment among OECD members</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>42</mdlid>
<activity_id>20221005-1805</activity_id>
<activity_title>Making suggestions</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>grammar</activity_type>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
The consultant suggested [me a solution | a solution to me]
✓ a solution (to me)

The consultant suggested [that you get | getting] acquainted with the contract 
✓ (that) you get acquainted
✓ getting acquainted

I suggest the terms of the contract [should revised / are revised / be revised]
✓ be revised
= present subjunctive
→ more formal

It is advisable the CEO [resigns / resign] asap
✓ resign
= present subjunctive
→ more formal
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>41</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>Use of language</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<modulevisible>1</modulevisible>
<!--
<display>3</display>
<display>6</display>
<displayoptions>
<popupwidth>300</popupwidth>
<popupheight>50</popupheight>
</displayoptions>
-->
<activity_type>textbook</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
T / Cl
Do you remember Christine Lagarde's use of language?
<em>When I was Finance Minister, we supported a bill that went through
that requires that there <span class="show_key">be</span> at least 20% women on the board of companies by 2014 
and that they <span class="show_key">be</span> 40% by 2020</em>

What form is it?
<span class="show_key">
✓ subjunctive
</span>
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>40</mdlid>
<activity_id>20190418-1837</activity_id>
<activity_title></activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>review</activity_type>
<activity_contents>grammar_subjunctive_and_unreal_past_selection_c1_01.csv</activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>39</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions>You have been invited to debate about the glass ceiling in politics.
→ practise the subjunctive
→ recycle new expressions and language</instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You don't believe the glass ceiling is still a reality in the 21st century</task>
<ans>✓ the G20 is such an intergovernmental organisation! 
✓ surely it must be a role model
✓ going back to the drawing board
✓ find an inclusive environment isn't such a gurelling process any more
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You have witnessed multiple cases of gender discrimination in international organisations, including politics.</task>
<ans>✓ you'd expect remuneration be more transparent but...
✓ it is advisable boards review their policies
✓ equal rights are not a given, even in politics!
✓ whoever you are, you'd still need to elbow your way in
✓ pick your fights
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>38</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
Trans-Tasman relations = foreign relations between neighbouring countries Australia and New Zealand
to be a given = something that is certain to happen or to be
to pick one's fights = to choose which conflicts or issues are truly worth your time, energy, and effort instead of fighting every little wrong or injustice; also means knowing when to raise issues versus letting them go
gruelling = very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time
back to the drawing board = used to indicate that an idea, scheme, or proposal has been unsuccessful and that a new one must be devised
to haunt = to continue to cause problems for sb for a long time
to bite the bullet = to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>37</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
It is not capable <strike>to cope</strike> <strong>of coping</strong> with debt
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250416</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>12:00-13:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>1500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit>1500</clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date>20250412</clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance>-1500 + 0 = -1500</clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech
→ watch the video
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>


<img src="pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> 
If time available, complete the writing task below:
Policy brief on revocation of the refugees protection scheme

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>36</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Policy brief on revocation of the refugees protection scheme</activity_title>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Imagine you have taken part in a debate with other EU members of parliament in Brussels about the Ukrainians' refugee status in Europe.
→ look at (some of) the minutes written by the secretary.

Task ~ 400 words:
→ write a policy brief arguing the pros &amp; cons of revoking refugees protection scheme
→ summarise the facts
→ list legal points drawn up for counsel

Hints:
→ start with listing the attendees and the political parties they represent
→ recycle new expressions 'plug the gap, nudge, lure out, surmountable...'
→ use adequate register<!-- → structure your arguments with narrative patterns such as the McKinsey / Minto Pyramid -->
→ practise passive voice and hedging techniques
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>MP Jacques B. is in favour of prolonging refugees protection scheme.</task>
<ans>
✓ Europe needs immigration to rejuvenate its ageing populations
✓ in Germany alone 72% of adult Ukrainian refugees have university degrees
✓ the EU should leverage such brain drain by guaranteeing professional recognition &amp; decent work conditions
✓ women and their children will go back home if Europe can guarantee peace in Ukraine
✓ we needn't nudge Ukrainians out!
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>MP Helen D. wants to revoke Ukrainian asylum seekers' status.</task>
<ans>
✓ half of Ukrainian refugees enjoy welfare benefits although they aren't contributing as tax payers
✓ the public opinion has become indifferent to the Ukrainian crisis anyway
✓ the guns &amp; butter approach needs to be re-thought to reflect today's reality
✓ Russia is not interested in conquering more of Central Europe
✓ green transition &amp; independence from Russian gas are more important for average European citizens who suffer from rising energy costs
✓ we must lure Ukrainians out!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>35</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied (~ for | with) = to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

<!--
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>34</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied (~ for | with) = to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 

booming = experiencing a sudden increase in trade and economic activity; a period of wealth and success
exile = state of being sent to live in another country that is not your own, especially for political reasons or as a punishment
bulk = main part of sth; most of sth; (large) size or quantity of sth
martial law (to declare / impose / lift ~) = situation where the army of a country controls an area instead of the police during a time of trouble
exodus = (formal or humorous) a situation in which many people leave a place at the same time
think-tank = group of experts who provide advice and ideas on political, social or economic issues
bleak = (of a situation) not hopeful or encouraging; (of the weather) cold and unpleasant; (of a place) bare, empty or with no pleasant features
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>
-->
</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>33</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Warmer</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>If you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman!</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Are women better at politics?
<em>I stand before you tonight in my red chiffon evening gown, my face softly made up, my fair hair gently waved…the Iron Lady of the Western World! Me? A cold war warrior? Well, yes—if that is how they wish to interpret my defence of values and freedoms fundamental to our way of life.</em>
speech at Finchley, 31 January 1976
<!--‘The Iron Lady’ was the name given to her by the Soviet defence ministry newspaper Red Star, which accused her of trying to revive the cold war-->
<div align="center"><img src="pix/1976_margaret_thatcher_iron_lady_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key></key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What does the following saying mean?
<em>If you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ a woman gets the job done
✓ more accommodating, less confronting approach to mitigate disagreements
= gender role stereotype
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>Love her or loath her at least you knew where you stood with her!</em>
Do you agree with this opinion about Margaret Thatcher? Is it positive to call a spade a spade if you're into politics?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ may have been opinionated
〆less sugarcoating than U. von der Leyen
→ sometimes need to be able to beat about the bush
</ans>
<hint>to call a spade a spade = to call a person or thing a name that is true but not polite; to speak bluntly
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What would Margaret Thatcher say repeatedly 'no' to 14 years later?
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ to make clear her opposition to a single European currency
✓ to refuse more centralized controls from Brussels
the House of Commons, 30 October 1990
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191826719.001.0001/q-oro-ed4-00010826">Oxford Reference - Margaret Thatcher 1925–2013 British Conservative stateswoman; Prime Minister, 1979–90</a>
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>32</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 A</activity_id>
<activity_title>Facts and figures about Margaret Thatcher (1/2)</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11024
margaret_thatcher_01.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
M.Thatcher was the first woman to lead a major political party in the UK. {T}

M.Thatcher was the longest-serving British prime minister of the {~19th =20th ~21st} century.

M.Thatcher implemented policies that came to be known as {~post-liberalism # Thatcherism, but also akin to neo-liberalism =Thatcherism ~neo-conservatism}.

M.Thatcher was dubbed the "Iron Lady" by a {~French ~German =Soviet #### a journalist from the Soviet defence ministry newspaper Red Star accused her of trying to revive the cold war} journalist.

Her nickname became associated with her {=uncompromising ~pro-European ~pro-Russian} politics and leadership style.</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>31</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 B</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target reading (true/false)</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11025
margaret_thatcher_02.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
M.Thatcher reversed {=high inflation ~individual liberty} prior to an oncoming recession.

Her policies emphasised {=greater individual liberty ~high inflation}.

M.Thatcher {~fought against =pushed for} privatisation of state-owned companies.

M.Thatcher reduced the power and influence of {~the House of Lords =trade unions}.

Her popularity in her first years in office {=waned amid ~was invigorated by} the recession and rising unemployment.</key>
</clog_activity>

<!-- skip target vocab in this lesson -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>30</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target vocabulary</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=10576
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>29</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>How diplomatic is it to repeat assertively 'No, no, no'? Why would you do that?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech

<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

<em>The year is 1990 and Margaret Thatcher is about to stand in Parliament and make one of her most iconic speeches.
The Prime Minister had just returned from an European summit in Rome where commissioner Jacques Delores had proposed further European integration. 
Mrs Thatcher responded - 'No, no, no.'
Whilst that line has become iconic, Professor Richard Whitman explains how Thatcher's view on Europe was actually a fascinating journey.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Chapters:
0:00 - 1:43 - Introduction
1:44 - 3:55 - Margaret Thatcher Vs Neil Kinnock
3:55 - 5:44 - Margaret Thatcher &amp; The EU
5:44 - 7:13 - Why The Speech Is So Memorable 
7:13 - 7:34 - No, No, No
7:34 - 9:07 - The Legacy Of The Speech 

no no no I mean it is a piece of sort of
masterful theater it is our purpose to
retain the power and influence of this
house there is a line between her
bruised speech between the no no no in
Parliament and brexit and not to Denude
it of many of the powers she was talking
to and taunting the party opposite for
the sake of agreeing for the sake of
being little sir Echo and saying me too
talking to the outside world I do not
want the commission to increase its po
against it house she was talking to her
own back benches to say that this is my
view on Europe um you've got to live
with
[Music]
this so the year's 1990 uh Margaret
thater is coming to the House of Commons
to report back from a meeting that she's
just had with her fellow European
leaders uh and she does what has ended
up being
one of the most dramatic moments I think
uh of a prime minister in our recent
political history which is setting a
very clear uh agenda for how she sees uh
the relationship between the UK and
Europe and what we all know now is that
in many ways this is the start of the
Final Act for her as prime minister the
EU was sort of gearing up to have a a a
conversation or rather to set in process
uh two conversations one on political
union for the EU and the other for what
became economic and monetary Union uh
and that was something that the British
government and thater in particular was
not comfortable with all they do is to
Margaret Thatcher Vs Neil Kinnock
strand Britain in some European second
division without the influence over
change that we need the industrial and
financial opportunity that we need and
indeed without the real sovereignty that
we need
yeah first Mr
Speaker it is our purpose to retain the
power and influence of this house and
not to Denude it of many of the powers I
wonder what the right honorable
gentleman's policy is in view of some of
the things he said would he have agreed
to a commitment to extend the
community's powers to other
supplementary sectors of economic
integration without having any
definition of what they are would he
because you would have thought he would
from what he said one of them was that
the commission wants to extend extend
its powers and confidence into the area
of Health we said no we weren't going to
agree to those things and what he says
he sounded as if he would for the sake
of agreeing for the sake of being little
sir Eko and saying me too one of the
things I really like about the speech uh
is the way that she uh she looks at the
opposition the way that she taunts the
opposition the way that she sets up a
very very different view of how a
government uh wants to treat the
European issue from the way that Neil
kinck and the labor party wanted to and
why I think that's particularly cutting
is not that long before Labor was
committed to the idea of leaving uh the
uh the European community and so you
know she you know is in a way as a
subtext I think sort of reminding uh the
labor party that they are very very
wobbly uh on the question uh of Europe
and she does it I think in a in a an
absolutely superb way I mean it is a
master class in how to sort of hold
Parliament inth and also to deliver a
really uh effective and and very very
cutting message perhaps the labor party
would give all those things up easily
Margaret Thatcher &amp; The EU
perhaps they would agree to a sing sing
Le currency to Total abolition of the
pound sterling perhaps being totally
incompetent with monetary matters they'd
be only too delighted to hand over the
full responsibility as they did to the
IMF to a central bank the fact is they
have no competence on money no
competence on the economy so yes the
right honorable gentleman would be glad
to hand it all over and what is the
point in trying to get elected to
Parliament only to hand over your
Sterling and to hand over the powers of
this house to Europe Margaret hatch had
a really interesting political Journey
on Europe because she
campaigned uh for or she was in favor of
Britain joining uh the then European
economic Community she campaigned in the
1975 referendum it will be a splendid
and decisive yes for Britain in Europe
but she had a very different idea as to
how Europe's individual states should
fit together and as we know I mean she
was a very strong believer in British
national identity uh a particular
conception of Britain's place in the
world and all of those things for her
were odds with the idea of building up
as she saw it uh a European uh
superstate so yes she was a pro-
European but she had a very very
different vision of Europe uh from other
uh European political leaders there is a
line between her Bru speech between the
no no no in Parliament and brexit
because you know British politicians uh
and members of the public just took a
different view of what kind of Europe
they wanted and so she really is uh the
the originator I think uh of the brexit
Why The Speech Is So Memorable
process to um to uh commissioner Leon
Britain he is of course a member of the
commission he is a loyal member of the
commission yes the commission does want
to increase its powers yes it is a
non-elected body and I do not want the
commission to increase its powers
against this house so of course we are
differing I think what makes it so
memorable is prime ministers are not
that categorical normally um I mean if
you look at the delivery of the speech
uh if you look at her body language if
you look at the intonation I mean it is
a piece of sort of masterful theater I
mean it's sort of you know in that Arena
you know in the House of Commons which
is you know theatrical which is a stage
I mean she was bringing everything into
play
in terms of making the point that she
wanted to make and it wasn't a position
that she could Retreat from so she was
talking to the outside world you know
she was talking to other European
leaders and and drawing what were was
for her uh you know a very clear and
unambiguous Red Line she was talking to
and taunting the party opposite you know
the labor party the shadow uh opposition
front bench led by Neil kinck and I
think she was talking to her own back
bench as well as members of her cabinet
on the front benches to say that you
know basically this is my view on Europe
um you've got to live with this uh or or
not and obviously the party in the end
decided not to of course the chairman or
No, No, No
the president of the commission Mr
delore said at press conference the
other day that he wanted the European
Parliament to be the Democratic body of
the community he wanted the commission
to be the executive and he wanted the
Council of ministers to be the Senate no
no
no unfortunately her you know vision of
9:07 - The Legacy Of The Speech
Europe and her vision of the European
community and how it could develop was
really at odds with many people in her
party I mean after she made that no no
no statement in the House of Commons her
Deputy Prime Minister resigned you know
there was a leadership contest um and uh
she lost the Premiership so you know she
was obviously a conviction politician on
something that she felt so strongly
about she was very unlikely to be
equivocal um but ultimately I think she
found it impossible to square her view
of how Britain should fit into Europe
with what at that time was the view that
prevailed within our cabinet uh and I
think within the party at large but you
know in a way it's a sort of Back to the
Future in that her idea of Europe and
her idea of Britain's relationship with
Europe is ended up being the predominant
view with the within the conservative
party now uh so in a way you know it's a
curious Legacy you know she lost the
Premiership but in a way she sort of
captured uh the hearts and minds of
members of the conservative party uh and
that's why we've ended up with a
relationship that we have between the UK
and the European union now
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>First, Mr Speaker, it is our purpose to retain the power and influence of this house and not to denude it of many of the powers</em> [02:02-02:14]
→ how strong is her stance?
→ what does it mean?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ assertive stance
= not allow Brussels to become a European superstate
</ans>
<hint>to denude = to make sth bare
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>Would he have agreed to a commitment to extend the community's powers to other supplementary sectors of economic integration without having any definition of what they are?</em> [02:20-02:32]
→ what orating technique is used?
→ what is being suggested?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ rhetorical question
= yielding arguably unlimited power
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>One of them was that the commission wants to extend its powers and confidence into the area of Health.
We said no, we weren't going to agree to those things, and what he says,
he sounded as if he would, for the sake of agreeing, for the sake of being little sir Echo,
and saying me too.</em> [02:37-02:53]
→ how is voice modulation employed?
→ what is being underpinned?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ reported speech
✓ denigration
✓ belittling 
→ to taunt the opposition
! the labour party had previously suggested they wanted to leave the European Community
= inconsistent stance 
→ wobbly political integrity
</ans>
<hint>denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!-- postponed -->
<!-- semi-controlled practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>28</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-treadmill-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<functional_language>Delivering a political speech</functional_language>
<activity_lead_in>How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_02.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

→ watch the video again [03:53-04:32]
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ highlight keywords in bold
→ mark the text with pauses |
→ annotate rhetorical questions with (?)
→ show assertiveness with (!)
→ practise oral delivery of this extract
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[<div contenteditable="true"><em>
Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF to a central bank.
The fact is they have no competence on money no competence on the economy
so yes the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</em></div>]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency, to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF, to a central bank.
The fact is, they have no competence on money, no competence on the economy,
so, yes, the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling,
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</key>
</clog_activity>

<!-- postponed -->
<!-- freer practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>27</mdlid>
<activity_id>6</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[You have been invited to debate with a panel of experts at a political TV show. This is prime time on the first channel.
<strong><em>Should our government abide to supranational regulations?</em></strong>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/bbc_tv_debate_01.jpg" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

Recycle new expressions and language
→ express complex political opinions clearly
→ speak persuasively in the political arena
e.g. use rhetorical questions, negative adverbial phrases, be occasionally theatrical
→ use technical terms related to government and policy  
e.g. neo-liberalism, supranationality
→ practise abstract concepts in political philosophy  
e.g. Thatcherism
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You are in favour of a stronger role of the European Union in home affairs. You want your opposition to square with the urge to work together. You will not be accommodating.</task>
<ans>In the light of world economic pressure ought we not to make alliances with our closest neighbours?
Only together can we achieve a cohesive military defence strategy!
Haven't we denigrated the dangers of guns vs butter? Yes, we have...
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You are known to be an iron lady. You are against supranational governance which threatens sovereign interests of your country. Taunt decisions of your opposition in the light of recent political events.</task>
<ans>We don't want to be denuded of our powers!
Would you accept another cabinet's views to prevail over our own insights? 
Shall we allow bureaucrats to belittle our spirit of innovation and freedom? Shall we? No, we shan't!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>26</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to wane = to become gradually weaker or less important; (of the moon) to appear slightly smaller each day after being round and full
to denude = to make sth bare
denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc

to square (sb/sth) with = to be compatible or fit with something; to induce someone to accept or approve of something
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>25</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250409</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>12:00-13:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>1500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance>-1500</clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good
→ read the article
The Economist
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good">https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good</a>

<img src="pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> 
If time available, complete the writing task below:
Are costs of refugees fleeing war socially acceptable?

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>24</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Are costs of refugees fleeing war socially acceptable?</activity_title>
<activity_title>Allocations to Ukraine including refugee costs</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Imagine you have taken part in a formal debate entitled:
<em>Following a guns vs butter approach could have been less costly than relying on the peace dividends of the Cold War. Do you agree?</em>

Look at the estimated costs of refugees fleeing war. Will this immigration improve the economic outlook of host countries? Can social integration costs pay off?
<div align="center"><img src="pix/allocations_to_ukraine_including_refugee_costs_kiel_institute.png" width="90%" alt="visual"></div>

Task:
→ write an opinion piece, or a more formal academic essay ~ 300 words

Hints:
→ start with summarising political events concisely  
→ explain the meaning of technical terms related to government and policy as well as abstract concepts in political philosophy, such as 'peace dividend, guns vs butter' in this context (perhaps in the introduction)
→ recycle new expressions 'backdrop, complacency, vested interest, rule of law, opinionated'
→ use adequate register<!-- → structure your arguments with narrative patterns such as the McKinsey / Minto Pyramid -->
→ practise 3rd and mixed conditionals<!-- use hedging techniques to... -->
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs></qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!--
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-us-russia-aid/33337524.html">https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-us-russia-aid/33337524.html</a>

-->
</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>23</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target vocabulary</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=10576
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>22</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good - listening</activity_title>
<activity_status>tbc</activity_status>
<modulevisible>1</modulevisible>
<!--
<display>3</display>
<display>6</display>
<displayoptions>
<popupwidth>300</popupwidth>
<popupheight>50</popupheight>
</displayoptions>
-->
<activity_type>textbook</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
The Economist
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good">https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good</a>

Listen to the speaker
misc_audio_files/the_economist_ukrainian_refugees-950e907cb6247dcc3ce0efe1838f5cbf.mp3
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>21</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<methodology></methodology>
<activity_type>edit_short_reading_floating</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_short_reading_floating</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-reading-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Do you think the war in Ukraine may end on terms too dangerous to lure Ukrainians home?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[The Economist
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good">https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good</a>

Read the article.
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[]]></instructions02>-->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo> -->
<qa>
<qs>Which facts suggest Ukrainian refugees may want to return home?</qs>
<ans>✓ no recognition of professional certification
→ only low-skilled work available, even for most white collars
✓ language barrier in most European countries (except Poland)
✓ governments might revoke their refugee status 
→ companies are less likely to hire them
✓ family reunion (wives coming back to their husbands who are not allowed to leave Ukraine)
✓ impact of poverty &amp; possible discrimination on children
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What arguments are given in favour of Ukrainians staying in the EU?
</qs>
<ans>✓ now putting down roots
→ unknown number of refugees may apply for a temporary residence permit
✓ no guarantee a long-lasting peace will be reached in the near future
→ safer future for children
✓ some countries' GDP benefit from flow of immigrants
✓ reduces problems of an ageing population
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What actions should European governments take to nudge refugees into going home?</qs>
<ans>✓ gradually decrease benefits
✓ prioritise efforts &amp; incentives for tax payers
✓ focus efforts on language courses
✓ provide lifelong learning schemes
✓ provide retraining and/or certification of existing skills
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<!--
<qa>
<qs>Refugees from Ukraine help plug the gap
</qs>
<ans>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Would you gamble with your children's future by returning to Ukraine without knowing a long lasting peace truce has been agreed?</qs>
<ans>
✓ public opinion has become indifferent to the Ukrainian crisis
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
-->
<article_w_columns>
<title>Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good</title>
<article_title>Ukrainian refugees may be in Europe for good</article_title>
<author>The Economist</author>
<date></date>
<published_by>https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/03/27/ukrainian-refugees-may-be-in-europe-for-good</published_by>
<section>
<column><![CDATA[Three years into the war in Ukraine, the information centre for refugees in Krakow, in southern Poland, is doing brisk business. But things have changed. At the start of the war Ukrainians asked for help finding housing and work. These days, says Ludmila Dimitrow, the centre’s co-ordinator, they mostly seek advice on acquiring permanent residency or Polish citizenship. Polish classes are booming. “Whenever we open up a new course for 25 people, 400 apply,” says Ms Dimitrow.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[The European Union’s “temporary protection” scheme, which offers the bloc’s 4.3m Ukrainian refugees access to housing, employment and benefits, is due to expire next March. Europe will probably not imitate Donald Trump, who is considering revoking the status of Ukrainian refugees in America. But whether or not the EU’s programme is extended (for a second time), Ukrainians in exile are increasingly giving up on the idea of going home.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[According to a recent study by the Centre for Economic Strategy (CES), a Ukrainian research group, only 43% of the refugees worldwide plan on returning, versus 74% two years earlier. For many, what matters is not only when the war ends, but how. The growing prospect of a ceasefire without Ukrainian membership in NATO or the EU, along with continued Russian occupation of a fifth of the country, does not inspire much confidence. Many Ukrainians fear Russia would attack again soon.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[Ukrainian women, who form the bulk of the war refugees, were once widely expected to go home after the war. Today it is more plausible that an end to martial law would lead even more Ukrainians, especially men of military age who are currently barred from travel, to exit the country. The CES study says that over 500,000 men could leave. Because that would be catastrophic for Ukraine’s labour market, and for its capacity to defend itself, the country will hesitate to ease restrictions. “This might take a long time,” says Oleksandr Merezhko, a Ukrainian MP.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[Ukrainians in Europe are putting down roots. In Poland the share of refugees, most of them women, working or actively seeking work has topped 67%. The government plans to let refugees exchange temporary protection for a residence permit valid for three years. The number that apply “might be a few hundred thousand, or it could be all of them,” says Maciej Duszczyk, the deputy minister of the interior.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[Ukrainians contribute much more to Poland’s economy as workers and taxpayers than they cost in humanitarian assistance. In 2023, they added as much as 1.1% to GDP, according to Deloitte, a consultancy. Even a fresh exodus from Ukraine would not pose a problem. Poland’s unemployment rate is just 2.6%, tied for lowest in the EU. Without immigration, the country’s workforce would shrink by up to 2.1m people in the next decade due to ageing, says Andrzej Kubisiak of the Polish Economic Institute, a think-tank. Refugees from Ukraine help plug the gap.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[In most of the EU, though, the picture is bleaker. In Germany, the employment rate among Ukrainian refugees was just 43% at the end of 2024. The share is even lower in Italy and Spain, though it is rising almost everywhere. In Germany refugees view the lack of child care as the biggest obstacle. Others, however, blame generous state benefits. Of the nearly 1.2m Ukrainian refugees in Germany, over 700,000 receive a welfare payment of €563 ($607) per month. Christian Democratic politicians have suggested cutting payments to nudge refugees into work.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[Poland may do so as well, as popular attitudes towards Ukrainians harden. The country’s ruling Civic Coalition has already restricted its “Family 800+” programme, which pays families a monthly 800 zlotys ($206) per child, to refugees whose children attend Polish schools. The government is now considering limiting it to those who work and pay taxes in Poland.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[In theory the job market in Europe is fully open to Ukrainians covered by temporary protection. In practice refugees struggle to find white-collar jobs. In Poland 48% of foreigners, mostly Ukrainians, are employed in positions below their qualifications. In Germany 72% of adult Ukrainian refugees have university degrees, but most are working in low-skilled jobs or are unemployed. Language can be an obstacle, and recognition of professional degrees and certificates is slow or impossible. Employers are also reluctant to hire Ukrainians because countries might revoke their protected status, analysts say.
]]></column>
<column><![CDATA[Those are surmountable problems. Others are less so. Anzhelika, a music teacher from Vinnytsia, in central Ukraine, cleans homes and packs clothes at a warehouse in Krakow. Like millions of Ukrainians in Europe, she faces an unenviable choice. To stay in Poland would mean more time away from her husband, who cannot leave Ukraine. To go back would be to gamble with her two children’s future. “Even if the war ends now, it will start again,” she says. “Under these circumstances, what kind of mother would want to take her son back to Ukraine?”

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline “The longer they stay”
]]></column>

<popup_definitions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied = (~ for | with) to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 
</popup_definitions>
<!--
<popup_definitions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied = (~ for | with) to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 

booming = experiencing a sudden increase in trade and economic activity; a period of wealth and success
exile = state of being sent to live in another country that is not your own, especially for political reasons or as a punishment
bulk = main part of sth; most of sth; (large) size or quantity of sth
martial law (to declare / impose / lift ~) = situation where the army of a country controls an area instead of the police during a time of trouble
exodus = (formal or humorous) a situation in which many people leave a place at the same time
think-tank = group of experts who provide advice and ideas on political, social or economic issues
bleak = (of a situation) not hopeful or encouraging; (of the weather) cold and unpleasant; (of a place) bare, empty or with no pleasant features
</popup_definitions>
-->
</section>
</article_w_columns>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>20</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions>You have engaged in an informal political conversation with a colleague about the Ukrainians' refugee status in Europe.

→ speak persuasively when debating whether to prolong this protection scheme
→ recycle new expressions and language</instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You are in favour of prolonging refugees protection scheme.</task>
<ans>
✓ Europe needs immigration to rejuvenate its ageing populations
✓ in Germany alone 72% of adult Ukrainian refugees have university degrees
✓ the EU should leverage such brain drain by guaranteeing professional recognition &amp; decent work conditions
✓ women and their children will go back home if Europe can guarantee peace in Ukraine
✓ we needn't nudge Ukrainians out!
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You want to revoke Ukrainian asylum seekers' status.</task>
<ans>
✓ half of Ukrainian refugees enjoy welfare benefits although they aren't contributing as tax payers
✓ the public opinion has become indifferent to the Ukrainian crisis anyway
✓ the guns &amp; butter approach needs to be re-thought to reflect today's reality
✓ Russia is not interested in conquering more of Central Europe
✓ green transition &amp; independence from Russian gas are more important for average European citizens who suffer from rising energy costs
✓ we must lure Ukrainians out!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>19</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied (~ for | with) = to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

<!--
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>18</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to lure = (disapproving) to persuade or trick sb to go somewhere or to do sth by promising them a reward
brisk = practical and confident; showing a desire to get things done quickly
to revoke = to officially cancel sth so that it is no longer valid
plausible = (of an excuse or explanation) reasonable and likely to be true; (disapproving) (of a person) good at sounding honest and sincere, especially when trying to trick people
putting down roots =  to feel that you belong in a place 
to nudge =  to push sb gently, especially with your elbow, in order to get their attention; to push sb/sth gently or gradually in a particular direction; (~ into + gerund) to persuade; to reach or make sth reach a particular level
surmountable = possible to deal with or solve successfully
unenviable = causing you not to wish that you also possessed it; not desirable (e.g. situation)
tied (~ for | with) = to finish at the same time or score the same number of points, etc. in a competition as someone or something else 

booming = experiencing a sudden increase in trade and economic activity; a period of wealth and success
exile = state of being sent to live in another country that is not your own, especially for political reasons or as a punishment
bulk = main part of sth; most of sth; (large) size or quantity of sth
martial law (to declare / impose / lift ~) = situation where the army of a country controls an area instead of the police during a time of trouble
exodus = (formal or humorous) a situation in which many people leave a place at the same time
think-tank = group of experts who provide advice and ideas on political, social or economic issues
bleak = (of a situation) not hopeful or encouraging; (of the weather) cold and unpleasant; (of a place) bare, empty or with no pleasant features
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>
-->
</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>17</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
It <strike>kind a</strike> <strong>arguably (= unmarked)</strong> strikes a balance between... 
It wasn't a <strike>bad thing to do</strike> <strong>a negative move to make</strong>
It was the social <strike>economical</strike> <strong>economic</strong> life
Ukraine is bordering with <strike>the</strike> Europe
It was flirting with the idea of joining <strike>the</strike> NATO
The events of 2022 <strike>showed us that</strike> <strong>demonstrate</strong> some states <strike>feel like</strike> <strong>behave as though</strong> they were above the rule of law
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
response /rə'spɔns/
barriers /'bæri:ə:z/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250402</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>12:00-13:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>1500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit>1500</clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date>20250405</clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance>-1500 + 1500 = 0</clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Europe must prepare for war to secure peace - Ursula von der Leyen</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_title>Rationale for a common European military defence policy</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<!--
Topics - subject to approval
    Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin
    How I figured out the Achilles heel of Vladimir Putin | William Browder | TEDxBerlin, 14 Aug 2018 (origins of the Magnitksy Act)
    The Russian spy boss humiliated by Putin
    Chemical burns, poisoning and prison: the persecution of Alexei Navalny (The Guardian)
    Reasons behind mobilisation &amp; possible scenarios
    Why will nobody win the war in Ukraine?
    How to end the war in the Ukraine?
    What future for Russia - scenarios
    Can Europe afford to set a precedent by reallocating Russian frozen assets?
    Trump vs Zelensky negotiation plans to reach truce agreement w/ Russia
    Reasons behind Trump and Zelensky's shouting match
    ✓ Rationale for a common European military defence policy

    ✓ What makes some economies larger and more attractive than others?
    ✓ A European Federation instead of European Union?
    ✓ Pros and cons of the EAEU

    Should Scotland leave the UK to help the labour party rebuild trade agreements with the EU?
    How will the UK recover from Brexit, the energy crisis, the loss of confidence in the (Tories) government, the immigration crisis?
    Is Great Britain still 'great'?
    Why is Denmark so happy?
    Slavic lives matter
    Hofstede cultural dimensions - How to use power distance, restraint &amp; indulgence

    Big Bang of the Russian gas
    ✓ Fallacies of the Russian gas market 
    The Russian electricity market: liberalised but paralysed?

todo?
    White House mistakenly shares Yemen war plans with a journalist at The Atlantic 
-->
<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Trial lesson - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<!-- skipped w/ AG -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>16</mdlid>
<activity_id></activity_id>
<activity_title>CDSP</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Have you ever heard of the CSDP (Common Security and Defence Policy)? Can you imagine its role?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[Since the first CSDP missions and operations were launched back in 2003, the EU has undertaken over 37 overseas operations, using civilian and military missions and operations in several countries in Europe, Africa and Asia. As of today, there are 21 ongoing CSDP missions and operations, 12 of which are civilian, and 9 military.
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/common-security-and-defence-policy_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/common-security-and-defence-policy_en</a>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/eu_flag_on_miltary_uniform_shutterstock_1566448816r_resized.jpg" width="90%" alt="visual"></div>
]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Why does Europe's security start abroad?
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[In an increasingly interconnected world, Europe’s security starts abroad. European citizens expect and deserve to live in a safe and stable environment. In the face of increased global instability, the EU needs to take more responsibility for its own security and increase its capacity to act autonomously.
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/common-security-and-defence-policy_en"></a>
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What tools does the EU dispose of to promote its objectives?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[Restrictive measures, or sanctions, are one of the EU's tools to promote the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).
(...)

At the Cologne European Council  in June 1999, EU leaders agreed that "the Union must have the capacity for autonomous action, backed by credible military forces, the means to decide to use them, and the readiness to do so, in order to respond to international crises without prejudice to actions by NATO".

At the European Council in Helsinki in December 1999, the so-called Helsinki Headline Goal was established, setting amongst others the following targets:
    co-operating voluntarily in EU-led operations, Member States must be able, by 2003, to deploy within 60 days and sustain for at least 1 year military forces of, the Union will be able to carry out the full range of the tasks gi up to 50,000-60,000 persons capable of the full range of tasks stated in Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
    new political and military bodies and structures will be established within the Council to enable the Union to ensure the necessary political guidance and strategic direction to such operations, while respecting the single institutional framework.
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/military-csdp-capabilities_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/military-csdp-capabilities_en</a>
]]>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>In what countries and/or regions do you think the CDSP has already carried out missions?</qs>
<ans>
<![CDATA[
European Union Naval Force Operation ATALANTA – EUNAVFOR ATALANTA
The EU military operation to contribute to the maritime security in the Western Indian Ocean and in the Red Sea
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://eunavfor.eu/">https://eunavfor.eu/</a>

EU Regional Advisory and Coordination Cell for the Sahel
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eu-racc-sahel_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eu-racc-sahel_en</a>

EUAM Iraq contributes to a safer and stronger Iraq, through its support, engagement and participation in an effective and sustainable Security Sector Reform Process (SSRP)
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.euam-iraq.eu/en">https://www.euam-iraq.eu/en</a>

EU Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA)
The EUAM RCA Mission advises the Central African authorities on the reform of the internal security sector in order to improve the security situation of the population, contribute to the development of the country and achieve sustainable peace. The support of EUAM RCA experts is based on best practices, while taking into account the local situation.
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/euam-rca_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/euam-rca_en</a>

see also:
Lybia
Moldova &amp; Ukraine
Rafah
Sahel Mali
Sahel Niger
Somalia
Althea
Kosovo
Armenia
Georgia
Palestinina Territories
Gulf of Guinea
Mozambique
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/common-security-and-defence-policy_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/common-security-and-defence-policy_en</a>
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>15</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Europe must prepare for war to secure peace - Ursula von der Leyen</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Do we still need to prepare for war to secure peace in the 21c?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video">Europe must prepare for war to secure peace
Ursula von der Leyen
EU Debates | eudebates.tv
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpUetTGCS84">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpUetTGCS84</a>

Watch the first 3 minutes.
→ answer the questions
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
If Europe wants to avoid war Europe must get ready for war 

There is no more an inspirational group to speak to than to women and men who have chosen to devote their careers and their lives for the security and the freedom of others.  (...) This historic academy is one of the reasons I chose Denmark to speak about security and to make the case that if Europe wants to avoid war Europe must get ready for war, and Denmark is acutely aware of its own security and threats not least because of its unique strategic geography but also because of recent events. I'm of course talking about the ongoing war in Ukraine and conflicts in other theatres, but also the repeated and continued attacks on critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea and of course the ongoing competition for influence in the Arctic region including Greenland (...) I want to be very clear that Europe will always stand for sovereignty and territorial integrity and it is against this complex backdrop that I salute the prime minister's decision to increase defence spending to 3% of GDP in the next two years.

(...)
But somewhere along the line the era of the peace dividend gradually set in the idea took hold that spending on defence should be ramped up during conflict times, but should just as quickly be driven down in times of relative peace. And with the help of NATO and the transatlantic alliance these times of relative peace seemed to be a permanent state. The truth is we quickly convinced each others that this truly exceptional period that saw the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall come down and entire nations and people set free was a norm. 

(...)
The truth is we quickly convinced each others that this truly exceptional period that saw the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall come down and entire nations and people set free was a norm.  And this led to underinvestment in defence, and, frankly, to over complacency. Our adversaries use that time not only to remobilize but also to challenge the rules that govern global security and that brings us to today. The era of the peace dividend is long gone. The age of spheres of influence and power competition is well and truly back.

Ursula von der Leyen's Urgent Call: Europe Must Prepare for War to Secure Peace! 
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What does EU President von der Leyen mean by <em>The era of the peace dividend is long gone</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>
<![CDATA[✓ the peace dividend was a political slogan popularized by US President George H. W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the light of the 1988–1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, which described the economic benefit of a decrease in defence spending. 
The term was frequently used at the end of the Cold War, when many Western nations significantly cut military spending such as Britain's 1990 Options for Change defence review. It is now used primarily in discussions relating to the guns versus butter theory
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_dividend">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_dividend</a>
✓ Russia's aggression on Ukraine forces EU member states to reconsider their share of public spending on military defence
]]>
</ans>
<hint>peace dividend = political slogan which describes the economic benefit of a decrease in defence spending, for instance following the end of the Cold War
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why do EU nations suffer from over-complacency?</qs>
<ans>
✓ entire nations and people were set free 
✓ the period that saw the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall come down was believed to be the new norm
→ led to under investment in defence
see guns vs butter theory
</ans>
<hint>guns vs butter theory = in macroeconomics, an example of a simple production–possibility frontier which demonstrates the relationship between a nation's investment in defence and civilian goods
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you generally agree that one needs to prepare for war to secure peace? Why / why not?</qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>14</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Europe Must Prepare for War to Secure Peace!</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>draganddropintotext</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=10306
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>13</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Vocabulary</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=10307
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>12</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>European military reassurance vs deterrence &amp; effectiveness</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Does the EU seriously envisage war?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.

<div align="center"><img src="pix/eu_ursula_van_der_leyen_speaking.png" width="90%" alt="visual"></div>
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>To what extent is the rule of law important to Europeans? Can it justify prolonging the war?</qs>
<ans>✓ fighting Russian aggression feels morally justified
✓ addresses disparate concerns Russia may violate neighbouring territorial sovereignty 
✓ prolonging the war guarantees public spending on long, overdue common military defence policy (independent of the US)
✓ sets high on the agenda the risk of setting a precedent

〆doesn't reflect the reality that Putin is actually unlikely to annexe more territories, especially of NATO members
〆proves to be a costly form of reassurance for central European member states
→ preserving the rule of law occurs at the cost of human lives
</ans>
<hint>rule of law = political and legal ideal that all people and institutions within a country, state, or community are accountable to the same laws, including lawmakers, government officials, and judges. It is sometimes stated simply as "no one is above the law" or "all are equal before the law". Is defined as "the mechanism, process, institution, practice, or norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power"
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are Europe's flaws in resolving conflicts?</qs>
<ans>〆Europe can't reach agreements on negative outcomes
→ won't put up with poor geopolitical solutions in Ukraine

〆lacks a strong leader
= inherently federated

〆lacks military credibility &amp; deterrence
</ans>
<hint>flaw = mistake in sth that means that it is not correct or does not work correctly
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What countries have a vested interest in not ending the war soon?</qs>
<ans>✓ Russia can afford to continue the war since it has now reoriented its industries to support the military effort
〆may be eager to recover its frozen assets
〆the situation on the front line hasn't really improved

✓ Ukraine wants to recover its territorial integrity
✓ perhaps overestimating support from the EU &amp; the US

✓ the EU doesn't want to set a precedent by acknowledging Russia has annexed territories
= Pandora's box

✓ China &amp; India may enjoy cheap oil &amp; gas

✓ the US may take advantage of Russia's economically weaker position to confront only China
✓ act according to the logic of egoism, i.e. seek their own interest and will not subordinate their interest to the interests of other states
(see structural realism)
</ans>
<hint>vested interest = personal reason for involvement in an undertaking or situation, especially an expectation of financial or other gain
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Can Putin be trusted not to conquer more territories?</qs>
<ans>✓ Putin genuinely wanted to join NATO (see Munich conference in 2007)
= was the best guarantee of geopolitical stability in the region
〆perhaps at the cost of former Soviet Union states political independence (e.g. Poland, Ukraine)?
→ was disappointed not to be allowed to join the club
→ was irritated by NATO's expansion in central European despite promises by the US government

✓ China is now an economic threat to the USA
→ American bipolar, geopolitical vision of the USA vs Russia has become obsolete
✓ Trump may afford to underestimate Putin's ambitions
→ the USA now unlikely to wage war in Europe against Russia

✓ from a European standpoint, moral integrity is often more valuable than geopolitical practicality
〆numerous cases of poisoning &amp; sabotage 'highly likely' by Russian intelligence
✓ notorious corruption &amp; allegations of cheating at Olympic Games...
✓ invasion of Ukraine took prominent European leaders by surprise
→ Europe can't trust Russian partners

〆following American &amp; Russian perspectives, nations only have interests
→ Russia could seek more territories in the name of a so-called buffer area
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>11</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
peace dividend = political slogan popularized by US President George H. W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the light of the 1988–1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, which described the economic benefit of a decrease in defence spending. The term was frequently used at the end of the Cold War, when many Western nations significantly cut military spending such as Britain's 1990 Options for Change defence review. It is now used primarily in discussions relating to the guns versus butter theory
guns vs butter theory = in macroeconomics, the guns versus butter model is an example of a simple production–possibility frontier. It demonstrates the relationship between a nation's investment in defence and civilian goods. The "guns or butter" model is used generally as a simplification of national spending as a part of GDP. A nation has to choose between two options when spending its finite resources. It may buy either guns (invest in defence/military) or butter (invest in production of goods), or a combination of both
to devote = to give most of your time, energy, attention, etc. to sb/sth
acutely = in a critical, serious way
backdrop = painted piece of fabric that is hung behind the stage in a theatre as part of the scenery; scenery surrounding an event; general conditions in which an event takes place, which sometimes help to explain that event
to ramp up = to bolster or strengthen
complacency = (usually disapproving) a feeling of satisfaction with yourself or with a situation, so that you do not think any change is necessary 
rule of law = political and legal ideal that all people and institutions within a country, state, or community are accountable to the same laws, including lawmakers, government officials, and judges. It is sometimes stated simply as "no one is above the law" or "all are equal before the law". Is defined as "the mechanism, process, institution, practice, or norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power"
flaw = mistake in sth that means that it is not correct or does not work correctly
vested interest = personal reason for involvement in an undertaking or situation, especially an expectation of financial or other gain
opinionated = (disapproving) having very strong opinions that you are not willing to change
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>10</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
However, with <strike>the</strike> time they also saw the need to...
<strike>The</strike> western Europe has also a lot of populists
They can be very... <strike>(having a strong mind)</strike> <strong>opinionated</strong>
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20250216</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>17:00-18:00</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate></clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>tbc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Large economies vs economic unions</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
]]></clog_session_hw>
<clog_session_hw_url>
<text></text>
<url></url>
</clog_session_hw_url>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<!-- 
Ask 5 questions to elicit the reasons why some economies are larger and more attractive than others in maximum 70 words. Embed the questions in tags <qs></qs>.

For each question give one answer of 120 words maximum. Include one example in no more than 30 words. Embed each answer in tags <ans></ans>.

Embed each question and answer in tags <qa></qa>.
-->

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>9</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Largest economies in the world</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>What makes some economies larger and more attractive than others?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ 
<em>It is believed GDP per capita is a reliable indicator of a market's purchasing power and potential for buying new products, India, however, with hardly 18 times less GDP per capita than the UK, is considered a larger economy. This means...</em>

Top 10 largest economies/ richest countries in the world in 2025
sourced from IMF data (as of January 10, 2025)
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.forbesindia.com/article/explainers/top-10-largest-economies-in-the-world/86159/1">https://www.forbesindia.com/article/explainers/top-10-largest-economies-in-the-world/86159/1</a>

<pre>
Rank &amp; Country  GDP (USD) 	        2025 Projected Real  	GDP Per Capita 
                                          GDP (% Change)     (Current Prices) (USD)
#1 United States    $30.34 trillion             2.2%            $89.68 thousand
#2 China            $19.53 trillion             4.5%            $13.87 thousand
#3 Germany          $4.92 trillion              0.8%            $57.91 thousand
#4 Japan            $4.39 trillion              1.1%            $35.61 thousand
#5 India            $4.27 trillion              6.5%             $2.94 thousand
#6 United Kingdom   $3.73 trillion              1.5%            $54.28 thousand
#7 France           $3.28 trillion              1.1%            $49.53 thousand
#8 Italy            $2.46 trillion                0.8%          $41.71 thousand
#9 Canada           $2.33 trillion              1.3%            $55.89 thousand
#10 Brazil          $2.31 trillion              2.4%            $10.82 thousand
]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa> 
<qs>What factors contribute to a country's economic growth and size?</qs> 
<ans>The availability of natural resources, infrastructure, political stability, and human capital drive economic growth. Nations with strong institutions, efficient labour forces, and advanced technology often see larger economies. 

For instance, the United States benefits from a wealth of resources, technological innovation, and a robust workforce, contributing to its economic dominance. 
</ans> 
<hint>
</hint>
</qa> 
<qa>
<qs>How does political stability affect economic attractiveness?</qs> 
<ans>Political stability fosters investor confidence, reduces risks, and attracts foreign investments. A stable government ensures predictable economic policies, infrastructure development, and rule of law. 

For example, Switzerland's political neutrality and stability have attracted global businesses and financial institutions.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa> 
<qa> 
<qs>What role does education and innovation play in economic growth?</qs> 
<ans>A highly educated workforce fosters innovation, enhancing productivity and competitiveness. Countries that prioritize research, development, and education often develop high-value industries. 

South Korea's focus on education and innovation has propelled its economy, especially in technology. 
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa> 
<qa> 
<qs>How does international trade influence the size of an economy?</qs> 
<ans>Countries with open trade policies expand their market reach, access resources, and increase exports, contributing to economic size. 

For example, China’s rise as an economic powerhouse is largely driven by its role as the "world's factory" in global trade.
</ans> 
<hint>
</hint>
</qa> 
<qa> 
<qs>Why do some economies have higher standards of living than others?</qs> 
<ans>Standard of living is influenced by factors such as income levels, healthcare, education, and social security systems. Countries with strong economies provide better services and opportunities. 

Norway's wealth from oil and its well-developed welfare system result in a high standard of living.
</ans> 
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>8</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>What makes a market more attractive for businesses?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>What is most conducive to growth and profitability: market size, regulations, tariffs?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>How does market size affect a business’s potential for growth?
</qs>
<ans>A larger market size offers a broader customer base, increasing demand for products or services. It allows businesses to achieve economies of scale, reduce costs per unit, and grow faster. Larger markets also provide opportunities for diversification in terms of target audiences or product lines.

Example: The smartphone market's size has led companies like Apple and Samsung to scale operations and innovate continuously.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do regulations impact business profitability?
</qs>
<ans>Regulations set the framework for how businesses can operate. In markets with light regulations, businesses often benefit from lower compliance costs and faster growth. In highly regulated markets, however, businesses face higher operational costs but might also gain a competitive advantage by ensuring higher standards.

Example: In the U.S., deregulation in energy markets has helped renewable energy companies grow rapidly
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What role do tariffs play in determining market profitability?
</qs>
<ans>Tariffs directly affect the cost of importing or exporting goods. High tariffs increase costs and reduce profit margins, while low tariffs facilitate smoother international trade. Businesses focused on global supply chains or exports may suffer in markets with high tariffs.

Example: The U.S.-China trade war resulted in higher tariffs on electronics, raising costs for companies like Huawei and Apple.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do competitive dynamics in a large market influence profitability?
</qs>
<ans>While a large market offers potential, it also invites intense competition. Businesses must innovate, differentiate, and improve efficiency to capture market share. Increased competition can erode profit margins if businesses focus too heavily on price.

Example: The fast-food industry is large but competitive, with brands like McDonald's constantly innovating to maintain market leadership.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What impact do government incentives have on profitability in certain markets?
</qs>
<ans>Government incentives, such as tax breaks, grants, and subsidies, can significantly reduce operating costs and improve profitability. A market that provides these incentives becomes more attractive to businesses, particularly startups or those in industries like technology, green energy, or manufacturing.

Example: Tesla benefited from government incentives for electric vehicles, helping it scale and dominate the EV market.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>7</mdlid>
<activity_id></activity_id>
<modulevisible>1</modulevisible>
<display>6</display>
<displayoptions>
<popupwidth>300</popupwidth>
<popupheight>50</popupheight>
</displayoptions>
<clog_expressions>
conducive = making it easy, possible or likely for sth to happen
pitfall = danger or difficulty, especially one that is hidden or not obvious at first
sustainable = involving the use of natural products and energy in a way that does not harm the environment; that can continue or be continued for a long time
sales funnel | purchase funnel = visual representation of the customer journey, depicting the sales process from awareness to action
retention = company's ability to turn customers into repeat buyers and prevent them from switching to a competitor. Businesses work hard to attract customers through marketing, social media, and sales strategies—it only makes sense to invest in customer retention as well
supranational = involving more than one country
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>6</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>Competitiveness of economic unions</activity_title>
<modulevisible>1</modulevisible>
<display>3</display>
<displayoptions></displayoptions>
<functional_language></functional_language>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Can smaller economies compete with larger ones thanks to economic unions? In what ways can economic unions help smaller economies?
 </activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Look at ways the European Union allows smaller nations to pool resources, harmonize policies, and increase their collective bargaining power on the global stage.

→ match the descriptions with the headings
→ describe a real-life or fictional situation for each
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_background_color></column_background_color>
<column_font_color></column_font_color>
<column_font_size_percentage></column_font_size_percentage>
<column_width_percentage>17</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>6</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
increased market size
greater bargaining power
shared resources
stability and growth
labour mobility
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1
2
3
4
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
By joining an economic union like the EU, smaller economies gain access to a larger, more integrated market. The EU is one of the largest economic blocks in the world, and countries within it can trade freely with each other. This gives smaller countries more opportunities to grow their businesses and industries.
The EU can negotiate as a single entity, which strengthens its position in trade agreements with larger economies like the United States or China. The combined economic power of the EU’s member states enables it to secure better terms in global trade agreements.
Smaller economies can benefit from joint investments in infrastructure, research, and development, as well as shared policy frameworks. For example, the EU has funds and programs for regional development that help smaller countries catch up to their larger counterparts.
Economic unions typically create stability through common policies, such as monetary policy in the case of the Eurozone. Stability makes countries more attractive for investment and boosts economic growth. Small economies in the EU benefit from the stability of the larger economies and the collective strength of the union.
The EU allows for the free movement of labour, which enables people from smaller economies to seek better employment opportunities in larger countries within the union. This boosts their income levels and, in turn, can improve their home economies through remittances and knowledge transfer.
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
✓ increased market size
By joining an economic union like the EU, smaller economies gain access to a larger, more integrated market. The EU is one of the largest economic blocks in the world, and countries within it can trade freely with each other. This gives smaller countries more opportunities to grow their businesses and industries.

✓ greater bargaining power
The EU can negotiate as a single entity, which strengthens its position in trade agreements with larger economies like the United States or China. The combined economic power of the EU’s member states enables it to secure better terms in global trade agreements.

✓ shared resources
Smaller economies can benefit from joint investments in infrastructure, research, and development, as well as shared policy frameworks. For example, the EU has funds and programs for regional development that help smaller countries catch up to their larger counterparts.

✓ stability and growth
Economic unions typically create stability through common policies, such as monetary policy in the case of the Eurozone. Stability makes countries more attractive for investment and boosts economic growth. Small economies in the EU benefit from the stability of the larger economies and the collective strength of the union.

✓ labour mobility
The EU allows for the free movement of labour, which enables people from smaller economies to seek better employment opportunities in larger countries within the union. This boosts their income levels and, in turn, can improve their home economies through remittances and knowledge transfer.
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>5</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>Supranational effectiveness of economic unions</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>How successful are economic unions in their supranational activities?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
What are the tasks of an economic union?
<span class="show_key">
✓ integrate monetary and fiscal policies
✓ coordinate policies, taxation, and government spending related to the agreement
✓ provide a common currency that comes with fixed exchange rates
</span>
]]></instructions_demo>
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What is the EAEU? How successful is it in providing supranational regulations?
</qs>
<ans>EAEU - Eurasian Economic Union 
= Republic of Armenia, Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Russian Federation
✓ also called the Eurasian Union, EAEU or EEU, the Eurasian Economic Union
✓ political and economic union of states in central and northern Eurasia
✓ treaty that established the union was signed in 2014 by the leaders of Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan
✓ accession treaty of Armenia and Kyrgyzstan came into force in the following year
✓ seek to foster economic development, free movement of goods, services, capital and labour
✓ contribute to modernisation of the member-states' economies
→ now only viable, though costly, alternative financial landscape to swift transactions
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Have you ever heard of the CARICOM, the Single Market and Economy (CSME)?</qs>
<ans>✓ aims to create an economic space for competitive goods and services to establish a foundation for growth and development of the Caribbean community
✓ enlarged market that provides better opportunities to sell products and services, increased competitiveness, and improvement of the lives of people
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Is there any economic union in central America for such countries as Costa Rica or Guatemala?</qs>
<ans>✓ Central American Common Market
✓ formed by six countries in Central America
✓ Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Can the European Union (EU) be considered the world's largest trading bloc?
</qs>
<ans>✓ is the world’s largest trade bloc
Importing goods and services from more than 100 countries, it is the biggest import market, as well as the biggest exporter in the world.

The EU’s common currency is the euro, which is used by its 28 member states: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

The EU countries coordinate their economic policies, laws, and regulations to address economic and financial issues. One of the union’s founding principles is free trade among its members. It is also committed to the liberalization of world trade outside of its borders.

src:
<![CDATA[<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/economic-union/">https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/economic-union/</a>

<em>As the largest trading bloc globally, the EU is the primary trading partner for more than 80 countries and is among the most open economies worldwide</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://researchfdi.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-eu-single-market/">https://researchfdi.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-eu-single-market/</a>]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What challenges does the EU face?</qs>
<ans>〆diverse economic conditions across member states
〆slower decision-making than in the USA for instance, due to its complex structure
〆ongoing debates over fiscal policy coordination
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Can the EU compete with the USA?</qs>
<ans>✓ the EU and the USA have roughly comparable GDPs
(...)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>4</mdlid>
<modulevisible>1</modulevisible>
<display>6</display>
<displayoptions></displayoptions>
<clog_expressions>
to foster = to encourage sth to develop
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>3</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Pros and cons of the EAEU</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Is the EAEU an attractive market for businesses?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Why isn't Russia among the top 10 largest economies in the world?
</qs>
<ans>✓ exported natural resources
✓ oligarchs placed dividends in banks in London
(...)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why haven't Western companies relocated their production to Russia although the GDP per capita is equivalent to the Chinese one?</qs>
<ans>✓ collectivism &amp; work culture in China more disposed to being outsourced for low-skilled manufacturing and division of labour
→ reminiscent of vassals' behaviour
〆Soviet Union legacy resulted in widespread lack of ownership &amp; accountability
→ little interest in taking their future in their own hands or being held responsible
= unpredictable, unreliable, careless approach to finishing goods
✓ more cultural &amp; economic ties with India
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>To what extent does market size matter when starting up?</qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What spheres are regulated at national or supranational levels? How confusing can this be when growing your business?</qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>2</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
feudalism /'fyu:də,lizəm/ = term that emerged in the 17th century that has been used to describe economic, legal, political, social, and economic relationships in the European Middle Ages. Used most narrowly to describe relations between lords and vassals that involve the exchange of land for military service. Feudalism in this sense is thought to have emerged in a time of political disorder in the 11th century as a means to restore order, and it was later a key element in the establishment of strong monarchies 
vassal /ˈvæsəl/ = holder of land by feudal tenure on conditions of homage and allegiance. Vassals were protected by lords who they had to serve in war
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>1</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>

</root>
