<root>
<clog_course_details>
<clog_member>ashutov</clog_member>
<clog_password>y25ashutov</clog_password>
<clog_last_update>20260424</clog_last_update>
<clog2dbdetails>
<courseid_ofl>157</courseid_ofl>
<courseid_ofl>148</courseid_ofl>
<mbzfile2restore></mbzfile2restore>
<mbzsessions2restore>2</mbzsessions2restore>
<mooshcli_offline>
</mooshcli_offline>
<courseid_onl>95</courseid_onl>
<courseid_onl>86</courseid_onl>
</clog2dbdetails>
<clog_notes>
<![CDATA[
vim cheat sheet
:setlocal spell spelllang=ru_yo en_gb fr
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href=""></a>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="http://www.ictnle.com/tmp_pdf/"></a>
<img src="pix/icons8-reading-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icons8-reading-100.png">
<img src="pix/icons8-quiz-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="quarterly test"> Prepare for quarterly test
<img src="pix/icons8-dictionary-100.png" width="30em" border="0" alt="vocab pre teach" />
<img src="pix/icons8-hammer-100.png" width="30em" border="0" alt="functional language"> 
<img src="pix/icons8-automation-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="grammar focus" />
<img src="pix/icons8-smartphone-tablet-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="smartphone or tablet device"> <img src="pix/icons8-listen-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="listening"> Download onto your phone or tablet and listen carefully.


:!php ~/www/soosh/xml2mbz_overwrite_offline.php ~/www/moodle/public/sdata/inc_xml_mdl/course_log_ashutov_2026-1.xml
:!php ~/www/moosh/moosh.php course-restore --overwrite ../mbz_bup_offline/course_log_ashutov_2026-1.xml_2mdl.mbz 157
:!php ~/www/soosh/xml2mbz_update_onl.php ~/www/moodle/public/sdata/inc_xml_mdl/course_log_ashutov_2026-1.xml
  ]]>
</clog_notes>
<clog_format></clog_format>
<clog_plugins>
sbook_plugins/wordlist_generated_from_xml_clog_sbook_for_sbook_session.inc
sbook_plugins/payment_history_generated_from_xml_clog_sbook.inc
</clog_plugins>
<clog_company>
<clog_company_name>Avito</clog_company_name>
<clog_course_name></clog_course_name>
<email></email>
<phone></phone>
<account_number01></account_number01>
<account_number02></account_number02>
<account_number03></account_number03>
</clog_company>
<clog_list_of_students>
<clog_student>
<clog_name>Andrey</clog_name>
<clog_surname>Shutov</clog_surname>
<clog_entry_level>C1</clog_entry_level>
<email></email>
<phone></phone>
<notes><![CDATA[
62 yr old
founding member
8 yr older daughter
wine lover


BE C1 iAS 2025-1

Andrey, good morning,

I have CELTA (Certificate of English Language Training for Adults) delivered by Cambridge and that's why as a native speaker I charge 2500 roubles / 60min via Zoom. As I have my own ИП I can issue an invoice if your employer is ready to pay or contribute to your continuous learning (i.e. English lessons).

Aside of groups at B1-C1 levels (intermediate to advanced), I currently also have private individuals relocating & rehearsing for job interviews. Sometimes this involves preparing for an exam, such as IELTS, either to get a visa or to study abroad... 

We may improve your general English if you have academic needs (eg IELTS, TOEFL...) and/or business English (if you need to prepare for a presentation, negotiation or expect an MBA-like case study during your skills interview). Depending on your needs, we may work on pronunciation & listening skills based either on the above mentioned, or on specific materials you need (I also edit content tailored to learner's needs in LMS Moodle). 

I have my own web-site (using Moodle) where you may find examples of my work, such as
As far as pronunciation is concerned, we would probably use some the following:
https://www.ictnle.com/local/staticpage/view.php?page=ptec_intro

If interested, please let me know what times would be convenient to you.

We can do zoom lessons on the platform and also lessons in person. I’ve made a swift search through your website. 
Looks very impressive.  
Theme I need is business English, negotiation and pitch sessions. Honestly,I couldn’t register and log in.((( 
How could we start?
I’ll be ready for lessons starting from the beginning of November.
P.s this is my website 
www.komos.ru

[09:10, 07/11/2025] Duncan Potter: 

In the mean time, I'll create an account in my database with your e-mail address for you to register (please send me a valid e-mail address).
Feel free to drop me a summary of learning experience if you wish (last course book covered, estimated level, immediate needs).

[09:10, 07/11/2025] Duncan Potter: 

I'll be happy to meet if it is relevant to your communicative needs, for example because you should really want to show me your plant & processes.
Such a scenario would be possible if you needed me to create a comprehensive business course specifically designed to target the needs of your staff, in which case I'd recommend to get in touch with a language school I'm affiliated with that could cater for greater training volumes based on your company's needs... but that's probably another story.

Yes,it is another story. All my export guys are fluent enough in English. 
I never learned English for any degrees or estimated levels. 
My purpose is to upgrade my business English in terms of vocab and comprehension of spoken language. Also I would like to sound more American, not British)))

[09:57, 07/11/2025] Андрей Шутов: My private e-mail is shutov_av@me.com
[09:58, 07/11/2025] Андрей Шутов: I think we could start from some kind of testing to find my weak zones.
[10:26, 07/11/2025] Андрей Шутов: I gonna be in Moscow next Friday,so our lesson could be online. When and how we could make an entrance testing ?

You may take this free, on-line placement test:
https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/test-your-english/business/

→ C2?

https://www.komos.ru/eng/about/leadership/


Dear Andrey,
Please find attached an invoice for today's lesson (ИП at AlphaBank).
I may issue such invoices in your name for each lesson (or on a weekly or monthly basis if more convenient).

As explained, however, you might be also interested in the option of having all your lessons (and those of your relatives if I'm not mistaken) free of charge if your company signs a contract for more courses.
I'll take the liberty of contacting Natalya Agapova, head of a language school I regularly work with, to get back to you at your earliest convenience. 

Привет,
Сегодня утром занимался 1ый раз с Андрейем Шутов (руководитель компании 13 000 человек).
https://www.komos.ru/about/leadership/
Возможно сможешь какой то договор с ними подписать?...
Я у него беру 2500 (но если бы знал раньше, что он такую большою шишку, то я бы взял 3200 за 60мин).
Удачи

TOC
Harry Mills
Lynda.com
Thums up
Hofstede
MacDonalds
Kvas

QS
How do you want to be remembered?
What legacy for stakeholders, other than a successful business?
local inhabitants?
examples of CSR
CLIP
https://www.efmdglobal.org/accreditations-assessments/companies/clip/


Cargill Green book of 


Cargill’s Code of Conduct is the foundation for our strong compliance culture which drives our business conduct throughout the world. Our Code applies to all employees, holding everyone to the same standard of behavior regardless of their role.

The Code is shared with new employees during onboarding and reinforced through annual training. Ongoing targeted communications remind employees of our ethics and compliance expectations, enhance awareness of compliance risks and provide guidance on actions to take. Every employee must comply with, and report known or suspected violations of Cargill’s Code of Conduct or compliance policies.

As an organization privileged to do business all over the world, Cargill is constantly looking at our environment to understand our risks and comply with the laws applicable to our businesses. Cargill prevents risks through policies, controls, communications, and training; detects gaps through data analysis, monitoring and auditing; and responds to misconduct concerns  through investigation and remediation.

To monitor and maintain our strong compliance culture, Cargill’s Ethics and Compliance Office manages and supports key global compliance programs across Cargill. Below are a few highlights.


While preparing staff of NLMK's corporate university for CLIP accreditation by EFMD with Valentina Satarova (head of the CU), we had a presentation by Valery Katkalo on 14.12.2021 entitled 'Inspiring Corporate Learning'.
This was actually based on an earlier article by Martin Moehrle and Steven Smith - 18 October 2021
https://www.globalfocusmagazine.com/inspiring-corporate-learning/

NLMK's clip accreditation process was suspended in 2022, however, your industry being quite different, I believe V.Katkalo might be the right person to help Komos navigate possible sanctions if you were interested in such certification.
https://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/27307009/

Alternatively, you may want to contact directly someone at EFMD Global Network Central & Eastern Europe (scroll down the page):
https://www.efmdglobal.org/about-efmd-global/efmd-global-staff/

20260330
46.138.30.25

todo
]]></notes>
</clog_student>
<clog_student>
<clog_name></clog_name>
<clog_surname></clog_surname>
<clog_entry_level></clog_entry_level>
<email></email>
<phone></phone>
<notes><![CDATA[
]]></notes>
</clog_student>
</clog_list_of_students>
</clog_course_details>

<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260427</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>tbc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>What will happen to marketing in the age of AI?</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> What will happen to marketing in the age of AI?
<em>Generative AI is poised to transform the workplace, but we still need human brains for new ideas, says marketing expert Jessica Apotheker. She explores how marketers can find their niche in the world of AI based on their preference for data or creativity, offering a pragmatic and hopeful look at the future of business</em>
Watch the video
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/jessica_apotheker_what_will_happen_to_marketing_in_the_age_of_ai?language=en">https://www.ted.com/talks/jessica_apotheker_what_will_happen_to_marketing_in_the_age_of_ai?language=en</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Bottoms Up - BE</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>B2</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>The AI revolution</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>108</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>What will happen to marketing in the age of AI?</activity_title>
<session_date>20240508</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20240515</hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>How do you seize the productivity opportunity brought about by artificial intelligence?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> What will happen to marketing in the age of AI?
<em>Generative AI is poised to transform the workplace, but we still need human brains for new ideas, says marketing expert Jessica Apotheker. She explores how marketers can find their niche in the world of AI based on their preference for data or creativity, offering a pragmatic and hopeful look at the future of business</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/jessica_apotheker_what_will_happen_to_marketing_in_the_age_of_ai?language=en">https://www.ted.com/talks/jessica_apotheker_what_will_happen_to_marketing_in_the_age_of_ai?language=en</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
<strong>Sample questions</strong>
Can access to big data help tap into the emotional needs of consumers?
Can brainstorming with a computer help come up with a perfect product or innovation to meet consumer needs?
Can AI help generate a sales pitch to convince a prospect buyer at the point of sale?
]]></instructions_demo>
<html5_video>what_will_happen_to_marketing_in_the_age_of_ai_121579.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Why and by how much could productivity increase in marketing thanks to AI [02:51]?</qs>
<ans>✓ marketing has traditionally been a right brain type of function
→ generative AI will bring about the next productivity revolution [01:19]

e.g. the Boston Consulting Group conducted with Harvard a study
✓ ChatGPT (in 2023) already improves the right-brain performance of marketers by 40 percent [02:51]
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What will happen to marketers once AI can help them generate more? What risk may AI lead to in marketing? [03:58]</qs>
<ans>✓ more personalised contents &amp; ideas
〆content overload [04:22]
= feeling chased by contents
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the danger of relying on generative AI in marketing? [04:47]</qs>
<ans>✓ generative AI has been trained on existing content and data
→ reduces divergence of outcomes
≠ equalization of marketing is not a productive increase
</ans>
<hint>divergence = difference between conflicting facts or claims or opinions
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How can you solve the negative outcomes of generative AI? [05:02]
</qs>
<ans>✓ need to develop a left AI brain
→ reskill &amp; reorganize with left brain type human resources
→ build, use and diffuse predictive AI tools in the heart of decision-making
= build solutions to predict outcomes
✓ identify and protect top right-brained talent
</ans>
<hint>left brain type = logical, analytical, orderly. The theory suggests that people who are left-brain dominant do well in careers that involve linear thinking, math, and verbal information. This includes careers such as accountant, scientist, or computer programmer
right brain type = creative, emotional, intuitive. More likely imaginative and innovative thinkers, often drawn to fields where they can express themselves freely and help others
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What typical questions &amp; answers generated by AI to distribute to marketers could be provided by teams of marketing data scientists &amp; marketing data engineers? [05:38]
</qs>
<ans>✓ what audience creative couples are really hitting it off 
✓ what product is working with which consumer 
✓ why or how is the marketing funnel evolving
</ans>
<hint>to hit it off = to be naturally friendly or well suited
funnel = device that is wide at the top and narrow at the bottom, used for pouring liquids or powders into a small opening; in marketing: e.g. discovery, interest, appraisal, confirmation
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>If you are successful with a given target generation, what are the risks when envisaging marketing for a new consumer segment? [07:18]
</qs>
<ans>✓ brand could get trapped in current territory ...
e.g. if a brand is strong with millennials
〆lack of data and content existing on millennials that will help you to be successful with Gen Z

〆conducting a market survey is more a left brain type of activity
(= confirmation of a sales hypothesis)
✓ interpreting trends &amp; decision making 
= more right brain type
→ need a combination of both types
→ don't rely only on AI for your market survey
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What 2 steps should marketers follow when making use of AI? [07:52]</qs>
<ans>1 identify who could provide most relevant data 
= recognise content partners
✓ think outside the box, beyond your eco-system
→ contact financial institutions, insurances
(= already common practice to buy data from other service providers)

e.g. a construction company decides to market to architects for the first time
→ find data on architects
〆construction companies (= direct competitors)

2 set up a federated model
✓ train algorithms
= don't believe in the first answers
→ always rephrase
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the impact on creativity if all right brain tasks rely on generative AI? [08:51]
</qs>
<ans>〆drop by 40% of collective divergent ideas
〆true innovation is being stifled
</ans>
<hint>to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How can you protect the identity of your brand and differentiation on the market? [09:25]
</qs>
<ans>✓ identify true innovators 
e.g. those who usually disagree with you
✓ strategically reskill to use AI efficiently
e.g.how to develop new prototypes fast &amp; multiply their impact
→ protect &amp; teach how to use AI
= keep juices flowing

→ protect brand identity &amp; differentiation in the market
</ans>
<hint>to keep juices flowing = to become inspired to greater creativity, productivity, or energy, or to cause such a feeling in someone
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What should marketers do to survive? [10:06]
</qs>
<ans>✓ identify whether talents are left brain or right brain type
✓ specialise their skills
→ choose their brain
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>107</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to seize = to take control of a place or situation, often suddenly and violently; to be quick to make use of a chance, an opportunity, etc
divergence = difference between conflicting facts or claims or opinions
left brain type = logical, analytical, orderly. The theory suggests that people who are left-brain dominant do well in careers that involve linear thinking, math, and verbal information. This includes careers such as accountant, scientist, or computer programmer
right brain type = creative, emotional, intuitive. More likely imaginative and innovative thinkers, often drawn to fields where they can express themselves freely and help others
funnel = device that is wide at the top and narrow at the bottom, used for pouring liquids or powders into a small opening; in marketing: e.g. discovery, interest, appraisal, confirmation
to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
to keep juices flowing = to become inspired to greater creativity, productivity, or energy, or to cause such a feeling in someone
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Bottoms Up - BE</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>B2</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>The AI revolution</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>106</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Will AGI make societies happier?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
<![CDATA[
Discuss the following topic by asking 8 questions and eliciting answers:
Will AGI make societies happier?
Apply the following formatting rules.

Use British English spelling and words when possible.

Each question should be no more than 100 words.
Each answer should consist of 5 to 8 bullet points of no more than 70 words per line.
Each answer should use only infinitive forms when talking about the present or future, and past participle when talking about the past.
For each question include 1 or 2 key expressions or collocations (called 'hints') which are more advanced and which are essential to answer this particular question.

For answers:
Don't use capital letters at the beginning of each bullet point.
Don't use a full stop at the end of each bullet point.
Replace the bullet point sign with ✓ when the sentence is affirmative and 〆 when the sentence is in the negative form.

For hints:
Give a definition of no more than 100 words.
Separate the keyword from the definition with the following delimiter '=' .
Don't use capital letters at the beginning of the key expression.
Don't use a full stop at the end of the definition.

Embed the output in an xml file beginning with <ai> and ending with </ai> where each trio of question, answer and hint is between tags <qa></qa>.
Embed each question between tags <qs></qs>.
Embed each answer between tags <ans></ans>.
Embed each keyword between tags <hint></hint>.
]]>
</key>
<qa>  
<qs>In what ways could AGI contribute to a happier society overall?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ increase access to personalized mental health support for all age groups  
✓ reduce workload and stress through intelligent task automation  
✓ enhance public services through optimized resource allocation  
✓ support lifelong learning and skill development with adaptive systems  
✓ improve work-life balance by reshaping employment patterns  
✓ enable stronger social safety nets using predictive modelling  
〆reinforce inequality if benefits unequally distributed  
〆reduce human agency without clear ethical frameworks  
</ans>  
<hint>personalized mental health support = tailoring psychological or emotional assistance to individual needs using data-driven insights or AI-based understanding  
public service optimization = improving the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of services provided by government or public institutions using intelligent systems  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>What might be the risks of relying on AGI for emotional or social fulfilment?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ reduce authentic human interaction by replacing social roles  
✓ distort emotional development due to artificial empathy cues  
✓ reinforce confirmation bias via curated AI responses  
✓ increase loneliness despite constant virtual presence  
✓ desensitize individuals to natural human limitations  
〆eliminate the need for interpersonal relationships entirely  
〆create universal emotional templates that fit all individuals  
</ans>  
<hint>artificial empathy = the simulated ability of machines to recognize and respond to human emotions, often without true understanding or consciousness  
confirmation bias = tendency to favour information that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs or assumptions, often reinforced by algorithmic filtering  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>How could AGI reshape our concepts of work and leisure?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ automate repetitive or hazardous jobs across sectors  
✓ create new professions centred on human-AI collaboration  
✓ enable more flexible, project-based employment systems  
✓ expand leisure opportunities through personalized content delivery  
✓ redefine productivity through continuous AI-enhanced assistance  
✓ support universal basic income by redistributing economic gains  
〆eliminate human participation from all economic functions  
〆preserve outdated work structures despite automation  
</ans>  
<hint>human-AI collaboration = cooperative interaction between people and intelligent systems to solve problems or accomplish tasks  
universal basic income = regular, unconditional payment provided to all citizens to cover basic living expenses, potentially supported by AI-driven productivity  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>Could AGI reduce global inequalities, or make them worse?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ democratize access to education through multilingual tutoring systems  
✓ enhance healthcare delivery in underserved regions  
✓ forecast resource distribution needs using real-time data  
✓ empower local economies via intelligent micro-financing platforms  
✓ support inclusive policymaking by simulating outcomes  
〆ensure equal access if governed by profit-driven entities  
〆overcome digital divides in remote or impoverished areas  
</ans>  
<hint>digital divide = gap between individuals or communities with access to digital technology and those without  
inclusive policymaking = designing laws or decisions by considering the needs and voices of diverse or marginalized groups  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>What ethical dilemmas may emerge if AGI begins managing human happiness?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ influence emotional states through data-based behavioural nudging  
✓ redefine well-being through metrics not aligned with cultural values  
✓ compromise autonomy through algorithmic decision-making  
✓ manipulate desires to fit predefined happiness models  
✓ prioritize collective happiness over individual rights  
〆resolve moral uncertainty with universal AI ethics  
〆balance emotional health with freedom without bias  
</ans>  
<hint>behavioural nudging = subtly steering people's choices or behaviours using psychological or environmental cues without restricting freedom  
algorithmic decision-making = using automated systems to make judgements or take actions that impact human lives, often raising accountability concerns  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>In what ways could AGI help individuals live more meaningful lives?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ tailor life advice based on individual values and goals  
✓ foster lifelong creativity through co-creation tools  
✓ guide personal growth using pattern recognition in behaviour  
✓ deepen understanding of others through cultural simulation  
✓ suggest purpose-driven paths informed by real-time context  
〆impose standardized visions of meaning on diverse populations  
〆replace inner reflection with automated self-improvement tools  
</ans>  
<hint>co-creation tools = digital or AI-driven platforms that support shared innovation or artistic expression between humans and machines  
purpose-driven path = life direction centred around meaningful values or contributions rather than material success  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>How might AGI impact mental health across different generations?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ detect early signs of distress through behavioural monitoring  
✓ offer real-time therapeutic interventions tailored to age groups  
✓ reduce stigma by normalizing mental health dialogue through bots  
✓ support intergenerational communication via intelligent mediators  
✓ encourage emotional resilience through adaptive coping strategies  
〆replace human therapists in all scenarios  
〆ignore cultural or age-specific sensitivities in diagnostics  
</ans>  
<hint>emotional resilience = the capacity to recover from stress or adversity by managing emotions effectively  
intelligent mediators = AI systems designed to facilitate conversations or resolve conflicts between people or groups  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>Can AGI redefine our understanding of what happiness really is?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ analyse large-scale well-being data to reveal new insights  
✓ question materialistic assumptions by modelling emotional impact  
✓ simulate alternative lifestyles and their happiness outcomes  
✓ test philosophical theories of happiness with real-world metrics  
✓ offer pluralistic frameworks for emotional fulfilment  
〆replace individual introspection with prescriptive happiness scores  
〆reach a universally agreed-upon definition across societies  
</ans>  
<hint>pluralistic frameworks = multiple coexisting approaches that recognize diverse ways of achieving a goal, such as happiness  
emotional fulfilment = the experience of having one's emotional needs and aspirations satisfied  
</hint>  
</qa>  
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>105</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
personalized mental health support = tailoring psychological or emotional assistance to individual needs using data-driven insights or AI-based understanding  
public service optimization = improving the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of services provided by government or public institutions using intelligent systems  
artificial empathy = the simulated ability of machines to recognize and respond to human emotions, often without true understanding or consciousness  
confirmation bias = tendency to favour information that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs or assumptions, often reinforced by algorithmic filtering  
human-AI collaboration = cooperative interaction between people and intelligent systems to solve problems or accomplish tasks  
universal basic income = regular, unconditional payment provided to all citizens to cover basic living expenses, potentially supported by AI-driven productivity  
digital divide = gap between individuals or communities with access to digital technology and those without  
inclusive policymaking = designing laws or decisions by considering the needs and voices of diverse or marginalized groups  
behavioural nudging = subtly steering people's choices or behaviours using psychological or environmental cues without restricting freedom  
algorithmic decision-making = using automated systems to make judgements or take actions that impact human lives, often raising accountability concerns  
co-creation tools = digital or AI-driven platforms that support shared innovation or artistic expression between humans and machines  
purpose-driven path = life direction centred around meaningful values or contributions rather than material success  
emotional resilience = the capacity to recover from stress or adversity by managing emotions effectively  
intelligent mediators = AI systems designed to facilitate conversations or resolve conflicts between people or groups  
pluralistic frameworks = multiple coexisting approaches that recognize diverse ways of achieving a goal, such as happiness  
emotional fulfilment = the experience of having one's emotional needs and aspirations satisfied  
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>104</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Will AGI make societies happier?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
<![CDATA[
Discuss the following topic by asking 8 questions and eliciting answers:
Will AGI make societies happier?
Apply the following formatting rules.

Use British English spelling and words when possible.

Each question should be no more than 100 words.
Each answer should consist of 5 to 8 bullet points of no more than 70 words per line.
Each answer should use only infinitive forms when talking about the present or future, and past participle when talking about the past.
For each question include 1 or 2 key expressions or collocations (called 'hints') which are more advanced and which are essential to answer this particular question.

For answers:
Don't use capital letters at the beginning of each bullet point.
Don't use a full stop at the end of each bullet point.
Replace the bullet point sign with ✓ when the sentence is affirmative and 〆 when the sentence is in the negative form.

For hints:
Give a definition of no more than 100 words.
Separate the keyword from the definition with the following delimiter '=' .
Don't use capital letters at the beginning of the key expression.
Don't use a full stop at the end of the definition.

Embed the output in an xml file beginning with <ai> and ending with </ai> where each trio of question, answer and hint is between tags <qa></qa>.
Embed each question between tags <qs></qs>.
Embed each answer between tags <ans></ans>.
Embed each keyword between tags <hint></hint>.
]]>
</key>
<qa>  
<qs>In what ways could AGI contribute to a happier society overall?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ increase access to personalized mental health support for all age groups  
✓ reduce workload and stress through intelligent task automation  
✓ enhance public services through optimized resource allocation  
✓ support lifelong learning and skill development with adaptive systems  
✓ improve work-life balance by reshaping employment patterns  
✓ enable stronger social safety nets using predictive modelling  
〆reinforce inequality if benefits unequally distributed  
〆reduce human agency without clear ethical frameworks  
</ans>  
<hint>personalized mental health support = tailoring psychological or emotional assistance to individual needs using data-driven insights or AI-based understanding  
public service optimization = improving the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of services provided by government or public institutions using intelligent systems  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>What might be the risks of relying on AGI for emotional or social fulfilment?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ reduce authentic human interaction by replacing social roles  
✓ distort emotional development due to artificial empathy cues  
✓ reinforce confirmation bias via curated AI responses  
✓ increase loneliness despite constant virtual presence  
✓ desensitize individuals to natural human limitations  
〆eliminate the need for interpersonal relationships entirely  
〆create universal emotional templates that fit all individuals  
</ans>  
<hint>artificial empathy = the simulated ability of machines to recognize and respond to human emotions, often without true understanding or consciousness  
confirmation bias = tendency to favour information that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs or assumptions, often reinforced by algorithmic filtering  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>How could AGI reshape our concepts of work and leisure?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ automate repetitive or hazardous jobs across sectors  
✓ create new professions centred on human-AI collaboration  
✓ enable more flexible, project-based employment systems  
✓ expand leisure opportunities through personalized content delivery  
✓ redefine productivity through continuous AI-enhanced assistance  
✓ support universal basic income by redistributing economic gains  
〆eliminate human participation from all economic functions  
〆preserve outdated work structures despite automation  
</ans>  
<hint>human-AI collaboration = cooperative interaction between people and intelligent systems to solve problems or accomplish tasks  
universal basic income = regular, unconditional payment provided to all citizens to cover basic living expenses, potentially supported by AI-driven productivity  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>Could AGI reduce global inequalities, or make them worse?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ democratize access to education through multilingual tutoring systems  
✓ enhance healthcare delivery in underserved regions  
✓ forecast resource distribution needs using real-time data  
✓ empower local economies via intelligent micro-financing platforms  
✓ support inclusive policymaking by simulating outcomes  
〆ensure equal access if governed by profit-driven entities  
〆overcome digital divides in remote or impoverished areas  
</ans>  
<hint>digital divide = gap between individuals or communities with access to digital technology and those without  
inclusive policymaking = designing laws or decisions by considering the needs and voices of diverse or marginalized groups  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>What ethical dilemmas may emerge if AGI begins managing human happiness?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ influence emotional states through data-based behavioural nudging  
✓ redefine well-being through metrics not aligned with cultural values  
✓ compromise autonomy through algorithmic decision-making  
✓ manipulate desires to fit predefined happiness models  
✓ prioritize collective happiness over individual rights  
〆resolve moral uncertainty with universal AI ethics  
〆balance emotional health with freedom without bias  
</ans>  
<hint>behavioural nudging = subtly steering people's choices or behaviours using psychological or environmental cues without restricting freedom  
algorithmic decision-making = using automated systems to make judgements or take actions that impact human lives, often raising accountability concerns  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>In what ways could AGI help individuals live more meaningful lives?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ tailor life advice based on individual values and goals  
✓ foster lifelong creativity through co-creation tools  
✓ guide personal growth using pattern recognition in behaviour  
✓ deepen understanding of others through cultural simulation  
✓ suggest purpose-driven paths informed by real-time context  
〆impose standardized visions of meaning on diverse populations  
〆replace inner reflection with automated self-improvement tools  
</ans>  
<hint>co-creation tools = digital or AI-driven platforms that support shared innovation or artistic expression between humans and machines  
purpose-driven path = life direction centred around meaningful values or contributions rather than material success  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>How might AGI impact mental health across different generations?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ detect early signs of distress through behavioural monitoring  
✓ offer real-time therapeutic interventions tailored to age groups  
✓ reduce stigma by normalizing mental health dialogue through bots  
✓ support intergenerational communication via intelligent mediators  
✓ encourage emotional resilience through adaptive coping strategies  
〆replace human therapists in all scenarios  
〆ignore cultural or age-specific sensitivities in diagnostics  
</ans>  
<hint>emotional resilience = the capacity to recover from stress or adversity by managing emotions effectively  
intelligent mediators = AI systems designed to facilitate conversations or resolve conflicts between people or groups  
</hint>  
</qa>  
<qa>  
<qs>Can AGI redefine our understanding of what happiness really is?</qs>  
<ans>  
✓ analyse large-scale well-being data to reveal new insights  
✓ question materialistic assumptions by modelling emotional impact  
✓ simulate alternative lifestyles and their happiness outcomes  
✓ test philosophical theories of happiness with real-world metrics  
✓ offer pluralistic frameworks for emotional fulfilment  
〆replace individual introspection with prescriptive happiness scores  
〆reach a universally agreed-upon definition across societies  
</ans>  
<hint>pluralistic frameworks = multiple coexisting approaches that recognize diverse ways of achieving a goal, such as happiness  
emotional fulfilment = the experience of having one's emotional needs and aspirations satisfied  
</hint>  
</qa>  
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>103</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
personalized mental health support = tailoring psychological or emotional assistance to individual needs using data-driven insights or AI-based understanding  
public service optimization = improving the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of services provided by government or public institutions using intelligent systems  
artificial empathy = the simulated ability of machines to recognize and respond to human emotions, often without true understanding or consciousness  
confirmation bias = tendency to favour information that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs or assumptions, often reinforced by algorithmic filtering  
human-AI collaboration = cooperative interaction between people and intelligent systems to solve problems or accomplish tasks  
universal basic income = regular, unconditional payment provided to all citizens to cover basic living expenses, potentially supported by AI-driven productivity  
digital divide = gap between individuals or communities with access to digital technology and those without  
inclusive policymaking = designing laws or decisions by considering the needs and voices of diverse or marginalized groups  
behavioural nudging = subtly steering people's choices or behaviours using psychological or environmental cues without restricting freedom  
algorithmic decision-making = using automated systems to make judgements or take actions that impact human lives, often raising accountability concerns  
co-creation tools = digital or AI-driven platforms that support shared innovation or artistic expression between humans and machines  
purpose-driven path = life direction centred around meaningful values or contributions rather than material success  
emotional resilience = the capacity to recover from stress or adversity by managing emotions effectively  
intelligent mediators = AI systems designed to facilitate conversations or resolve conflicts between people or groups  
pluralistic frameworks = multiple coexisting approaches that recognize diverse ways of achieving a goal, such as happiness  
emotional fulfilment = the experience of having one's emotional needs and aspirations satisfied  
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>
<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Can't we just print more money?</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>102</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Can't we just print more money?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Can't we just print more money? Economics in Ten Simple Questions
by Rupal Patel 2022
<div align="center"><img src="pix/cant-we-just-print-more-money_360px_1747178701.webp" width="300" alt="visual"></div> 
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money">https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money</a>


→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
<![CDATA[
"The Road Less Stupid"
business book by Keith J. Cunningham that emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and avoiding poor decisions to achieve financial success. It provides strategies for minimizing mistakes and encourages readers to engage in "Thinking Time" to improve decision-making




Can't we just print more money? Economics in Ten Simple Questions
by Rupal Patel 2022
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money">https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money</a>

Key Takeaways
1. Economics is everywhere, shaping our daily choices and societal outcomes
Economics affects all of us every day of our lives. Each time you make a choice about whether or not to work, whether to spend some money today or save it for tomorrow, go out for a meal or cook one at home, you are making an economic decision.

Ubiquitous economic decisions. Every day, we make countless economic choices without realizing it. From deciding what to eat for breakfast to choosing a career path, these decisions involve trade-offs and opportunity costs. Economics provides a framework for understanding these choices and their implications.

Markets and resource allocation. At its core, economics studies how societies allocate scarce resources. Markets play a crucial role in this process, coordinating the actions of millions of individuals through the forces of supply and demand. This "invisible hand" often leads to efficient outcomes, but not always.

Societal impact. Economic forces shape not just individual choices, but entire societies. They influence:

Income distribution
Technological innovation
Environmental sustainability
Political systems
Understanding these forces empowers individuals to make better decisions and engage more effectively in civic life.

2. Markets coordinate supply and demand, but can fail in crucial ways
Economics can help us understand the forces that led to this happening, as well as how we should respond.

Market mechanics. Markets bring together buyers and sellers, with prices acting as signals to coordinate their actions. When demand for a product increases, prices rise, incentivizing more production. This process generally leads to efficient outcomes, matching supply with demand.

Market failures. However, markets can fail in important ways:

Externalities: When the full costs or benefits of an action aren't reflected in market prices (e.g., pollution)
Public goods: Products that benefit everyone but are difficult to charge for individually (e.g., national defense)
Information asymmetries: When one party has more information than the other (e.g., used car sales)
Monopolies: When a single seller dominates a market, leading to higher prices and less innovation
Policy interventions. Recognizing these failures, policymakers often intervene in markets through:

Regulations
Taxes and subsidies
Direct provision of goods and services
Understanding market failures is crucial for addressing major societal challenges like climate change and healthcare provision.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX cont. from here 
3. Labor markets determine wages and employment, with inherent frictions
To understand labour markets you need to not just make sense of how markets work, but understand the peculiar ways in which they interact with the idiosyncratic economics of employment.

Supply and demand for labor. Wages and employment levels are determined by the interaction of labor supply (workers) and demand (employers). Factors influencing this include:

Worker skills and productivity
Business needs and profitability
Economic conditions
Labor market frictions. Unlike in idealized markets, labor markets have inherent frictions that prevent perfect matching of workers to jobs:

Search costs: Time and effort required to find suitable jobs or employees
Geographic constraints: Workers may be unable or unwilling to relocate for jobs
Skill mismatches: Available workers may lack the skills needed for open positions
Policy implications. Understanding these frictions informs policies aimed at reducing unemployment and improving labor market efficiency, such as:

Job search assistance programs
Education and training initiatives
Labor mobility support
Recognizing the complexities of labor markets helps explain persistent unemployment and wage disparities, even in otherwise healthy economies.

4. Economic growth drives long-term prosperity, but has complex impacts
You're richer than your ancestors because of economic growth. That economic growth comes from a combination of several factors – most notably, improvements in technology.

Drivers of growth. Long-term economic growth primarily stems from:

Technological innovation
Capital accumulation (investment in productive assets)
Human capital development (education and skills)
Institutional improvements (rule of law, property rights)
Compounding effects. Over time, even small differences in growth rates lead to massive differences in living standards. This explains why modern societies are so much wealthier than those of the past.

Complexities and trade-offs. While growth generally improves living standards, it can have negative side effects:

Environmental degradation
Inequality (if benefits are unevenly distributed)
Cultural disruption
Policymakers must balance promoting growth with addressing these potential downsides. Sustainable development aims to achieve growth that improves quality of life without compromising future generations' well-being.

5. International trade allows specialization and mutual benefit between nations
Even if there are lots of jobs across an entire economy, that doesn't mean there are lots of jobs on offer in the area where each individual is based.

Comparative advantage. The key insight of international trade theory is that countries benefit by specializing in what they're relatively best at producing, even if they're not the absolute best. This counter-intuitive idea explains why trade can benefit all parties involved.

Benefits of trade:

Lower prices for consumers
Greater product variety
Increased economic efficiency
Knowledge and technology transfer
Challenges and controversies. While trade generally increases overall economic welfare, it can create losers within countries:

Industries facing foreign competition may decline
Workers may need to transition to new sectors
This has led to political backlash against globalization in some countries. Policymakers face the challenge of balancing the broad benefits of trade with addressing its localized negative impacts.

6. Inflation erodes purchasing power over time, with wide-ranging effects
Inflation can be thought of as a tax on keeping money. Just as income tax might take away a fraction of your salary every month, inflation takes away a fraction of your spending power.

Causes of inflation. Price increases can be driven by:

Demand-pull factors: Increased spending outpacing production
Cost-push factors: Rising input costs (e.g., raw materials, wages)
Monetary factors: Expansion of the money supply
Economic impacts. Moderate, stable inflation is generally considered beneficial, but high or unpredictable inflation can be harmful:

Erodes savings and fixed incomes
Creates uncertainty, hampering investment
Can lead to inefficient allocation of resources
Policy responses. Central banks typically aim for low, stable inflation (often around 2% annually) using tools like:

Interest rate adjustments
Quantitative easing/tightening
Understanding inflation is crucial for personal financial planning, business decision-making, and evaluating economic policies.

7. Money and banking are built on trust, facilitating economic activity
Money is ultimately a system of mutually agreed trust; over the centuries, people have looked to reinforce that trust in various ways: drawing on the 'intrinsic' value of precious metals and commodities, drawing on the resources and power of the state, or even drawing on the cool logic of computer code.

Evolution of money. Money has taken many forms throughout history, from commodity-based systems to today's fiat currencies. Its core functions remain constant:

Medium of exchange
Store of value
Unit of account
Banking system. Modern economies rely on a complex banking system that:

Creates money through fractional reserve lending
Facilitates payments and credit
Helps manage economic risks
Trust and regulation. The entire monetary and banking system relies on trust. Governments and central banks play crucial roles in maintaining this trust through:

Deposit insurance
Bank regulations
Monetary policy
Understanding money and banking is essential for grasping how modern economies function and the role of financial institutions in both facilitating growth and potentially creating instability.

8. Economic crises have far-reaching consequences and are difficult to predict
Economists are all too aware of this phenomenon. Even Adam Smith recognised that there are some situations in which markets end up working against the common good.

Anatomy of crises. Economic crises can stem from various sources:

Financial bubbles and crashes
Banking system failures
External shocks (e.g., pandemics, natural disasters)
Policy mistakes
These events can trigger a self-reinforcing cycle of declining confidence, reduced spending, and job losses.

Widespread impacts. Economic crises affect far more than just financial markets:

Unemployment and income loss
Business failures
Social and political instability
Long-term "scarring" effects on growth
Prediction challenges. Forecasting crises is notoriously difficult due to:

Complex, interconnected economic systems
Inherent unpredictability of human behavior
Potential for "black swan" events
While economists have developed tools to better understand and potentially mitigate crises, perfect prediction remains elusive. This underscores the importance of building resilient economic systems and maintaining policy flexibility.

9. Policymakers use various tools to manage the economy, with limitations
Just like Smith's workers in the pin factory, countries tend to specialise in producing certain things – the things they're best at making –then swap these items through trade.

Monetary policy. Central banks use tools like interest rate adjustments and quantitative easing to influence:

Inflation
Employment
Overall economic activity
Fiscal policy. Governments use taxation and spending to:

Provide public goods and services
Redistribute income
Stabilize the economy during downturns
Limitations and trade-offs. Economic management faces several challenges:

Time lags between policy changes and their effects
Unintended consequences
Political constraints
Globalization reducing national policy effectiveness
Policy debates. Economists and policymakers often disagree on the optimal approach to managing the economy, with ongoing debates about:

The appropriate balance between markets and government intervention
The effectiveness of different policy tools
How to address long-term challenges like inequality and climate change
Understanding these policy tools and their limitations is crucial for informed civic engagement and evaluating economic proposals.

Last updated: April 22, 2025
]]>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What are ubiquitous economic decisions?
</qs>
<ans>Every day, we make countless economic choices without realizing it. From deciding what to eat for breakfast to choosing a career path, these decisions involve trade-offs and opportunity costs. Economics provides a framework for understanding these choices and their implications
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is the <em>invisible hand</em>?]]></qs>
<ans>✓ how societies allocate scarce resources
✓ markets play a crucial role in this process
→ coordinate actions of millions of individuals through the forces of supply and demand
→ often leads to efficient outcomes, but not always
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the societal impact of economic forces?</qs>
<ans>✓ income distribution
✓ technological innovation
✓ environmental sustainability
✓ political systems
→ understanding empowers individuals to make better decisions 
→ engage more effectively in civic life
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do market mechanics coordinate supply and demand?</qs>
<ans>✓ bring together buyers and sellers

✓ prices act as signals to coordinate actions
→ when demand for a product increases, prices rise
→ incentivise more production

✓ leads to efficient outcomes, matching supply with demand
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why can markets fail to coordinate supply and demand? How should we respond to that?</qs>
<ans>✓ externalities
= when the full costs or benefits of an action aren't reflected in market prices (e.g., pollution)

✓ public goods
= products that benefit everyone but are difficult to charge for individually (e.g., national defence)

✓ information asymmetries
= when one party has more information than the other (e.g., used car sales)

✓ monopolies
= when a single seller dominates a market
→ leads to higher prices and less innovation
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do policymakers often intervene in markets?
</qs>
<ans>✓ regulations
✓ taxes and subsidies
✓ direct provision of goods and services
→ understanding market failures is crucial for addressing major societal challenges like climate change and healthcare provision
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>101</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
glass ceiling = ceiling based on attitudinal or organizational bias in the work force that prevents minorities and women from advancing to leadership positions
empathy = ability to understand another person's feelings, experience, etc
Trans-Tasman Economic Area = highly integrated economic zone between Australia and New Zealand, founded on the 1983 Closer Economic Relations (CER) agreement, which eliminated almost all tariffs and quotas. It features free movement of people, mutual recognition of standards, and a single economic market (SEM) agenda focused on reducing regulatory barriers
cue = action or event that is a signal for sb to do sth; a few words or an action in a play that is a signal for another actor to do sth
China, Empire of the Middle = China's traditional name, Zhongguo (中國), meaning "Middle Kingdom," reflecting its historical self-perception as the centre of civilization, bridging the divine (Heaven) and the earthly world, a concept that evolved from referring to the central plains to the entire unified empire, influencing its worldview and cultural significance
frugality = using only as much money or food as is necessary
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>100</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>






<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260424</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Russian business landscape: a fertile desert awaiting water</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_title>Why Russians don't use their brains</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Interview with Izac Adizes by Vedomosti.ru
Why Russians don't use their brains<!-- Ицхак Адизеc -->
Watch the video.
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewEb_lAd0zc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewEb_lAd0zc</a>

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Bottoms Up - JH</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>B2</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>
<clog_book_unit>Business or pleasure</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>99</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Russian business landscape: a fertile desert awaiting water</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Interview with Izac Adizes by Vedomosti.ru
Why Russians don't use their brains<!-- Ицхак Адизеc -->
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewEb_lAd0zc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewEb_lAd0zc</a>

Watch the video.
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<instructions02><![CDATA[
<div align="left"><img src="mindmaps/russian_background_mindmap.png" width="90%" border="0" alt="Russian background mindmap"></div>
]]></instructions02>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>-->
<!--      Caucasus traits of character
pride &amp;self-esteem prevents people from accomplishing minor tasks
spontaneously
even a waiter will deny providing unsolicited help

instrumental adoption of children to satisfy egocentrism

Kudrin, a potential as a dinosaur for surviving current political terror & amp;vertical management style
a patriarch sharing modern values

no mature demand
lack of informed choice
-->
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>How has Russia’s historical development influenced its current trade practices?
(Euro-Asian heritage, Soviet legacy)</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ developed under Mongolian influence and adopted Asian practices
✓ built independent mentality without single dominant foreign model
✓ integrated haggling and bribery into business culture
✓ carries long-lasting marks from Soviet era
✓ combines European and Asian commercial behaviours
〆not fully aligned with Western standards
]]></ans>
<hint></hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are the characteristics of a patriarchal system of values?
</qs>
<ans>
✓ based on respect of the elder ones
〆responsibilities &amp; authority can't bypass age-related hierarchy
〆no initiative granted to the younger ones (who are not trusted to be accountable)
〆no ability to delegate
→ control through terror
→ principles of democracy irrelevant &amp; misunderstood by the masses
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How does the patriarchal system shape management and authority in Russian organisations?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ bases authority on age and seniority
✓ restricts initiative among younger employees
✓ limits delegation of responsibilities
✓ reinforces strict top-down decision making
✓ maintains control through fear in some cases
→ doesn't encourage democratic participation
]]></ans>
<hint>vertical management = top-down control structure
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What characteristics define the “golden youth” in Russia and their approach to responsibility?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ grew up in protected and privileged environments
✓ received education abroad and became cosmopolitan
✓ focused on pleasure and present moment lifestyle
✓ avoided responsibility and accountability
✓ take impulsive and risky decisions
→ haven't developed resilience or discipline, unlike previous generations?
]]></ans>
<hint>carpe diem = enjoy present moment
self-indulgent = focused on own pleasure
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How does the “new elite” differ from the golden youth in terms of mindset and ambitions?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ pursues continuous learning and self-improvement
✓ sets realistic and long-term objectives
✓ combines international outlook with local awareness
✓ shows determination and ambition
✓ seeks to improve conditions in Russia
〆can't fully escape corruption constraints?
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What role do the nouveaux-riches play in the Russian business culture?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ display wealth through visible luxury items
✓ influence social perception of success
✓ act unpredictably in business dealings
✓ lack clear purpose or strategic direction (offshore investments)
✓ repeat mistakes seen in other economies
〆don't provide stable or reliable leadership
]]></ans>
<hint>status symbols = items showing wealth
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What obstacles do Russian entrepreneurs face in developing their businesses?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ encounter complex bureaucracy and regulations
✓ deal with corruption at local levels
✓ adapt global practices to local conditions
✓ simplify products for immature markets
✓ rely on negotiation skills to survive
〆don't benefit from strong institutional support
]]></ans>
<hint>red tape = excessive bureaucracy
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do Russian consumers typically behave in the marketplace?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ follow trends and social pressure
✓ prioritise image and external perception
✓ show limited awareness of consumer rights
✓ spend heavily on non-essential goods
✓ act cautiously on important purchases
〆still not learning effectively from past mistakes?
]]></ans>
<hint>herd instinct = following others
keeping up appearances = trying to look successful
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is competition limited in many Russian industries?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ benefits from constant and strong demand
✓ offers similar products across markets
✓ provides inconsistent service quality
✓ ignores need for customer satisfaction
✓ avoids focus on repeat business
→ little pressure to innovate or improve
]]></ans>
<hint>omnipresent demand = demand everywhere
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What attitudes influence Russian politics in relation to economic change?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ scepticism towards political reform
✓ limited understanding of economics
✓ perceived wealth as result of opportunism
✓ distrust of both government and opposition
✓ reaction to economic crises
〆little belief in effective free market models
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is breaking the patriarchal cycle in Russia particularly challenging?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ remains embedded in historical traditions
✓ influences social and business structures deeply
✓ discourages radical reforms due to past experiences
✓ favours gradual rather than sudden changes
✓ maintains stability over transformation
〆doesn't support revolutionary approaches
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the main role of democracy in balancing Russian society?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ aims to maintain social stability
✓ prevents conflicts between groups
✓ balances interests of rich and poor
✓ supports fair distribution of resources
✓ encourages peaceful coexistence
〆doesn't eliminate inequalities completely
]]></ans>
<hint>equilibrium = balanced situation
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are the weaknesses of many Russian managers?
</qs>
<ans>〆middle managers are afraid of losing their jobs
→ they prefer terror &amp; micro-management to empowerment
〆middle managers hire staff they can control 
= they want to protect themselves 
〆middle managers don't usually train their subordinates to become their successors
→ higher management need to threaten middle managers with 30% penalties on their yearly bonus if they have no successor
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>98</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
patriarchy = society, system or country that is ruled or controlled by men
part &amp; parcel = necessary or important part; something necessary to a larger thing
to plunder = to steal things from a place, especially using force during a time of war
haggling = ~ (with sb) (over sth) arguing with sb in order to reach an agreement, especially about the price of sth
daunting = discouraging through fear; intimidating
self-indulgent = (disapproving) allowing yourself to have or do things that you like, especially when you do this too much or too often 
reckless = showing a lack of care about danger and the possible results of your actions
CSR = corporate social responsibility
herd instinct = natural tendency in people or animals to behave or think like other people or animals
thrifty = (approving) careful about spending money and not wasting things
tight-fisted = not willing to spend or give much money; mean; stingy
to splash out = to spend a lot of money on sth without counting
trustworthy = that you can rely on to be good, honest, sincere, etc.
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>97</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
If these issues <strike>won't be</strike> <strong>aren't | weren't</strong> controlled they would <strong>(will | would)</strong> be a mess
They're trying to <strike>fillful</strike> <strong>fulfil</strong> these instructions
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>


<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260420</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Why good leaders make you feel safe?</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Why good leaders make you feel safe | Simon Sinek
  
<em>What makes a great leader? Management theorist Simon Sinek suggests, it's someone who makes their employees feel secure, who draws staffers into a circle of trust. But creating trust and safety — especially in an uneven economy — means taking on big responsibility.</em>
Watch the video.
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Bottoms Up - JH</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>B2</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>
<clog_book_unit>Preparing for professional mobility</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>96</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Why good leaders make you feel safe?</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[Watch the video. Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<instructions02><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Why good leaders make you feel safe | Simon Sinek
  
<em>What makes a great leader? Management theorist Simon Sinek suggests, it's someone who makes their employees feel secure, who draws staffers into a circle of trust. But creating trust and safety — especially in an uneven economy — means taking on big responsibility.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo</a>]]></instructions02>
<html5_video>why_good_leaders_make_you_feel_safe_simon_sinek-lmyzmtpvodo.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Why was Captain Swenson recognised? [00:52]
</qs>
<ans>✓ ran into live fire when caught in an ambush in Afghanistan
✓ rescued the wounded
✓ pulled out the dead
= brave
→ reminiscent of a hero?
</ans>
<hint>to recognise = to express obligation, thanks, or gratitude for
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is remarkable about what Captain Swenson did? [01:36]
</qs>
<ans>✓ he kissed his wounded soldier who was being evacuated by helicopter
→ emotional intelligence?
</ans>
<hint>emotional intelligence = ability to understand, use, and manage your own emotions in positive ways to relieve stress, communicate effectively, empathize with others, overcome challenges and defuse conflict</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the difference in making sacrifices in the army and in business? [02:06]
</qs>
<ans>
✓ in the army, they're willing to sacrifice themselves so that others may gain
→ leaders are rewarded with a medal
✓ in business, leaders give bonuses to people who are ready to sacrifice others so that leaders may gain
= opposite action
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you know of - or believe that - soldiers are attracted by the ideology: having a vocation, giving a service to their country? Can employees in business be motivated in the same way? [02:30]
</qs>
<ans>〆their environment doesn't define how they act
✓ they would sacrifice themselves for you (if you can create the right environment)
→ employees, like soldiers, may work harder if well motivated, or inspired
→ create the right environment
</ans>
<hint>vocation = type of work or way of life that you believe is especially suitable for you
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is special about this environment? What are the 2 key ingredients? [03:01]
</qs>
<ans>✓ trust
✓ cooperation
≠ words or instructions
→ empathy
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the circle of safety? [03:52]
</qs>
<ans>✓ an area where the tribe of social animals collaborate together
→ feel safe
✓ protect against external danger
= feeling of trust &amp; cooperation
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How does the anecdote of the airport staff support the anti-thesis (i.e. situation in which you are not in the circle of safety)? [05:44]</qs>
<ans>〆if you don't follow the rules
→ lose your job
= don't trust their leaders
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What makes a good parent? How is this relevant to leaders? [06:36]
</qs>
<ans>✓ giving love
✓ ensuring education
✓ teaching discipline
✓ providing support to make great achievements
✓ giving opportunities to try and fail
→ be a role model?

How often should a manager give opportunities to try and fail?
→ create sandbox environments

How many leaders prepare their successors?
〆lack of talent management
〆little concern for knowledge management
= self-protection in Russia  
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is lifetime employment policy? [07:19]
</qs>
<ans>✓ don't lay off staff for performance issues (because you wouldn't lay off children either)
→ coach when there is an issue
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Would you sacrifice numbers to save people? [08:18]
</qs>
<ans>✓ in practice, reduce operational costs before labour costs because recruiting is time consuming
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the difference between head counts and heart counts? [09:25]
</qs>
<ans>✓ don't lay off staff during hard times
✓ people who feel safe will collaborate better &amp; spontaneously make compromises
= better to all suffer a little than one should suffer a lot
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How different are some of the recognised leaders at the top and unofficial leaders at the bottom? [10:22]
</qs>
<ans>✓ many leaders at the top feature only authority
〆they lack empathy
〆they are not trusted
  
✓ leaders at the bottom (usually) lack authority 
→ feature consideration for others
✓ they are trusted 
= create a safe environment
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why are some staff members ready to sacrifice themselves? [11:24]
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ because that's what their managers would do for them
= guarantee of a safe environment for all
≠ networking

Managers should not be fat cats.
<div align="center"><img src="pix/fat_cat_the_Subsidised_Mineowner.jpg" width="40%" alt="visual"></div>

→ don't make staff members feel like a cogwheel in the system, or just a pawn in a board game
= being Russian doesn't mean adhering to authoritarian management styles
]]></ans>
<hint>to adhere = to behave according to a particular law, rule, set of instructions, etc
fat cat = (informal, disapproving) person who earns, or who has, a lot of money (especially when compared to people who do not earn so much)
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!-- tbc w/ AS perhaps continue w/ mentoring & AI case studies similar to fast fitness... -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>95</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Introduction to management styles</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!-- <instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Are skills needed to be a female referee different from a male referee?
</qs>
<ans>✓ depends on gender role in a given country or corporate culture
</ans>
<hint>gender role = overt expression of attitudes that indicate to others the degree of your maleness or femaleness
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What management styles do you know of?
</qs>
<ans>✓ authoritative vs democratic
✓ empowering vs controlling
✓ directive vs laid-back &amp; laissez-faire
</ans>
<hint>laid-back = calm, and relaxed; seeming not to worry about anything
laissez-faire /,leɪseɪˈfɛə/ = allow to do
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are the advantages of empowering?
</qs>
<ans>✓ decentralised decision-making 
✓ less bureaucratic
✓ employees motivated by company ownership
</ans>
<hint>empowering = giving sb the power or authority to do sth
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are the characteristics of a strong leadership?
</qs>
<ans>✓ traditional, authoritarian manager
✓ visionary, charismatic leader
✓ decisions made in a top-down approach
</ans>
<hint>top-down = approach where an executive decision maker or other top person makes the decisions of how something should be done, from their level to lower levels in the hierarchy
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How would you define management by consensus?
</qs>
<ans>✓ process of consultation
✓ employees contribute to decision-making
</ans>
<hint>consensus = opinion that all members of a group agree with
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why should managers achieve consensual management with coaching &amp; mentoring?
</qs>
<ans>✓ be a role model
✓ senior managers groom 'future' managers
</ans>
<hint>role model = person that you admire and try to copy
to groom = sb (for / as sth) to prepare or train sb for an important job or position
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>94</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
vocation = type of work or way of life that you believe is especially suitable for you
to adhere = to behave according to a particular law, rule, set of instructions, etc

empowerment = to give sb the power or authority to do sth
consensus ~ (among sb) | ~ (about sth) | ~ (that ...) = an opinion that all members of a group agree with
consensual /kən'sensu:əl/ /kən'senʃu:əl/ = which people in general agree with 
decisive /dɪˈsaɪsɪv/ = very important for the final result of a particular situation; able to decide sth quickly and with confidence
to groom sb (for / as sth) = to prepare or train sb for an important job or position
laid-back = calm, and relaxed; seeming not to worry about anything
fat cat = (informal, disapproving) person who earns, or who has, a lot of money (especially when compared to people who do not earn so much)
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>93</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
Some people do their work according to their <strike>table</strike> <strong>job description</strong>
If they <strike>wouldn't</strike> <strong>didn't</strong> act like this they wouldn't be safe
They (buffaloes and zebras) can <strike>afford them</strike> <strong>allow themselves | take the risk of being</strong> to be together
You can't produce what <strike>do</strike> you do
We're spending money <strike>for</strike> <strong>on</strong> that
It's better to <strike>conserve</strike> <strong>keep | retain</strong> talent than lay off
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260417</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>lc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title></clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Why good leaders make you feel safe | Simon Sinek
  
<em>What makes a great leader? Management theorist Simon Sinek suggests, it's someone who makes their employees feel secure, who draws staffers into a circle of trust. But creating trust and safety — especially in an uneven economy — means taking on big responsibility.</em>
Watch the video.
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>92</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[

]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260413</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Ideologies in Iran vs Russia</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Why good leaders make you feel safe | Simon Sinek
  
<em>What makes a great leader? Management theorist Simon Sinek suggests, it's someone who makes their employees feel secure, who draws staffers into a circle of trust. But creating trust and safety — especially in an uneven economy — means taking on big responsibility.</em>
Watch the video.
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyZMtPVodo</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>91</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Is there a genuine ideology behind Russia's war?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Can looking at the geopolitical situation in Iran help fathom the ideology behind Russia's war?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Answer the questions
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02> -->
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Use rules, general, lesson_structure, format, qa_formatting, answers, hints, final_checklist from the Business English Lesson Generator — Prompt Template to discuss the following topic and answer the following questions: 

Topic: 
Ideologies in Iran vs Russia 

Questions: 
How different are ideologies in Russia and Iran? 
To what extent are patriotism or nationalism in Russia comparable to radical religious ideology in Iran? 
Can ideology in Russia be strong enough to support further economic &amp; cultural isolation from the West? 
Isn't Russian state intervention in market forces excessive &amp; restricting liberties? 
How long will Russians be willing to accept their government's narrative?
</key>
<qa>
<qs>How different are ideologies in Russia and Iran in terms of governance and societal influence?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ Russian ideology largely state-centred and pragmatic
✓ Iran ideology underpinned by religious doctrine

✓ Russian system predicated upon nationalism and sovereignty
✓ Iran governance contingent upon clerical authority

✓ role of religion minimal in Russia but central in Iran
→ ideological control mechanisms differ significantly
]]></ans>
<hint>governance = way a country is controlled or directed
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>To what extent can Russian patriotism be compared with religious ideology in Iran?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ acknowledge both are underpinned by identity narratives

✓ Iranian ideology hinges on religious legitimacy
✓ heirs of 5000-year old culture
→ Iranians willing to die to become a martyr

✓ Russian patriotism derivative of shorter historical and geopolitical factors
✓ today's Russian identity is only ~ 600 years old
→ patriotism is perhaps more of a government tool

〆mobilisation tools differ across contexts
✓ emotional appeal present in both systems
→ equivalence limited due to different foundations
]]></ans>
<hint>to hinge on = to depend decisively on one factor
martyr /ˈmɑ:tə/ = person who suffers very much or is killed because of their religious or political beliefs
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Can ideology in Russia be strong enough to support further isolation from the West?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ feasibility contingent upon economic resilience
〆may lose the AI race even if partnering with or relying on Chinese LLMs

✓ narrative premised on sovereignty and independence
〆controlled media &amp; freedom of expression
→ success hinges on public acceptance of the government's message<!--i.e. propaganda -->

〆potential downstream impacts on living standards
→ narrower assortment of goods &amp; feeling of being unfairly denied access to a given lifestyle

✓ warn of second- and third-order consequences for economy
〆fewer opportunities for divergent thinking
〆sub-conscious resentment towards western trends
✓ sanctions bring about creative solutions to circumvent artificial obstacles

〆Russians having been given a taste of the western lifestyle are less prone to giving up
〆public opinion unlikely to continue such structural changes unless under coercion of the government 
→ sustainability remains uncertain over the long term
]]></ans>
<hint>to be contingent upon = to depend on a condition
downstream impact = later consequences in process
coercion = action of making sb do sth that they do not want to do, using force or threatening to use force
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Is Russian state intervention in market forces excessive and restrictive?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ intervention predicated upon strategic control
✓ benefits underpinned by stability concerns
✓ critics claim restrictions open a can of worms
✓ policies will set off a chain reaction in markets
✓ potential fallout for private sector growth
→ impact depends on balance between control and freedom
]]></ans>
<hint>to open a can of worms = to create complicated problems
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How long might citizens accept government narratives, and what factors influence this?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ acceptance contingent upon economic conditions
✓ trust hinges on perceived stability
✓ narrative persistence is down to media control
✓ dissent could send shockwaves through society
✓ contagion effect in spread of alternative views
→ tolerance depends on wider ramifications of policies
]]></ans>
<hint>dissent = fact of having or expressing opinions that are different from those that are officially accepted
to be down to = be caused by specific factor
contagion effect = tendency to spread quickly
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>90</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
governance = way a country is controlled or directed
martyr /ˈmɑ:tə/ = person who suffers very much or is killed because of their religious or political beliefs
to hinge on = to depend decisively on one factor
martyr /ˈmɑ:tə/ = person who suffers very much or is killed because of their religious or political beliefs
coercion = action of making sb do sth that they do not want to do, using force or threatening to use force
to be contingent upon = to depend on condition
downstream impact = later consequences in process
to open a can of worms = to create complicated problems
dissent = fact of having or expressing opinions that are different from those that are officially accepted
to be down to = be caused by specific factor
contagion effect = tendency to spread quickly
to fathom ~ sb/sth (out) = to understand or find an explanation for sth; noun - a unit for measuring the depth of water, equal to 6 feet or 1.8 metres
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>89</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
There is a small village <strike>nearby</strike> <strong>near | close to</strong> Budapest
Once I<strike>'ve been to</strike> <strong>was in</strong>  Taiwan
China is a self <strike>dependent</strike> <strong>sufficient</strong> country
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
authoritarianism /ə,θɔ:rə'teri:ə,nizəm/
heir /ɛə/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>





<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260410</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Michelle Obama: A passionate, personal case for education</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> A passionate, personal case for education
Michelle Obama
Elizabeth G. Anderson School
April 2009
<em>Speaking to an audience of students, US First Lady Michelle Obama reminds each one to take their education seriously -- and never take it for granted. This new, brilliant generation, she tells us, is the one that could close the gap between the world as it is and the world as it should be.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/michelle_obama_a_passionate_personal_case_for_education">https://www.ted.com/talks/michelle_obama_a_passionate_personal_case_for_education</a>


→ watch the video
→ answer the questions
<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Politics</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>88</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Michelle Obama: A passionate, personal case for education</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>How would you convince generation Alpha to fight for a better world?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<span class="show_key">
✓ Generation Alpha generally includes those born after 2010
→ choose someone perhaps slightly older who represents their values &amp; questions the establishment

e.g. Greta Thunberg 
✓ embodies environmental concerns of Generation Z (b. 2003)
✓ acts as a leader for her peers and the younger, Gen Alpha generation
✓ belongs to the cohort born roughly between the mid-1990s and early 2000s
→ often acts as a key figure representing youth climate activism
</span>

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> A passionate, personal case for education
Michelle Obama
Elizabeth G. Anderson School
April 2009
<em>Speaking to an audience of students, US First Lady Michelle Obama reminds each one to take their education seriously -- and never take it for granted. This new, brilliant generation, she tells us, is the one that could close the gap between the world as it is and the world as it should be.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/michelle_obama_a_passionate_personal_case_for_education">https://www.ted.com/talks/michelle_obama_a_passionate_personal_case_for_education</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video>michelle_obama_ted_talk_a_passionate_personal_case_for_education.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
This is my first trip, my first foreign trip as a first lady. Can you believe that? (Applause) And while this is not my first visit to the U.K., I have to say that I am glad that this is my first official visit. The special relationship between the United States and the U.K. is based not only on the relationship between governments, but the common language and the values that we share, and I'm reminded of that by watching you all today. During my visit I've been especially honored to meet some of Britain's most extraordinary women -- women who are paving the way for all of you.

And I'm honored to meet you, the future leaders of Great Britain and this world. And although the circumstances of our lives may seem very distant, with me standing here as the First Lady of the United States of America, and you, just getting through school, I want you to know that we have very much in common. For nothing in my life's path would have predicted that I'd be standing here as the first African-American First Lady of the United States of America. There is nothing in my story that would land me here. I wasn't raised with wealth or resources or any social standing to speak of. I was raised on the South Side of Chicago. That's the real part of Chicago. And I was the product of a working-class community. My father was a city worker all of his life, and my mother was a stay-at-home mom. And she stayed at home to take care of me and my older brother. Neither of them attended university. My dad was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in the prime of his life. But even as it got harder for him to walk and get dressed in the morning -- I saw him struggle more and more -- my father never complained about his struggle. He was grateful for what he had. He just woke up a little earlier and worked a little harder. And my brother and I were raised with all that you really need: love, strong values and a belief that with a good education and a whole lot of hard work, that there was nothing that we could not do.

02:43
I am an example of what's possible when girls from the very beginning of their lives are loved and nurtured by the people around them. I was surrounded by extraordinary women in my life: grandmothers, teachers, aunts, cousins, neighbors, who taught me about quiet strength and dignity. And my mother, the most important role model in my life, who lives with us at the White House and helps to care for our two little daughters, Malia and Sasha. She's an active presence in their lives, as well as mine, and is instilling in them the same values that she taught me and my brother: things like compassion, and integrity, and confidence, and perseverance -- all of that wrapped up in an unconditional love that only a grandmother can give.

03:43
I was also fortunate enough to be cherished and encouraged by some strong male role models as well, including my father, my brother, uncles and grandfathers. The men in my life taught me some important things, as well. They taught me about what a respectful relationship should look like between men and women. They taught me about what a strong marriage feels like: that it's built on faith and commitment and an admiration for each other's unique gifts. They taught me about what it means to be a father and to raise a family. And not only to invest in your own home but to reach out and help raise kids in the broader community.

04:33
And these were the same qualities that I looked for in my own husband, Barack Obama. And when we first met, one of the things that I remember is that he took me out on a date. And his date was to go with him to a community meeting. (Laughter) I know, how romantic. (Laughter) But when we met, Barack was a community organizer. He worked, helping people to find jobs and to try to bring resources into struggling neighborhoods. As he talked to the residents in that community center, he talked about two concepts. He talked about "the world as it is" and "the world as it should be." And I talked about this throughout the entire campaign. What he said, that all too often, is that we accept the distance between those two ideas. And sometimes we settle for the world as it is, even when it doesn't reflect our values and aspirations. But Barack reminded us on that day, all of us in that room, that we all know what our world should look like. We know what fairness and justice and opportunity look like. We all know. And he urged the people in that meeting, in that community, to devote themselves to closing the gap between those two ideas, to work together to try to make the world as it is and the world as it should be, one and the same.

06:09
And I think about that today because I am reminded and convinced that all of you in this school are very important parts of closing that gap. You are the women who will build the world as it should be. You're going to write the next chapter in history. Not just for yourselves, but for your generation and generations to come. And that's why getting a good education is so important. That's why all of this that you're going through -- the ups and the downs, the teachers that you love and the teachers that you don't -- why it's so important. Because communities and countries and ultimately the world are only as strong as the health of their women. And that's important to keep in mind.

06:59
Part of that health includes an outstanding education. The difference between a struggling family and a healthy one is often the presence of an empowered woman or women at the center of that family. The difference between a broken community and a thriving one is often the healthy respect between men and women who appreciate the contributions each other makes to society. The difference between a languishing nation and one that will flourish is the recognition that we need equal access to education for both boys and girls.

07:39
And this school, named after the U.K.'s first female doctor, and the surrounding buildings named for Mexican artist Frida Kahlo, Mary Seacole, the Jamaican nurse known as the "black Florence Nightingale," and the English author, Emily Bronte, honor women who fought sexism, racism and ignorance, to pursue their passions to feed their own souls. They allowed for no obstacles. As the sign said back there, "without limitations." They knew no other way to live than to follow their dreams. And having done so, these women moved many obstacles. And they opened many new doors for millions of female doctors and nurses and artists and authors, all of whom have followed them. And by getting a good education, you too can control your own destiny.

08:44
Please remember that. If you want to know the reason why I'm standing here, it's because of education. I never cut class. Sorry, I don't know if anybody is cutting class. I never did it. I loved getting As. I liked being smart. I liked being on time. I liked getting my work done. I thought being smart was cooler than anything in the world. And you too, with these same values, can control your own destiny. You too can pave the way. You too can realize your dreams, and then your job is to reach back and to help someone just like you do the same thing. History proves that it doesn't matter whether you come from a council estate or a country estate.

09:37
Your success will be determined by your own fortitude, your own confidence, your own individual hard work. That is true. That is the reality of the world that we live in. You now have control over your own destiny. And it won't be easy -- that's for sure. But you have everything you need. Everything you need to succeed, you already have, right here.

10:06
My husband works in this big office. They call it the Oval Office. In the White House, there's the desk that he sits at -- it's called the Resolute desk. It was built by the timber of Her Majesty's Ship Resolute and given by Queen Victoria. It's an enduring symbol of the friendship between our two nations. And its name, Resolute, is a reminder of the strength of character that's required not only to lead a country, but to live a life of purpose, as well. And I hope in pursuing your dreams, you all remain resolute, that you go forward without limits, and that you use your talents -- because there are many; we've seen them; it's there -- that you use them to create the world as it should be. Because we are counting on you. We are counting on every single one of you to be the very best that you can be. Because the world is big. And it's full of challenges. And we need strong, smart, confident young women to stand up and take the reins.

11:19
We know you can do it. We love you. Thank you so much.
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why does M.Obama say the following?
<em>For nothing in my life's path would have predicted that I'd be standing here as the first African-American First Lady of the United States of America.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ wasn't raised with wealth or resources or any social standing to speak of
✓ was the product of a working-class community
✓ father was a city worker 
✓ mother was a stay-at-home mum
✓ none of her family members attended university
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What did M.Obama learn from people around her?</qs>
<ans>✓ role models of how to love &amp; nurture
✓ was taught quiet strength &amp; dignity
✓ was instilled compassion, integrity, confidence, perseverance by her grand mother
</ans>
<hint>to instil ~ sth (in / into sb) = to gradually make sb feel, think or behave in a particular way over a period of time
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How did the male role models impact her life?</qs>
<ans>✓ taught her what a respectful relationship should look like between men and women
✓ gave the example of what a strong marriage feels like
e.g. built on faith and commitment, admiration for each other's unique gifts
✓ showed what it means to be a father and raise a family
✓ demonstrate the duty to both invest in your own home  and reach out &amp; help raise kids in the broader community
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What were the two concepts Barack Obama talked about? What was his message?</qs>
<ans>1) "the world as it is" 
2) "the world as it should be" 
✓ we accept the distance between those two ideas
〆sometimes we settle for the world as it is, even when it doesn't reflect our values and aspirations
→ devote ourselves to closing the gap between those two ideas
</ans>
<hint>to settle for = to accept sth that is not completely satisfactory but is the best that is available
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Do you agree with the following statement? Why / why not?
<em>Communities and countries, and ultimately the world are only as strong as the health of their women.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ Michelle Obama embodies rather traditional values about the importance of a family cell
= more collective, arguably patriarchal approach

✓ Greta Thunberg might be easier a role model to identify with
= more individual, Western approach
→ synonymous of a more balanced femininity vs masculinity cultural dimension per Hoefstode model

In the word as it should be...
⇒ women may close the gap and/or outperform men

〆In Islam, women are considered spiritual equals to men, with both genders equally responsible for upholding religious obligations like prayer and fasting, and they are promised equal rewards for good deeds. Islam grants women distinct rights—including inheriting property, receiving a marriage dowry (mahr), and pursuing education—while traditionally focusing their primary, but not exclusive, role on managing the household and nurturing the family
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.alislam.org/articles/role-of-women-in-an-islamic-society/#:~:text=Islam%20gave%20women%20rights%20that,for%20various%20forms%20of%20mistreatment.">https://www.alislam.org/articles/role-of-women-in-an-islamic-society/#:~:text=Islam%20gave%20women%20rights%20that,for%20various%20forms%20of%20mistreatment.</a>
= example of propaganda?...

In the word as it should be...
⇒ women are not expected to close the gap, and certainly not allowed to surpass men
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>87</mdlid>
<activity_id>20260410-0950</activity_id>
<activity_title>Use of 3rd person plural determiner with unknown gender</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>grammar</activity_type>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
The traffic officer took off [his | her | their] helmet
Is the traffic officer a man or a woman?
〆we don't know
→ his or her 
✓ their
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>86</mdlid>
<activity_id>20260410-0953</activity_id>
<activity_id>20220817-1127</activity_id>
<activity_title>One meaning 'you' in a formal, impersonal context</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>grammar</activity_type>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
What is a more formal way of saying 'You shouldn't smoke'?
〆They shouldn't smoke
✓ One should not smoke
one = you
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>85</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>Equity vs equality</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<methodology>How to distinguish equity from equality</methodology>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<display>3</display> 
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[<strong>Are you sure you know how to avoid micro insults? Are you really fair to everyone?</strong>

What is the difference between equality and equity?
<span class="show_key">
equality = each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities

equity = recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome
</span>
<div align="center" class="zoom_1_2"><img src="pix/equality_vs_equity.jpg" width="50%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>

→ match the descriptions with the categories
→ which situation(s) in the descriptions may call for better equity, or vice-versa?
→ which situation(s) in the descriptions might be considered as politically incorrect, or be perceived as a micro insult? 
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_width_percentage>45</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>8</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
<img style="width: 150px; background-size: cover;" src="pix/equality.jpg" border="1" alt="visual aid">
<img style="width: 150px; background-size: cover;" src="pix/equity.jpg" border="1" alt="visual aid">
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;3;4
2;5;6;7;8
</js_droppables>
<!--
<activity_contents><![CDATA[every person gets the same meal at the cafeteria
elder students get a bigger piece of pizza than younger ones
the teacher gives the same amount of homework to all students
the school director asks a teacher to substitute for a colleague on sick leave
the teacher provides additional lessons for students in difficulties
the teacher gives extra homework to the best students
the school has different rules for boys and girls
the Ministry of education offers allowances for single parents &amp; low-income families
]]></activity_contents>
-->
<activity_contents><![CDATA[every person gets the same meal at the cafeteria
elder team members receive a bigger bonus than younger ones
the team lead allocates the same amount of work to all team members
the head of dept asks you to substitute for a colleague on sick leave
the manager provides additional training for junior employees 
the mentor gives extra help to a mentee
corporate policy has different rules for men and women
corporate policy offers allowances for single parents &amp; expats
]]></activity_contents>
<key></key>
</clog_activity>

<!-- rescheduled from previous lesson -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>84</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions>You have been invited to debate about the glass ceiling in business and politics.
→ practise the subjunctive
→ recycle new expressions and language</instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You don't believe the glass ceiling is still a reality in the 21st century.</task>
<ans>✓ nowadays boards across the world recommend HR be aware of discriminatory practices
✓ they have been advising businesses be a role model for decades
✓ finding an inclusive environment in either politics or business needn't be such a gruelling process any more
✓ best practice suggests any CEO go back to the drawing board if they exhibit bias ← subjunctive
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You have witnessed multiple cases of gender discrimination in both international organisations and joint ventures.</task>
<ans>✓ you'd expect remuneration be more transparent but...
✓ it is advisable boards review their policies
✓ equal rights are not a given, even in political organisations!
✓ whoever you are, you'd still need to elbow your way in
✓ pick your fights
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>83</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
fortitude = courage shown by sb who is suffering great pain or facing great difficulties
to instil ~ sth (in / into sb) = to gradually make sb feel, think or behave in a particular way over a period of time
to surpass = to do or be better than sb/sth
to settle for = to accept sth that is not completely satisfactory but is the best that is available
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>82</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
(...) children <strike>are overcoming</strike> <strong>are outperforming | surpassing</strong> their parents
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260330</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist | Making suggestions</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist 
→ watch the video
→ answer the questions (cont. from qs 5)
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Politics</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>81</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune
<em>Christine Lagarde on the challenges encountered and lessons learned becoming the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Introduction
well good evening we are so delighted to
have m madame lagard um and I we've
tried a few times before and I want to
give a good shout out to our mutual
friend Ambassador Sue Schwab for
convincing you to
come so Andy shared with us obviously
needless to say there's a lot of
financial crisis issues that we have to
deal with um in this conversation but as
is our prerogative at most powerful
Women's Summit we want to get to know
you a little bit first and Andy started
that process and of course everybody
knows the firsts about you the first
chair of bigam mcken Law Firm first uh
uh Finance Minister of a G8 country
first female IMF um director but there
are a lot of little known facts about
your time here in America um you did
work for William Cohen where you you
opened mail during the Watergate period
uh where you got to from French Canadian
citizens from Maine and you had to do
impeach Nixon don't impeach Nixon that
was sort of your job um the other
interesting thing about about you is
that you spent a year at Holton arms you
were pretty daring you smoked cigarettes
you use chamomile in your hair to make
it
blonder um you ate copia amounts of
yogurt but here's the most interesting
fact to me you hated math and in
fact in the yearbook you said please no
more
math how did someone who hates math
become the most important woman on the
International Financial
[Laughter]
scene well thank you very much for the
Interview process for IMF job
introduction uh I did and actually I
think I still do um but I think the way
math was taught both at Halton and prior
to that in in in French school was
certainly not conducive to uh you know
people not so inclined to actually like
math um when I when I then studied law
and and economics actually a bit um
there are lots of things that things
that I liked about having a more
scientific approach but I still don't
like math to this day and uh I'm
delighted that I have really fantastic
econometrist experts in modeling people
who know it all about math and I listen
to them and I pick their brain it gives
us all hope as math
haters so you know when you went to
interview for this the IMF job it wasn't
just a given I mean you went through a
pretty grueling process can you describe
that
well the process had to do with um
having the support of as many countries
as possible and um there were a few
competitors to begin with the most
serious one was my friend Austin Ken who
is now the governor of the Central Bank
of Mexico so he was zigzagging the world
in One Direction and I was zigzagging
the world in the other direction to make
sure that we did not meet uh and yet we
had to cover the same essentially the
same authorities and the same countries
around the world so I never traveled as
extensively as I did at that time and
then that was followed once the sort of
the short list was was arrived at that
was followed by an interview with with
members of the board which was quite
quite an experience because that board
still today only has one it's a board of
24 members and there is only one woman
on the board who is there are a few
alternates but as far as members are
concerned there's only one female member
and that's the US Representative but
that day uh Meg had to attend the
article for review with Treasury and and
fed so she was not sitting at the table
as a result of which I was interviewed
by 24
men which was you know an interesting
phenomenon when you are yourself
Minister of Finance you've handled the
presidency by front of the G20 you've
gone through the crisis of 2008 2009 and
there you are facing you know 24 very
cous respect respectful and nice men um
it came as a shock yeah and was did you
have to cram I mean was it a difficult
learning process to get through
that it was exhausting because prior to
the 24 U board setting I had to spend
half an hour with each of the 24 over a
course of two two days so that was that
was a bit so nothing comes easy even in
your life no no no and it's interesting
I some career choice choices have been
made or at least one was made for you in
that the male dominated um French school
that and I that that turns out French
politicians and and bureaucrats and so
forth you were turned down twice by that
school um talk about that but also some
career choices that decisions that
you've had to make along the way and
what was the best advice you ever
got well I think having been turned down
twice first time for incompetency the
second for um for having missed the
deadline what do you mean by that
incompetency in what well I was I wasn't
prepared enough I hadn't studied hard
enough and I was I was in love that year
so I spent a lot more
time
so and the second time around I I missed
the deadline and I think that was a you
know missed you know whether that was
a good turnout of of things or not I
don't know but fce to say that I went
back a few years later and uh I was
asked to give a speech to those young
bright kids from Ina and I have to say
that that day I felt really really
powerful you know I had flunked and
there I was coming to tell them about
the uh legalization of society or some
really obscure matter that they had no
interest in actually um but you know two
things that I take away from that is you
failed
somewhere you know bounce back get on
with it have a few drinks or whatever uh
takes you away from that but move on
don't don't don't don't you know start
um don't feel sorry about yourself don't
lose confidence just move on move to
something else um the second time I felt
exactly the same is when I I interviewed
in Paris at the time for one of the top
uh law firms and and I had all the
credentials and I had done all the right
things and the resume was fine and I was
behaving properly and all the rest of it
and the hiring partner who was also the
managing partner said to me well we'll
we'll we'll take you we'll take you as
an associate but don't expect ever to
make partnership and that was a really
really very high standing you know
excellent law firm and I said well why
is that that was back in 7 in 79 and he
said well because you're a woman
so again you know I packed my things and
I just run I didn't want to have
anything to do with these people so
sometimes you have to pick your fight
and and really persist but on other
occasions if people don't deserve you
just go move on
yeah did you get advice along the way or
Advice from mentors
did you create your advice
you know in those days uh there were not
many uh not much by way of mentoring
coaching and and support so I had uh I
had my mother to support me and she was
a she was an extraordinary uh support I
and you lost your father when you were
just 16 yeah and I constantly opposed my
mother but she was nonetheless a great
support and I didn't really know it but
she was a role model and I constantly
had my fights with her but that's we we
often do that daughters and mother's
relationships are complicated
um but then I was hired by a a female
partner at Becka McKenzie and she was a
role model for me she was uh she was a
strongest she was in my view the best
lawyer in the uh in the firm and she was
always discreetly in those days you had
to do things quite discreetly she would
support the young female Associates and
elegant I think you said she was she was
yeah yeah always yeah um you I'm going
to let you say this in French you've
referred to this that sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile so that's a phrase
I I believe you learned during
synchronized swimming a sport that you
took up which is interestingly enough
you took it up in 1968 when the schools
were shut down over a student protest
right um but you went into synchronized
swimming right um you've also said that
as a woman you have to Elbow your way in
what's an example in recent years or
especially at the IMF where you've had
to apply both those or either of those
precepts you know I'm not sure I would
say elbow your way in because I in that
there is something of you know sort of
push people out of your way I think you
can very much uh progress and and make
your way as hton would say in
wakam if you remember yeah um for those
Stand your ground
who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day
basis it's you know I'll I'll I'll find
my way if I don't find it I will make it
so I think you can actually make your
way you can you can um Follow Your
Destiny without necessarily being
aggressive without pushing people you
can you can let other people progress as
well along the way but you should not
shy away from the things that you are
you feel strongly about and I'll give
you an example when we had um you know
we had to deal with Greece uh quite a
lot in the last few years and back two
years ago we had great difficulties is
about you know what was the next step
and was the debt sustainable or not and
over what period of time would it become
sustainable and there was a lot of
um a lot of disagreement a lot of
controversy a lot of political ganging
uh on on that particular topic but I
knew we we were right I knew we had
checked the numbers times and and again
and I knew that the debt sustainability
analysis that we were producing was
sound solid and and and was a good
principle on which to build to help that
country restore it the situation so I
stood my ground and when Angela Merkel
said oh Christine you know how can you
be so certain a debt sustainability
analysis is only a debt sustainability
analysis after all and I said yeah but
that's what where you want to Anchor
everything you do and if you throw you
know zillion in a country you want to
have a good anchoring point so that to
me was a bit of a defining moment when
we stood our ground other members of the
troa were not necessarily as convinced
as we were but it wasn't elbowing my way
it was saying we've done it we've
reviewed it it's it's solid in terms of
analysis and we have to build around it
and you got some heat for that and you
got some heat for suggesting that the
Greek um the Greek style of paying taxes
probably wasn't up to enough and you got
some heat when you said that the
European Banks were under capitalized
let's take that sharp eye to Europe
right now and tell us what needs to be
done a lot needs to be done but I want
to because it's easy to do to to go for
the Euro bashing that that's that's been
the game for the last two years and uh
they have done an awful lot for people
who don't understand Europe they don't
they don't understand what they've done
but you know I've been Finance Minister
for four years and they have done a lot
what they need to do today is keep up
keep up the work keep up the reform that
they have started doing you know that's
the case for product and service Market
it's the case for labor market it's the
case particularly uh in the uh in in the
banking sector there's a lot of uh
fragmentation still going on there is
not a good monetary transmission going
on they have to work on that they have
to continue the job that they have
started they will be doing a lot of um
what they call balance sheet assessment
asset quality review stress testing and
all the rest of it I don't think we
should start from the basis that then
they're going to do a bad job we should
give them the credit of wanting to do it
seriously wanting to coordinate the work
from the ECB where Mario Mario dragy has
done an extraordinary job to rescue that
zone but now that they they want to do
it it's going to be messy there will be
obstacles there will be uh hiccups on
the way there will be bumps on the road
the media will say how terrible it is at
the end of the
day they will make it I'm convinced of
it and I think that there is the
political will the political urge to
actually keep it together those people
some of them have suffered in their
flesh in their family from what's
happened uh back 70 years ago they're
not going to let it drop like that
because of lack of Courage their courage
will be eventually there to to respond
to the uh the challenge it's a huge
challenge you bring 18 countries
together I'm talking about the Euro Zone
here you bring 18 countries with 18
different flags 18 different national
anthems 18 different defense and you ask
them to have one single currency one
single set of fiscal policies that are
compatible with each other and to bring
their banking system Under One Roof with
one resolution system it's a a job yeah
Time is short
I I'd love to go beyond this there's so
much more to say about this but um time
is short so we do have to uh turn your
attention a little closer to this town
um I thought of your turn your your
precept uh grit my teeth when you had
all the ministers here this weekend and
you watched what was going on on the
hill um I wonder you know but you've
also spent a lot of time here and
understand the political system here
were you not sure explaining it or
tearing your hair out or you don't you
don't you don't understand it go
ahead you know what what was complicated
Unconventional monetary policy
this week actually is that we had about
300 Ministers of finance and governance
of Central Bank from all all around the
world and we had you know we had a focus
which was essentially unconventional
monetary policy and consequences for the
rest of the world how do we develop
anchor the recovery how do we make sure
that Emerging Markets are going to
continue to do well without suffering
from tapering and d d d and and the only
thing that was on their mind was when is
this going to end what what is this
discussion about the debt ceiling and it
was it it really uh completely
overwhelmed the discussion and it's it's
Debt ceiling
believe me it's it's difficult to
explain u i mean you can explain the the
the the sort of direct fiscal
consequences you can try to imagine what
the indirect consequences will be you
can try to speculate about what a
message will be on the markets you can
imagine the accident you can assume that
it's going to be worse than previous
events but it's difficult to explain the
rationale behind it and you've warned of
course over the last couple days of
massive disruption if Thursday passes
and um there isn't a deal but what if
there is a deal which most likely will
happen where the deadlines just pushed
off for another two months another three
months doesn't that create an
uncertainty in the markets in and of
itself what's the danger of putting off
the deadline what going to be to put
Susan Collins and her friends back back
US economy
and Senator kobar yes uh back to the
drawing board yet again because I think
that uh it it will reactivate the same
sort of trepidation anxiety and and
worries what's amazing is that the
United States of America first largest
economy in the world is still and will
probably continue to be regarded as a as
a safe heaven to which can flow back
when there is trouble now you know it's
a bit like a rubber band when you you
pull you pull you pull you pull it works
it works it works and but who wants to
take the risk of that breaking so again
so there's danger to even putting off
the deadline till a January or you just
reactivate the same debate over right
and is there a danger to the economy the
US economy and the world economy by not
addressing the
debt
US debt
mean and I don't mean like I don't I
mean like not not you know taking steps
to address the US debt did you consider
that a a a damper on the economic
growth yeah that that's I mean it's it's
a it's the most serious thing that could
happen if if it is not addressed if it's
not um tackled tackled it it
will it will be
um very very damaging and not just for
the US economy for for all economies I
guess I mean like in you know reform to
you know bring spending and and and and
borrowing into line do you consider that
is the well that's that's another debate
you know I think the most critical one
is the issue of the debt sealing okay
that's the issue of you know default no
default what's a technical default
what's a real default and so on and so
forth but so that's what you're talking
that's the most urgent matter the rest
the fiscal policy of the United States
of America I summarize it for my simple
as um you know slow down but hurry
Fiscal policy
up and describe that well slowdown means
um no brutal um heavy duty uh fiscal
consolidation in the short run because
you're going to prevent recovery from
taking roots and and cons and and
strengthening but hurry up to take the
measures now that are going to deal with
the um the the long-term liabilities
that will come to haunt the United
States back in 2020 whether it's
entitlement or whether it's high
interests that will come to haunt the
economy in the in in 2020 if nothing is
done before so that's why we say hurry
up do do it now because it will produce
results in the years to come and it will
address the situation that would
otherwise be very difficult in 2020
there's a lot of talk about a new normal
in the US and in frankly in the global
economy where we're going to have um
even when we have econ economic growth
it's not going to be followed by job
growth do you see unemployment rates
getting to pre-recession
levels and at what
Unemployment
point if you look at numbers in this
country and if you look at unemployment
numbers it has progressed enormously
it's gone from the highest at 10% down
to 7.3% so take granted the
participation rate is probably lower and
the number that we should also look at
is employment numbers
uh but there has been progress and and
jobs are being created it's the same in
other countries not very fast in in
Europe and in the Euro Zone in
particular but U you know there are
signs of of Hope where those jobs will
be what will be the job content how the
economic model is going to change uh to
you know to what uh business model are
we heading to I think we we are facing
huge transitions at the moment and um
that better have because otherwise we're
not just facing economic problems we'll
be facing social problems and you've
warned about um a rush to the exit for
the fed's what you call unconventional
monetary policies $85 billion a month in
in the QE program um is that something
you communicated to Ben banki before
their decision to stay the
course you know central banks are
Central Banks
independent um but what I have said
including in Jackson Hall where all
Central bankers get together is
that given that the fed's decisions has
impact across the world it would be
appropriate not just to communicate well
uh not just to gradually phase out but
also to cooperate with other Central
Bankers so that they understand what
precautions they have to take uh what
consequences uh it will be for them and
they can prepare better so so I'm not
sure they all happy to to cooperate I
think I think they would be well advised
to do so but and I know you wanted to
mention um the IMF came out with a
gender study which is the first time I
believe that you've looked at the impact
of gender in the world economy um can
you talk about Japan in particular was
an interesting case study of what for
cultural reasons women aren't in that
economy to the level they are other in
other industrialized countries what has
that done to growth in Japan
I'm looking at it the other way what
Growth in Japan
could it give to growth uh in Japan and
we we just recently published for the
first time a study that is called women
work and the economy but we also did a
special chapter on Japan because Japan
has a very specific issue they have an
aging population they're not
particularly um immigration prone they
say the least and currently Japanese
women are not participating in society
as much as the average oecd country so
the resources that the Japanese people
can tap into are the Japanese women but
for all sorts of reasons including
cultural lack of um institutions that
can help with uh child care and uh and a
general sort of attitude of society
towards uh female participation it's not
happening now as a follow-up to that
study that we published exactly a year
ago I'm pleased to report that maybe not
attributable to us but prime minister
Abbe has made it part of his budget and
commitment to actually really fund child
care centers in Japan and to encourage
women to join the workforce they are far
better educated than Japanese male uh
they really can contribute to uh the
growth of society and by our account and
I don't claim the math credit to it but
the teams are are doing it the the GDP
of Japan could increase by about 9% just
as a result of their participation and
that before the end of the decade so
that's really help important two more
Quotas
quick questions before we get the cane
um you and quick answer to this you've
gone from describing quotas for women in
EUR in terms of Europe uh for women
board members is offensive to saying it
should be a temporary measure at least
correct what should be a temporary
measure I'm sorry quotas for um women
and board members yes sorry on you
Europe we're back to Europe real quick
yeah yeah yeah so you think they're
important as a temporary measure but
look it's it's working um when when I
was Finance Minister we uh supported a a
bill that went through uh that requires
that there be at least 20% women on the
board of companies uh by 2014 and that
they be
20% um 40% by 2020 theyve ex exceeded
the threshold of 20% already so I think
quotas should not be a longlasting
feature because we can do better than
that uh but at least in the first stage
when you have such a big step uh to to
to take yes temporarily I think it's
it's very helpful and we should use it
it will be used by the way on the
paneuropean basis since you won't answer
this last question I'll ask the audience
to answer it um Madame lagard is French
president
oh thank thank you so much it's been an
honor thank you thank
[Applause]
you
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Would you be surprised if C.Lagarde said otherwise? [02:50]
<em>When you went to interview for this IMF job it wasn't just a given.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ demanding responsibilities at such high level
✓ national &amp; international professional recognition is not a guarantee
→ need to gather support from as many organisations as possible
✓ board consisted of 24 members and only one woman [03:50]
→ shows realistic expectations as to eligibility
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is C.Lagarde suggesting by the following? [03:14]
<em>He was zigzagging the world in one direction, and I was zigzagging the world in the other direction to make sure that we did not meet. And yet, we had to cover essentially the same authorities and the same countries around the world</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ was competing with a friend, Austin Ken, now governor of the Central Bank of Mexico
✓ avoided a conflict of interest
→ displayed political correctness
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why was it shocking? How would you have reacted in such a situation? [04:12]
<em>I was interviewed by 24 men, which was - you know - an interesting phenomenon 
when you are yourself Minister of Finance,
you've handled the presidency by front of the G20,
you've gone through the crisis of 2008 2009
and there you are, facing - you know - 
24 very respectful and nice men, it came as a shock.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ shocking gender imbalance
✓ questionable impartiality of the panel
→ exhibits diplomatic stance to old-fashioned, institutional discrimination
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is C.Lagarde's advice when facing failures? [06:25]
<em>(...)things that I take away from that is (if) you failed somewhere, you know,
bounce back, get on with it, have a few drinks, or whatever takes you away from that,
but move on</em>]]></qs>
<ans>✓ do not blame yourself
✓ don't lose confidence
→ be resilient
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What was C.Lagarde stance towards the hiring partner? What does she recommend doing? [07:06]
<em>'We'll take you as an associate but don't expect ever to make partnership'

That was a really, really very high standing - you know - excellent law firm,
and I said:

'Well, why is that?'
That was back in '79 and he said:

'Well, because you're a woman'

So, again - you know - I packed my things 
and I just ran, 
I didn't want to have anything to do with these people.
So, sometimes, you have to pick your fight,
and really persist, but on other occasions,
if people don't deserve you, just go - move on!</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ most women would have gone mad at such gender discrimination
〆no time or energy to fight every little wrong or injustice
→ choose wisely which battles are worth time and energy to engage in

✓ it would have taken too much effort for relatively little gain
→ might be better letting it go and finding a more worthy battle to fight
= be rational, practical
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<!--
<qa>
<qs>sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile </qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
-->
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[How is C.Lagarde possibly poking fun at asserting oneself? [09:32]
<em>I'm not sure I would say elbow your way in, 
because, in that, there is something of - you know -
sort of push people out of your way.
I think you can very much progress and make your way as Horton would say in Latin
if you remember - for those who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day basis,
Stand your ground</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ doesn't want to be perceived as a street fighter or maverick despite difficulties
✓ don't shy away from what you believe in either
→ displays only justified assertiveness
= quite diplomatic stance

✓ Horton v. State (2020), a Florida case where the defendant, Steven Horton, attempted to use Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law to dismiss charges, according to Florida District Court of Appeal documents
✓ Florida Law (0.4.16): Allows individuals who are not engaged in unlawful activity and are attacked in a place they have a right to be to meet force with force, including deadly force, without a duty to retreat
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is meant by a 'good anchoring point' in the following extract? Why was it a 'defining moment'? [11:12]
<em>When Angela Merkel said:
Oh, Christine, you know! 
How can you be so certain? 
A debt sustainability analysis is only a debt sustainability analysis after all!

And I said: 
'Yeah, but that's what where you want to anchor everything you do.'

And if you throw - you know - a zillion in a country,
you want to have a good anchoring point!
So, that to me was a bit of a defining moment when we stood our ground.
Other members of the board were not necessarily as convinced as we were
but it wasn't elbowing my way!
It was saying: 'We've done it, we've reviewed it,
it's solid in terms of analysis and we have to build around it.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ thorough analysis was unquestionable and not just attempting to convince (by 'elbowing in')
→ gained confidence
→ made an anchoring point
= defining point regarding credibility

✓ make sure any anchoring point lives up to your reputation
</ans>
<hint>to live up to = to meet the requirements or expectations of 
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why are findings in Japan quite astonishing? How does C.Lagarde respond to them? [22:02]
<em>The resources that the Japanese people can tap into are the Japanese women 
but for all sorts of reasons, 
including cultural, lack of institutions that can help with child care,
and a general sort of attitude of society towards female participation.
Prime minister Abbe has made it part of his budget and commitment to actually really fund child care centres in Japan,
and to encourage women to join the workforce.
They are far better educated than Japanese male,
they really can contribute to the growth of society,
and by our account - and I don't claim the math credit to it but the teams are doing it -
the GDP of Japan could increase by about 9% just as a result of their participation,
and that before the end of the decade.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ ageing population
✓ not prone to immigration
✓ smallest share of female employment among OECD members
✓ acknowledges cultural disparities
→ suggests more equal rights based on social &amp; economic facts rather than political trends &amp; emotions
≠ feminist approach
→ remain analytical even in the light of obvious bias
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>80</mdlid>
<activity_id>20221005-1805</activity_id>
<activity_title>Making suggestions</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>grammar</activity_type>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
The consultant suggested [me a solution | a solution to me]
✓ a solution (to me)

The consultant suggested [that you get | getting] acquainted with the contract 
✓ (that) you get acquainted
✓ getting acquainted

I suggest the terms of the contract [should revised | are revised | be revised]
✓ be revised
= present subjunctive
→ more formal

It is advisable the CEO [resigns | resign] asap
✓ resign
= present subjunctive
→ more formal
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>79</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>Use of language</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>textbook</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Do you remember Christine Lagarde's use of language?</activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
T / Cl
Do you remember Christine Lagarde's use of language?
<em>When I was Finance Minister, we supported a bill that went through
that requires that there <span class="show_key">be</span> at least 20% women on the board of companies by 2014 
and that they <span class="show_key">be</span> 40% by 2020</em>

What form is it?
<span class="show_key">
✓ subjunctive
</span>
]]></activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>78</mdlid>
<activity_id>20190418-1837</activity_id>
<activity_title>Practice: Subjunctive</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>review</activity_type>
<activity_contents>grammar_subjunctive_and_unreal_past_selection_c1_01.csv</activity_contents>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>77</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions>You have been invited to debate about the glass ceiling in business and politics.
→ practise the subjunctive
→ recycle new expressions and language</instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You don't believe the glass ceiling is still a reality in the 21st century.</task>
<ans>✓ nowadays boards across the world recommend HR be aware of discriminatory practices
✓ they have been advising businesses be a role model for decades
✓ finding an inclusive environment in either politics or business needn't be such a gruelling process any more
✓ best practice suggests any CEO go back to the drawing board if they exhibit bias ← subjunctive
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You have witnessed multiple cases of gender discrimination in both international organisations and joint ventures.</task>
<ans>✓ you'd expect remuneration be more transparent but...
✓ it is advisable boards review their policies
✓ equal rights are not a given, even in political organisations!
✓ whoever you are, you'd still need to elbow your way in
✓ pick your fights
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>76</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
Trans-Tasman relations = foreign relations between neighbouring countries Australia and New Zealand
to be a given = something that is certain to happen or to be
to pick one's fights = to choose which conflicts or issues are truly worth your time, energy, and effort instead of fighting every little wrong or injustice; also means knowing when to raise issues versus letting them go
gruelling = very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time
back to the drawing board = used to indicate that an idea, scheme, or proposal has been unsuccessful and that a new one must be devised
to haunt = to continue to cause problems for sb for a long time
to bite the bullet = to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over
to live up to = to meet the requirements or expectations of 

GCC = the Gulf Cooperation Council is a political and economic union of six Arab states bordering the Persian Gulf: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Established in 1981, this regional bloc aims to foster economic, security, and cultural cooperation among its members
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>75</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
She decided to <strike>quit</strike> <strong>give up (before even starting)</strong>
If you <strike>will</strike> fight every dog which barks <strike>with</strike> <strong>at</strong> you, you will never win...
In <strike>comparance</strike> <strong>comparison</strong> with what is worth...
In case <strike>if</strike> someone attacks you
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260327</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist 
→ watch the video
→ answer the questions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Politics</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>74</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Gender gap in politics</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Is gender gap still a reality among white collars?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img src="pix/christine_lagarde_you_have_to_pick_your_fights_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>
Answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What could explain the gender gap in politics in the 21st century?
</qs>
<ans>✓ traditions
✓ prejudice in the field of decision-making
✓ glass ceiling
✓ cultural values (e.g. in Japan)
</ans>
<hint>glass ceiling = ceiling based on attitudinal or organizational bias in the work force that prevents minorities and women from advancing to leadership positions
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you believe women have any traits that are more relevant to politics than men's?</qs>
<ans>✓ empathy
→ better facilitator
✓ those who make it into politics are bound to feature more determination than men
</ans>
<hint>empathy = ability to understand another person's feelings, experience, etc
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What would you expect to learn from prominent female politicians such as M.Thatcher, U.von der Leyen, C.Lagarde?</qs>
<ans>✓ both anecdotal hurdles and success stories
→ go ahead no matter what people say or think of you
✓ evidence of disparate gender roles
→ acknowledge strengths &amp; weaknesses without being excessively feminist about it
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>73</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 A</activity_id>
<activity_title>G20 - IMF facts</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11525
g20_imf_facts_01.gift
php ../../moosh/moosh.php module-copy --section 1 11525 95

]]></activity_contents>
<key>
G20 is an intergovernmental forum comprising {~19 =20 ~21} sovereign countries, the European Union (EU), and the {=African Union ~EuroAsian Economic Union ~South American ~Trans-Tasma Economic Area}. It works to address major issues related to the global economy, such as international financial stability, climate change {~eradication ~facilitation =mitigation} and sustainable development.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a major financial agency of the {~USA =United Nations ~European Union}, and an international financial institution funded by {~18 ~21 =191} member countries. It is regarded as the global {=lender ~borrower ~collateral} of last resort to national governments, and a leading supporter of exchange-rate stability. 

The IMF stated mission is "working to foster global {~fiscal ~military =monetary} cooperation, secure financial stability, {=facilitate ~strictly regulate ~deregulate} international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce {~taxes ~military conflicts =poverty} around the world.
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>72</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 B</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target vocab</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
a_given_gruelling_biting_the_bullet_01.gift
.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11527
php ../../moosh/moosh.php module-copy --section 1 11527 95
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
something that is certain to happen or to be {=to be a given ~to be taken ~to be a written}

very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time {=gruelling ~grumbling ~grafting} 

to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over {=to bite the bullet ~to kick the bullet ~to swallow the bullet}
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>71</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You Have To Pick Your Fights And Really Persist | Fortune
<em>Christine Lagarde on the challenges encountered and lessons learned becoming the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Introduction
well good evening we are so delighted to
have m madame lagard um and I we've
tried a few times before and I want to
give a good shout out to our mutual
friend Ambassador Sue Schwab for
convincing you to
come so Andy shared with us obviously
needless to say there's a lot of
financial crisis issues that we have to
deal with um in this conversation but as
is our prerogative at most powerful
Women's Summit we want to get to know
you a little bit first and Andy started
that process and of course everybody
knows the firsts about you the first
chair of bigam mcken Law Firm first uh
uh Finance Minister of a G8 country
first female IMF um director but there
are a lot of little known facts about
your time here in America um you did
work for William Cohen where you you
opened mail during the Watergate period
uh where you got to from French Canadian
citizens from Maine and you had to do
impeach Nixon don't impeach Nixon that
was sort of your job um the other
interesting thing about about you is
that you spent a year at Holton arms you
were pretty daring you smoked cigarettes
you use chamomile in your hair to make
it
blonder um you ate copia amounts of
yogurt but here's the most interesting
fact to me you hated math and in
fact in the yearbook you said please no
more
math how did someone who hates math
become the most important woman on the
International Financial
[Laughter]
scene well thank you very much for the
Interview process for IMF job
introduction uh I did and actually I
think I still do um but I think the way
math was taught both at Halton and prior
to that in in in French school was
certainly not conducive to uh you know
people not so inclined to actually like
math um when I when I then studied law
and and economics actually a bit um
there are lots of things that things
that I liked about having a more
scientific approach but I still don't
like math to this day and uh I'm
delighted that I have really fantastic
econometrist experts in modeling people
who know it all about math and I listen
to them and I pick their brain it gives
us all hope as math
haters so you know when you went to
interview for this the IMF job it wasn't
just a given I mean you went through a
pretty grueling process can you describe
that
well the process had to do with um
having the support of as many countries
as possible and um there were a few
competitors to begin with the most
serious one was my friend Austin Ken who
is now the governor of the Central Bank
of Mexico so he was zigzagging the world
in One Direction and I was zigzagging
the world in the other direction to make
sure that we did not meet uh and yet we
had to cover the same essentially the
same authorities and the same countries
around the world so I never traveled as
extensively as I did at that time and
then that was followed once the sort of
the short list was was arrived at that
was followed by an interview with with
members of the board which was quite
quite an experience because that board
still today only has one it's a board of
24 members and there is only one woman
on the board who is there are a few
alternates but as far as members are
concerned there's only one female member
and that's the US Representative but
that day uh Meg had to attend the
article for review with Treasury and and
fed so she was not sitting at the table
as a result of which I was interviewed
by 24
men which was you know an interesting
phenomenon when you are yourself
Minister of Finance you've handled the
presidency by front of the G20 you've
gone through the crisis of 2008 2009 and
there you are facing you know 24 very
cous respect respectful and nice men um
it came as a shock yeah and was did you
have to cram I mean was it a difficult
learning process to get through
that it was exhausting because prior to
the 24 U board setting I had to spend
half an hour with each of the 24 over a
course of two two days so that was that
was a bit so nothing comes easy even in
your life no no no and it's interesting
I some career choice choices have been
made or at least one was made for you in
that the male dominated um French school
that and I that that turns out French
politicians and and bureaucrats and so
forth you were turned down twice by that
school um talk about that but also some
career choices that decisions that
you've had to make along the way and
what was the best advice you ever
got well I think having been turned down
twice first time for incompetency the
second for um for having missed the
deadline what do you mean by that
incompetency in what well I was I wasn't
prepared enough I hadn't studied hard
enough and I was I was in love that year
so I spent a lot more
time
so and the second time around I I missed
the deadline and I think that was a you
know missed you know whether that was
a good turnout of of things or not I
don't know but fce to say that I went
back a few years later and uh I was
asked to give a speech to those young
bright kids from Ina and I have to say
that that day I felt really really
powerful you know I had flunked and
there I was coming to tell them about
the uh legalization of society or some
really obscure matter that they had no
interest in actually um but you know two
things that I take away from that is you
failed
somewhere you know bounce back get on
with it have a few drinks or whatever uh
takes you away from that but move on
don't don't don't don't you know start
um don't feel sorry about yourself don't
lose confidence just move on move to
something else um the second time I felt
exactly the same is when I I interviewed
in Paris at the time for one of the top
uh law firms and and I had all the
credentials and I had done all the right
things and the resume was fine and I was
behaving properly and all the rest of it
and the hiring partner who was also the
managing partner said to me well we'll
we'll we'll take you we'll take you as
an associate but don't expect ever to
make partnership and that was a really
really very high standing you know
excellent law firm and I said well why
is that that was back in 7 in 79 and he
said well because you're a woman
so again you know I packed my things and
I just run I didn't want to have
anything to do with these people so
sometimes you have to pick your fight
and and really persist but on other
occasions if people don't deserve you
just go move on
yeah did you get advice along the way or
Advice from mentors
did you create your advice
you know in those days uh there were not
many uh not much by way of mentoring
coaching and and support so I had uh I
had my mother to support me and she was
a she was an extraordinary uh support I
and you lost your father when you were
just 16 yeah and I constantly opposed my
mother but she was nonetheless a great
support and I didn't really know it but
she was a role model and I constantly
had my fights with her but that's we we
often do that daughters and mother's
relationships are complicated
um but then I was hired by a a female
partner at Becka McKenzie and she was a
role model for me she was uh she was a
strongest she was in my view the best
lawyer in the uh in the firm and she was
always discreetly in those days you had
to do things quite discreetly she would
support the young female Associates and
elegant I think you said she was she was
yeah yeah always yeah um you I'm going
to let you say this in French you've
referred to this that sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile so that's a phrase
I I believe you learned during
synchronized swimming a sport that you
took up which is interestingly enough
you took it up in 1968 when the schools
were shut down over a student protest
right um but you went into synchronized
swimming right um you've also said that
as a woman you have to Elbow your way in
what's an example in recent years or
especially at the IMF where you've had
to apply both those or either of those
precepts you know I'm not sure I would
say elbow your way in because I in that
there is something of you know sort of
push people out of your way I think you
can very much uh progress and and make
your way as hton would say in
wakam if you remember yeah um for those
Stand your ground
who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day
basis it's you know I'll I'll I'll find
my way if I don't find it I will make it
so I think you can actually make your
way you can you can um Follow Your
Destiny without necessarily being
aggressive without pushing people you
can you can let other people progress as
well along the way but you should not
shy away from the things that you are
you feel strongly about and I'll give
you an example when we had um you know
we had to deal with Greece uh quite a
lot in the last few years and back two
years ago we had great difficulties is
about you know what was the next step
and was the debt sustainable or not and
over what period of time would it become
sustainable and there was a lot of
um a lot of disagreement a lot of
controversy a lot of political ganging
uh on on that particular topic but I
knew we we were right I knew we had
checked the numbers times and and again
and I knew that the debt sustainability
analysis that we were producing was
sound solid and and and was a good
principle on which to build to help that
country restore it the situation so I
stood my ground and when Angela Merkel
said oh Christine you know how can you
be so certain a debt sustainability
analysis is only a debt sustainability
analysis after all and I said yeah but
that's what where you want to Anchor
everything you do and if you throw you
know zillion in a country you want to
have a good anchoring point so that to
me was a bit of a defining moment when
we stood our ground other members of the
troa were not necessarily as convinced
as we were but it wasn't elbowing my way
it was saying we've done it we've
reviewed it it's it's solid in terms of
analysis and we have to build around it
and you got some heat for that and you
got some heat for suggesting that the
Greek um the Greek style of paying taxes
probably wasn't up to enough and you got
some heat when you said that the
European Banks were under capitalized
let's take that sharp eye to Europe
right now and tell us what needs to be
done a lot needs to be done but I want
to because it's easy to do to to go for
the Euro bashing that that's that's been
the game for the last two years and uh
they have done an awful lot for people
who don't understand Europe they don't
they don't understand what they've done
but you know I've been Finance Minister
for four years and they have done a lot
what they need to do today is keep up
keep up the work keep up the reform that
they have started doing you know that's
the case for product and service Market
it's the case for labor market it's the
case particularly uh in the uh in in the
banking sector there's a lot of uh
fragmentation still going on there is
not a good monetary transmission going
on they have to work on that they have
to continue the job that they have
started they will be doing a lot of um
what they call balance sheet assessment
asset quality review stress testing and
all the rest of it I don't think we
should start from the basis that then
they're going to do a bad job we should
give them the credit of wanting to do it
seriously wanting to coordinate the work
from the ECB where Mario Mario dragy has
done an extraordinary job to rescue that
zone but now that they they want to do
it it's going to be messy there will be
obstacles there will be uh hiccups on
the way there will be bumps on the road
the media will say how terrible it is at
the end of the
day they will make it I'm convinced of
it and I think that there is the
political will the political urge to
actually keep it together those people
some of them have suffered in their
flesh in their family from what's
happened uh back 70 years ago they're
not going to let it drop like that
because of lack of Courage their courage
will be eventually there to to respond
to the uh the challenge it's a huge
challenge you bring 18 countries
together I'm talking about the Euro Zone
here you bring 18 countries with 18
different flags 18 different national
anthems 18 different defense and you ask
them to have one single currency one
single set of fiscal policies that are
compatible with each other and to bring
their banking system Under One Roof with
one resolution system it's a a job yeah
Time is short
I I'd love to go beyond this there's so
much more to say about this but um time
is short so we do have to uh turn your
attention a little closer to this town
um I thought of your turn your your
precept uh grit my teeth when you had
all the ministers here this weekend and
you watched what was going on on the
hill um I wonder you know but you've
also spent a lot of time here and
understand the political system here
were you not sure explaining it or
tearing your hair out or you don't you
don't you don't understand it go
ahead you know what what was complicated
Unconventional monetary policy
this week actually is that we had about
300 Ministers of finance and governance
of Central Bank from all all around the
world and we had you know we had a focus
which was essentially unconventional
monetary policy and consequences for the
rest of the world how do we develop
anchor the recovery how do we make sure
that Emerging Markets are going to
continue to do well without suffering
from tapering and d d d and and the only
thing that was on their mind was when is
this going to end what what is this
discussion about the debt ceiling and it
was it it really uh completely
overwhelmed the discussion and it's it's
Debt ceiling
believe me it's it's difficult to
explain u i mean you can explain the the
the the sort of direct fiscal
consequences you can try to imagine what
the indirect consequences will be you
can try to speculate about what a
message will be on the markets you can
imagine the accident you can assume that
it's going to be worse than previous
events but it's difficult to explain the
rationale behind it and you've warned of
course over the last couple days of
massive disruption if Thursday passes
and um there isn't a deal but what if
there is a deal which most likely will
happen where the deadlines just pushed
off for another two months another three
months doesn't that create an
uncertainty in the markets in and of
itself what's the danger of putting off
the deadline what going to be to put
Susan Collins and her friends back back
US economy
and Senator kobar yes uh back to the
drawing board yet again because I think
that uh it it will reactivate the same
sort of trepidation anxiety and and
worries what's amazing is that the
United States of America first largest
economy in the world is still and will
probably continue to be regarded as a as
a safe heaven to which can flow back
when there is trouble now you know it's
a bit like a rubber band when you you
pull you pull you pull you pull it works
it works it works and but who wants to
take the risk of that breaking so again
so there's danger to even putting off
the deadline till a January or you just
reactivate the same debate over right
and is there a danger to the economy the
US economy and the world economy by not
addressing the
debt
US debt
mean and I don't mean like I don't I
mean like not not you know taking steps
to address the US debt did you consider
that a a a damper on the economic
growth yeah that that's I mean it's it's
a it's the most serious thing that could
happen if if it is not addressed if it's
not um tackled tackled it it
will it will be
um very very damaging and not just for
the US economy for for all economies I
guess I mean like in you know reform to
you know bring spending and and and and
borrowing into line do you consider that
is the well that's that's another debate
you know I think the most critical one
is the issue of the debt sealing okay
that's the issue of you know default no
default what's a technical default
what's a real default and so on and so
forth but so that's what you're talking
that's the most urgent matter the rest
the fiscal policy of the United States
of America I summarize it for my simple
as um you know slow down but hurry
Fiscal policy
up and describe that well slowdown means
um no brutal um heavy duty uh fiscal
consolidation in the short run because
you're going to prevent recovery from
taking roots and and cons and and
strengthening but hurry up to take the
measures now that are going to deal with
the um the the long-term liabilities
that will come to haunt the United
States back in 2020 whether it's
entitlement or whether it's high
interests that will come to haunt the
economy in the in in 2020 if nothing is
done before so that's why we say hurry
up do do it now because it will produce
results in the years to come and it will
address the situation that would
otherwise be very difficult in 2020
there's a lot of talk about a new normal
in the US and in frankly in the global
economy where we're going to have um
even when we have econ economic growth
it's not going to be followed by job
growth do you see unemployment rates
getting to pre-recession
levels and at what
Unemployment
point if you look at numbers in this
country and if you look at unemployment
numbers it has progressed enormously
it's gone from the highest at 10% down
to 7.3% so take granted the
participation rate is probably lower and
the number that we should also look at
is employment numbers
uh but there has been progress and and
jobs are being created it's the same in
other countries not very fast in in
Europe and in the Euro Zone in
particular but U you know there are
signs of of Hope where those jobs will
be what will be the job content how the
economic model is going to change uh to
you know to what uh business model are
we heading to I think we we are facing
huge transitions at the moment and um
that better have because otherwise we're
not just facing economic problems we'll
be facing social problems and you've
warned about um a rush to the exit for
the fed's what you call unconventional
monetary policies $85 billion a month in
in the QE program um is that something
you communicated to Ben banki before
their decision to stay the
course you know central banks are
Central Banks
independent um but what I have said
including in Jackson Hall where all
Central bankers get together is
that given that the fed's decisions has
impact across the world it would be
appropriate not just to communicate well
uh not just to gradually phase out but
also to cooperate with other Central
Bankers so that they understand what
precautions they have to take uh what
consequences uh it will be for them and
they can prepare better so so I'm not
sure they all happy to to cooperate I
think I think they would be well advised
to do so but and I know you wanted to
mention um the IMF came out with a
gender study which is the first time I
believe that you've looked at the impact
of gender in the world economy um can
you talk about Japan in particular was
an interesting case study of what for
cultural reasons women aren't in that
economy to the level they are other in
other industrialized countries what has
that done to growth in Japan
I'm looking at it the other way what
Growth in Japan
could it give to growth uh in Japan and
we we just recently published for the
first time a study that is called women
work and the economy but we also did a
special chapter on Japan because Japan
has a very specific issue they have an
aging population they're not
particularly um immigration prone they
say the least and currently Japanese
women are not participating in society
as much as the average oecd country so
the resources that the Japanese people
can tap into are the Japanese women but
for all sorts of reasons including
cultural lack of um institutions that
can help with uh child care and uh and a
general sort of attitude of society
towards uh female participation it's not
happening now as a follow-up to that
study that we published exactly a year
ago I'm pleased to report that maybe not
attributable to us but prime minister
Abbe has made it part of his budget and
commitment to actually really fund child
care centers in Japan and to encourage
women to join the workforce they are far
better educated than Japanese male uh
they really can contribute to uh the
growth of society and by our account and
I don't claim the math credit to it but
the teams are are doing it the the GDP
of Japan could increase by about 9% just
as a result of their participation and
that before the end of the decade so
that's really help important two more
Quotas
quick questions before we get the cane
um you and quick answer to this you've
gone from describing quotas for women in
EUR in terms of Europe uh for women
board members is offensive to saying it
should be a temporary measure at least
correct what should be a temporary
measure I'm sorry quotas for um women
and board members yes sorry on you
Europe we're back to Europe real quick
yeah yeah yeah so you think they're
important as a temporary measure but
look it's it's working um when when I
was Finance Minister we uh supported a a
bill that went through uh that requires
that there be at least 20% women on the
board of companies uh by 2014 and that
they be
20% um 40% by 2020 theyve ex exceeded
the threshold of 20% already so I think
quotas should not be a longlasting
feature because we can do better than
that uh but at least in the first stage
when you have such a big step uh to to
to take yes temporarily I think it's
it's very helpful and we should use it
it will be used by the way on the
paneuropean basis since you won't answer
this last question I'll ask the audience
to answer it um Madame lagard is French
president
oh thank thank you so much it's been an
honor thank you thank
[Applause]
you
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Would you be surprised if C.Lagarde said otherwise? [02:50]
<em>When you went to interview for this IMF job it wasn't just a given.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ demanding responsibilities at such high level
✓ national &amp; international professional recognition is not a guarantee
→ need to gather support from as many organisations as possible
✓ board consisted of 24 members and only one woman [03:50]
→ shows realistic expectations as to eligibility
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is C.Lagarde suggesting by the following? [03:14]
<em>He was zigzagging the world in one direction, and I was zigzagging the world in the other direction to make sure that we did not meet. And yet, we had to cover essentially the same authorities and the same countries around the world</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ was competing with a friend, Austin Ken, now governor of the Central Bank of Mexico
✓ avoided a conflict of interest
→ displayed political correctness
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why was it shocking? How would you have reacted in such a situation? [04:12]
<em>I was interviewed by 24 men, which was - you know - an interesting phenomenon 
when you are yourself Minister of Finance,
you've handled the presidency by front of the G20,
you've gone through the crisis of 2008 2009
and there you are, facing - you know - 
24 very respectful and nice men, it came as a shock.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ shocking gender imbalance
✓ questionable impartiality of the panel
→ exhibits diplomatic stance to old-fashioned, institutional discrimination
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is C.Lagarde's advice when facing failures? [06:25]
<em>(...)things that I take away from that is (if) you failed somewhere, you know,
bounce back, get on with it, have a few drinks, or whatever takes you away from that,
but move on</em>]]></qs>
<ans>✓ do not blame yourself
✓ don't lose confidence
→ be resilient
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What was C.Lagarde stance towards the hiring partner? What does she recommend doing? [07:06]
<em>'We'll take you as an associate but don't expect ever to make partnership'

That was a really, really very high standing - you know - excellent law firm,
and I said:

'Well, why is that?'
That was back in '79 and he said:

'Well, because you're a woman'

So, again - you know - I packed my things 
and I just ran, 
I didn't want to have anything to do with these people.
So, sometimes, you have to pick your fight,
and really persist, but on other occasions,
if people don't deserve you, just go - move on!</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ most women would have gone mad at such gender discrimination
〆no time or energy to fight every little wrong or injustice
→ choose wisely which battles are worth time and energy to engage in

✓ it would have taken too much effort for relatively little gain
→ might be better letting it go and finding a more worthy battle to fight
= be rational, practical
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<!--
<qa>
<qs>sort of bite the
bullet and keep smiling you say it um
it's greet your teeth and smile grit
your teeth and smile </qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
-->
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[How is C.Lagarde possibly poking fun at asserting oneself? [09:32]
<em>I'm not sure I would say elbow your way in, 
because, in that, there is something of - you know -
sort of push people out of your way.
I think you can very much progress and make your way as Horton would say in Latin
if you remember - for those who don't speak Latin on a day-to-day basis,
Stand your ground</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ doesn't want to be perceived as a street fighter or maverick despite difficulties
✓ don't shy away from what you believe in either
→ displays only justified assertiveness
= quite diplomatic stance

✓ Horton v. State (2020), a Florida case where the defendant, Steven Horton, attempted to use Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law to dismiss charges, according to Florida District Court of Appeal documents
✓ Florida Law (0.4.16): Allows individuals who are not engaged in unlawful activity and are attacked in a place they have a right to be to meet force with force, including deadly force, without a duty to retreat
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is meant by a 'good anchoring point' in the following extract? Why was it a 'defining moment'? [11:12]
<em>When Angela Merkel said:
Oh, Christine, you know! 
How can you be so certain? 
A debt sustainability analysis is only a debt sustainability analysis after all!

And I said: 
'Yeah, but that's what where you want to anchor everything you do.'

And if you throw - you know - a zillion in a country,
you want to have a good anchoring point!
So, that to me was a bit of a defining moment when we stood our ground.
Other members of the board were not necessarily as convinced as we were
but it wasn't elbowing my way!
It was saying: 'We've done it, we've reviewed it,
it's solid in terms of analysis and we have to build around it.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ thorough analysis was unquestionable and not just attempting to convince (by 'elbowing in')
→ gained confidence
→ made an anchoring point
= defining point regarding credibility

✓ make sure any anchoring point lives up to your reputation
</ans>
<hint>to live up to = to meet the requirements or expectations of 
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why are findings in Japan quite astonishing? How does C.Lagarde respond to them? [22:02]
<em>The resources that the Japanese people can tap into are the Japanese women 
but for all sorts of reasons, 
including cultural, lack of institutions that can help with child care,
and a general sort of attitude of society towards female participation.
Prime minister Abbe has made it part of his budget and commitment to actually really fund child care centres in Japan,
and to encourage women to join the workforce.
They are far better educated than Japanese male,
they really can contribute to the growth of society,
and by our account - and I don't claim the math credit to it but the teams are doing it -
the GDP of Japan could increase by about 9% just as a result of their participation,
and that before the end of the decade.</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ ageing population
✓ not prone to immigration
✓ smallest share of female employment among OECD members
✓ acknowledges cultural disparities
→ suggests more equal rights based on social &amp; economic facts rather than political trends &amp; emotions
≠ feminist approach
→ remain analytical even in the light of obvious bias
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>70</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
Trans-Tasman relations = foreign relations between neighbouring countries Australia and New Zealand
to be a given = something that is certain to happen or to be
to pick one's fights = to choose which conflicts or issues are truly worth your time, energy, and effort instead of fighting every little wrong or injustice; also means knowing when to raise issues versus letting them go
gruelling = very difficult and tiring, needing great effort for a long time
back to the drawing board = used to indicate that an idea, scheme, or proposal has been unsuccessful and that a new one must be devised
to haunt = to continue to cause problems for sb for a long time
to bite the bullet = to decide to do something difficult or unpleasant that one has been putting off or hesitating over
to live up to = to meet the requirements or expectations of 
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>69</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
It's not bad <strike>too</strike> <strong>either</strong>
If your grand mother is still <strike>in power</strike> <strong>active</strong>
They're not <strike>full-scale</strike> <strong>a 100% | die-hard</strong> feminist
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
prejudice /ˈpredʒudɪs/
determine /dɪˈtə:mɪn/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260323</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs | Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_title>Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
Role play
→ choose 1 role
→ prepare your arguments
→ practise rhetorical techniques

if time available
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Christine Lagarde: You have to pick your fights and really persist 
→ watch the video
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p1wJhUjINk</a>


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Politics</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>68</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>Rhetorical exchanges</activity_title>
<functional_language></functional_language>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<display>3</display> 
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>How do you respond in rhetorical exchanges? Do you throw oil on the smouldering fire?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
→ match the quotations with the speakers
→ are these responses contradictory, offensive or defensive?
→ are they convincing or just rhetorical? 
→ are they supported by facts or just sarcastic?
→ what other devices are used to denigrate the interlocutor?
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_background_color></column_background_color>
<column_font_color></column_font_color>
<column_font_size_percentage></column_font_size_percentage>
<column_width_percentage>45</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>12</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
Keir Starmer
Liz Truss
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;2;3
4;5;6
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
A book is being written about the prime minister's time in office.<br /><em>Apparently, it's going to be out by Christmas.</em><br />Is that the release date or the title?
Mr Speaker, last week the Prime Minister ignored every question put to her.<br />She repeatedly criticized Labour's plan for a six-month freeze on energy bills.<br />This week the chancellor made it her policy.
Last week, the Prime Minister stood there and promised absolutely no spending reductions. They all cheered.<br />This week, the chancellor announced a new wave of cuts.<br />What's the point of a prime minister whose promises don't even last a week?
I have been in office for just under two months and I have delivered the energy price guarantee(...)<br />I've reversed the National Insurance increase, and I've also taken steps, and we will be taking steps to crack down on the militant unions.<br />I think, Mr Speaker, that is more of a record of action than the honourable gentleman in his two and a half years in the job.
I'm somebody who's prepared to front up<br />I'm prepared to take the tough decisions unlike the honourable gentleman who hasn't done anything on businesses.<br />He's done nothing to say or protect people after one year.<br />He's got no plan.
The labour party has pledged hundreds of billions of spending. Pledges none of which they've retracted.<br />The honourable gentleman needs to reflect the economic reality in his policy.
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
<strong>K.Starmer</strong>
A book is being written about the prime minister's time in office.<br /><em>Apparently, it's going to be out by Christmas.</em><br />Is that the release date or the title?
✓ sarcasm

Mr Speaker, last week the Prime Minister ignored every question put to her.
✓ allegation

She repeatedly criticized Labour's plan for a six-month freeze on energy bills.<br />This week the chancellor made it her policy.
✓ contradictory fact

Last week, the Prime Minister stood there and promised absolutely no spending reductions. They all cheered.<br />This week, the chancellor announced a new wave of cuts.<br />What's the point of a prime minister whose promises don't even last a week?
✓ contradictory fact
✓ irony

<strong>L.Truss</strong>
I have been in office for just under two months and I have delivered the energy price guarantee(...)<br />I've reversed the National Insurance increase, and I've also taken steps, and we will be taking steps to crack down on the militant unions.<br />I think, Mr Speaker, that is more of a record of action than the honourable gentleman in his two and a half years in the job.
✓ facts
✓ rhetorical use of tenses to suggest determination
〆little convincing rhetorical contrast of 2 months vs 2 years

I'm somebody who's prepared to front up<br />I'm prepared to take the tough decisions unlike the honourable gentleman who hasn't done anything on businesses.
〆too emotional (in contrast to the previous exchange)
→ don't say who you are but what you do
〆unsupported argumentation
I'm prepared to take tough decisions ← she is bearing responsibility

He's done nothing to say or protect people after one year.<br />He's got no plan.
〆not likely to be accurate
→ weakens credibility of her argumentation

The labour party has pledged hundreds of billions of spending. Pledges none of which they've retracted.<br />The honourable gentleman needs to reflect the economic reality in his policy.
〆vague criticism
〆didn't identify problems
need to reflect the economic reality ← blame the situation

<strong>Devices used to denigrate the interlocutor</strong>
✓ reporting the interlocutor's words

✓ 3rd pers sing instead of 'you'
<em>The honourable gentleman</em>


<strong>Conclusions</strong>
Keir Starmer 
✓ named problems
✓ pointed to a few contradictions made by Liz Truss
= factual approach
✓ didn't blame himself
✓ mocked his opponent
= offensive stance
→ won the battle

Liz Truss 
〆didn't blame the situation but assumed responsibility
〆shouldn't have adopted a defensive, circumstantial stance
→ an offensive strategy would have been more effective

Churchill <em>I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat</em>
= acknowledged a difficult period ahead while preparing the nation to fight for victory against a "monstrous tyranny"
→ blame the situation
= circumstantial excuse
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>67</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[<!-- You are running a meeting with shareholders. Explain your decisions to the board. -->
Recycle new expressions and language.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You are a political leader in the opposition. Question the rationale, veracity and viability of decisions made by a member of the political party in power.
Adopt a mocking, offensive strategy.
</task>
<ans>Why have you...? Why are you...? Why will you...?
Last year... last month... Last week...
You claimed you would... but in effect you have... Why should we trust you when...?
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>Your political party has been elected to take tough decisions. Take a defensive stance to address allegations of poor decision making voiced by the opposition.
Blame the situation.
Find circumstantial excuses.
</task>
<ans>Our mandate has always been... it is always... and will always (tripling)
Is this the title of a new soap opera?!
I'm prepared to front up!
I am a winner, not a loser!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>66</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to smoulder = to burn slowly without a flame; (written) to be filled with a strong emotion that you do not fully express
to pour oil on the fire = to make things worse; to exacerbate; to rub salt into the wound
fiery = showing strong emotions, especially anger
to retract = to say that sth you have said earlier is not true or correct or that you did not mean it; to refuse to keep an agreement, a promise, etc
pledge = serious promise
to denigrate = to criticize sb/sth unfairly; to say sb/sth does not have any value or is not important
toil = hard work, especially work that makes you feel physically tired  
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>65</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
I'm telling who <strike>am</strike> I <strong>am</strong>
If you have no money, you can print <strike>them</strike> <strong>it</strong>
It affects the <strike>economical</strike> <strong>economic</strong> situation
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260316</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>
→ watch the video

Stylistic reiterations to gain public support
Can you guess the same missing word for all gaps except the last one?
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level>C1</clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Politics</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>64</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Stylistic reiterations to gain public support</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Can you guess the same missing word for all gaps except the last one?
→ answer the questions
→ watch an extract of the following video to check your answers [04:00-05:00]
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[Keir Starmer
<em>I've got the list here:
45p tax cut? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>. 
Corporation tax cut? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>.
20p tax cut? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>.
Two-year energy freeze? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>.
Tax-free shopping? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>.
Economic credibility? <span class="show_key">Gone</span>.
And her supposed best friend, the former Chancellor? He's <span class="show_key">gone</span> as well.
They're all <span class="show_key">gone</span>.

So, why is she still <span class="show_key">here</span>?</em>
]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
It was a mandate built on fantasy economics and it ended in disaster (...)
I've got the list here:
45p tax cut? {=Gone}. 
Corporation tax cut? {=Gone}.
20p tax cut? {=Gone}.
Two-year energy freeze? {=Gone}.
Tax-free shopping? {=Gone}.
Economic credibility? {=Gone}.
And her supposed best friend, the former Chancellor? He's {=gone} as well.
They're all {=gone}.

So, why is she still {=here}?
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What is the purpose of repeating the same word?
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[<em>gone</em>
✓ invite audience to repeat earlier linguistic pattern
✓ build rhythm
= active listening
→ encourage audience to participate
✓ gain agreement
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the predictable outcome of these politics?</qs>
<ans>✓ Liz Truss will quit
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is the last question using a different grammar structure?</qs>
<ans>= rhetorical question
→ build contrast
✓ confirm the narrative's outcome
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!-- alternative task to embed quiz into viewing future youtube activity
need to additional questions from current activity 1 above
-->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>63</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Stylistic reiterations to gain public support</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_stylistic_reiterations.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
//Can you guess the same missing word for all gaps except the last one?
It was a mandate built on fantasy economics and it ended in disaster (...). I've got the list here:

45p tax cut? {=Gone}. 

Corporation tax cut? {=Gone}.

20p tax cut? {=Gone}.

Two-year energy freeze? {=Gone}.

Tax-free shopping? {=Gone}.

Economic credibility? {=Gone}.

And her supposed best friend, the former Chancellor? He's {=gone} as well.

They're all {=gone}.

So, why is she still {=here}?
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>62</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<em>2,318,076 views  Oct 19, 2022  HOUSE OF COMMONS
The prime minister, Liz Truss, and the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, went head-to-head in Wednesday's PMQ's with a number of fiery exchanges.
Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub

Starmer gave a list of the government's recent U-turns after the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's mini-budget. 'Why is she still here?' he asked. The prime minister responded: 'I'm not a quitter, I'm a fighter'.

PMQs verdict: combative performance keeps Liz Truss safe – for a few hours ► https://www.theguardian.com/global/20...

Liz Truss says she is ‘completely committed’ to pensions triple lock as Keir Starmer calls her ‘opposition in waiting’ – live ► https://www.theguardian.com/politics/...</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>

→ now watch the video from the beginning
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
 ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
A book is being written about the prime
minister's time in office.
Apparently it's going to be out by
Christmas. Is that the release date or
the title?
well Mr Speaker
Mr Speaker
I have been in office for just under two
months and I have delivered the energy
price guarantee
alarm paying six thousand pound bills
this winter I've reversed the National
Insurance increase and I've also taken
steps and we will be taking steps to
crack down on the militant unions now
what what Mr Speaker I think Mr Speaker
that is more of a record of action than
the honorable gentleman in his two and a
half years in the job foreign
Mr Speaker last week the Prime Minister
ignored every question put to her
instead she repeatedly criticized
Labor's plan for a six-month freeze on
energy bills this week the chancellor
made it her policy
to be held to account when she's not in
charge
[Applause]
our policy is to protect the most
vulnerable for two years foreign
because of the economic situation to
adjust our policies I'm somebody who's
prepared to front up I'm prepared to
take the tough decisions unlike The
Honorable gentleman who hasn't done
anything on businesses he's done nothing
to say or protect people after one year
he's got no plan
[Applause]
Mr Speaker last week the Prime Minister
stood there and promised absolutely no
spending reductions they all cheered
this week the chancellor announced a new
wave of cuts what's the point of a prime
minister whose promises don't even last
a week
[Applause]
you're the right honorable gentleman
that that spending will go up next year
and it will go up the year after but of
course we need to get value for
taxpayers money the labor party has
pledged hundreds of billions of spending
pledges none of which they've retracted
The Honorable gentleman needs to reflect
the economic reality and his policy
[Applause]
Mr Speaker those spending cuts are on
the table for one reason and one reason
only because they crashed the economy
working working
people working people are going to have
to pay 500 quid more a month on their
mortgages and what's the prime
minister's response
to say she's sorry
what does she think people will think
and say that's all right I don't mind
Financial ruin at least she apologized
prime minister
I do think there has to be some
reflection of economic reality from the
party
interest rates are rising across the
world and the economic conditions have
worsened and we are being honest we're
leveling with the public unlike The
Honorable gentleman who simply won't do
it and what is the honorable gentleman
doing about the fact that workers train
workers are again going on strike the
fact is he refuses to condemn the
workers we are bringing forward policies
Mr Speaker we are bringing forward
policies that are going to make sure our
Railways are protected people going to
work are protected he backs the strikers
we back the Strivers
Mr Speaker she's asking me questions
because we're a government in Waiting
there's no
exactly there's no getting away from
this millions of people are facing
horrendous mortgage repayments and she's
admitted it's her fault she shouldn't
have conducted an economic experiment on
the British public but it's not just her
they put her there they're keeping her
there why on Earth would anyone trust
the Tories with the economy ever again
well I noticed Mr Speaker he's not
actually objecting to a single Economic
Policy but the chancellor announced on
Monday
he's refusing to condemn the strikers
we're on the side of working people
we're going to legislate to make sure we
keep our Railways open The Honorable
gentleman refuses to do anything
[Applause]
Mr Speaker the only mandate she's ever
had is from Members opposite yeah it was
a mandate built on fantasy economics and
it ended in disaster the country's got
nothing to show for it except the
destruction of the economy and the
implosion of the Tory party 
I've got the list here 
45p tax cut gone 
corporation tax cut gone 
20p tax cut gone 
two-year energy freeze gone 
tax-free shopping gone economic 
credibility gone
and her supposed best friend the former Chancellor he's gone as well 
they're all gone 
so why is she still here
Mr Speaker
[Applause]
Mr Speaker I am a fighter and not a
quitter
I have acted in the National interest to
make sure that we have economic
stability order
order I'm going to hear the Prime
Minister I suggest that all members need
to hear the answer prime minister
[Applause]
[Music]
I am a fighter
[Music]
delivered on the energy price guarantee
we have we delivered on the energy price guarantee 
we've delivered on National Insurance 
we are going to deliver to stop the militant trade unions
disrupting our Railways 
The Honorable
gentleman has no idea he has no plan and
he has no alternative
[Music]
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What do you understand by <em>opposition in the waiting</em>?]]></qs>
<ans>✓ commitment to pensions triple lock is unpopular 
→ the Tories are likely to lose the next elections
→ the Tories will be in the opposition
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What do you understand when Keir Starmer says: 
<em>She's asking me questions because we're a government in waiting.
There's no exactly, there's no getting away from this.
Millions of people are facing horrendous mortgage repayments 
and she's admitted it's her fault.
She shouldn't have conducted an economic experiment on the British public.
But it's not just her.
They put her there, they're keeping her there.
Why on Earth would anyone trust the Tories with the economy ever again?</em>
How would you feel if you were a Tory?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ the Tories will be in the opposition
〆will feel under pressure to defend oneself
→ need to react in a more emotional or more rational way?
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What do you understand by <em>I am a fighter and not a quitter</em>
Is it a rather rational or more emotional response to criticism?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ defensive, rhetorical stance
〆unsupported by arguments
✓ Prime Minister Liz Truss doesn't want to give up despite lost credibility &amp; troubles ahead
→ should seek means to regain credibility
= focus on achievements
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>
<![CDATA[What rhetorical technique is used by Liz Truss in the following two extracts?
Is it effective?

<em>We have we delivered on the energy price guarantee.
We've delivered on National Insurance.
We are going to deliver to stop the militant trade unions disrupting our Railways.</em>

<em>The honourable gentleman has no idea, he has no plan and he has no alternative.</em>]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[<em>We have we delivered on the energy price guarantee.
We've delivered on National Insurance.
We are going to deliver to stop the militant trade unions disrupting our Railways.</em>
✓ tripling
✓ present perfect to describe completed actions
✓ present continuous to talk about an arrangement &amp; plan
→ suggests determination to achieve results based on past results

<em>The honourable gentleman has no idea, he has no plan and he has no alternative.</em>
✓ tripling with present simple &amp; negative form 
→ suggests routine, rule
]]></ans>
<hint>tripling = rhetorical device of grouping three parallel words, phrases, or clauses together to create emphasis, rhythm, or a memorable cadence. This technique leverages the inherent power of three to make descriptions more vivid or persuasive 
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!-- alternative task to embed quiz into viewing future youtube activity
need to additional questions from current activity 1 above
-->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>61</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_government_in_waiting.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
//<div align="center"><img src="pix/liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_01.png" width="400%" alt="visual"></div>
//<div align="center"><img src="pix/liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_02.png" width="400%" alt="visual"></div>
//<div align="center"><img src="pix/liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_03.png" width="400%" alt="visual"></div>
//'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
What do you understand when Keir Starmer says 'She's asking me questions because we're a government in waiting. There's no exactly, there's no getting away from this.  Millions of people are facing horrendous mortgage repayments and she's admitted it's her fault. She shouldn't have conducted an economic experiment on the British public. But it's not just her. They put her there, they're keeping her there. Why on Earth would anyone trust the Tories with the economy ever again? {
~the Tories are unlikely to lose the next elections
=the Tories will be in the opposition
}

What do you understand by 'I am a fighter and not a quitter'? {
~this is an offensive, rhetorical stance, though it is unsupported by arguments
=Prime Minister Liz Truss doesn't want to give up despite lost credibility and troubles ahead #this is only a defensive, rhetorical stance (because it is unsupported by arguments)
}

What rhetorical technique is used by Liz Truss in the following quote 'The honourable gentleman has no idea, he has no plan and he has no alternative'? {
=tripling #tripling - rhetorical device of grouping three parallel words, phrases, or clauses together to create emphasis, rhythm, or a memorable cadence. This technique leverages the inherent power of three to make descriptions more vivid or persuasive 

~present perfect to describe completed actions
~present continuous to talk about an arrangement &amp; plan
}

What rhetorical technique is used by Liz Truss in the following quote 'We have we delivered on the energy price guarantee. We've delivered on National Insurance. We are going to deliver to stop the militant trade unions disrupting our Railways.' ? {
~tripling
=present perfect to describe completed actions #builds credibility
=present continuous to talk about an arrangement and plan #suggests determination to achieve results based on past results
}
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>60</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Expressing your narrative to the public</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=
liz_truss_vs_keir_starmer_expressing_your_narrative.gift
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
//Preparing a narrative and delivering your opinion to the public
//How do you build climax in your narrative?
//→ put the quotations in the right order
//→ which of these arguments are factual? Which are just rhetorical?
//→ explain how offensive these criticisms &amp; allegations may be perceived
//→ explain how Keir Starmer takes advantage of speaking in public to stir the audience: would this be as effective if this was just a dialogue between two persons?

Those spending cuts {=are on the table for one reason},

and {=one reason only}, 

because {=they crashed} the economy.

Working {=people}, 

working {=people are going to have to pay 500 quid more a month on their mortgages}.

And what's {=the prime minister's response}?

To say {=she's sorry}!

What {=does she think}?

People will {=think and say}:

That's {=all right},

I don't {=mind financial ruin}.

At least {=she apologized}.
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>59</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>Expressing your narrative to the public</activity_title>
<functional_language>Preparing a narrative and delivering your opinion to the public</functional_language>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<display>3</display> 
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>How do you build climax in your narrative?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
→ put the quotations in the right order
→ which of these arguments are factual? Which are just rhetorical?
→ explain how offensive these criticisms &amp; allegations may be perceived
→ explain how Keir Starmer takes advantage of speaking in public to stir the audience: would this be as effective if this was just a dialogue between two persons?
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_background_color></column_background_color>
<column_font_color></column_font_color>
<column_font_size_percentage></column_font_size_percentage>
<column_width_percentage>14</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>8</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
Those spending cuts...
and...
because...
Working...
working... 
And what's...
To say...
What... 
People will...
That's... 
I don't...
At least...
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
are on the table for one reason,
one reason only, 
they crashed the economy.
people, 
people are going to have to pay 500 quid more a month on their mortgages.
the prime minister's response?
she's sorry!
does she think?
think and say:
all right, 
mind financial ruin.
she apologized.
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
Those spending cuts are on the table for one reason,
and one reason only, 
because they crashed the economy.
Working people, 
working people are going to have to pay 500 quid more a month on their mortgages.
And what's the prime minister's response?
To say she's sorry!
What does she think?
People will think and say:
That's all right, 
I don't mind financial ruin.
At least she apologized.

Rhetorical devices
✓ questions &amp; answers
And what's the prime minister's response?

✓ fictional reported speech 
People will think and say

✓ mocking &amp; theatrical stance
That's all right, 
I don't mind financial ruin.

✓ reiteration
for one reason, and one reason only
Working people, working people

✓ sarcasm
At least she apologised

✓ public speaking
pretending to be talking to each other
but with a view to reaching a wide audience
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>58</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
fiery = showing strong emotions, especially anger
to retract = to say that sth you have said earlier is not true or correct or that you did not mean it; to refuse to keep an agreement, a promise, etc
pledge = serious promise
tripling = rhetorical device of grouping three parallel words, phrases, or clauses together to create emphasis, rhythm, or a memorable cadence. This technique leverages the inherent power of three to make descriptions more vivid or persuasive 
allegation = public statement that is made without giving proof, accusing sb of doing sth that is wrong or illegal
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>57</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[

]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260306</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech (2/2)</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_title>'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-treadmill-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher
→ highlight keywords in bold
→ mark the text with pauses |
→ annotate rhetorical questions with (?)
→ show assertiveness with (!)
→ practise oral delivery of this extract
<!-- 
If time available, prepare the role play below:
<img src="pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="icon"> <em>Should our government abide to supranational regulations?</em>
-->
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'Why is she still here?': Liz Truss and Keir Starmer's fiery exchange at PMQs
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYe6gxXFQNs</a>
→ watch the video


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<!-- semi-controlled practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>56</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-treadmill-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<functional_language>Delivering a political speech</functional_language>
<activity_lead_in>How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_02.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?
<span class="show_key">
✓ question the integrity &amp; competence of the opposition
→ make insinuations about concessions
✓ belittle the opposition
→ accept abolition of the pound sterling
✓ mock &amp; taunt them
→ hand over responsibility
</span>

→ watch the video again [03:53-04:32]
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ highlight keywords in bold
→ mark the text with pauses |
→ annotate rhetorical questions with (?)
→ show assertiveness with (!)
→ practise oral delivery of this extract
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[<div contenteditable="true"><em>
Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF to a central bank.
The fact is they have no competence on money no competence on the economy
so yes the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</em></div>]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency, to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF, to a central bank.
The fact is, they have no competence on money, no competence on the economy,
so, yes, the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling,
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</key>
</clog_activity>

<!-- postponed -->
<!-- freer practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>55</mdlid>
<activity_id>6</activity_id>
<activity_title>Role play</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-theatre-mask-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[You have been invited to debate with a panel of experts at a political TV show. This is prime time on the first channel.
<strong><em>Should our government abide to supranational regulations?</em></strong>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/bbc_tv_debate_01.jpg" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

Recycle new expressions and language
→ express complex political opinions clearly
→ speak persuasively in the political arena
e.g. use rhetorical questions, negative adverbial phrases, be occasionally theatrical
→ use technical terms related to government and policy  
e.g. neo-liberalism, supranationality
→ practise abstract concepts in political philosophy  
e.g. Thatcherism
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>You are in favour of a stronger role of the European Union in home affairs. You want your opposition to square with the urge to work together. You will not be accommodating.</task>
<ans>In the light of world economic pressure ought we not to make alliances with our closest neighbours?
Only together can we achieve a cohesive military defence strategy!
Haven't we denigrated the dangers of guns vs butter? Yes, we have...
</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>You are known to be an iron lady. You are against supranational governance which threatens sovereign interests of your country. Taunt decisions of your opposition in the light of recent political events.</task>
<ans>We don't want to be denuded of our powers!
Would you accept another cabinet's views to prevail over our own insights? 
Shall we allow bureaucrats to belittle our spirit of innovation and freedom? Shall we? No, we shan't!
Never before had we been plagued by such regulations!
Never before have we been crippled by such consumer protection policies!
And never again will we have to abide to measures that contradict our national interests!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>54</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to wane = to become gradually weaker or less important; (of the moon) to appear slightly smaller each day after being round and full
to denude = to make sth bare
denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc

to square (sb/sth) with = to be compatible or fit with something; to induce someone to accept or approve of something
to abide = to accept and act according to a law, an agreement, etc
cohesive = causing people or things to become united
accommodating = willing to help and do things for other people
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>53</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
A cohesive military strategy can <strike>appear</strike> <strong>emerge | result</strong> from our mutual efforts
Should we give up our national interests <strike>in case</strike> if we want to...
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260302</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech (1/2)</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>52</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Warmer</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>If you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman!</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Are women better at politics?
<em>I stand before you tonight in my red chiffon evening gown, my face softly made up, my fair hair gently waved…the Iron Lady of the Western World! Me? A cold war warrior? Well, yes—if that is how they wish to interpret my defence of values and freedoms fundamental to our way of life.</em>
speech at Finchley, 31 January 1976
<!--‘The Iron Lady’ was the name given to her by the Soviet defence ministry newspaper Red Star, which accused her of trying to revive the cold war-->
<div align="center"><img src="pix/1976_margaret_thatcher_iron_lady_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key></key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What does the following saying mean?
<em>If you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman</em>
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ a woman gets the job done
✓ more accommodating, less confronting approach to mitigate disagreements
✓ can afford to be more emotional
= gender role stereotype
〆female leaders who have made it to the top act like men

〆women may generate more conflictual situations when dealing with other women than men with men
= recognise common ambitious goals
→ natural rivalry
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>Love her or loathe her at least you knew where you stood with her!</em>
Do you agree with this opinion about Margaret Thatcher? Is it positive to call a spade a spade if you're into politics?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ may have been opinionated
〆less sugarcoating than U. von der Leyen
= reminiscent of a show of power before fighting
→ intimidation as a technique to impress your counterpart relevant only if they are actually smaller than you
e.g. would fail with China

→ sometimes need to be able to beat about the bush
= questionable stance when negotiating
→ make it harder for your opponent to understand your hidden agenda
</ans>
<hint>to call a spade a spade = to call a person or thing a name that is true but not polite; to speak bluntly
to loathe = to dislike sb/sth very much
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What would Margaret Thatcher say repeatedly 'no' to 14 years later?
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ to make clear her opposition to a single European currency
✓ to refuse more centralized controls from Brussels
the House of Commons, 30 October 1990
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191826719.001.0001/q-oro-ed4-00010826">Oxford Reference - Margaret Thatcher 1925–2013 British Conservative stateswoman; Prime Minister, 1979–90</a>
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>51</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 A</activity_id>
<activity_title>Facts and figures about Margaret Thatcher</activity_title>
<activity_title>Facts and figures about Margaret Thatcher (1/2)</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11024
margaret_thatcher_01.gift
php ../../moosh/moosh.php module-copy --section 1 11251 95
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
M.Thatcher was the first woman to lead a major political party in the UK. {T}

M.Thatcher was the longest-serving British prime minister of the {~19th =20th ~21st} century.

M.Thatcher implemented policies that came to be known as {~post-liberalism # Thatcherism, but also akin to neo-liberalism =Thatcherism ~neo-conservatism}.

M.Thatcher was dubbed the "Iron Lady" by a {~French ~German =Soviet #### a journalist from the Soviet defence ministry newspaper Red Star accused her of trying to revive the cold war} journalist.

Her nickname became associated with her {=uncompromising ~pro-European ~pro-Russian} politics and leadership style.</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>50</mdlid>
<activity_id>2 B</activity_id>
<activity_title>Target reading (true/false)</activity_title>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>quiz</activity_type>
<activity_module>matching</activity_module>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
https://www.ictnle.com/mod/quiz/view.php?id=11025
margaret_thatcher_02.gift
php ../../moosh/moosh.php module-copy --section 1 24171 95
]]></activity_contents>
<key>
M.Thatcher reversed {=high inflation ~individual liberty} prior to an oncoming recession.

Her policies emphasised {=greater individual liberty ~high inflation}.

M.Thatcher {~fought against =pushed for} privatisation of state-owned companies.

M.Thatcher reduced the power and influence of {~the House of Lords =trade unions}.

Her popularity in her first years in office {=waned amid ~was invigorated by} the recession and rising unemployment.</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>49</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>How diplomatic is it to repeat assertively 'No, no, no'? Why would you do that?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> 'No, No, No!' Margaret Thatcher's Most Iconic Speech

<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_01.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

<em>The year is 1990 and Margaret Thatcher is about to stand in Parliament and make one of her most iconic speeches.
The Prime Minister had just returned from an European summit in Rome where commissioner Jacques Delores had proposed further European integration. 
Mrs Thatcher responded - 'No, no, no.'
Whilst that line has become iconic, Professor Richard Whitman explains how Thatcher's view on Europe was actually a fascinating journey.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Chapters:
0:00 - 1:43 - Introduction
1:44 - 3:55 - Margaret Thatcher Vs Neil Kinnock
3:55 - 5:44 - Margaret Thatcher &amp; The EU
5:44 - 7:13 - Why The Speech Is So Memorable 
7:13 - 7:34 - No, No, No
7:34 - 9:07 - The Legacy Of The Speech 

no no no I mean it is a piece of sort of
masterful theater it is our purpose to
retain the power and influence of this
house there is a line between her
bruised speech between the no no no in
Parliament and brexit and not to Denude
it of many of the powers she was talking
to and taunting the party opposite for
the sake of agreeing for the sake of
being little sir Echo and saying me too
talking to the outside world I do not
want the commission to increase its po
against it house she was talking to her
own back benches to say that this is my
view on Europe um you've got to live
with
[Music]
this so the year's 1990 uh Margaret
thater is coming to the House of Commons
to report back from a meeting that she's
just had with her fellow European
leaders uh and she does what has ended
up being
one of the most dramatic moments I think
uh of a prime minister in our recent
political history which is setting a
very clear uh agenda for how she sees uh
the relationship between the UK and
Europe and what we all know now is that
in many ways this is the start of the
Final Act for her as prime minister the
EU was sort of gearing up to have a a a
conversation or rather to set in process
uh two conversations one on political
union for the EU and the other for what
became economic and monetary Union uh
and that was something that the British
government and thater in particular was
not comfortable with all they do is to
Margaret Thatcher Vs Neil Kinnock
strand Britain in some European second
division without the influence over
change that we need the industrial and
financial opportunity that we need and
indeed without the real sovereignty that
we need
yeah first Mr
Speaker it is our purpose to retain the
power and influence of this house and
not to Denude it of many of the powers I
wonder what the right honorable
gentleman's policy is in view of some of
the things he said would he have agreed
to a commitment to extend the
community's powers to other
supplementary sectors of economic
integration without having any
definition of what they are would he
because you would have thought he would
from what he said one of them was that
the commission wants to extend extend
its powers and confidence into the area
of Health we said no we weren't going to
agree to those things and what he says
he sounded as if he would for the sake
of agreeing for the sake of being little
sir Eko and saying me too one of the
things I really like about the speech uh
is the way that she uh she looks at the
opposition the way that she taunts the
opposition the way that she sets up a
very very different view of how a
government uh wants to treat the
European issue from the way that Neil
kinck and the labor party wanted to and
why I think that's particularly cutting
is not that long before Labor was
committed to the idea of leaving uh the
uh the European community and so you
know she you know is in a way as a
subtext I think sort of reminding uh the
labor party that they are very very
wobbly uh on the question uh of Europe
and she does it I think in a in a an
absolutely superb way I mean it is a
master class in how to sort of hold
Parliament inth and also to deliver a
really uh effective and and very very
cutting message perhaps the labor party
would give all those things up easily
Margaret Thatcher &amp; The EU
perhaps they would agree to a sing sing
Le currency to Total abolition of the
pound sterling perhaps being totally
incompetent with monetary matters they'd
be only too delighted to hand over the
full responsibility as they did to the
IMF to a central bank the fact is they
have no competence on money no
competence on the economy so yes the
right honorable gentleman would be glad
to hand it all over and what is the
point in trying to get elected to
Parliament only to hand over your
Sterling and to hand over the powers of
this house to Europe Margaret hatch had
a really interesting political Journey
on Europe because she
campaigned uh for or she was in favor of
Britain joining uh the then European
economic Community she campaigned in the
1975 referendum it will be a splendid
and decisive yes for Britain in Europe
but she had a very different idea as to
how Europe's individual states should
fit together and as we know I mean she
was a very strong believer in British
national identity uh a particular
conception of Britain's place in the
world and all of those things for her
were odds with the idea of building up
as she saw it uh a European uh
superstate so yes she was a pro-
European but she had a very very
different vision of Europe uh from other
uh European political leaders there is a
line between her Bru speech between the
no no no in Parliament and brexit
because you know British politicians uh
and members of the public just took a
different view of what kind of Europe
they wanted and so she really is uh the
the originator I think uh of the brexit
Why The Speech Is So Memorable
process to um to uh commissioner Leon
Britain he is of course a member of the
commission he is a loyal member of the
commission yes the commission does want
to increase its powers yes it is a
non-elected body and I do not want the
commission to increase its powers
against this house so of course we are
differing I think what makes it so
memorable is prime ministers are not
that categorical normally um I mean if
you look at the delivery of the speech
uh if you look at her body language if
you look at the intonation I mean it is
a piece of sort of masterful theater I
mean it's sort of you know in that Arena
you know in the House of Commons which
is you know theatrical which is a stage
I mean she was bringing everything into
play
in terms of making the point that she
wanted to make and it wasn't a position
that she could Retreat from so she was
talking to the outside world you know
she was talking to other European
leaders and and drawing what were was
for her uh you know a very clear and
unambiguous Red Line she was talking to
and taunting the party opposite you know
the labor party the shadow uh opposition
front bench led by Neil kinck and I
think she was talking to her own back
bench as well as members of her cabinet
on the front benches to say that you
know basically this is my view on Europe
um you've got to live with this uh or or
not and obviously the party in the end
decided not to of course the chairman or
No, No, No
the president of the commission Mr
delore said at press conference the
other day that he wanted the European
Parliament to be the Democratic body of
the community he wanted the commission
to be the executive and he wanted the
Council of ministers to be the Senate no
no
no unfortunately her you know vision of
9:07 - The Legacy Of The Speech
Europe and her vision of the European
community and how it could develop was
really at odds with many people in her
party I mean after she made that no no
no statement in the House of Commons her
Deputy Prime Minister resigned you know
there was a leadership contest um and uh
she lost the Premiership so you know she
was obviously a conviction politician on
something that she felt so strongly
about she was very unlikely to be
equivocal um but ultimately I think she
found it impossible to square her view
of how Britain should fit into Europe
with what at that time was the view that
prevailed within our cabinet uh and I
think within the party at large but you
know in a way it's a sort of Back to the
Future in that her idea of Europe and
her idea of Britain's relationship with
Europe is ended up being the predominant
view with the within the conservative
party now uh so in a way you know it's a
curious Legacy you know she lost the
Premiership but in a way she sort of
captured uh the hearts and minds of
members of the conservative party uh and
that's why we've ended up with a
relationship that we have between the UK
and the European union now
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>First, Mr Speaker, it is our purpose to retain the power and influence of this house and not to denude it of many of the powers</em> [02:02-02:14]
→ how strong is her stance?
→ what does it mean?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ assertive stance
→ speech should not seem to be contrived or deceitful
✓ use of theatrical touch 
→ need to overdo when speaking in public

✓ this house = Parliament
= not allow Brussels to become a European superstate
</ans>
<hint>to denude = to make sth bare
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>Would he have agreed to a commitment to extend the community's powers to other supplementary sectors of economic integration without having any definition of what they are?</em> [02:20-02:32]
→ what orating technique is used?
→ what is being suggested?
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ rhetorical question
〆unusually long for a rhetorical question
≠ being an eloquent speaker...

→ was she reading or improvising?
✓ probably paraphrasing bullet points of her speech
→ should have been easier to reproduce &amp; identify with

&bullet; agreed to a commitment?
&bullet; extend the community's powers
&bullet; to other supplementary sectors of economic integration 
&bullet; no definition of what they are

= yielding arguably unlimited power
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>One of them was that the commission wants to extend its powers and confidence into the area of Health.
We said no, we weren't going to agree to those things, and what he says,
he sounded as if he would, for the sake of agreeing, for the sake of being little sir Echo,
and saying me too.</em> [02:37-02:53]
→ how is voice modulation employed?
→ what is being underpinned?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ reported speech
✓ denigration
✓ belittling 
→ to taunt the opposition
! the labour party had previously suggested they wanted to leave the European Community
= inconsistent stance 
→ wobbly political integrity
</ans>
<hint>to underpin = to support or form the basis of an argument, a claim, etc
denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<!-- set for hw -->
<!-- semi-controlled practice -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>48</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Perhaps they would agree to a single currency - M.Thatcher</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-treadmill-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<functional_language>Delivering a political speech</functional_language>
<activity_lead_in>How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="pix/1990_margaret_thatcher_s_iconic_no_no_no_speech_02.png" width="400" alt="visual"></div>

How would you square your views with those of the opposition in Parliament?
<span class="show_key">
✓ question the integrity &amp; competence of the opposition
→ make insinuations about concessions
✓ belittle the opposition
→ accept abolition of the pound sterling
✓ mock &amp; taunt them
→ hand over responsibility
</span>

→ watch the video again [03:53-04:32]
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmsMNQl7V0</a>

→ highlight keywords in bold
→ mark the text with pauses |
→ annotate rhetorical questions with (?)
→ show assertiveness with (!)
→ practise oral delivery of this extract
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[<div contenteditable="true"><em>
Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF to a central bank.
The fact is they have no competence on money no competence on the economy
so yes the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</em></div>]]></instructions_demo>
<!-- <activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>Perhaps the labour party would give all those things up easily
Perhaps they would agree to a single currency, to total abolition of the pound sterling
Perhaps being totally incompetent with monetary matters 
they'd be only too delighted to hand over the full responsibility 
as they did to the IMF, to a central bank.
The fact is, they have no competence on money, no competence on the economy,
so, yes, the right honourable gentleman would be glad to hand it all over
And what is the point in trying to get elected to Parliament
only to hand over your Sterling,
and to hand over the powers of this house to Europe
</key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>47</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to call a spade a spade = to call a person or thing a name that is true but not polite; to speak bluntly
to loathe = to dislike sb/sth very much
to wane = to become gradually weaker or less important; (of the moon) to appear slightly smaller each day after being round and full
to denude = to make sth bare
to underpin = to support or form the basis of an argument, a claim, etc
denigration = action of choosing a person or thing for a particular purpose, or of giving them or it a particular status
belittling = making sb or the things that sb does seem unimportant
to taunt = to try to make sb angry or upset by saying unkind things about them, laughing at their failures, etc
to square (sb/sth) with = to be compatible or fit with something; to induce someone to accept or approve of something
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>46</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260227</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>How language shapes the way we think | Lera Boroditsky</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> How language shapes the way we think | Lera Boroditsky
<em>There are about 7,000 languages spoken around the world -- and they all have different sounds, vocabularies and structures. But do they shape the way we think? Cognitive scientist Lera Boroditsky shares examples of language -- from an Aboriginal community in Australia that uses cardinal directions instead of left and right to the multiple words for blue in Russian -- that suggest the answer is a resounding yes. "The beauty of linguistic diversity is that it reveals to us just how ingenious and how flexible the human mind is," Boroditsky says. "Human minds have invented not one cognitive universe, but 7,000.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKK7wGAYP6k">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKK7wGAYP6k</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>45</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>How language shapes the way we think | Lera Boroditsky</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in><![CDATA[Could you feel smarter in another language than your mother tongue? Why? How can language shape the way we think?
<span class="show_key">
✓ if that target language features concepts that don't exist in your mother tongue
✓ you may have fewer prejudices than those you have become accustomed to in your native language
e.g. collocations
(...)</span>]]></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> How language shapes the way we think | Lera Boroditsky
<em>There are about 7,000 languages spoken around the world -- and they all have different sounds, vocabularies and structures. But do they shape the way we think? Cognitive scientist Lera Boroditsky shares examples of language -- from an Aboriginal community in Australia that uses cardinal directions instead of left and right to the multiple words for blue in Russian -- that suggest the answer is a resounding yes. "The beauty of linguistic diversity is that it reveals to us just how ingenious and how flexible the human mind is," Boroditsky says. "Human minds have invented not one cognitive universe, but 7,000.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKK7wGAYP6k">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKK7wGAYP6k</a>

→ watch the video 
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/minstrels_of_beverley.gif" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/benny_hill_plays_uganda_dictator_idi_amin.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>]]></instructions02> -->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>how_language_shapes_the_way_we_think_lera_boroditsky_TED_RKK7wGAYP6k.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
So, I'll be speaking to you using language ...
because I can.
This is one these magical abilities that we humans have.
We can transmit really complicated thoughts to one another.
So what I'm doing right now is, I'm making sounds with my mouth
as I'm exhaling.
I'm making tones and hisses and puffs,
and those are creating air vibrations in the air.
Those air vibrations are traveling to you,
they're hitting your eardrums,
and then your brain takes those vibrations from your eardrums
and transforms them into thoughts.
I hope.
(Laughter)
I hope that's happening.
So because of this ability, we humans are able to transmit our ideas
across vast reaches of space and time.
We're able to transmit knowledge across minds.
I can put a bizarre new idea in your mind right now.
I could say,
"Imagine a jellyfish waltzing in a library
while thinking about quantum mechanics."
(Laughter)
Now, if everything has gone relatively well in your life so far,
you probably haven't had that thought before.
(Laughter)
But now I've just made you think it,
through language.
Now of course, there isn't just one language in the world,
there are about 7,000 languages spoken around the world.
And all the languages differ from one another in all kinds of ways.
Some languages have different sounds,
they have different vocabularies,
and they also have different structures --
very importantly, different structures.
That begs the question:
Does the language we speak shape the way we think?
Now, this is an ancient question.
People have been speculating about this question forever.
Charlemagne, Holy Roman emperor, said,
"To have a second language is to have a second soul" --
strong statement that language crafts reality.
But on the other hand, Shakespeare has Juliet say,
"What's in a name?
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
Well, that suggests that maybe language doesn't craft reality.
These arguments have gone back and forth for thousands of years.
But until recently, there hasn't been any data
to help us decide either way.
Recently, in my lab and other labs around the world,
we've started doing research,
and now we have actual scientific data to weigh in on this question.
So let me tell you about some of my favorite examples.
I'll start with an example from an Aboriginal community in Australia
that I had the chance to work with.
These are the Kuuk Thaayorre people.
They live in Pormpuraaw at the very west edge of Cape York.
What's cool about Kuuk Thaayorre is,
in Kuuk Thaayorre, they don't use words like "left" and "right,"
and instead, everything is in cardinal directions:
north, south, east and west.
And when I say everything, I really mean everything.
You would say something like,
"Oh, there's an ant on your southwest leg."
Or, "Move your cup to the north-northeast a little bit."
In fact, the way that you say "hello" in Kuuk Thaayorre is you say,
"Which way are you going?"
And the answer should be,
"North-northeast in the far distance.
How about you?"
So imagine as you're walking around your day,
every person you greet,
you have to report your heading direction.
(Laughter)
But that would actually get you oriented pretty fast, right?
Because you literally couldn't get past "hello,"
if you didn't know which way you were going.
In fact, people who speak languages like this stay oriented really well.
They stay oriented better than we used to think humans could.
We used to think that humans were worse than other creatures
because of some biological excuse:
"Oh, we don't have magnets in our beaks or in our scales."
No; if your language and your culture trains you to do it,
actually, you can do it.
There are humans around the world who stay oriented really well.
And just to get us in agreement
about how different this is from the way we do it,
I want you all to close your eyes for a second
and point southeast.
(Laughter)
Keep your eyes closed. Point.
OK, so you can open your eyes.
I see you guys pointing there, there, there, there, there ...
I don't know which way it is myself --
(Laughter)
You have not been a lot of help.
(Laughter)
So let's just say the accuracy in this room was not very high.
This is a big difference in cognitive ability across languages, right?
Where one group -- very distinguished group like you guys --
doesn't know which way is which,
but in another group,
I could ask a five-year-old and they would know.
(Laughter)
There are also really big differences in how people think about time.
So here I have pictures of my grandfather at different ages.
And if I ask an English speaker to organize time,
they might lay it out this way,
from left to right.
This has to do with writing direction.
If you were a speaker of Hebrew or Arabic,
you might do it going in the opposite direction,
from right to left.
But how would the Kuuk Thaayorre,
this Aboriginal group I just told you about, do it?
They don't use words like "left" and "right."
Let me give you hint.
When we sat people facing south,
they organized time from left to right.
When we sat them facing north,
they organized time from right to left.
When we sat them facing east,
time came towards the body.
What's the pattern?
East to west, right?
So for them, time doesn't actually get locked on the body at all,
it gets locked on the landscape.
So for me, if I'm facing this way,
then time goes this way,
and if I'm facing this way, then time goes this way.
I'm facing this way, time goes this way --
very egocentric of me to have the direction of time chase me around
every time I turn my body.
For the Kuuk Thaayorre, time is locked on the landscape.
It's a dramatically different way of thinking about time.
Here's another really smart human trick.
Suppose I ask you how many penguins are there.
Well, I bet I know how you'd solve that problem if you solved it.
You went, "One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight."
You counted them.
You named each one with a number,
and the last number you said was the number of penguins.
This is a little trick that you're taught to use as kids.
You learn the number list and you learn how to apply it.
A little linguistic trick.
Well, some languages don't do this,
because some languages don't have exact number words.
They're languages that don't have a word like "seven"
or a word like "eight."
In fact, people who speak these languages don't count,
and they have trouble keeping track of exact quantities.
So, for example, if I ask you to match this number of penguins
to the same number of ducks,
you would be able to do that by counting.
But folks who don't have that linguistic trick can't do that.
Languages also differ in how they divide up the color spectrum --
the visual world.
Some languages have lots of words for colors,
some have only a couple words, "light" and "dark."
And languages differ in where they put boundaries between colors.
So, for example, in English, there's a word for blue
that covers all of the colors that you can see on the screen,
but in Russian, there isn't a single word.
Instead, Russian speakers have to differentiate
between light blue, "goluboy,"
and dark blue, "siniy."
So Russians have this lifetime of experience of, in language,
distinguishing these two colors.
When we test people's ability to perceptually discriminate these colors,
what we find is that Russian speakers are faster
across this linguistic boundary.
They're faster to be able to tell the difference
between a light and dark blue.
And when you look at people's brains as they're looking at colors --
say you have colors shifting slowly from light to dark blue --
the brains of people who use different words for light and dark blue
will give a surprised reaction as the colors shift from light to dark,
as if, "Ooh, something has categorically changed,"
whereas the brains of English speakers, for example,
that don't make this categorical distinction,
don't give that surprise,
because nothing is categorically changing.
Languages have all kinds of structural quirks.
This is one of my favorites.
Lots of languages have grammatical gender;
every noun gets assigned a gender, often masculine or feminine.
And these genders differ across languages.
So, for example, the sun is feminine in German but masculine in Spanish,
and the moon, the reverse.
Could this actually have any consequence for how people think?
Do German speakers think of the sun as somehow more female-like,
and the moon somehow more male-like?
Actually, it turns out that's the case.
So if you ask German and Spanish speakers to, say, describe a bridge,
like the one here --
"bridge" happens to be grammatically feminine in German,
grammatically masculine in Spanish --
German speakers are more likely to say bridges are "beautiful," "elegant"
and stereotypically feminine words.
Whereas Spanish speakers will be more likely to say
they're "strong" or "long,"
these masculine words.
(Laughter)
Languages also differ in how they describe events, right?
You take an event like this, an accident.
In English, it's fine to say, "He broke the vase."
In a language like Spanish,
you might be more likely to say, "The vase broke,"
or, "The vase broke itself."
If it's an accident, you wouldn't say that someone did it.
In English, quite weirdly, we can even say things like,
"I broke my arm."
Now, in lots of languages,
you couldn't use that construction unless you are a lunatic
and you went out looking to break your arm --
(Laughter)
and you succeeded.
If it was an accident, you would use a different construction.
Now, this has consequences.
So, people who speak different languages will pay attention to different things,
depending on what their language usually requires them to do.
So we show the same accident to English speakers and Spanish speakers,
English speakers will remember who did it,
because English requires you to say, "He did it; he broke the vase."
Whereas Spanish speakers might be less likely to remember who did it
if it's an accident,
but they're more likely to remember that it was an accident.
They're more likely to remember the intention.
So, two people watch the same event,
witness the same crime,
but end up remembering different things about that event.
This has implications, of course, for eyewitness testimony.
It also has implications for blame and punishment.
So if you take English speakers
and I just show you someone breaking a vase,
and I say, "He broke the vase," as opposed to "The vase broke,"
even though you can witness it yourself,
you can watch the video,
you can watch the crime against the vase,
you will punish someone more,
you will blame someone more if I just said, "He broke it,"
as opposed to, "It broke."
The language guides our reasoning about events.
Now, I've given you a few examples
of how language can profoundly shape the way we think,
and it does so in a variety of ways.
So language can have big effects,
like we saw with space and time,
where people can lay out space and time
in completely different coordinate frames from each other.
Language can also have really deep effects --
that's what we saw with the case of number.
Having count words in your language,
having number words,
opens up the whole world of mathematics.
Of course, if you don't count, you can't do algebra,
you can't do any of the things
that would be required to build a room like this
or make this broadcast, right?
This little trick of number words gives you a stepping stone
into a whole cognitive realm.
Language can also have really early effects,
what we saw in the case of color.
These are really simple, basic, perceptual decisions.
We make thousands of them all the time,
and yet, language is getting in there
and fussing even with these tiny little perceptual decisions that we make.
Language can have really broad effects.
So the case of grammatical gender may be a little silly,
but at the same time, grammatical gender applies to all nouns.
That means language can shape how you're thinking
about anything that can be named by a noun.
That's a lot of stuff.
And finally, I gave you an example of how language can shape things
that have personal weight to us --
ideas like blame and punishment or eyewitness memory.
These are important things in our daily lives.
Now, the beauty of linguistic diversity is that it reveals to us
just how ingenious and how flexible the human mind is.
Human minds have invented not one cognitive universe, but 7,000 --
there are 7,000 languages spoken around the world.
And we can create many more --
languages, of course, are living things,
things that we can hone and change to suit our needs.
The tragic thing is that we're losing so much of this linguistic diversity
all the time.
We're losing about one language a week,
and by some estimates,
half of the world's languages will be gone in the next hundred years.
And the even worse news is that right now,
almost everything we know about the human mind and human brain
is based on studies of usually American English-speaking undergraduates
at universities.
That excludes almost all humans. Right?
So what we know about the human mind is actually incredibly narrow and biased,
and our science has to do better.
I want to leave you with this final thought.
I've told you about how speakers of different languages think differently,
but of course, that's not about how people elsewhere think.
It's about how you think.
It's how the language that you speak shapes the way that you think.
And that gives you the opportunity to ask,
"Why do I think the way that I do?"
"How could I think differently?"
And also,
"What thoughts do I wish to create?"
Thank you very much.
(Applause)
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What concept is illustrated by saying:
<em>"Imagine a jellyfish waltzing in a library while thinking about quantum mechanics."</em> [01:05-01:24]
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ share new thoughts through language which you had perhaps even never envisaged
→ the more vocabulary you have the better equipped you are to communicate effectively
</ans>
<hint>to envisage = to imagine what will happen in the future
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What did Charlemagne, Holy Roman emperor, mean, when he said:
<em>"To have a second language is to have a second soul"</em> [01:50-02:00]
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ language crafts reality
→ you are another person when you speak a different language
→ the more vocabulary you have the more perspectives you may take advantage of to look at things
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why did Shakespeare have Juliet say:
<em>"What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."</em> [02:00-02:20]
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ perhaps language doesn't craft reality
→ objective reality should be the same for every person but it is subjective
= ageless contradiction
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is unusual about the language used by an Aboriginal community in Australia, called Kuuk Thaayorre? [02:45-03:30]</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ in Kuuk Thaayorre, they don't use words like "left" and "right,"
→ instead, everything is in cardinal directions: north, south, east and west

e.g. the way that you say "hello" in Kuuk Thaayorre
question: <em>"Which way are you going?"</em>
answer: <em>North - north east in the far distance</em>
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What two conclusions can you draw from the cultural example of language spoken by Kuuk Thaayorre people [03:30-05:51]?
(staying oriented [03:48])
(thinking about time [05:10])</qs>
<ans>✓ if your language and your culture trains you to do it, you can do it
e.g. stay oriented although we have no magnets in our beaks or in our scales

✓ they organize time from east to west
= it gets locked on the landscape
→ no egocentric view (traditionally from left to right or vice versa)

✓ use a more organic approach to time management
= less linear &amp; target-oriented?
→ open to sharing more opportunities than just your own goals
✓ assess your position (as well as perhaps skills) in your environment in real time
→ anticipate possible obstacles better?
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What does the quantity of alternative words for different colours &amp; shades suggest? [06:48-07:59]</qs>
<ans>✓ in English, there's a word for blue that covers all of the colours that you can see
✓ in Russian, there isn't a single word
→ Russian speakers have to differentiate between light blue, "goluboy," and dark blue, "siniy."
→ make a categorical distinction
= ability to perceptually discriminate colours faster
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How can gender of nouns differ across cultures? How does this affect the way people think? [08:01-08:58]</qs>
<ans>examples:
✓ the sun is feminine in German but masculine in Spanish
✓ the moon is masculine in German but feminine in Spanish

→ for German speakers 
bridges are "beautiful," "elegant"
= stereotypically feminine words

→ for Spanish speakers 
bridges are "strong" or "long"
= more masculine words
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What examples are given to suggest how differently languages can describe events? [09:02-09:40]</qs>
<ans>✓ in English: "He broke the vase"
✓ in Spanish: "The vase broke"

in English: "I broke my arm."
→ in many languages = you did it intentionally
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How will different speakers interpret a same event in different ways? What conclusion can be drawn? [09:42-10:55]</qs>
<ans>✓ people remember different things about the same event
→ even eye-witnessing an event may be interpreted differently

e.g. English speakers will remember who did it [09:56]
→ English requires you to say, "He did it; he broke the vase."

e.g. Spanish speakers might be less likely to remember who did it if it's an accident
→ more likely to remember that it was an accident

Conclusion [10:44]
✓ you will punish someone more, you will blame someone more if you just said
"He broke it"
(as opposed to "It broke.")
✓ language guides our reasoning about events
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What are the risks of losing linguistic diversity? [12:28-12:56]</qs>
<ans>〆about one language is lost every week
〆half of the world's languages will be gone in the next hundred years according to some estimates
〆almost everything we know about the human mind and human brain is based on studies of usually American English-speaking undergraduates at universities
→ what we know about the human mind is actually incredibly narrow and biased
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>44</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
perpetuation = act of prolonging something
to undermine = to make sth, especially sb's confidence or authority, gradually weaker or less effective
to reprimand = to tell sb officially that you do not approve of them or their actions
construct = idea or a belief that is based on various pieces of evidence which are not always true; contrast between lived reality and the construct held in the mind
attuned = familiar with sb/sth so that you can understand or recognize them or it and act in an appropriate way
hangover = feeling, custom, habit, etc. that remains from the past, although it is no longer practical or suitable
agreeable = pleasant and easy to like
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>43</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
It describes <strike>an</strike> <strong>the</strong> ability to hear 
I don't remember in <strike>details</strike> <strong>detail</strong> what <strike>did</strike> she <strike>say</strike> <strong>said</strong>
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
determining /də'tə:məniŋ/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>





<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260216</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>18:15-19:15 MSK</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Political correctness works for no one (2/2)</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
(continuation from previous lesson)

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Political Correctness Works For No One | Jonathan Kay | TEDxUTSC - 16 Sept 2019
<em>Jonathan Kay is the Canadian editor for Quillette.com, a host of the Quillette and Wrongspeak podcasts, a book author and a columnist. His work has appeared recently in the National Post, Washington Post, The Atlantic, CBC.ca, Foreign Affairs and Maclean’s. His books include Among The Truthers(HarperCollins, 2011) and Legacy: How French Canadians Shaped North America (Signal, 2016). He is currently working on two book projects scheduled for publication in 2019. He tweets daily on the news at @jonkay.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>42</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Political correctness works for no one - Jonathan Kay</activity_title>
<session_date>20240110</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20240117</hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Do you believe political correctness really makes things better? For whom?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Political Correctness Works For No One | Jonathan Kay | TEDxUTSC - 16 Sept 2019
<em>Jonathan Kay is the Canadian editor for Quillette.com, a host of the Quillette and Wrongspeak podcasts, a book author and a columnist. His work has appeared recently in the National Post, Washington Post, The Atlantic, CBC.ca, Foreign Affairs and Maclean’s. His books include Among The Truthers(HarperCollins, 2011) and Legacy: How French Canadians Shaped North America (Signal, 2016). He is currently working on two book projects scheduled for publication in 2019. He tweets daily on the news at @jonkay.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions
<!-- → <span style="background-color: lime;">recycle cultural dimensions terminology &amp; concepts to support Jonathan Kay's explanations</span>
(use the same googledoc as previously)
~ 10-120 words / question
→ <strong>deadline: 20231206</strong> -->
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[[00:39-00:48]
Hugh Laurie: <em>This Octopus, what was it called?</em>
The Greek waiter: <em>Where was it caught? What a question! In the sea.</em>
Hugh Laurie: <em>Yeah... so, that should be OK, Gordon...</em>]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>political_correctness_works_for_no_one_jonathan_kay_TEDxUTSC_tPdMG3oFGac.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>

Introduction
my name is Jonathan Kaye I'm the
Canadian editor for Colette comm a
podcaster a book author
many people in the Twitter community
have described me as a professional
shitty story one of the previous
speakers she mentioned about her
intersectional nature she talked about
going to Starbucks and being the one who
had the really really complicated latte
I just warned you I'm the guy who goes
to the gas station and gets the instant
coffee in the microwave so my
perspective is a little different but I
do want to build bridges my subject is
political correctness and I think when
people look at someone like me they
assume that I'm gonna start my
presentation by going through a long
angry list of recent episodes and
controversies people who got shut up or
were censored or were mobbed in some way
but I don't want to recite that list of
controversies because I think most
people in this room already know the
episodes I'm talking about they're
pretty well covered in the news I also
want to make sure that when people watch
this video on YouTube which I hope they
do in coming years they find it relevant
in a way that goes past recent headlines
because the problem of political
correctness that I'm talking about is a
problem that is ageless it's a problem
that goes back in fact to ancient times
since people have been using words they
have been using those words to shut down
people who are using words that they
don't like some of the foundational and
most violent disputes in Islam and
Judaism and Christianity involve people
trying to dictate what language other
people use what languages they use for
God or for prayer or for believers or
for heretics and many of those
discussions that were had many of those
arguments and controversies essentially
followed the same politically correct
pattern that now dictates the arguments
we have over land and
hashtags and everything else that
informs our arguments about this subject
I also want to acknowledge the fact that
political correctness is a bipartisan
phenomenon we typically talk about it
these days as
problem on the left but you also see it
on the right side of the political
spectrum if you go on a right-wing
Facebook group and you say something
nasty about Donald Trump
I can guarantee you you will see a
politically correct reaction from your
audience even if they don't call it
political correctness I'd also like to
acknowledge that even though political
correctness has a negative connotation
it starts out with good intentions we
all want to live in a society that has
less racism and less sexism and less
homophobia and transphobia the problem
isn't with bad intentions behind
political correctness the problem is
human nature human beings love power
they love the power to shut up other
people and they will leverage any rule
any law any standard to attain that
power and that's how political
correctness affects our society it's not
just that we can't say a limited range
of things we can't resonate with other
people on any subject we want to take
the subject of today's event we become
more passive aggressive we become more
aggressive we become more passive
aggressive because we are encouraged to
feel more pain more emotional discomfort
when other people say things that we
disagree with then we become more
aggressive because we weaponize that
pain that we feel we mob people on
social media we attack people now it
used to be political correctness in the
old days when I was younger when I was
at college you had to use an
intermediary you had to go through
government or you had to go through a
human rights tribunal to shut somebody
down that's not the case anymore you can
go directly to Facebook or to Twitter
this is one of the ways that political
correctness has changed you know when I
was younger the dominant metaphor was
big brother from Georgia where Orwell's
novel 1984
Big Brother
but that model doesn't exist anymore the
idea of a single authoritarian power
shutting people down these days people
their censorship the telescreen that
existed on the wall in the novel 1984
that telescreen is now in our hands
that's how we censor people we don't
depend on Big Brother we have become Big
Brother now some people may say well
that's fine
you may call it Big Brother you may call
it political correctness but it's about
calling people out on racism and sexism
online and surely that's a good thing
the problem is that the people who
suffer most are the smallest fish in the
ocean
they're the people who don't have any
power they're the people who get called
out the big players on the other hand
someone like for instance Jordan
Peterson he doesn't get called out or if
he does he has the power to overcome it
Jordan Peterson of course is a tenured
University of Toronto professor at the
school where we're having this event he
says politically correct things all the
time politically incorrect things all
the time but he doesn't suffer much for
it in fact his last book sold I think 2
million copies because he has the power
to fight back political correctness
targets people who can't fight back and
this plays out institutionally as well I
have experience in journalism on the
left and on the right I worked for a
progressive liberal magazine and I also
worked for a conservative newspaper it
was at the left-wing liberal magazine
that I saw political correctness was the
most acute that's because of the
crowdsource nature of political
correctness these days it's the people
within your own networks who hurt you so
if you're a conservative it actually
doesn't hurt you that much if you're a
conservative the people in your networks
don't mind if you say politically
incorrect things in fact they're
cheerleading you when I worked at that
conservative newspaper
my most popular columns were the ones
denouncing political correctness when I
went to that left-wing magazine as I
said despite the fact that the actual
substance of what I was publishing what
I was saying was progressive stuff the
people I work with were terrified of
saying the wrong thing that's because
the people in their social networks were
the enforcers of politically correct
orthodoxy this is what's different from
the old days in the old days you ran
afoul of a central authority these days
you run afoul of your friends your
colleagues your relatives people who
have the same opinions as you and who
monitor everything you say closely some
of the smartest people I worked with in
my career were at that left-wing
progressive magazine but they were
people who were scared to say what they
wanted to say because they thought that
they were always one hashtag or one
syllable one pronoun one mistake away
from a career-ending utterance and so
they kept their mouth shut
whole weeks would go by when they
wouldn't say anything on Twitter or
Facebook or if they did they talk about
their clothes or what they ate meanwhile
my conservative friends are jabbering
away they don't care that's why if you
remember one thing from this
presentation please remember this
political correctness despite the fact
that it's supposed to be a left-wing
doctrine hurts people on the Left more
than it hurts people on the right
because of the crowdsourced nature of
its implementation that's why I don't
like to talk about scandals that you see
in the news that much because the
scandals don't tell the whole story you
know do I think it's terrible that some
conservative professor was shut down on
a university campus or someone pulled a
fire alarm or ben shapiro
was prevented from speaking at berkeley
or something like that yeah that's
annoying it's not good but the real
scandal isn't those isolated scandals
the real scandal is everything you don't
hear about because people don't speak
their mind because they're scared and so
no one notices
because no one says anything and as I
say that hurts people on the left more
than hurts people on the right this very
week I said I wasn't going to talk a lot
about examples but something happened
this very week that I thought was highly
illustrative it was it involved the
children's and young adult author named
Ellen oh and I could not think of a more
impeccably diverse multicultural ally
and advocate and is known in the world
of young adult fiction for her advocacy
of diversity and even started an
organization called we need more diverse
books she went on Twitter earlier this
week and started calling out peoples
that people of color can be racist to
which is true and we need people of
color to to be more rigorous about their
messaging because a lot of them are tone
deaf mistake you can imagine how people
responded they say tone deaf that's
insulting a few hours later she gets
back on Twitter and says I'm so sorry
I'm so sorry I offended people by saying
the word deaf and then at the end she
apologizes she says thank you for
pointing out my mistake and making me a
better person or words to the effect by
the way this is how you can always tell
if you're in the midst of a politically
correct cult if people end by thanking
their tormentors for pointing out how
horrible they are you know when when the
witches thank the witch hunters that's
when you know that during a cult and
this is a serious problem and as I say
it's limiting the range of opinions
people hear and in fact it attacks the
very premise of this event we're having
the idea of resonance resonance works
great when you're on the same wavelength
with somebody when someone is on a
different wavelength the concept of
resonance both in physics and in society
it becomes more complicated and you need
a robust society
a robust commitment to freedom of speech
so that people who have different
wavelengths can communicate with each
other and don't shut each other down so
what are the solutions
I see three solutions oh I see more but
I have a limited amount of time the
first is we shouldn't be part of the
problem
it means if we disagree with somebody
you hear something you disagree with
try not to medicalize it
try not to assign psychic pain or
emotional discomfort to it without first
saying maybe I just disagreed with that
it doesn't mean I'm suffering some kind
of medical reaction to it now there are
some kinds of words and phrases that
truly are medically painful in the way
they they affect us we all know those
those words and phrases I'm not gonna
repeat them here in those cases it's
fine to say those words hurt me because
some words really do hurt I get that but
in borderline cases ask yourself is the
pain I'm feeling is the discomfort I'm
feeling is it authentic or is it a
political artifact of the environment in
which we live where I am encouraged to
experience different kinds of opinions
different senses of humor different
kinds of communication as authoring as a
form of attack on me when it's not
sometimes it's just at different
wavelengths that happens - so ask
yourself that cross examine yourself
about your reaction to things the other
thing is when somebody does force you to
submit to political correctness try to
resist but I'm not naive I know that
especially for young people it's
impossible sometimes sometimes to keep
your job or to keep your place in school
or to keep yourself you're placing a
peer group it's necessary to submit to
politically correct regimes but what I
would ask is that if you do have to
submit destroy the premise of the person
who is trying to shut you up
say to them look
I get it I have to delete the tweet I
have to apologize
I have to do this I have to go to a
diversity class or what not because of
what I said
fine you have more power than me that's
why I'm doing what you want me to do not
because I agree with the premise that I
caused anybody psychological pain but
because you have more power than me
I also will tell you that if the roles
are reversed in a few years and I have
that power over you I will not be using
that power in the same way because I
want to live in a society where free
speech is valued more than the feelings
of people who may or may not be offended
by what I have to say the third thing I
would say my third solution voice your
community regardless of whether or not
you're offended I happen to be Jewish
when I'm online and I see somebody
getting called out for saying something
that's allegedly anti-semitic bad joke
stereotype if I don't think it's
anti-semitic I will say so I will jump
in and say I'm Jewish I don't find that
offensive relax we've all seen Seinfeld
we can tell the jokes I tried to use my
moral capital as a Jew to say that
something isn't anti-semitic if it's not
and you can do the same thing with it
whether you're gay trans black Jewish
not Jewish it doesn't matter voice your
community regardless of whether you're
offended or not because if we leave the
marketplace of ideas to people who are
constantly offended and we don't speak
up when we're not offending we have no
one else to blame but ourselves if the
marketplace of ideas is taken over by
Big Brother's little minions thank you
you
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What kind of person gets their coffee at a petrol station &amp; warms it up in the microwave? Why does Jonathan introduce himself this way? What bridges does he want to build? [00:30-01:04]
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ instant coffee suggests lack of fastidiousness
= indulgence oriented
→ warns the audience he may come across as too direct and blunt
= low power distance
✓ wants to build bridges by not starting with a long, angry list as people would expect him to do so
= linear active, low power distance
<!--
〆<span class="warning">He probably does it not to offend a person who works at a petrol station and makes this coffee by saying that the drink is cold. He doesn’t want to make any fuss about it and look like he’s nitpicking</span>

< ! - - (Tatiana Bogomolova) - - >
✓ His action of getting coffee at a petrol station and warming it in the microwave may symbolize a practical, no-frills approach to life, which could be perceived as a low-context behavior. It also represents a pragmatic, down-to-earth mindset. His choice of coffee and method of preparation could align with a linear-active mindset, which values efficiency and straightforwardness. It may resonate with cultures that emphasize a focus on indulgence versus restraint, favoring simplicity over extravagance -->
]]></ans>
<hint>fastidiousness = trait of being meticulous about matters of taste or style
fastidious /fəsˈtɪdɪəs/ = very careful in matters of choice or taste; fussy
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is the problem of political correctness ageless? [01:31-02:01]
</qs>
<ans>✓ goes back in fact to ancient times since people have been using words
✓ they have been using those words to shut down people who are using words that they don't like 
〆political correctness is leveraged to silence opposing viewpoints 
→ maintain existing power structures
= arguably synonymous of high uncertainty avoidance 
= reminiscent of collectivism &amp; restraint rather than more progressive, indulgence oriented individualism

✓ some of the foundational and most violent disputes in Islam and Judaism and Christianity involve people trying to dictate what language other people use what languages they use for God or for prayer or for believers or for heretics
= inclination to control language and expression 
→ reduce potential sources of conflict or confusion
→ high uncertainty avoidance
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ tension between individual expression and societal expectations (...) transcends time and cultures

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ arises from the human tendency to use language as a means of asserting power, expressing identity, and navigating social and cultural dynamics
✓ stems from clashes between different communication styles and cultural norms

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ using language to silence and control others (...) prevalent in major religions, where violent disputes have revolved around dictating the language used for God, prayer, believers, and heretics
(...)
From the viewpoint of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, the issue of political correctness can be connected to cultural values associated with power distance and uncertainty avoidance. In societies with high power distance, there may be a greater focus on language and communication as means of upholding social structure and hierarchy. 
Likewise, in cultures with high uncertainty avoidance, there may be a stronger inclination to control language and expression in order to reduce potential sources of conflict or confusion -->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What does he mean by political correctness being a bipartisan phenomenon? [02:21]
</qs>
<ans>✓ problem is on the left but you also see it on the right side of the political spectrum 
→ any political group can demonstrate tendencies to control language 
→ any political group can conform to certain standards in ways that limit open discourse
<!--
(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In the context of the United States, for example, both Democrats and Republicans have debates and discussions around political correctness

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ tendency to enforce certain standards of language and behaviour exists not only on the left side of the political spectrum, where it is usually associated, but also on the right
→ emphasizes widespread occurrence of the phenomenon across different ideological groups
→ encourages listeners to recognize its existence across the political spectrum

For example, the left side can show a politically correct behaviour because of their collectivist nature since they care about the minorities. On the other hand, in a conservative setting, individuals might be careful with language to maintain a sense of order and respect for authority (because of high power distance index), thus also behaving in a politically correct manner -->
</ans>
<hint>bipartisan /baɪˌpɑ:tɪˈzæn/ = involving two (political) parties
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why aren't good intentions just not enough? [02:45]
</qs>
<ans>✓ we all want to live in a society that has less racism and less sexism and less homophobia and transphobia
〆the problem is human nature 
→ human beings love power 
→ they love the power to shut up other people 
→ they will leverage any rule, any law, any standard to attain that power
= restraint rather than indulgence
<!--
(Tatiana Bogomolova)
(...) political correctness can be used by those in positions of power to silence opposing viewpoints and maintain existing power structures. By labelling certain opinions or expressions as politically incorrect, those in positions of power can effectively limit the freedom of speech and discourage criticism

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ According to Edward T. Hall, in high-context cultures, much of the meaning is implied in the context or the relationship between the speakers. Therefore, individuals from high-context cultures may perceive political correctness as an obstacle to genuine communication, as it may restrict their ability to express themselves openly and honestly -->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why are we becoming more passive aggressive? [03:42]
</qs>
<ans>✓ we are encouraged to feel more pain, more emotional discomfort when other people say things that we disagree with
✓ we weaponise that pain
→ individuals avoid direct confrontation 
→ resort instead to passive-aggressive tactics when faced with disagreement or emotional discomfort
<!--
(Tatiana Bogomolova)
For example, reactive cultures tend to avoid confrontation and maintain harmony. As a result, people may adopt passive-aggressive behaviour as a way to express disagreement or discomfort without engaging in direct confrontation with others. This is particularly evident in the context of social media, where people can indirectly express their dissatisfaction and attack others while avoiding personal confrontation

(Daria Sigaeva)
Jonathan Kay says that when other people say things that we disagree with, then we become more aggressive because we weaponize that pain that we feel. For example, according to G. Hofstede in societies with high uncertainty avoidance, individuals may be more likely to avoid direct confrontation and instead resort to passive-aggressive tactics when faced with disagreement or emotional discomfort. Similarly, according to the Lewis model, individuals from multi-active cultures may be more inclined to express their pain and discomfort indirectly, leading to passive-aggressive behaviour as a means of coping with emotional distress
-->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How was political correctness in the old days, how has it changed now? [04:08-05:16]
</qs>
<ans>✓ the dominant metaphor was Big Brother from George Orwell's novel 1984
Big Brother
= idea of a single authoritarian power shutting people down
→ high uncertainty avoidance, restraint and power distance

✓ we have become Big Brother
→ nowadays, we can call people out on racism and sexism online
= levels of indulgence and uncertainty avoidance have decreased 
→ majority of people are not afraid to take risks and express their opinions
<!--
(Valerya Batova)
✓ attribute transformations in political correctness to cultural shifts
e.g. changes in individualism-collectivism 
e.g. heightened awareness of social justice issues

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
(...) levels of uncertainty avoidance, restraint and power distance were high in earlier times. People were afraid of face-to-face confrontations and had to go through certain authorities to “shut the person up”. This all made them more restrained. Nowadays, the level of indulgence and uncertainty avoidance has become lower, so the majority of people are not afraid to take risks and express their opinions to others as soon as they feel discomfort. Moreover, people don't need to go through special instances, they can do it all on social media, which explains the low level of power distance -->
</ans>
<hint>mobbing = bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighbourhood, community, or online. When it occurs as physical and emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumour, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, non-sexual, non-racial/racial, general harassment
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What does Jonathan contest about political correctness? [05:20-06:08]
</qs>
<ans>✓ political correctness targets people who can't fight back
〆big wigs can get away with politically incorrect contents
= can afford to do so because of their reputation &amp; their power to fight back
<!--
(Valerya Batova)
✓ challenge the potential stifling of free expression or the imposition of rigid language norms
✓ frame contest within the context of individualism-collectivism, where an emphasis on personal expression clashes with societal expectations

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ nature of political correctness is crowd-driven 
✓ varies based on the social and ideological networks individuals belong to 
e.g. if you're conservative, the people don't mind if you say politically incorrect things
e.g. if you’re liberal, you may face backlash if you say something that goes against the progressive narrative
-->
</ans>
<hint>big wig = important person
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why does political correctness as a left-wing doctrine hurt actually people more on the left than on the right end of the spectrum? [06:24-07:10]
</qs>
<ans>✓ politically correct behaviour is supposed to be a left-wing doctrine 
→ care about the minorities
〆hurts people on the left more than it hurts people on the right 
→ should be extremely careful of every single hashtag/syllable/pronoun 
e.g. firefighter ← fireman
house-maker ← house-wife
chalkboard ← blackboard
<!--
→ creates a hierarchy of victimhood
= certain groups are deemed more oppressed or marginalized than others
→ crowdsourced nature of its implementation
✓ left-wing are progressive

(Maria Shramko)
✓ The ideas of left-wing are progressive, and thus people on the left should be extremely conscious about every single hashtag/syllable/pronoun (using firefighter instead of fireman; house-maker instead of house-wife; chalkboard instead of blackboard and so on)

(Veronika Strelnikova)
✓ often creates a hierarchy of victimhood, where certain groups are deemed more oppressed or marginalized than others

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ society expects people more on the left than on the right end of the spectrum to follow the politically correct norms because, first of all, they themselves have shown to everyone their intention to follow these norms
✓ since left-wingers always have to think about what they say, we can state that they have a high uncertainty avoidance level
→ political correctness can be seen as a set of rules to navigate uncertainty
-->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why are some people terrified of saying the wrong thing? What has changed? [07:11]
</qs>
<ans>✓ people in their social networks are the enforcers of politically correct orthodoxy 
= different from the old days 

→ in the old days you ran afoul of a central authority 

→ these days you run afoul of your friends, your colleagues, your relatives 
= people who have the same opinions as you but who monitor everything you say closely 
〆always one hashtag, or one syllable, one pronoun, one mistake away from a career-ending utterance 
= increased awareness and scrutiny of language
→ unreported cases where individuals self-censor out of fear

✓ political correctness is leveraged to silence opposing viewpoints 
→ maintain existing power structures
<!--
(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In terms of cultural models, Edward T. Hall's high-context and low-context communication styles may play a role in this fear. 
e.g. high-context culture
= where communication relies heavily on non-verbal cues and implicit understanding
→ individuals may be more afraid of being misunderstood or misinterpreted in an online environment where these signs are not as readily available
✓ Additionally, Lewis's model of linear-active, multi-active, and reactive communication styles may also contribute to this fear, as individuals from different cultural backgrounds may have different approaches to communication and may fear being perceived as insensitive or offensive
-->
</ans>
<hint>enforcer = one whose job it is to execute unpleasant tasks for a superior
to run afoul /ə'faul/ of sth (AmEn) = to do sth that is not allowed by a law or rule or sth that people in authority disapprove of
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the real scandal about political correctness? [08:53-09:20]
</qs>
<ans>✓ you don't hear everything because people don't speak their mind 
✓ refrain from self-expression
= fear of facing backlash
→ opt to remain silent
= self-censorship
→ no one notices
→ limiting the range of opinions people hear 
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ undermines the principles of free speech and intellectual diversity

(Anastasia Mesezhnikova)
✓ Ellen Oh apologized for her choice of words, expressing gratitude for being corrected and vowing to become a better person. 
→ this pattern, where individuals thank their critics for pointing out their perceived mistakes, is indicative of a politically correct culture, likening it to a cult

(Veronika Vitomskaya)
✓ recognise consent may be about power imbalances rather than agreement 
→ undermines assumptions of those who promote political correctness

(Valerya Batova)
✓ unintended consequences of limiting free expression in favour of adhering to strict language norms and societal expectations
✓ ultimately impact the depth of public discourse

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ constraint of individual expression in collectivist settings
= opinion of the group is valued more highly than that of the individual member 
→ in order not to become an outsider, she/he has to keep silent and follow the same opinion

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In Hofstede's model, cultures with high individualism value personal freedom and expression. When political correctness prevents individuals from speaking out and voicing their opinions, it goes against the cultural value of individualism and the expression of diverse perspectives
-->
</ans>
<hint>to undermine = to make sth, especially sb's confidence or authority, gradually weaker or less effective; to make sth weaker at the base, for example by digging under it
backlash (~ against | from) = strong negative reaction by a large number of people, for example to sth that has recently changed in society
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What solutions does Jonathan recommend? What question(s) should one ask themselves? [11:25]
→ 3 solutions [12:25] [13:00] [14:14]
</qs>
<ans>if we disagree with somebody, or you hear something you disagree with
→ try not to medicalize it [12:25]
i.e. not to assign psychic pain or emotional discomfort to it 
e.g. Is the pain or discomfort I'm feeling authentic or a political artefact of the environment in which we live, where I am encouraged to experience different kinds of opinions?
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ Does the pursuit of political correctness come at the expense of intellectual diversity and free expression?
-->
→ resist if someone forces you to submit [13:00]

→ voice your community if you think it's not offending [14:14]
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ foster a culture that values open dialogue, humour, and the ability to engage in difficult conversations without fear of retribution

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ encourage individuals to speak out and voice their opinions, even if it means going against the grain

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
1) We shouldn't be part of the problem. If we disagree with someone, we need to understand if what was said was truly hurtful and offensive, or if we disagree because of an existing necessity to maintain political correctness.
2) Try to resist when someone forces you to submit to political correctness. If you do have to submit, make it clear that you are doing so not because you want to, but because you are forced to obey these rules due to a lack of power.
3) Voice your community regardless of whether you’re offended or not
-->
</ans>
<hint>artefact = feature not naturally present, introduced during preparation or investigation
to go against the grain = to be contrary to the natural inclination or feeling of someone or something
to medicalise = to identify a condition as a disease so as to get treatment in order to improve your overall quality of life
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What conclusions are drawn? Do you agree with them? [15:06]
</qs>
<ans>✓ don't stifle free speech
. if we allow the marketplace of ideas to be dominated by easily offended individuals 
. if we fail to defend our own viewpoints when they are not offensive
→ we are responsible for any consequences that arise
<!--
(Maria Shramko)
✓ If we allow the marketplace of ideas to be dominated by easily offended individuals and fail to defend our own viewpoints when they are not offensive, we are responsible for any consequences that arise

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ warns that if only those who are constantly offended speak out, then everyone else is to blame for not participating in the marketplace of ideas

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ we should always talk about our likes and dislikes
✓ if you don't talk about likes &amp; dislikes
→ others will not know about your preferences 
→ will be afraid to say anything in order not to offend you
→ will drive themselves into even more limits
→ will invent more rules in order not to accidentally hurt you with a word or phrase

Most importantly, because of these unnecessary rules, these people themselves can suffer: 
e.g. they will be criticized by society by saying something they think is forbidden

(which does not offend you, but no one knows about it)

✓ extremely important to talk about what's offensive and what's not to different minorities 
→ make life easier not only for them but for everyone else
→ political correctness will be obvious and clear to absolutely everyone 
→ everyone will understand why it is necessary to follow it
-->
</ans>
<hint>to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[<em>Speech was given to man to hide his thoughts</em> French diplomat and politician Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord (1754–1838)
Do you agree with this quote? Is it still true today?
]]></qs>
<ans>
✓ language is frequently used as a tool for deception, diplomacy, or discretion rather than for honest, transparent communication
→ spoken words are used to conceal true feelings, intentions, or private thoughts
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>41</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
fastidiousness = trait of being meticulous about matters of taste or style
fastidious /fəsˈtɪdɪəs/ = very careful in matters of choice or taste; fussy
bipartisan /baɪˌpɑ:tɪˈzæn/ = involving two (political) parties
mobbing = bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighbourhood, community, or online. When it occurs as physical and emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumour, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, non-sexual, non-racial/racial, general harassment
big wig = important person
enforcer = one whose job it is to execute unpleasant tasks for a superior
to run afoul /ə'faul/ of sth (AmEn) = to do sth that is not allowed by a law or rule or sth that people in authority disapprove of
to undermine = to make sth, especially sb's confidence or authority, gradually weaker or less effective; to make sth weaker at the base, for example by digging under it
backlash (~ against | from) = strong negative reaction by a large number of people, for example to sth that has recently changed in society
artefact = feature not naturally present, introduced during preparation or investigation
to go against the grain = to be contrary to the natural inclination or feeling of someone or something
to medicalise = to identify a condition as a disease so as to get treatment in order to improve your overall quality of life
to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>40</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
All our activities <strike>is</strike> <strong>are</strong> scrutinised
They say I am a communist despite <strong>the fact (that)</strong> I am so wealthy but...
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
component /kəmˈpəunənt/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260213</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Political correctness works for no one</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Political Correctness Works For No One | Jonathan Kay | TEDxUTSC - 16 Sept 2019
<em>Jonathan Kay is the Canadian editor for Quillette.com, a host of the Quillette and Wrongspeak podcasts, a book author and a columnist. His work has appeared recently in the National Post, Washington Post, The Atlantic, CBC.ca, Foreign Affairs and Maclean’s. His books include Among The Truthers(HarperCollins, 2011) and Legacy: How French Canadians Shaped North America (Signal, 2016). He is currently working on two book projects scheduled for publication in 2019. He tweets daily on the news at @jonkay.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>39</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Micro assaults (common racial micro aggressions 1/2)</activity_title>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<display>3</display> 
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Does micro racism exist, or is it just another controversial lack of political correctness?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[What may feel incorrect or offensive in the following exchange? [01:42]

iRabbit English customer <em>Are you com-FOR-TA-ble? What is this ve-GE-TA-ble?</em> 
iRabbit Indian help desk <em>Sir, did you just head wobble and do the Indian accent?
(...) I sense micro racism &amp; nano supremacy in your assertions.</em> 

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> British 🇬🇧or Indian 🇮🇳accent? | iRabbit #4
Moontajska Productions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U</a>


Why could this be considered a micro aggression?
<span class="show_key">
= remarks and behaviours which might be experienced occasionally and brushed off as ‘rude’ or ‘inconsiderate’ by white people, and are amplified by being a constant part of the affected person’s daily experience
</span>

→ match the micro assaults with the categories
→ give examples
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_width_percentage>30</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>12</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
racial slurs 
avoidance behaviour 
positive representations of white supremacy or colonialism or negative representations of people of colour
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;2;3
4;5
6;7
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
N _ _ _ o
coloured
oriental
moving away
leaving out of group discussions
swastikas
images of subjugation
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
N _ _ _ o ← Negro

<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ed.ac.uk/equality-diversity/students/microaggressions/racial-microaggressions/common-racial-micro-agressions">https://www.ed.ac.uk/equality-diversity/students/microaggressions/racial-microaggressions/common-racial-micro-agressions</a>
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>38</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>Micro insults &amp; invalidations (common racial micro aggressions 2/2)</activity_title>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Have you ever experienced micro insults, and / or suffered from micro invalidation?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[
→ micro insults
<em>= variety of subtle snubs, conveying a hidden insult to the recipient. Perpetrators are usually unaware they are speaking from bias</em>

→ micro invalidation
<em>= communications that negate or nullify the thoughts, feelings or experiential reality of a person of colour</em>

→ match the micro insults &amp; invalidations with the categories
→ give examples
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_width_percentage>40</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>20</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
micro insults
micro invalidations
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;2;3;4;5;6
7;8;9;10;11;12;13;14
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
Your English is really good! (to someone who is Black or Asian British, Nigerian, American or to people perceived as speaking English as an additional language)
You are a credit to your people! (as if they are an exception to the rule) 
You’re Asian, how come you’re not good at Maths? (stereotyping) 
You are intimidating/aggressive. (to black people)
You’re very exotic! (intended compliment but experienced as racially-based)
You Chinese students are too quiet!
I’m sure they didn't mean anything by that!
You’re being over-sensitive!
Your colour doesn't matter to me, everyone’s human.
All lives matter!
You’re imagining it!
Anyone can succeed if they work hard enough...
I have Black friends, I can’t be racist!?
You should try to fit in more.
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.ed.ac.uk/equality-diversity/students/microaggressions/racial-microaggressions/common-racial-micro-agressions">https://www.ed.ac.uk/equality-diversity/students/microaggressions/racial-microaggressions/common-racial-micro-agressions</a>
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>37</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
to brush off = to bar from attention or consideration, to disregard
slur = unfair remark about sb/sth that may damage other people's opinion of them
supremacy = position in which you have more power, authority or status than anyone else
Negro = (old-fashioned, often offensive) member of a race of people with dark skin who originally came from Africa
swastika /ˈswɔstɪkə/ = ancient symbol in the form of a cross with its ends bent at an angle of 90 degrees, used in the 20th century as the symbol of the German Nazi party
subjugation = forced submission to control by others; oppression
micro insult = variety of subtle snubs, conveying a hidden insult to the recipient. Perpetrators are usually unaware they are speaking from bias
micro invalidation = communications that negate or nullify the thoughts, feelings or  experiential reality of a person of colour
Negro = (old-fashioned, often offensive) member of a race of people with dark skin who originally came from Africa
snub = action or a comment that is deliberately rude in order to show sb that you do not like or respect them
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>36</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Political correctness works for no one - Jonathan Kay</activity_title>
<session_date>20240110</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20240117</hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Do you believe political correctness really makes things better? For whom?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Political Correctness Works For No One | Jonathan Kay | TEDxUTSC - 16 Sept 2019
<em>Jonathan Kay is the Canadian editor for Quillette.com, a host of the Quillette and Wrongspeak podcasts, a book author and a columnist. His work has appeared recently in the National Post, Washington Post, The Atlantic, CBC.ca, Foreign Affairs and Maclean’s. His books include Among The Truthers(HarperCollins, 2011) and Legacy: How French Canadians Shaped North America (Signal, 2016). He is currently working on two book projects scheduled for publication in 2019. He tweets daily on the news at @jonkay.</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPdMG3oFGac</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions
<!-- → <span style="background-color: lime;">recycle cultural dimensions terminology &amp; concepts to support Jonathan Kay's explanations</span>
(use the same googledoc as previously)
~ 10-120 words / question
→ <strong>deadline: 20231206</strong> -->
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[[00:39-00:48]
Hugh Laurie: <em>This Octopus, what was it called?</em>
The Greek waiter: <em>Where was it caught? What a question! In the sea.</em>
Hugh Laurie: <em>Yeah... so, that should be OK, Gordon...</em>]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>political_correctness_works_for_no_one_jonathan_kay_TEDxUTSC_tPdMG3oFGac.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>

Introduction
my name is Jonathan Kaye I'm the
Canadian editor for Colette comm a
podcaster a book author
many people in the Twitter community
have described me as a professional
shitty story one of the previous
speakers she mentioned about her
intersectional nature she talked about
going to Starbucks and being the one who
had the really really complicated latte
I just warned you I'm the guy who goes
to the gas station and gets the instant
coffee in the microwave so my
perspective is a little different but I
do want to build bridges my subject is
political correctness and I think when
people look at someone like me they
assume that I'm gonna start my
presentation by going through a long
angry list of recent episodes and
controversies people who got shut up or
were censored or were mobbed in some way
but I don't want to recite that list of
controversies because I think most
people in this room already know the
episodes I'm talking about they're
pretty well covered in the news I also
want to make sure that when people watch
this video on YouTube which I hope they
do in coming years they find it relevant
in a way that goes past recent headlines
because the problem of political
correctness that I'm talking about is a
problem that is ageless it's a problem
that goes back in fact to ancient times
since people have been using words they
have been using those words to shut down
people who are using words that they
don't like some of the foundational and
most violent disputes in Islam and
Judaism and Christianity involve people
trying to dictate what language other
people use what languages they use for
God or for prayer or for believers or
for heretics and many of those
discussions that were had many of those
arguments and controversies essentially
followed the same politically correct
pattern that now dictates the arguments
we have over land and
hashtags and everything else that
informs our arguments about this subject
I also want to acknowledge the fact that
political correctness is a bipartisan
phenomenon we typically talk about it
these days as
problem on the left but you also see it
on the right side of the political
spectrum if you go on a right-wing
Facebook group and you say something
nasty about Donald Trump
I can guarantee you you will see a
politically correct reaction from your
audience even if they don't call it
political correctness I'd also like to
acknowledge that even though political
correctness has a negative connotation
it starts out with good intentions we
all want to live in a society that has
less racism and less sexism and less
homophobia and transphobia the problem
isn't with bad intentions behind
political correctness the problem is
human nature human beings love power
they love the power to shut up other
people and they will leverage any rule
any law any standard to attain that
power and that's how political
correctness affects our society it's not
just that we can't say a limited range
of things we can't resonate with other
people on any subject we want to take
the subject of today's event we become
more passive aggressive we become more
aggressive we become more passive
aggressive because we are encouraged to
feel more pain more emotional discomfort
when other people say things that we
disagree with then we become more
aggressive because we weaponize that
pain that we feel we mob people on
social media we attack people now it
used to be political correctness in the
old days when I was younger when I was
at college you had to use an
intermediary you had to go through
government or you had to go through a
human rights tribunal to shut somebody
down that's not the case anymore you can
go directly to Facebook or to Twitter
this is one of the ways that political
correctness has changed you know when I
was younger the dominant metaphor was
big brother from Georgia where Orwell's
novel 1984
Big Brother
but that model doesn't exist anymore the
idea of a single authoritarian power
shutting people down these days people
their censorship the telescreen that
existed on the wall in the novel 1984
that telescreen is now in our hands
that's how we censor people we don't
depend on Big Brother we have become Big
Brother now some people may say well
that's fine
you may call it Big Brother you may call
it political correctness but it's about
calling people out on racism and sexism
online and surely that's a good thing
the problem is that the people who
suffer most are the smallest fish in the
ocean
they're the people who don't have any
power they're the people who get called
out the big players on the other hand
someone like for instance Jordan
Peterson he doesn't get called out or if
he does he has the power to overcome it
Jordan Peterson of course is a tenured
University of Toronto professor at the
school where we're having this event he
says politically correct things all the
time politically incorrect things all
the time but he doesn't suffer much for
it in fact his last book sold I think 2
million copies because he has the power
to fight back political correctness
targets people who can't fight back and
this plays out institutionally as well I
have experience in journalism on the
left and on the right I worked for a
progressive liberal magazine and I also
worked for a conservative newspaper it
was at the left-wing liberal magazine
that I saw political correctness was the
most acute that's because of the
crowdsource nature of political
correctness these days it's the people
within your own networks who hurt you so
if you're a conservative it actually
doesn't hurt you that much if you're a
conservative the people in your networks
don't mind if you say politically
incorrect things in fact they're
cheerleading you when I worked at that
conservative newspaper
my most popular columns were the ones
denouncing political correctness when I
went to that left-wing magazine as I
said despite the fact that the actual
substance of what I was publishing what
I was saying was progressive stuff the
people I work with were terrified of
saying the wrong thing that's because
the people in their social networks were
the enforcers of politically correct
orthodoxy this is what's different from
the old days in the old days you ran
afoul of a central authority these days
you run afoul of your friends your
colleagues your relatives people who
have the same opinions as you and who
monitor everything you say closely some
of the smartest people I worked with in
my career were at that left-wing
progressive magazine but they were
people who were scared to say what they
wanted to say because they thought that
they were always one hashtag or one
syllable one pronoun one mistake away
from a career-ending utterance and so
they kept their mouth shut
whole weeks would go by when they
wouldn't say anything on Twitter or
Facebook or if they did they talk about
their clothes or what they ate meanwhile
my conservative friends are jabbering
away they don't care that's why if you
remember one thing from this
presentation please remember this
political correctness despite the fact
that it's supposed to be a left-wing
doctrine hurts people on the Left more
than it hurts people on the right
because of the crowdsourced nature of
its implementation that's why I don't
like to talk about scandals that you see
in the news that much because the
scandals don't tell the whole story you
know do I think it's terrible that some
conservative professor was shut down on
a university campus or someone pulled a
fire alarm or ben shapiro
was prevented from speaking at berkeley
or something like that yeah that's
annoying it's not good but the real
scandal isn't those isolated scandals
the real scandal is everything you don't
hear about because people don't speak
their mind because they're scared and so
no one notices
because no one says anything and as I
say that hurts people on the left more
than hurts people on the right this very
week I said I wasn't going to talk a lot
about examples but something happened
this very week that I thought was highly
illustrative it was it involved the
children's and young adult author named
Ellen oh and I could not think of a more
impeccably diverse multicultural ally
and advocate and is known in the world
of young adult fiction for her advocacy
of diversity and even started an
organization called we need more diverse
books she went on Twitter earlier this
week and started calling out peoples
that people of color can be racist to
which is true and we need people of
color to to be more rigorous about their
messaging because a lot of them are tone
deaf mistake you can imagine how people
responded they say tone deaf that's
insulting a few hours later she gets
back on Twitter and says I'm so sorry
I'm so sorry I offended people by saying
the word deaf and then at the end she
apologizes she says thank you for
pointing out my mistake and making me a
better person or words to the effect by
the way this is how you can always tell
if you're in the midst of a politically
correct cult if people end by thanking
their tormentors for pointing out how
horrible they are you know when when the
witches thank the witch hunters that's
when you know that during a cult and
this is a serious problem and as I say
it's limiting the range of opinions
people hear and in fact it attacks the
very premise of this event we're having
the idea of resonance resonance works
great when you're on the same wavelength
with somebody when someone is on a
different wavelength the concept of
resonance both in physics and in society
it becomes more complicated and you need
a robust society
a robust commitment to freedom of speech
so that people who have different
wavelengths can communicate with each
other and don't shut each other down so
what are the solutions
I see three solutions oh I see more but
I have a limited amount of time the
first is we shouldn't be part of the
problem
it means if we disagree with somebody
you hear something you disagree with
try not to medicalize it
try not to assign psychic pain or
emotional discomfort to it without first
saying maybe I just disagreed with that
it doesn't mean I'm suffering some kind
of medical reaction to it now there are
some kinds of words and phrases that
truly are medically painful in the way
they they affect us we all know those
those words and phrases I'm not gonna
repeat them here in those cases it's
fine to say those words hurt me because
some words really do hurt I get that but
in borderline cases ask yourself is the
pain I'm feeling is the discomfort I'm
feeling is it authentic or is it a
political artifact of the environment in
which we live where I am encouraged to
experience different kinds of opinions
different senses of humor different
kinds of communication as authoring as a
form of attack on me when it's not
sometimes it's just at different
wavelengths that happens - so ask
yourself that cross examine yourself
about your reaction to things the other
thing is when somebody does force you to
submit to political correctness try to
resist but I'm not naive I know that
especially for young people it's
impossible sometimes sometimes to keep
your job or to keep your place in school
or to keep yourself you're placing a
peer group it's necessary to submit to
politically correct regimes but what I
would ask is that if you do have to
submit destroy the premise of the person
who is trying to shut you up
say to them look
I get it I have to delete the tweet I
have to apologize
I have to do this I have to go to a
diversity class or what not because of
what I said
fine you have more power than me that's
why I'm doing what you want me to do not
because I agree with the premise that I
caused anybody psychological pain but
because you have more power than me
I also will tell you that if the roles
are reversed in a few years and I have
that power over you I will not be using
that power in the same way because I
want to live in a society where free
speech is valued more than the feelings
of people who may or may not be offended
by what I have to say the third thing I
would say my third solution voice your
community regardless of whether or not
you're offended I happen to be Jewish
when I'm online and I see somebody
getting called out for saying something
that's allegedly anti-semitic bad joke
stereotype if I don't think it's
anti-semitic I will say so I will jump
in and say I'm Jewish I don't find that
offensive relax we've all seen Seinfeld
we can tell the jokes I tried to use my
moral capital as a Jew to say that
something isn't anti-semitic if it's not
and you can do the same thing with it
whether you're gay trans black Jewish
not Jewish it doesn't matter voice your
community regardless of whether you're
offended or not because if we leave the
marketplace of ideas to people who are
constantly offended and we don't speak
up when we're not offending we have no
one else to blame but ourselves if the
marketplace of ideas is taken over by
Big Brother's little minions thank you
you
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What kind of person gets their coffee at a petrol station &amp; warms it up in the microwave? Why does Jonathan introduce himself this way? What bridges does he want to build? [00:30-01:04]
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ instant coffee suggests lack of fastidiousness
= indulgence oriented
→ warns the audience he may come across as too direct and blunt
= low power distance
✓ wants to build bridges by not starting with a long, angry list as people would expect him to do so
= linear active, low power distance
<!--
〆<span class="warning">He probably does it not to offend a person who works at a petrol station and makes this coffee by saying that the drink is cold. He doesn’t want to make any fuss about it and look like he’s nitpicking</span>

< ! - - (Tatiana Bogomolova) - - >
✓ His action of getting coffee at a petrol station and warming it in the microwave may symbolize a practical, no-frills approach to life, which could be perceived as a low-context behavior. It also represents a pragmatic, down-to-earth mindset. His choice of coffee and method of preparation could align with a linear-active mindset, which values efficiency and straightforwardness. It may resonate with cultures that emphasize a focus on indulgence versus restraint, favoring simplicity over extravagance -->
]]></ans>
<hint>fastidiousness = trait of being meticulous about matters of taste or style
fastidious /fəsˈtɪdɪəs/ = very careful in matters of choice or taste; fussy
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is the problem of political correctness ageless? [01:31-02:01]
</qs>
<ans>✓ goes back in fact to ancient times since people have been using words
✓ they have been using those words to shut down people who are using words that they don't like 
〆political correctness is leveraged to silence opposing viewpoints 
→ maintain existing power structures
= arguably synonymous of high uncertainty avoidance 
= reminiscent of collectivism &amp; restraint rather than more progressive, indulgence oriented individualism

✓ some of the foundational and most violent disputes in Islam and Judaism and Christianity involve people trying to dictate what language other people use what languages they use for God or for prayer or for believers or for heretics
= inclination to control language and expression 
→ reduce potential sources of conflict or confusion
→ high uncertainty avoidance
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ tension between individual expression and societal expectations (...) transcends time and cultures

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ arises from the human tendency to use language as a means of asserting power, expressing identity, and navigating social and cultural dynamics
✓ stems from clashes between different communication styles and cultural norms

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ using language to silence and control others (...) prevalent in major religions, where violent disputes have revolved around dictating the language used for God, prayer, believers, and heretics
(...)
From the viewpoint of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, the issue of political correctness can be connected to cultural values associated with power distance and uncertainty avoidance. In societies with high power distance, there may be a greater focus on language and communication as means of upholding social structure and hierarchy. 
Likewise, in cultures with high uncertainty avoidance, there may be a stronger inclination to control language and expression in order to reduce potential sources of conflict or confusion -->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What does he mean by political correctness being a bipartisan phenomenon? [02:21]
</qs>
<ans>✓ problem is on the left but you also see it on the right side of the political spectrum 
→ any political group can demonstrate tendencies to control language 
→ any political group can conform to certain standards in ways that limit open discourse
<!--
(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In the context of the United States, for example, both Democrats and Republicans have debates and discussions around political correctness

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ tendency to enforce certain standards of language and behaviour exists not only on the left side of the political spectrum, where it is usually associated, but also on the right
→ emphasizes widespread occurrence of the phenomenon across different ideological groups
→ encourages listeners to recognize its existence across the political spectrum

For example, the left side can show a politically correct behaviour because of their collectivist nature since they care about the minorities. On the other hand, in a conservative setting, individuals might be careful with language to maintain a sense of order and respect for authority (because of high power distance index), thus also behaving in a politically correct manner -->
</ans>
<hint>bipartisan /baɪˌpɑ:tɪˈzæn/ = involving two (political) parties
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why aren't good intentions just not enough? [02:45]
</qs>
<ans>✓ we all want to live in a society that has less racism and less sexism and less homophobia and transphobia
〆the problem is human nature 
→ human beings love power 
→ they love the power to shut up other people 
→ they will leverage any rule, any law, any standard to attain that power
= restraint rather than indulgence
<!--
(Tatiana Bogomolova)
(...) political correctness can be used by those in positions of power to silence opposing viewpoints and maintain existing power structures. By labelling certain opinions or expressions as politically incorrect, those in positions of power can effectively limit the freedom of speech and discourage criticism

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ According to Edward T. Hall, in high-context cultures, much of the meaning is implied in the context or the relationship between the speakers. Therefore, individuals from high-context cultures may perceive political correctness as an obstacle to genuine communication, as it may restrict their ability to express themselves openly and honestly -->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why are we becoming more passive aggressive? [03:42]
</qs>
<ans>✓ we are encouraged to feel more pain, more emotional discomfort when other people say things that we disagree with
✓ we weaponise that pain
→ individuals avoid direct confrontation 
→ resort instead to passive-aggressive tactics when faced with disagreement or emotional discomfort
<!--
(Tatiana Bogomolova)
For example, reactive cultures tend to avoid confrontation and maintain harmony. As a result, people may adopt passive-aggressive behaviour as a way to express disagreement or discomfort without engaging in direct confrontation with others. This is particularly evident in the context of social media, where people can indirectly express their dissatisfaction and attack others while avoiding personal confrontation

(Daria Sigaeva)
Jonathan Kay says that when other people say things that we disagree with, then we become more aggressive because we weaponize that pain that we feel. For example, according to G. Hofstede in societies with high uncertainty avoidance, individuals may be more likely to avoid direct confrontation and instead resort to passive-aggressive tactics when faced with disagreement or emotional discomfort. Similarly, according to the Lewis model, individuals from multi-active cultures may be more inclined to express their pain and discomfort indirectly, leading to passive-aggressive behaviour as a means of coping with emotional distress
-->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How was political correctness in the old days, how has it changed now? [04:08-05:16]
</qs>
<ans>✓ the dominant metaphor was Big Brother from George Orwell's novel 1984
Big Brother
= idea of a single authoritarian power shutting people down
→ high uncertainty avoidance, restraint and power distance

✓ we have become Big Brother
→ nowadays, we can call people out on racism and sexism online
= levels of indulgence and uncertainty avoidance have decreased 
→ majority of people are not afraid to take risks and express their opinions
<!--
(Valerya Batova)
✓ attribute transformations in political correctness to cultural shifts
e.g. changes in individualism-collectivism 
e.g. heightened awareness of social justice issues

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
(...) levels of uncertainty avoidance, restraint and power distance were high in earlier times. People were afraid of face-to-face confrontations and had to go through certain authorities to “shut the person up”. This all made them more restrained. Nowadays, the level of indulgence and uncertainty avoidance has become lower, so the majority of people are not afraid to take risks and express their opinions to others as soon as they feel discomfort. Moreover, people don't need to go through special instances, they can do it all on social media, which explains the low level of power distance -->
</ans>
<hint>mobbing = bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighbourhood, community, or online. When it occurs as physical and emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumour, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, non-sexual, non-racial/racial, general harassment
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What does Jonathan contest about political correctness? [05:20-06:08]
</qs>
<ans>✓ political correctness targets people who can't fight back
〆big wigs can get away with politically incorrect contents
= can afford to do so because of their reputation &amp; their power to fight back
<!--
(Valerya Batova)
✓ challenge the potential stifling of free expression or the imposition of rigid language norms
✓ frame contest within the context of individualism-collectivism, where an emphasis on personal expression clashes with societal expectations

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ nature of political correctness is crowd-driven 
✓ varies based on the social and ideological networks individuals belong to 
e.g. if you're conservative, the people don't mind if you say politically incorrect things
e.g. if you’re liberal, you may face backlash if you say something that goes against the progressive narrative
-->
</ans>
<hint>big wig = important person
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why does political correctness as a left-wing doctrine hurt actually people more on the left than on the right end of the spectrum? [06:24-07:10]
</qs>
<ans>✓ politically correct behaviour is supposed to be a left-wing doctrine 
→ care about the minorities
〆hurts people on the left more than it hurts people on the right 
→ should be extremely careful of every single hashtag/syllable/pronoun 
e.g. firefighter ← fireman
house-maker ← house-wife
chalkboard ← blackboard
<!--
→ creates a hierarchy of victimhood
= certain groups are deemed more oppressed or marginalized than others
→ crowdsourced nature of its implementation
✓ left-wing are progressive

(Maria Shramko)
✓ The ideas of left-wing are progressive, and thus people on the left should be extremely conscious about every single hashtag/syllable/pronoun (using firefighter instead of fireman; house-maker instead of house-wife; chalkboard instead of blackboard and so on)

(Veronika Strelnikova)
✓ often creates a hierarchy of victimhood, where certain groups are deemed more oppressed or marginalized than others

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ society expects people more on the left than on the right end of the spectrum to follow the politically correct norms because, first of all, they themselves have shown to everyone their intention to follow these norms
✓ since left-wingers always have to think about what they say, we can state that they have a high uncertainty avoidance level
→ political correctness can be seen as a set of rules to navigate uncertainty
-->
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why are some people terrified of saying the wrong thing? What has changed? [07:11]
</qs>
<ans>✓ people in their social networks are the enforcers of politically correct orthodoxy 
= different from the old days 

→ in the old days you ran afoul of a central authority 

→ these days you run afoul of your friends, your colleagues, your relatives 
= people who have the same opinions as you but who monitor everything you say closely 
〆always one hashtag, or one syllable, one pronoun, one mistake away from a career-ending utterance 
= increased awareness and scrutiny of language
→ unreported cases where individuals self-censor out of fear

✓ political correctness is leveraged to silence opposing viewpoints 
→ maintain existing power structures
<!--
(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In terms of cultural models, Edward T. Hall's high-context and low-context communication styles may play a role in this fear. 
e.g. high-context culture
= where communication relies heavily on non-verbal cues and implicit understanding
→ individuals may be more afraid of being misunderstood or misinterpreted in an online environment where these signs are not as readily available
✓ Additionally, Lewis's model of linear-active, multi-active, and reactive communication styles may also contribute to this fear, as individuals from different cultural backgrounds may have different approaches to communication and may fear being perceived as insensitive or offensive
-->
</ans>
<hint>enforcer = one whose job it is to execute unpleasant tasks for a superior
to run afoul of sth (AmEn) = to do sth that is not allowed by a law or rule or sth that people in authority disapprove of
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the real scandal about political correctness? [08:53-09:20]
</qs>
<ans>✓ you don't hear everything because people don't speak their mind 
✓ refrain from self-expression
= fear of facing backlash
→ opt to remain silent
= self-censorship
→ no one notices
→ limiting the range of opinions people hear 
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ undermines the principles of free speech and intellectual diversity

(Anastasia Mesezhnikova)
✓ Ellen Oh apologized for her choice of words, expressing gratitude for being corrected and vowing to become a better person. 
→ this pattern, where individuals thank their critics for pointing out their perceived mistakes, is indicative of a politically correct culture, likening it to a cult

(Veronika Vitomskaya)
✓ recognise consent may be about power imbalances rather than agreement 
→ undermines assumptions of those who promote political correctness

(Valerya Batova)
✓ unintended consequences of limiting free expression in favour of adhering to strict language norms and societal expectations
✓ ultimately impact the depth of public discourse

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ constraint of individual expression in collectivist settings
= opinion of the group is valued more highly than that of the individual member 
→ in order not to become an outsider, she/he has to keep silent and follow the same opinion

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ In Hofstede's model, cultures with high individualism value personal freedom and expression. When political correctness prevents individuals from speaking out and voicing their opinions, it goes against the cultural value of individualism and the expression of diverse perspectives
-->
</ans>
<hint>to undermine = to make sth, especially sb's confidence or authority, gradually weaker or less effective; to make sth weaker at the base, for example by digging under it
backlash (~ against | from) = strong negative reaction by a large number of people, for example to sth that has recently changed in society
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What solutions does Jonathan recommend? What question(s) should one ask themselves? [11:25]
→ 3 solutions [12:25] [13:00] [14:14]
</qs>
<ans>if we disagree with somebody, or you hear something you disagree with
→ try not to medicalize it [12:25]
i.e. not to assign psychic pain or emotional discomfort to it 
e.g. Is the pain or discomfort I'm feeling authentic or a political artefact of the environment in which we live, where I am encouraged to experience different kinds of opinions?
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ Does the pursuit of political correctness come at the expense of intellectual diversity and free expression?
-->
→ resist if someone forces you to submit [13:00]

→ voice your community if you think it's not offending [14:14]
<!--
(Alicia Petukhova)
✓ foster a culture that values open dialogue, humour, and the ability to engage in difficult conversations without fear of retribution

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ encourage individuals to speak out and voice their opinions, even if it means going against the grain

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
1) We shouldn't be part of the problem. If we disagree with someone, we need to understand if what was said was truly hurtful and offensive, or if we disagree because of an existing necessity to maintain political correctness.
2) Try to resist when someone forces you to submit to political correctness. If you do have to submit, make it clear that you are doing so not because you want to, but because you are forced to obey these rules due to a lack of power.
3) Voice your community regardless of whether you’re offended or not
-->
</ans>
<hint>artefact = feature not naturally present, introduced during preparation or investigation
to go against the grain = to be contrary to the natural inclination or feeling of someone or something
to medicalise = to identify a condition as a disease so as to get treatment in order to improve your overall quality of life
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What conclusions are drawn? Do you agree with them? [15:06]
</qs>
<ans>✓ don't stifle free speech
. if we allow the marketplace of ideas to be dominated by easily offended individuals 
. if we fail to defend our own viewpoints when they are not offensive
→ we are responsible for any consequences that arise
<!--
(Maria Shramko)
✓ If we allow the marketplace of ideas to be dominated by easily offended individuals and fail to defend our own viewpoints when they are not offensive, we are responsible for any consequences that arise

(Daria Sigaeva)
✓ warns that if only those who are constantly offended speak out, then everyone else is to blame for not participating in the marketplace of ideas

(Tatiana Bogomolova)
✓ we should always talk about our likes and dislikes
✓ if you don't talk about likes &amp; dislikes
→ others will not know about your preferences 
→ will be afraid to say anything in order not to offend you
→ will drive themselves into even more limits
→ will invent more rules in order not to accidentally hurt you with a word or phrase

Most importantly, because of these unnecessary rules, these people themselves can suffer: 
e.g. they will be criticized by society by saying something they think is forbidden

(which does not offend you, but no one knows about it)

✓ extremely important to talk about what's offensive and what's not to different minorities 
→ make life easier not only for them but for everyone else
→ political correctness will be obvious and clear to absolutely everyone 
→ everyone will understand why it is necessary to follow it
-->
</ans>
<hint>to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>35</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
fastidiousness = trait of being meticulous about matters of taste or style
fastidious /fəsˈtɪdɪəs/ = very careful in matters of choice or taste; fussy
bipartisan /baɪˌpɑ:tɪˈzæn/ = involving two (political) parties
mobbing = bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighbourhood, community, or online. When it occurs as physical and emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumour, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, non-sexual, non-racial/racial, general harassment
big wig = important person
enforcer = one whose job it is to execute unpleasant tasks for a superior
to run afoul of sth (AmEn) = to do sth that is not allowed by a law or rule or sth that people in authority disapprove of
to undermine = to make sth, especially sb's confidence or authority, gradually weaker or less effective; to make sth weaker at the base, for example by digging under it
backlash (~ against | from) = strong negative reaction by a large number of people, for example to sth that has recently changed in society
artefact = feature not naturally present, introduced during preparation or investigation
to go against the grain = to be contrary to the natural inclination or feeling of someone or something
to medicalise = to identify a condition as a disease so as to get treatment in order to improve your overall quality of life
to stifle /'staifəl/ = to prevent sth from happening; to prevent a feeling from being expressed
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>34</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
A political mechanism which allows <strike>to</strike> people to express themselves
It is <strike>spreaded</strike> <strong>spread</strong> among the members of society
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>





<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260209</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>British 🇬🇧or Indian 🇮🇳accent? | iRabbit #4</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> British 🇬🇧or Indian 🇮🇳accent? | iRabbit #4
Moontajska Productions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>33</mdlid>
<activity_id>7</activity_id>
<activity_title>Politically correct language 2/2</activity_title>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa_writing</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa_writing</activity_type>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[Re-write the following proverbs in a more politically correct way.
→ are such proverbs still valid in your culture?
<span class="show_key">
✓ many proverbs are timeless, regardless of their country of origin
</span>
→ is using proverbs a reliable way to communicate across cultures?
<span class="show_key">
〆probably not
</span>
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise.
</qs>
<ans>man → people

Is this more culturally true of people who live in northern parts of the hemisphere?
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>He who cannot obey cannot command.
</qs>
<ans>He → A person

Will you have enough self-discipline to do what you pray?
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>A man's home is his castle.
</qs>
<ans>A person's home is their castle.

Is this still true in today's on-line world?
✓ home may feel like a shell to protect oneself
✓ thanks to telework people may have both a social and professional life from their home
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Every man has his hobby horse.
</qs>
<ans>Everyone has their hobby horse.
</ans>
<hint>hobby horse = (sometimes disapproving) subject that sb feels strongly about and likes to talk about
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>He is happy that thinks himself so.
</qs>
<ans>They are happy that think themselves so.
↔ Happy are those who think themselves so.

Has pursuit of happiness become easier in the past centuries?
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>32</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Native speakers' dialect</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-movie-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>Can a language be taught without being occasionally politically incorrect?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Are native speakers such good examples to follow?
<span class="show_key">
✓ if native speakers are considered politically neutral in their environment...
= reminiscent of a dialect
→ make sure your register matches the cultural context
</span>

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> British 🇬🇧or Indian 🇮🇳accent? | iRabbit #4
Moontajska Productions
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U</a>

→ watch the video 
→ imagine what viewers may write in the comments
→ read sample comments
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/minstrels_of_beverley.gif" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/benny_hill_plays_uganda_dictator_idi_amin.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>]]></instructions02> -->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo> -->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>british_accent_or_indian_iRabbit_nr4_OwRvUCi2s1U.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What is the Englishman accused of? [01:42]
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[〆politically incorrect language
<em>The damn thing doesn't seem to work
I'm speaking the Queen's English
Don't need your damn course
Don't you bloody hell...
It's a bloody umbrella</em>
→ is speaking the Queen's English the only way to use English language properly?

〆wrong behaviour
mocking Indian accent
→ suggests nano-supremacy
= micro-racism

<em>The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool...
Did you Shakespeare me?</em>
→ quoting common wisdom may suggest a condescending approach

Is using offensive language justified?
〆no, should disarm people by making them proud of themselves
→ don't use colloquialism which might be misunderstood
]]></ans>
<hint>damn = swear word that people use to show that they are annoyed, disappointed, etc
bloody = swear word that many people find offensive that is used to emphasize a comment or an angry statement
colloquialism = word or phrase that is used in conversation but not in formal speech or writing
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why do you think Maria has a Soviet Union like accent? [02:15]
</qs>
<ans>✓ caricature of threatening, totalitarian regime
✓ doesn't allow for cultural &amp; linguistic diversity
= deploys political correctness to the detriment of authenticity 
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why does the Englishman say <em>"I beg your pardon?"</em>
Why does he ask if Maria is from another planet? [02:23]
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ he is not sure he has understood her well &amp; pretends to be very surprised by what she is suggesting
✓ she explains they don't tolerate any racist, sexist, homophobic, white supremacist, neocolonial insinuations on their platform

= woke alert
✓ initially advocating for justice, equity, and inclusion, fostering empathetic workplaces and social change
〆weaponised political term to describe perceived far-left ideologies, often conflated with "political correctness"

→ he thinks this is excessive because he probably doesn't consider himself using such language
= fish can't see water
</ans>
<hint>insinuation = suggesting indirectly that sth unpleasant is true
woke culture = heightened awareness of social, racial, and gender injustices, originating as a term for alertness to discrimination against marginalized groups, particularly Black people. Advocates for proactive, progressive change but has evolved into a contentious political term often used by critics to deride left-wing, identity-based, or "politically correct" ideologies
to deride = to treat sb/sth as ridiculous and not worth considering seriously
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you think British English will become a dialect one day? Why / why not?
</qs>
<ans>✓ it may have already...
✓ more non native people speak English than natives

→ approximately 7.8 billion inhabitants
✓ 1.35 billion speak English
~ 360 million people speak English as a first language
! most common first language is Chinese, then Spanish (English = 3rd)
✓ English is by far the most commonly studied
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Should RP (received pronunciation, aka BBC English) still be the kind of language taught?
</qs>
<ans>
<![CDATA[<em>The truth is this is now reality. I was teaching in a class in a British University (can't name it here, or I will get sued!). It was a post-graduate class, and almost all the students were international, including Chinese, Indians, many East Europeans, Italians, French, German etc. There were just a couple of English students in the class. Every class had a case or exercise, so there was lots of group discussion in the class. Most of the time, students spoke with their respective accents in the class, but everybody understood each other all the time.  

And then one day, one of the few English students (who were mostly silent) spoke and made his point. Suddenly there was a stunned silence in the class! And I quickly realized this was because not one of the students understood a word of what he spoke (except for the couple of other English students!). This student was from Liverpool. Then one of the international students politely requested him to repeat what he said. Again, none of the students understood him. Then he repeated himself a third time. And then out of sheer frustration, he just said 'oh well, forget it', and gave up! But by then I had picked up what he said, and interpreted what he said for the rest of the class. 

That scene was remarkable for me. This was a British University sitting in the heart of London, offering a British PG degree. And yet, all the international students could converse and understand each other perfectly in English, except when the actual native English student spoke! That to me suggested English had now truly become an international language, and was no more owned by England! (although England will always get full credit for having created the language).</em>
@stephenmani8495
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwRvUCi2s1U</a>
]]></ans>
<hint>RP (received pronunciation) = approved pronunciation of British English; originally based on the King's English as spoken at public schools and at Oxford and Cambridge Universities (and widely accepted elsewhere in Britain); until recently it was the pronunciation of English used in British broadcasting
to converse = to have a conversation with sb
stunned silence = silence resulting from such surprise or shock that nobody can think clearly or speak
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>31</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
damn = swear word that people use to show that they are annoyed, disappointed, etc
bloody = swear word that many people find offensive that is used to emphasize a comment or an angry statement
colloquialism = word or phrase that is used in conversation but not in formal speech or writing
insinuation = suggesting indirectly that sth unpleasant is true
woke culture = heightened awareness of social, racial, and gender injustices, originating as a term for alertness to discrimination against marginalized groups, particularly Black people. Advocates for proactive, progressive change but has evolved into a contentious political term often used by critics to deride left-wing, identity-based, or "politically correct" ideologies 
to deride = to treat sb/sth as ridiculous and not worth considering seriously
stunned silence = silence resulting from such surprise or shock that nobody can think clearly or speak
RP (received pronunciation) = approved pronunciation of British English; originally based on the King's English as spoken at public schools and at Oxford and Cambridge Universities (and widely accepted elsewhere in Britain); until recently it was the pronunciation of English used in British broadcasting
to converse = to have a conversation with sb
stunned silence = silence resulting from such surprise or shock that nobody can think clearly or speak
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>30</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
He was <strike>said</strike> <strong>told</strong> that he was speaking English with a rare dialect
You just say some <strike>quotas</strike> <strong>quotes</strong>
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
discipline /ˈdɪsɪplɪn/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260206</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>It's all Greek to me</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> It's All Greek To Me | A Bit Of Fry &amp;Laurie | BBC Comedy Greats
<em>A Bit of Fry &amp; Laurie is a British sketch comedy television series written by and starring former Cambridge Footlights members Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie, broadcast on both BBC1 and BBC2 between 1989 and 1995. It ran for four series with 26 episodes, including a 36-minute pilot episode in 1987.

As in The Two Ronnies, elaborate wordplay and innuendo were staples. It frequently broke the fourth wall; characters would revert to their real-life actors mid-sketch, or the camera would often pan off set into the studio. The show was punctuated with non sequitur vox pops in a similar style to those of Monty Python's Flying Circus, often making irrelevant statements and wordplay. Laurie was also seen playing piano and other instruments and singing comical numbers</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqZZKwCPCj8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqZZKwCPCj8</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>

<!-- 
Are there any minorities in your country that are often mocked?
-->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>29</mdlid>
<activity_id>8</activity_id>
<activity_title>It's all Greek to me</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in><![CDATA[Do you say sometimes <em>'I don't know'</em>?<br />Is it all right to lose face in your culture, or will you pretend you know something at any cost rather than admit you don't?<!-- Is it considered normal behaviour in a collective environment to lie because of the high, implied level of distrust?-->]]></activity_lead_in>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> It's All Greek To Me | A Bit Of Fry &amp;Laurie | BBC Comedy Greats
<em>A Bit of Fry &amp; Laurie is a British sketch comedy television series written by and starring former Cambridge Footlights members Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie, broadcast on both BBC1 and BBC2 between 1989 and 1995. It ran for four series with 26 episodes, including a 36-minute pilot episode in 1987.

As in The Two Ronnies, elaborate wordplay and innuendo were staples. It frequently broke the fourth wall; characters would revert to their real-life actors mid-sketch, or the camera would often pan off set into the studio. The show was punctuated with non sequitur vox pops in a similar style to those of Monty Python's Flying Circus, often making irrelevant statements and wordplay. Laurie was also seen playing piano and other instruments and singing comical numbers</em>
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqZZKwCPCj8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqZZKwCPCj8</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions.]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[[00:39-00:48]
Hugh Laurie: <em>This Octopus, what was it called?</em>
The Greek waiter: <em>Where was it caught? What a question! In the sea.</em>
Hugh Laurie: <em>Yeah... so, that should be OK, Gordon...</em>]]></instructions_demo>
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>it_s_all_greek_to_me_a_bit_of_fry_and_laurie_BBC_comedy_greats_PqZZKwCPCj8.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>Why does the scene take place in a Greek restaurant (and not Indian for instance)?
</qs>
<ans>✓ pun on words
It's all Greek to me 
= way of saying that you do not understand something that is said or written
but Hugh Laurie pretends to understand Greek well...
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Hugh Laurie <em>That's a typical Londoner's reaction (...) You don't understand the Greek does things at his own tempo. You know, natural rhythms &amp; cycles deep within them. The Yorkshireman in me respects that</em> [00:06-00:13]

Why does Hugh Laurie pretend he understands Greek culture?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ wants to show off how well-educated he is
✓ cultural awareness is well-thought of
(= long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance...)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Stephen Fry <em>It's a bit forward, isn't? All that 'My lovely friends' don't (you think)?</em>
Hugh Laurie <em>Ah well, you see, Gordon, he (the Greek waiter) spotted a kindred spirit (in me).</em> [01:22-01:27]

Why does Hugh Laurie carry on pretending he &amp; the waiter share some same cultural values?]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[→ show respect for traditions
(= long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance...)
✓ Hugh Laurie wants to belong to a world where people (= clients) are <em>treated with respect - not the average walk-in, quick turn-over merchants</em> [01:34]
]]></ans>
<hint>kindred /ˈkɪndrɪd/ spirit = person with similar ideas, opinions, etc
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Hugh Laurie <em>Ah, I've had enough, Gordon. I'm gonna have an honest British kebab!</em> [03:58]

Why is this last reply amusing?]]></qs>
<ans>✓ a kebab is by no means more British than a Greek meal
= contradictory behaviour to long-term orientation &amp; uncertainty avoidance observed earlier
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Can you think of any reasons why this comedy could be considered as not politically correct by today's standards? Why has it - or hasn't it - crossed the border?</qs>
<ans>〆stereotypical portrait of Greek waiters
〆British condescending approach
✓ collective tolerance towards witty, established comedians?
✓ British laughing at themselves
= self-deprecating sense of humour
(...)
</ans>
<hint>self-deprecating = done in a way that makes your own achievements or abilities seem unimportant; ~ humour can be used as a way to make complaints, express modesty, invoke optimal reactions. It may also be used as a way for individuals to appear more likeable and agreeable
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Why does Hugh Laurie question the quality of the restaurant?
<em>Gordon, what am I, a peasant or a busy executive?</em> [01:58]
<em>Thanks for your input, Gordon, I hope I know my wines</em> [02:55]
<em>Let's get out of here, this is just a tourist trap</em> [02:13]

How can a business lunch or dining out with partners help nurture relationships?
Why is adherence to given social &amp; cultural values relevant to a corporate environment? 
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
✓ status in social hierarchy &amp; corporate culture depend on how much you may impress people
→ easier to speak with colleagues &amp; partners if you are respected
≠ peasant

✓ need to suggest you have access to better things than you really have
→ display cultural insight &amp; business acumen
= busy executive who knows their wines

✓ eating out in a prestigious restaurant makes for a more desirable &amp; memorable impression than just sharing a snack in a fast-food chain 
<em>not the average walk-in, quick turn-over merchants</em>

<em>Let's get out of here, this is just a tourist trap</em> [02:13]
✓ you wouldn't take out guests to a pretentious restaurant with decor, music and all the bells &amp; whistles
= a Michelin-like restaurant's appearance doesn't distract from quality food
→ only knowledgeable people understand the difference (and not tourists)
]]></ans>
<hint>adherence = fact of behaving according to a particular rule, etc., or of following a particular set of beliefs, or a fixed way of doing sth
business acumen /əˈkju:men / = ability to understand and judge things quickly and clearly
bells and whistles = non-essential features, visual or functional, that are an enhancement to an object
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>28</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
fourth wall (the ~) = performance convention in which an invisible, imaginary wall separates actors from the audience. While the audience can see through this "wall", the convention assumes the actors act as if they cannot. From the 16th century onward, the rise of illusionism in staging practices, which culminated in the realism and naturalism of the theatre of the 19th century, led to the development of the fourth wall concept.
innuendo = indirect remark about sb/sth, usually suggesting sth bad or rude
non sequitur = statement that does not seem to follow what has just been said in any natural or logical way
vox pops (vox populi) = belief or sentiment shared by most people; the voice of the people
It's all Greek to me = way of saying that you do not understand something that is said or written
kindred /ˈkɪndrɪd/ spirit = person with similar ideas, opinions, etc
self-deprecating = done in a way that makes your own achievements or abilities seem unimportant; ~ humour can be used as a way to make complaints, express modesty, invoke optimal reactions. It may also be used as a way for individuals to appear more likeable and agreeable
adherence = fact of behaving according to a particular rule, etc., or of following a particular set of beliefs, or a fixed way of doing sth
business acumen /əˈkju:men / = ability to understand and judge things quickly and clearly
bells and whistles = non-essential features, visual or functional, that are an enhancement to an object
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>27</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
The waiter is <strike>bringing</strike> <strong>taking too long to bring</strong> food <strike>for too long</strike>
He was saying that despite <strong>the fact (that)</strong> it was not long at all
I don't know all wines <strike>despite</strike> <strong>although</strong> I'm a wine lover
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260202</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Political correctness in comedies</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<strong>Comedy as a cultural gauge | Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest</strong>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/monty_python_1969.png" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>

<em>Monty Python were a British comedy troupe formed in 1969 consisting of Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin. Their work included live shows, films, albums, books, and musicals; their influence on comedy has been compared to the Beatles' influence on music.

Their sketch show has been called "an important moment in the evolution of television comedy".

Monty Python's Flying Circus was loosely structured as a sketch show, but its innovative stream-of-consciousness approach and Gilliam's animation skills pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable in style and content.

Monty Python received the BAFTA Award for Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema in 1988. In 1998, they were awarded the AFI Star Award by the American Film Institute. Holy Grail and Life of Brian are frequently ranked on lists of the greatest comedy films.</em>

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>26</mdlid>
<activity_id>5</activity_id>
<activity_title>Politically correct language 1/2</activity_title>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-dictionary-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<session_date>20231213</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20231220</hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[<em>In the European heaven...
✓ policemen are English</em>

Why is this politically incorrect?
<span class="show_key">
→ should be 'police officers are British'
</span>

<strong>Some expressions introduced for political correctness have become part of standard English now. Which do you think is the more politically correct expression?
</strong>
→ match the expressions with the categories
→ look at the key: which expressions do you think sound unnatural or far-fetched?
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_width_percentage>40</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>20</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
politically incorrect
politically correct
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9
10;11;12;13;14;15;16;17;18
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents>
unmarried mother
blacklisted
housewife
Third World countries 
bald
fireman 
Black American
blackboard 
deaf
single parent
banned
home-maker
developing countries
follically challenged
firefighter
African-American 
chalkboard
hearing-impaired 
</activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
100 Politically Correct (PC) Euphemisms
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://purlandtraining.com/2020/08/01/politically-correct-euphemisms/">https://purlandtraining.com/2020/08/01/politically-correct-euphemisms/</a>

<div style="float: left; width=45%; padding-right: 3em; font-size: 70%;">able-bodied > non-disabled
actress > actor
Australian Aborigine > Native Australian
bald > follically challenged
barman > bar attendant
bin man > cleanliness technician
black bag > bin bag
black person > Person of Colour
black sheep > pariah
blackboard > chalk board
blacklisted > banned
blind > sight impaired
blind drunk > very drunk
boring > differently interesting
broken home > dysfunctional family
brother / sister > sibling
chairman > chair
Christian name > first name
Christmas > Winter Festival / Winterval
cleaner > facility manager
clumsy > uniquely coordinated
confined to a wheelchair > wheelchair user
dead > passed away / terminally unavailable
deaf > hearing impaired
deforestation > forest management
diabetic > person with diabetes
dinner lady > mealtime supervisor
disease > disorder
drug addict > person with a chemical dependency
drug habit > substance use disorder
English > British / UK citizen
Eskimo > Inuit
fat > overweight / big-boned
fireman > firefighter
forefathers > ancestors / forebears
Frenchman > French person
get the sack > be part of a restructuring
guys > folks
hairdresser > stylist
headmaster / headmistress > director
homeless > residentially flexible
homosexual > same-sex
housewife > homemaker / stay-at-home mum
husband / wife > spouse / significant other
idiot / class clown > behaviourally challenged
illegal alien / illegal > undocumented worker
Indians > Native Americans
job losses > restructuring
junkie > person with a drug dependency
</div>
<div style="width=45%; font-size: 70%; margin-top: -30px;">juvenile delinquents > children at risk
ladies and gentlemen > everybody
lost > geographically disorientated
male nurse > nurse
man in the street > average person
man up > be brave
manhole > maintenance hole
mankind > humankind
man-made > synthetic
manpower > workforce
men / women > people
Merry Christmas > Happy Holidays
midget / dwarf > little person
minority group > numerically challenged group
Miss / Mrs > Ms
nut > person with a mental health condition
Oriental > Asian
plastic surgery > cosmetic surgery
policeman > police officer
poor > marginalised
postman / mailman > postal worker / mail carrier
prison cell > custody suite
problem > opportunity / challenge
promiscuous > sexually liberated
prostitute > sex worker
salesman > salesperson
secretary > administrative assistant
sex change > sex reassignment surgery (SRS)
short > vertically challenged
single > flying solo
skinny / thin > (very) slim
slum > economically deprived area
spokesman > spokesperson
sportsmanship > fairness
steward / stewardess > flight attendant
suffers from / victim of… > has… [condition]
tax man > tax officer
the disabled > disabled people
the elderly / old people > senior citizens
Third World > Developing Nations
to lie > to misspeak / be economical with the truth
to man sth > to operate / crew / run sth
ugly > unconventional-looking
unemployed > involuntarily leisured
used (goods) > pre-owned / pre-loved
waiter / waitress > server / waiting staff
warehouse worker > warehouse operative
white European > Caucasian
woman priest > priest
workman > worker
wrong > differently logical</div>
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>25</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
slapstick = type of humour that is based on simple actions, for example people hitting each other, falling down, etc
double entendre = word or phrase that can be understood in two different ways, one of which usually refers to sex

political correctness = (sometimes disapproving) the principle of avoiding language and behaviour that may offend particular groups of people
politically correct = term used to describe language, policies, or measures that are intended to avoid offence or disadvantage to members of particular groups in society. Since the late 1980s, the term has been used to describe a preference for inclusive language and avoidance of language or behaviour that can be seen as excluding, marginalizing, or insulting to groups of people disadvantaged or discriminated against, particularly groups defined by ethnicity, sex, gender, or sexual orientation. In public discourse and the media, the term is generally used as a pejorative with an implication that these policies are excessive or unwarranted
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>24</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Comedy as a cultural gauge | Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in>To what extent can comedy be representative of a culture?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/monty_python_1969.png" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>

<em>Monty Python were a British comedy troupe formed in 1969 consisting of Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin. Their work included live shows, films, albums, books, and musicals; their influence on comedy has been compared to the Beatles' influence on music.

Their sketch show has been called "an important moment in the evolution of television comedy".

Monty Python's Flying Circus was loosely structured as a sketch show, but its innovative stream-of-consciousness approach and Gilliam's animation skills pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable in style and content.

Monty Python received the BAFTA Award for Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema in 1988. In 1998, they were awarded the AFI Star Award by the American Film Institute. Holy Grail and Life of Brian are frequently ranked on lists of the greatest comedy films.</em>

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/minstrels_of_beverley.gif" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/benny_hill_plays_uganda_dictator_idi_amin.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>]]></instructions02>-->
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>-->
<!--<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video>monty_python_hairdressers_expedition_on_everest_0F2SJS6B1wQ.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What minorities are mocked?
</qs>
<ans>✓ homosexual communities
</ans>
<hint>to mock = to laugh at sb/sth in an unkind way, especially by copying what they say or do
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What kind of people might feel ridiculed by such stereotypical description?
</qs>
<ans>✓ female activists
≠ caricature of quaintrelles
→ may protest against suggested traits of behaviour, depicted as grossly unfit in such circumstances

✓ active, and yet dandy, men
→ today's men may use perfume &amp; still be perceived as sporty &amp; virile

✓ (Italian) hairdressers ← Mario's salon
〆sports people &amp; Alpinists may disregard this sketch as tacky
</ans>
<hint>to ridicule = to make sb/sth look silly by laughing at them or it in an unkind way
dandy = man who cares a lot about his clothes and appearance
quaintrelle = woman who lives life passionately, emphasizing personal style, charm, wit, and the cultivation of leisurely pleasures. Often described as a female counterpart to a "dandy," she is a sophisticated, worldly, and educated individual who focuses on refined living
virile /ˈvɪraɪl/ = (usually approving) (of men) strong and full of energy, especially sexual energy; having or showing the strength and energy that is considered typical of men
tacky = (informal) cheap, badly made and/or lacking in taste
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What cultural dimensions can be elicited from this video?
</qs>
<ans>✓ joy > restraint
✓ neuroticism
✓ short term orientation
✓ femininity > masculinity
✓ little power distance
✓ individualism > collectivism
✓ low uncertainty avoidance
</ans>
<hint>to elicit = to draw forth, make evident (what is latent)
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Could this video be considered offensive by today's standards? Why / why not?
</qs>
<ans>✓ perhaps regarded by LGBTQ+ as a vestige of the past, some form of collective, micro-discrimination
→ minorities - nowadays victimised - are portrayed only as silly, one-track-minded people

〆some societies may still be hostile to gay communities nowadays and yet not poke fun at them either
→ not funny any more to mock men with a feminine behaviour

〆no genuine insight of what Mount Everest expeditions are either
= only a cheesy caricature
→ no evidence of intentional offence caused to under-represented minorities
<!--
→ do under-represented minorities have more rights? -->
</ans>
<hint>vestige = small part of sth that still exists after the rest of it has stopped existing
LGBTQ+ = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (or queer)
cheesy = (slang) of low quality and without style; corny; tacky
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why is the term 'hairdresser' offensive?
</qs>
<ans>✓ not politically correct...
→ use 'stylist' instead
</ans>
<hint>political correctness = (sometimes disapproving) principle of avoiding language and behaviour that may offend particular groups of people
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>23</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
gauge /ɡeɪdʒ/ = instrument for measuring the amount or level of sth
to mock = to laugh at sb/sth in an unkind way, especially by copying what they say or do
to ridicule = to make sb/sth look silly by laughing at them or it in an unkind way
virile /ˈvɪraɪl/ = (usually approving) (of men) strong and full of energy, especially sexual energy; having or showing the strength and energy that is considered typical of men
tacky = (informal) cheap, badly made and/or lacking in taste
to elicit = to draw forth, make evident (what is latent)
LGBTQ+ = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (or queer) - In use since the late 1980s, the initialism, as well as some of its common variants, functions as an umbrella term for marginalized sexualities and gender identities
vestige = small part of sth that still exists after the rest of it has stopped existing
LGBTQ+ = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (or queer)
cheesy = (slang) of low quality and without style; corny; tacky
quaintrelle = woman who lives life passionately, emphasizing personal style, charm, wit, and the cultivation of leisurely pleasures. Often described as a female counterpart to a "dandy," she is a sophisticated, worldly, and educated individual who focuses on refined living
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>22</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
<strike>How</strike> <strong>What</strong> do you call a woman who is 
<strike>In</strike> everywhere, in every situation, you can joke about...
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>





<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260130</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>10:15-11:15 MSK | 11:15-12:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>lc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title></clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<strong>Comedy as a cultural gauge | Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest</strong>

<div align="center"><img src="pix/monty_python_1969.png" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>

<em>Monty Python were a British comedy troupe formed in 1969 consisting of Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin. Their work included live shows, films, albums, books, and musicals; their influence on comedy has been compared to the Beatles' influence on music.

Their sketch show has been called "an important moment in the evolution of television comedy".

Monty Python's Flying Circus was loosely structured as a sketch show, but its innovative stream-of-consciousness approach and Gilliam's animation skills pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable in style and content.

Monty Python received the BAFTA Award for Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema in 1988. In 1998, they were awarded the AFI Star Award by the American Film Institute. Holy Grail and Life of Brian are frequently ranked on lists of the greatest comedy films.</em>

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Monty Python - International Hairdressers Expedition on Everest
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2SJS6B1wQ</a>

→ watch the video
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>21</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[

]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>




<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260126</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>09:45-10:45 MSK | 10:45-11:45 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Political correctness - Blackface minstrelsy</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<strong>Politically correct minstrels?</strong>
<img src="pix/benny_hill_plays_uganda_dictator_idi_amin.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid">
→ read the short introduction
→ answer the questions

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>20</mdlid>
<activity_id>2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Politically correct minstrels?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_2columns_2qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Should today's minstrels be politically correct?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/minstrels_of_beverley.gif" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>

<em>A minstrel was an entertainer, initially in medieval Europe. It originally described any type of entertainer such as a musician, juggler, acrobat, singer or fool; later, from the sixteenth century, it came to mean a specialist entertainer who sang songs and played musical instruments.

Minstrels performed songs which told stories of distant places or of existing or imaginary historical events. Although minstrels created their own tales, often they would memorize and embellish the works of others. Frequently they were retained by royalty and high society. 

As the courts became more sophisticated, minstrels were eventually replaced at court by the troubadours, and many became wandering minstrels, performing in the streets; a decline in their popularity began in the late 15th century. 

Minstrels fed into later traditions of travelling entertainers, which continued to be moderately strong into the early 20th century, and which has some continuity in the form of today's buskers or street musicians.</em>
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02> -->
<!--<instructions_demo>
</instructions_demo> -->
<qa>
<qs>Who - in today's society - would play the role of former minstrels?</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[✓ stand-up comedians
→ deliver satirical sketches
e.g. George Carlin
<em>known for his dark comedy and reflections on politics, the English language, psychology, religion and taboo subject matter. Carlin was a frequent performer and guest host on The Tonight Show during the three-decade Johnny Carson era</em> 

✓ self-proclaimed influencers starting out on TikTok
〆gain popularity by being vulgar rather than drawing attention to societal &amp; cultural incongruities
→ want to resonate with their audience
→ today's society is probably less politically correct
]]></ans>
<hint>incongruity = appearing strange or wrong within a particular situation; unusual or different from what is around or from what is generally happening
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Did you know that many sketches by Benny Hill can't be found on the internet any more? Any ideas why?
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/benny_hill_plays_uganda_dictator_idi_amin.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>

✓ not politically correct
✓ arguably insulting

✓ political correctness becomes obsolete the moment a comment is made that something is not 
]]></ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What change(s) in cultural values does this suggest? Equity in the name of collectivism or individualism? Restraint or indulgence?</qs>
<ans>✓ caricaturing Idi Amin was acceptable because he was a dictator
✓ playing this role is not insulting, painting your face black now is
→ questions equity
= only Afro-Americans are allowed to mock themselves

〆lost ability to laugh at ourselves?
→ restraint in the name of collectivism &amp; political correctness
</ans>
<hint>equity = situation in which everyone is treated equally
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>
<!--
How a white man says the N-word 
Laugh Factory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcBCy5SYEps&pp=ygUPbiB3b3JkIHN0YW5kIHVw 
-->

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>19</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Political correctness - Blackface minstrelsy</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[<strong>Is blackface minstrelsy truly offensive? Is political correctness an indicator of joy or restraint?</strong><!--<strong>Did you know that many sketches can't be found on the internet any more? The one in which Benny Hill plays Uganda dictator Idi Amin is a good example. What change(s) in cultural values does this suggest? Equity? Joy or restraint?</strong>-->

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Benny Hill - Hot Gossamer (1979)
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXHTYsAJ91w">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXHTYsAJ91w</a>

→ watch the video [01:28-5:14]
→ imagine what viewers may write in the comments
→ read sample comments
→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[]]></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[<em>As an African American who adored Benny Hill this doesn't offend me at all this was hilarious to me i still crack up at this sketch 😂😂😂</em>
@byronbenguche

<em>I watched Benny Hill, growing up, and nobody even remotely thought that this kind of thing was racist! It was the furthest from our minds!</em>
@Mortthemoose
]]></instructions_demo> 
<html5_video>benny_hill_hot_gossamer_1979_zXHTYsAJ91w.mp4</html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What examples of discrimination are visible in this show?
]]></qs>
<ans>✓ racism
✓ sexism
✓ shortism
= unfair treatment of people who are short (i.e. not tall)
</ans>
<hint>sexism = unfair treatment of people, especially women, because of their sex
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[Read some of comments in the YouTube forum. Do you agree with the viewers?

<em>In his career Benny Hill poked fun at a lot of people, professions, and places, himself most of all.  I think most of us enjoyed the comedy without giving the social implications people would come up with years later a thought.</em>
@donaldmaxie9742

<em>(...) Because, back then, Britain was far less educated, and far more racist, than it became from the ’90s onwards.

Racism was still institutionalised and systemic back then. People from all sorts of minority cultures had a fight on their hands just to get recognition. And the face of that racism was the media’s popular entertainment - movies, radio, print media, comics, shows.
You would not believe how racist, sexist, ableist and queerphobic the media was, back in the day. And where the media led, the public followed.

Benny Hill was not the monster. He was just following the curve. The monster was the TV station which didn’t think twice about blackfacing, or making jokes about gay people, or mothers-in-law or women drivers</em>
Alex Greene
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.quora.com/How-come-Benny-Hill-got-a-pass-for-wearing-blackface-He-possibly-played-all-the-minority-characters-on-his-show">https://www.quora.com/How-come-Benny-Hill-got-a-pass-for-wearing-blackface-He-possibly-played-all-the-minority-characters-on-his-show</a>]]></qs>
<ans>✓ people who grew up with Benny Hill are like fish that don't see water
→ a caricature depends on its high context environment
✓ today, most viewers will just see people of colour dancing
In the 60's, Afro Americans were often considered the best disco dancers &amp; musicians
→ could be interpreted as paying tribute to their talent
</ans>
<hint>Fish can't see water...
ableism /ˈeɪbəlɪzəm/ aka ablism, disablism (British English), anapirophobia, anapirism, disability discrimination) = discrimination and social prejudice against physically or mentally disabled people. Ableism characterizes people as they are defined by their disabilities and also classifies disabled people as being inferior to non-disabled people
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Do you think this performance could still be broadcast on national Tv nowadays? Why / why not?
</qs>
<ans>〆probably not because politically incorrect
</ans>
<hint>blackface minstrelsy = indigenous American theatrical form that constituted a subgenre of the minstrel show. Intended as comic entertainment, blackface minstrelsy was performed by a group of white minstrels (travelling musicians) with black-painted faces, whose material caricatured the singing and dancing of slaves. The form reached the pinnacle of its popularity between 1850 and 1870, when it enjoyed sizeable audiences in both the United States and Britain. (src: https://www.britannica.com/art/blackface-minstrelsy)
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What cultural dimension(s) may have changed since this show was recorded?
</qs>
<ans>✓ shift from restraint to joy / indulgence, or the opposite?
✓ shift from masculinity to femininity
(...)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<!--
<qa>
<qs>
</qs>
<ans>✓ trust each other to overcome divergences
</ans>
<hint>
PayPal Mafia = group of former PayPal employees and founders who have since founded and/or developed additional technology companies based in Silicon Valley, such as LinkedIn, Palantir Technologies, SpaceX, Affirm, Slide, Kiva, YouTube, Yelp, and Yammer. Most of the members attended Stanford University or University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
</hint>
</qa>
-->
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>18</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>Cultural heaven and hell</activity_title>
<methodology>Using stereotypical behaviour to predict outcomes</methodology>
<functional_language></functional_language>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Are you familiar with stereotypical behaviours associated to certain nations?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Match nationalities with the descriptions.

→ explain these cliches using cultural models &amp; dimensions
→ are any of these prejudices politically incorrect?
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_background_color></column_background_color>
<column_font_color></column_font_color>
<column_font_size_percentage></column_font_size_percentage>
<column_width_percentage>23</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>6</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
cooks<br />in the European Heaven
policemen<br />in the European Heaven
lovers<br />in the European Heaven
everything<br />in the European Heaven
cooks<br />in the European Hell
policemen<br />in the European Hell
lovers<br />in the European Hell
everything<br />in the European Hell
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents><![CDATA[
are French
are British
are Italian
is organised by Germans
are British&nbsp;
are French&nbsp;
are German&nbsp;
is organised by Italians&nbsp;
]]></activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
In the European heaven:
→ cooks are French
✓ indulgence

→ policemen are British
✓ femininity > masculinity
✓ low level of uncertainty avoidance
= more tolerant

→ lovers are Italian
✓ indulgence
✓ multi-active

→ everything is organized by Germans
✓ high level of uncertainty avoidance
✓ linear-active approach


however, in the European hell:
→ cooks are English
✓ individualism > collectivism

→ policemen are French
✓ high level of uncertainty avoidance
= bureaucratic

→ lovers are German
✓ restraint

→ everything is organized by Italians
✓ multi-active
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>17</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
political correctness = (sometimes disapproving) the principle of avoiding language and behaviour that may offend particular groups of people
politically correct = term used to describe language, policies, or measures that are intended to avoid offence or disadvantage to members of particular groups in society. Since the late 1980s, the term has been used to describe a preference for inclusive language and avoidance of language or behaviour that can be seen as excluding, marginalizing, or insulting to groups of people disadvantaged or discriminated against, particularly groups defined by ethnicity, sex, gender, or sexual orientation. In public discourse and the media, the term is generally used as a pejorative with an implication that these policies are excessive or unwarranted

person of colour = primarily used to describe any person who is not considered "white". In its current meaning, the term originated in, and is primarily associated with, the United States; however, since the 2010s, it has been adopted elsewhere in the Anglosphere (often as person of colour), including relatively limited usage in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Ireland, South Africa, and Singapore (src: Wikipedia)
blackface = practice of non-Black performers using burnt cork or theatrical make-up to portray a caricature of Black people on stage or in entertainment
minstrel = entertainer, initially in medieval Europe. It originally described any type of entertainer such as a musician, juggler, acrobat, singer or fool; later, from the sixteenth century, it came to mean a specialist entertainer who sang songs and played musical instruments
blackface minstrelsy = indigenous American theatrical form that constituted a subgenre of the minstrel show. Intended as comic entertainment, blackface minstrelsy was performed by a group of white minstrels (travelling musicians) with black-painted faces, whose material caricatured the singing and dancing of slaves. The form reached the pinnacle of its popularity between 1850 and 1870, when it enjoyed sizeable audiences in both the United States and Britain. Although blackface minstrelsy gradually disappeared from the professional theatres and became purely a vehicle for amateurs, its influence endured in later entertainment genres and media, including vaudeville theatre, radio and television programs, and the world-music and motion-picture industries of the 20th and 21st centuries (src: https://www.britannica.com/art/blackface-minstrelsy)
gossamer = something super fine and delicate — like a spider web or the material of a wedding veil. The original gossamer, from which these meanings come from, is the fine, filmy substance spiders excrete to weave their webs. A dress can be gossamer-like, if its fabric is so sheer as to be see-through, or almost
sexism = unfair treatment of people, especially women, because of their sex
shortism = unfair treatment of people who are short (i.e. not tall)
ableism /ˈeɪbəlɪzəm/ aka ablism, disablism (British English), anapirophobia, anapirism, disability discrimination) = discrimination and social prejudice against physically or mentally disabled people. Ableism characterizes people as they are defined by their disabilities and also classifies disabled people as being inferior to non-disabled people
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>16</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
Absolute freedom means absolute <strike>unsafety</strike> <strong>absence of safety</strong>
I feel <strike>myself</strike> in the centre of...
He can <strike>influate</strike> <strong>influence</strong> other people
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>





<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260119</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>18:15-19:15 MSK | 19:15-20:15 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Case study - Regional manager in Baku | Kvass</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<strong>Case study - Regional manager in Baku</strong>
Shareholders want your company to penetrate new markets in Russia and Azerbaijan. A group of HR consultants are short-listing candidates for the position of regional sales manager in Baku.

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/business-career-confidence-776615.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 

You are a consultant of Russian ethnicity born in Baku in the Soviet Union with local experience in sales &amp; marketing.

→ brain-storm possible hurdles you may face with the local sales force e.g. power-distance, masculinity-femininity...<!--→ write skills &amp; qualities expected from the ideal candidate -->
e.g. striking a balance between local UAI (uncertainty avoidance index) and Russian LTO (long term orientation)
→ prepare a 5min presentation to the panel to explain your choice
e.g. person-orientation approach with high-context awareness to counterbalance uncertainty avoidance


<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>
<clog_book_unit>Regional sales manager in Baku</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>15</mdlid>
<activity_id>1/3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Regional sales manager in Baku</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Shareholders want your company to penetrate new markets in Russia and Azerbaijan. A group of HR consultants are short-listing candidates for the position of regional sales manager in Baku.

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/business-career-confidence-776615.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 

You are a consultant of Russian ethnicity born in Baku in the Soviet Union with local experience in sales &amp; marketing.

→ brain-storm possible hurdles you may face with the local sales force e.g. power-distance, masculinity-femininity...<!--→ write skills &amp; qualities expected from the ideal candidate
e.g. striking a balance between local UAI and Russian LTO
→ prepare a 5min presentation to the panel to explain your choice
e.g. person-orientation approach with high-context awareness to counterbalance uncertainty avoidance -->
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>Consultant of Russian ethnicity born in Baku

You believe one female director of sales has more potential than others for succeeding in this position although you are aware they have never had a female manager before.</task>
<ans>Haven't you heard of the country's recent efforts to rejuvenate its traditional image? 
e.g. Baku hosted the 57th Eurovision Song Contest in 2012, the 2015 European Games, 4th Islamic Solidarity Games, the European Grand Prix in 2016, the final of the 2018–19 UEFA Europa League
I really don't think choosing a female director of sales would be a bad choice if she's competent!</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>Business consultant

→ disagree with the other consultant
→ brain-storm possible hurdles a female director of sales may face with the local force</task>
<ans>I'm afraid power-distance is just too omnipresent in this country!
Think about Hofstede's masculinity-femininity...
On the other hand, if she's from a well-known family with an extended family of 300+ relatives, she might be intimidating enough in a patriarchal environment!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>14</mdlid>
<activity_id>2/3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Regional sales manager in Baku</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-lecturer-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_type>prep_2columns_2qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Shareholders want your company to penetrate new markets in Russia and Azerbaijan. A group of HR consultants are short-listing candidates for the position of regional sales manager in Baku. 

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/business-career-confidence-776615.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 

→ prepare a 5min presentation to the shareholders to explain your choice
→ make sure you answer at least the questions below






]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<qa>
  <qs><![CDATA[
<strong>Introduction</strong>
<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; border: dotted 1px; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">

&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>

<strong>Why may a person-oriented approach be a better choice?</strong>
<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">

&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>

<strong>How can high-context awareness help a female regional sales manager in this position between Moscow and Baku?</strong>
<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">

&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>

<strong>What steps should the regional sales manager take to counterbalance uncertainty avoidance?</strong>
<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">

&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>

<strong>Conclusion</strong>
<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">

&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>
]]>
</qs>
<ans></ans>
<hint>supremacist = person who believes that their own race is better than others and should be in power
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>
</qs>
<ans><![CDATA[<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; border: dotted 1px; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">
&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>

<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">
&bull; being person-oriented rather than task-oriented (femininity rather than masculinity) may be risky given high uncertainty avoidance...
&bull; but could prove more diplomatic when only starting out in new markets with new partners
&bull; you don't want to impose your views (and be perceived as a supremacist!...)
</div>

<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">
&bull; be attentive to what is expected before launching any new strategy
&bull; learn 'to read the air' 
&bull; = high-context skill
</div>

<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">
&bull; ask a senior person from Baku to introduce him/her to the local team
&bull; use senior endorsement to satisfy local power distance &amp; uncertainty avoidance
&bull; (...)
</div>

<div contenteditable="true" style="background-color: #cdcdcd; width: 80%; padding-left: 0.5em; font-size: 110%;">
&bull; 
&bull; 
&bull; 
</div>
]]>
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>13</mdlid>
<activity_id>3/3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Regional sales manager in Baku</activity_title>
<session_date>20231206</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20231213_n1</hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_status>wip</activity_status>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_type>prep_2columns_2qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Shareholders want your company to penetrate new markets in Russia and Azerbaijan. A group of HR consultants are short-listing candidates for the position of regional sales manager in Baku. 

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/business-career-confidence-776615.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 

→ write skills &amp; qualities expected from the ideal candidate to the shareholders
→ justify your choice
(recycle cultural dimensions terminology)





]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02> -->
<instructions_demo>
Striking a balance between local UAI (uncertainty avoidance index) and Russian LTO (long term orientation vs short term normative orientation) is essential, indeed (...)
→ example situation
</instructions_demo>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>12</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
frugality = prudence in avoiding waste
perseverance = quality of continuing to try to achieve a particular aim in spite of difficulties
indulgence = (usually disapproving) the state or act of having or doing whatever you want; the state of allowing sb to have or do whatever they want; something that you allow yourself to have even though it is not essential

to shortlist (sb/sth for sth) = to put sb/sth on a shortlist for a job, prize, etc
to rejuvenate = to make sb/sth look or feel younger or more lively
hurdle = obstacle
omnipresent = present everywhere
power distance = strength of social hierarchy; has been defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions (like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. This represents inequality (more versus less), but defined from below, not from above. It suggests that a society's level of inequality is endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders. Power and inequality, of course, are extremely fundamental facts of any society. All societies are unequal, but some are more unequal than others (https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&amp;context=orpc pg 8)
masculinity-femininity = task-orientation versus person-orientation
IDV (individualism-collectivism) = measures the extent to which people look out for each other as a team or look out for themselves as an individual
UAI (uncertainty avoidance index) = indicates to what extent nations avoid the unknown; is not the same as risk avoidance: it deals with a society's tolerance for ambiguity. It indicates to what extent a culture programs its members to feel either uncomfortable or comfortable in unstructured situations. Unstructured situations are novel, unknown, surprising, and different from usual. Uncertainty avoiding cultures try to minimize the possibility of such situations by strict behavioural codes, laws and rules, disapproval of deviant opinions, and a belief in absolute Truth; 'there can only be one Truth and we have it' (https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&amp;context=orpc pg 10)
LTO (long-term orientation) = expresses how societies either prioritize traditions or seek for the modern in their dealings with the present and the future
IVR (indulgence vs restraint) = comparison between a country's willingness to wait for long-term benefits by holding off on instant gratification, or preferences to no restraints on enjoying life at the present
gender gap = difference in opinions or attitudes between men and women concerning a variety of public and private issues, including political candidates, parties, or programmes
supremacist = person who believes that their own race is better than others and should be in power

to read the air = ability to discern unspoken thoughts, emotions, and intentions in a social context. In English, it would be something close to, “Read between the lines.” In Japanese society, where harmony and group cohesion are highly valued, being able to “read the air” is a vital skill; does not simply refer to gauging people's expressions as they speak; it's about nurturing the ability to sense the existing atmosphere, propose and communicate ideas for improvement, and then execute those ideas 
to read the room = to understand their audience and adapt what they say to suit it; to be or become aware of the opinions and attitudes of a group of people that you are talking to 
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>11</mdlid>
<activity_id>1/2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Kvas advertising plan</activity_title>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>role_play</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Kvass is a fermented cereal-based low-alcohol beverage with a slightly cloudy appearance, light-brown colour, and sweet-sour taste. Kvass originates from north-eastern Europe, where grain production was considered insufficient for beer to become a daily drink.

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/mint_bread_kvas.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 

You work as a (cross-cultural) marketing consultant for a soft drinks company that wants to export to new markets.
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>
<instructions_demo></instructions_demo> -->
<role_a>
<task>Marketing consultant

→ convince the board of directors to export Kvass
→ find arguments to support its cross-cultural appeal
→ explain how you will adapt the advertising campaign to (a selection of) target markets
e.g. China, Kazakhstan, Serbia (or any country / region relevant to you)
</task>
<ans>It's a great opportunity for people to spend time together in a market featuring such strong indulgent / joy indexes!
Individualist culture is dominant in that region.
(...) that's why we believe generations Y and Z will enjoy spending time together away from their families.
Just look at Hofstede's masculinity-femininity dimension in this region: it shows emphasis on building relationships (femininity → person-oriented) rather than being task-oriented.
(...) that's why we need an advertisement which shows people going out together with friends rather than their extended family.</ans>
</role_a>
<role_b>
<task>Member of the board of directors

→ partly disagree with the marketing consultant
→ brain-storm possible obstacles to sales in target markets</task>
<ans>I'm afraid power-distance is just too omnipresent in this country!
Such a drink without alcohol will never bring people from a collectivist culture together... even if it's about keeping traditions by drinking a natural drink like Kvass.
Look at the changes of cultural values between your target cohorts of generations in this part of the world!
(...) this means the elder generation will be more restrained &amp; less likely to  change their taste.
There's too much uncertainty avoidance in your target markets: they'll never want to try our Kvass when they've had Coca-Cola for so many years!
</ans>
</role_b>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>10</mdlid>
<activity_id>2/2</activity_id>
<activity_title>Kvas advertising plan</activity_title>
<session_date>20231201</session_date>
<hw_anchor>hw20231204</hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-hand-with-pen-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<instructions><![CDATA[Kvass is a fermented cereal-based low-alcohol beverage with a slightly cloudy appearance, light-brown colour, and sweet-sour taste. Kvass originates from north-eastern Europe, where grain production was considered insufficient for beer to become a daily drink.

<div style="float: left; width=40%;"><img src="pix/mint_bread_kvas.jpg" width="420px;" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div> 



You work as a (cross-cultural) marketing consultant for a soft drinks company that wants to export to new markets.

→ write an advertising plan to export Kvass
→ support its cross-cultural appeal with relevant cultural dimensions 
(= recycle terminology)
→ describe a single, short advert for 2-3 target countries (1 paragraph only)
e.g. China, Kazakhstan, Serbia (or any country / region relevant to you)
→ explain how you will adapt the advertising campaign to the selected target markets (with examples)
~ 350 words
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo>We believe generations Y and Z will enjoy spending time together drinking Kvass because...
→ examples of cross-cultural appeal
(...)

Our advertising plan is cost effective because we will be shooting basically the same story in different countries. In order to understand why our plan is effective, I'll explain the minor and major differences between the different versions. 

Indeed...
→ cultural characteristic of target country 1
Therefore...
→ scenario version 1

Indeed...
→ cultural characteristic of target country 2
Therefore...
→ scenario version 2

(...)
</instructions_demo>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[suggested answer #1

I’ve chosen Bulgaria, Montenegro and Armenia for Kvass exportation to new markets as:

All three countries are characterised by a large power distance index as well as Russia. Respect for older generations, traditions and the strength of social hierarchy are similarities that will be of aid to make this campaign successful.

Example: a family- and traditions-oriented advertisement  (showing family spending time \ having dinner together) will be positively accepted in all the countries. 

Very high UAI in the three countries provides us with the understanding that new product should be presented carefully and with no pressure, using elements which are well-known and accepted in the countries. 

Example: using traditional Russian patterns and colours for the package design, but with an emphasis on the countries’ flavour: ornaments with images of Armenian mountains, vineyards or ancient temples etc. 

The representatives of these countries tend to be collectivist, multi active and extroverted, that is why the advertising campaign could use people’s tendency to spend a lot of time together and communicate a lot.

Example: Launching an advertising campaign on social networks in the form of a photo competition: The participants should publish a photo of them drinking kvass in the company of their friends and family using a hashtag (e.g.#BulgarianKvass). The winners get a box of Kvass for free.
(...)

Source:
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
]]>
</ans>
<hint></hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[suggested answer #2
(...)
In Azerbaijan, where power distance is high, our advertising campaign will emphasize the traditional and rich heritage of Kvass. The advert will showcase a group of people sitting around a large table, symbolizing the importance of communal gatherings and sharing. The tagline "Experience the taste of togetherness with Kvass" will resonate with the culture's respect for authority and traditional values.

In Turkey, where masculinity is high, we will highlight the robust and invigorating qualities of Kvass. The advert will depict a group of friends engaging in outdoor activities, such as sports or hiking, and enjoying a refreshing bottle of Kvass afterward. The tagline "Fuel your adventure with Kvass" will appeal to the Turkish culture's emphasis on strength and vitality.

In Georgia, where indulgence is high, our advertising campaign will focus on the indulgent and pleasurable aspects of Kvass. The advert will showcase a group of people enjoying a leisurely picnic in a beautiful countryside, topped off with the sweet and sour taste of Kvass. The tagline "Indulge in the flavors of nature with Kvass" will appeal to the Georgian culture's appreciation for fine cuisine and relaxation.

To adapt the advertising campaign to the selected target markets, we will consider their unique cultural traits and preferences. For example, in Azerbaijan, we could collaborate with local influencers or celebrities who embody traditional values and have a large following. In Turkey, we could sponsor sports events or collaborate with outdoor enthusiasts to further associate Kvass with an active lifestyle. In Georgia, we could partner with renowned chefs or host tasting events to introduce Kvass as a versatile and gourmet beverage.
(...)
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
]]>
</ans>
<hint></hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[suggested answer #3

Kazakhstan: high context culture, multi-active, high power distance, collectivist, evenly masculine and feminine (source), high uncertainty avoidance, long term orientation, restraint

China: high context culture, reactive, high power distance, collectivist, masculine, low uncertainty avoidance (source), long term orientation, restraint

We propose creating an advertisement for the national beverage "Kvass" in Kazakhstan and China. By focusing on the cultural nuances of both countries, we are confident that our campaign will effectively engage the target audience in these countries. 

Why kvass?

Kvass is a family drink.

Based on the World Values Survey and various studies, it's evident that family holds great importance for both Kazakhs and Chinese people. The research suggests that the younger generation in Kazakhstan highly values family, while studies indicate that Chinese culture has not significantly embraced individualism over time. Hence, we anticipate that kvass will resonate with both older and younger generations, offering an opportunity to bring families together for enjoyable conversations over a cup of kvass.

Kvass is a way to express your love and support.

Kazakhstan and China are high-context cultures, relying on implicit communication and non-verbal cues. Offering a cool drink during hot weather is a nonverbal way to express care and love for loved ones, which is deeply valued in these cultures.

Kvass is a traditional drink. 

Kazakhstan and China's respect for tradition provides an opportunity to position kvass as a historically significant beverage, embodying centuries-old tradition, thus resonating with deep cultural values in both nations. In Kazakhstan, the focus on tradition's role in connecting generations aligns with collectivist values, while in China, the historical and status aspects of kvass correspond with the emphasis on tradition and authority. 

Both countries have a high power distance index, emphasizing respect for elders and strong hierarchy. To resonate with these values, it's essential to demonstrate respect for families and traditions in the advertisement. Additionally, Kazakhstan and China's collectivist nature emphasizes the importance of showing families spending time together.

However, they have some differences that have to be taken into account. 

Kazakhstan is a multi-active culture, while China is a reactive culture.

To adopt the adverts to the Kazakhstan context, vivid and expressive family scenes depicting active discussion, joyful interaction and lively body language should be highlighted. An example would be a large, boisterous family enjoying a picnic, talking excitedly and laughing. In contrast, Chinese adverts need to show a calmer family, attentive listening, politeness and calm communication. For example, a quiet family picnic scene with toasts, showing respect and unhurried conversations will convey the desired cultural approach.

Kazakhstan has a high level of uncertainty avoidance, while in China it’s low.

In advertising for Kazakhstan, it’s important to emphasise the safety and high quality of our product without putting pressure. For example, in one of the scenarios, a young person, having learnt about kvass in a shop, studies its useful properties on the Internet and only after weighing up all the pros and cons, buys it. Later, they enjoy the kvass and share their positive experiences with family and friends.

Considering all mentioned above, here is the advertising plan:

Identify the target audience: young people from 18 to 35, as well as old people 
Create the main slogan of the campaign. E.g. “Sip the Tradition and embrace the Heritage with your loved ones”
Emphasize tradition and family bonding in advertisements.
Position kvass as a traditional, heritage-based beverage.
Utilize social and traditional media, as well as local networks, which are popular among both older and younger generations, for advertising (e.g. Telegram, TikTok, WeChat for young; Facebook, Weibo, Douyin for old people). 
Partner with local influencers, bloggers and cultural organizations that are highly respected by both older and younger generations and are trustworthy in order to promote the product.
]]></qs>
<ans><![CDATA[
]]>
</ans>
<hint></hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit></clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>9</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Can't we just print more money?</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_lead_in></activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[Can't we just print more money? Economics in Ten Simple Questions
by Rupal Patel 2022
<div align="center"><img src="pix/cant-we-just-print-more-money_360px_1747178701.webp" width="300" alt="visual"></div> 
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money">https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money</a>


→ answer the questions]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo>
<activity_options>stopwatch</activity_options> -->
<html5_video></html5_video>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
<![CDATA[
"The Road Less Stupid"
business book by Keith J. Cunningham that emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and avoiding poor decisions to achieve financial success. It provides strategies for minimizing mistakes and encourages readers to engage in "Thinking Time" to improve decision-making




Can't we just print more money? Economics in Ten Simple Questions
by Rupal Patel 2022
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money">https://sobrief.com/books/cant-we-just-print-more-money</a>

Key Takeaways
1. Economics is everywhere, shaping our daily choices and societal outcomes
Economics affects all of us every day of our lives. Each time you make a choice about whether or not to work, whether to spend some money today or save it for tomorrow, go out for a meal or cook one at home, you are making an economic decision.

Ubiquitous economic decisions. Every day, we make countless economic choices without realizing it. From deciding what to eat for breakfast to choosing a career path, these decisions involve trade-offs and opportunity costs. Economics provides a framework for understanding these choices and their implications.

Markets and resource allocation. At its core, economics studies how societies allocate scarce resources. Markets play a crucial role in this process, coordinating the actions of millions of individuals through the forces of supply and demand. This "invisible hand" often leads to efficient outcomes, but not always.

Societal impact. Economic forces shape not just individual choices, but entire societies. They influence:

Income distribution
Technological innovation
Environmental sustainability
Political systems
Understanding these forces empowers individuals to make better decisions and engage more effectively in civic life.

2. Markets coordinate supply and demand, but can fail in crucial ways
Economics can help us understand the forces that led to this happening, as well as how we should respond.

Market mechanics. Markets bring together buyers and sellers, with prices acting as signals to coordinate their actions. When demand for a product increases, prices rise, incentivizing more production. This process generally leads to efficient outcomes, matching supply with demand.

Market failures. However, markets can fail in important ways:

Externalities: When the full costs or benefits of an action aren't reflected in market prices (e.g., pollution)
Public goods: Products that benefit everyone but are difficult to charge for individually (e.g., national defense)
Information asymmetries: When one party has more information than the other (e.g., used car sales)
Monopolies: When a single seller dominates a market, leading to higher prices and less innovation
Policy interventions. Recognizing these failures, policymakers often intervene in markets through:

Regulations
Taxes and subsidies
Direct provision of goods and services
Understanding market failures is crucial for addressing major societal challenges like climate change and healthcare provision.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX cont. from here 
3. Labor markets determine wages and employment, with inherent frictions
To understand labour markets you need to not just make sense of how markets work, but understand the peculiar ways in which they interact with the idiosyncratic economics of employment.

Supply and demand for labor. Wages and employment levels are determined by the interaction of labor supply (workers) and demand (employers). Factors influencing this include:

Worker skills and productivity
Business needs and profitability
Economic conditions
Labor market frictions. Unlike in idealized markets, labor markets have inherent frictions that prevent perfect matching of workers to jobs:

Search costs: Time and effort required to find suitable jobs or employees
Geographic constraints: Workers may be unable or unwilling to relocate for jobs
Skill mismatches: Available workers may lack the skills needed for open positions
Policy implications. Understanding these frictions informs policies aimed at reducing unemployment and improving labor market efficiency, such as:

Job search assistance programs
Education and training initiatives
Labor mobility support
Recognizing the complexities of labor markets helps explain persistent unemployment and wage disparities, even in otherwise healthy economies.

4. Economic growth drives long-term prosperity, but has complex impacts
You're richer than your ancestors because of economic growth. That economic growth comes from a combination of several factors – most notably, improvements in technology.

Drivers of growth. Long-term economic growth primarily stems from:

Technological innovation
Capital accumulation (investment in productive assets)
Human capital development (education and skills)
Institutional improvements (rule of law, property rights)
Compounding effects. Over time, even small differences in growth rates lead to massive differences in living standards. This explains why modern societies are so much wealthier than those of the past.

Complexities and trade-offs. While growth generally improves living standards, it can have negative side effects:

Environmental degradation
Inequality (if benefits are unevenly distributed)
Cultural disruption
Policymakers must balance promoting growth with addressing these potential downsides. Sustainable development aims to achieve growth that improves quality of life without compromising future generations' well-being.

5. International trade allows specialization and mutual benefit between nations
Even if there are lots of jobs across an entire economy, that doesn't mean there are lots of jobs on offer in the area where each individual is based.

Comparative advantage. The key insight of international trade theory is that countries benefit by specializing in what they're relatively best at producing, even if they're not the absolute best. This counter-intuitive idea explains why trade can benefit all parties involved.

Benefits of trade:

Lower prices for consumers
Greater product variety
Increased economic efficiency
Knowledge and technology transfer
Challenges and controversies. While trade generally increases overall economic welfare, it can create losers within countries:

Industries facing foreign competition may decline
Workers may need to transition to new sectors
This has led to political backlash against globalization in some countries. Policymakers face the challenge of balancing the broad benefits of trade with addressing its localized negative impacts.

6. Inflation erodes purchasing power over time, with wide-ranging effects
Inflation can be thought of as a tax on keeping money. Just as income tax might take away a fraction of your salary every month, inflation takes away a fraction of your spending power.

Causes of inflation. Price increases can be driven by:

Demand-pull factors: Increased spending outpacing production
Cost-push factors: Rising input costs (e.g., raw materials, wages)
Monetary factors: Expansion of the money supply
Economic impacts. Moderate, stable inflation is generally considered beneficial, but high or unpredictable inflation can be harmful:

Erodes savings and fixed incomes
Creates uncertainty, hampering investment
Can lead to inefficient allocation of resources
Policy responses. Central banks typically aim for low, stable inflation (often around 2% annually) using tools like:

Interest rate adjustments
Quantitative easing/tightening
Understanding inflation is crucial for personal financial planning, business decision-making, and evaluating economic policies.

7. Money and banking are built on trust, facilitating economic activity
Money is ultimately a system of mutually agreed trust; over the centuries, people have looked to reinforce that trust in various ways: drawing on the 'intrinsic' value of precious metals and commodities, drawing on the resources and power of the state, or even drawing on the cool logic of computer code.

Evolution of money. Money has taken many forms throughout history, from commodity-based systems to today's fiat currencies. Its core functions remain constant:

Medium of exchange
Store of value
Unit of account
Banking system. Modern economies rely on a complex banking system that:

Creates money through fractional reserve lending
Facilitates payments and credit
Helps manage economic risks
Trust and regulation. The entire monetary and banking system relies on trust. Governments and central banks play crucial roles in maintaining this trust through:

Deposit insurance
Bank regulations
Monetary policy
Understanding money and banking is essential for grasping how modern economies function and the role of financial institutions in both facilitating growth and potentially creating instability.

8. Economic crises have far-reaching consequences and are difficult to predict
Economists are all too aware of this phenomenon. Even Adam Smith recognised that there are some situations in which markets end up working against the common good.

Anatomy of crises. Economic crises can stem from various sources:

Financial bubbles and crashes
Banking system failures
External shocks (e.g., pandemics, natural disasters)
Policy mistakes
These events can trigger a self-reinforcing cycle of declining confidence, reduced spending, and job losses.

Widespread impacts. Economic crises affect far more than just financial markets:

Unemployment and income loss
Business failures
Social and political instability
Long-term "scarring" effects on growth
Prediction challenges. Forecasting crises is notoriously difficult due to:

Complex, interconnected economic systems
Inherent unpredictability of human behavior
Potential for "black swan" events
While economists have developed tools to better understand and potentially mitigate crises, perfect prediction remains elusive. This underscores the importance of building resilient economic systems and maintaining policy flexibility.

9. Policymakers use various tools to manage the economy, with limitations
Just like Smith's workers in the pin factory, countries tend to specialise in producing certain things – the things they're best at making –then swap these items through trade.

Monetary policy. Central banks use tools like interest rate adjustments and quantitative easing to influence:

Inflation
Employment
Overall economic activity
Fiscal policy. Governments use taxation and spending to:

Provide public goods and services
Redistribute income
Stabilize the economy during downturns
Limitations and trade-offs. Economic management faces several challenges:

Time lags between policy changes and their effects
Unintended consequences
Political constraints
Globalization reducing national policy effectiveness
Policy debates. Economists and policymakers often disagree on the optimal approach to managing the economy, with ongoing debates about:

The appropriate balance between markets and government intervention
The effectiveness of different policy tools
How to address long-term challenges like inequality and climate change
Understanding these policy tools and their limitations is crucial for informed civic engagement and evaluating economic proposals.

Last updated: April 22, 2025
]]>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>What are ubiquitous economic decisions?
</qs>
<ans>Every day, we make countless economic choices without realizing it. From deciding what to eat for breakfast to choosing a career path, these decisions involve trade-offs and opportunity costs. Economics provides a framework for understanding these choices and their implications
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs><![CDATA[What is the <em>invisible hand</em>?]]></qs>
<ans>✓ how societies allocate scarce resources
✓ markets play a crucial role in this process
→ coordinate actions of millions of individuals through the forces of supply and demand
→ often leads to efficient outcomes, but not always
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>What is the societal impact of economic forces?</qs>
<ans>✓ income distribution
✓ technological innovation
✓ environmental sustainability
✓ political systems
→ understanding empowers individuals to make better decisions 
→ engage more effectively in civic life
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do market mechanics coordinate supply and demand?</qs>
<ans>✓ bring together buyers and sellers

✓ prices act as signals to coordinate actions
→ when demand for a product increases, prices rise
→ incentivise more production

✓ leads to efficient outcomes, matching supply with demand
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Why can markets fail to coordinate supply and demand? How should we respond to that?</qs>
<ans>✓ externalities
= when the full costs or benefits of an action aren't reflected in market prices (e.g., pollution)

✓ public goods
= products that benefit everyone but are difficult to charge for individually (e.g., national defence)

✓ information asymmetries
= when one party has more information than the other (e.g., used car sales)

✓ monopolies
= when a single seller dominates a market
→ leads to higher prices and less innovation
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>How do policymakers often intervene in markets?
</qs>
<ans>✓ regulations
✓ taxes and subsidies
✓ direct provision of goods and services
→ understanding market failures is crucial for addressing major societal challenges like climate change and healthcare provision
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>8</mdlid>
<clog_expressions>
cue = action or event that is a signal for sb to do sth; a few words or an action in a play that is a signal for another actor to do sth
China, Empire of the Middle = China's traditional name, Zhongguo (中國), meaning "Middle Kingdom," reflecting its historical self-perception as the centre of civilization, bridging the divine (Heaven) and the earthly world, a concept that evolved from referring to the central plains to the entire unified empire, influencing its worldview and cultural significance
frugality = using only as much money or food as is necessary
</clog_expressions>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>7</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
When there was <strike>a</strike> privatisation <strike>process</strike> <strong>of national assets</strong> they <strike>have</strike> made <strong>(OR kept)</strong> their own elite
You should detect when they are <strike>receiving</strike> <strong>experiencing</strong> new feelings
If I <strike>would start</strike> <strong>started</strong> some popular advert
If the political situation <strike>would be</strike> <strong>were</strong> <strike>another</strike> <strong>different</strong>
Not so <strike>much</strike> <strong>many</strong> people are interested 
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
alumni /ə'ləm,nai/
determine /dɪˈtə:mɪn/
alien /ˈeɪljən/
elite /ə'li:t/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>


<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260116</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>09:45-10:45 MSK | 10:45-11:45 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>active</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title>Understanding the differences between low context and high context cultures</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Leadership Speaker Erin Meyer: Low Context vs. High Context Societies
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ</a>

Watch the video.
→ are the statements below true or false?

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>6</mdlid>
<activity_id>1</activity_id>
<activity_title>Lead in</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<methodology>Understanding the differences between low context and high context cultures</methodology>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[Look at this photo of Erin Meyer, author of 'The Culture map'. What do you think she is miming? Is her body language really needed?

<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/erin_meyer_s_body_language_explaining_low_context_culture.png" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>

Erin Meyer is a professor at INSEAD, where she directs the executive education programme Leading Across Borders and Cultures. She is also the co-author (with Reed Hastings) of No Rules Rules: Netflix and the Culture of Reinvention (Penguin, 2020).

Watch the video to find out why.

<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Leadership Speaker Erin Meyer: Low Context vs. High Context Societies
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ</a>

Are the statements below true or false?]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
]]></instructions_demo> -->
<html5_video>erin_meyer_low_context_vs_high_context_societies_9oYfhTC9lIQ.mp4</html5_video>
<activity_background></activity_background>
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
Audio transcript
in a low context society while we are
communicating we assume that we have a
low level of shared context what does
that mean it means that we don't have
the same reference points or the same
body of knowledge or relationships that
we have a low level of shared context so
in a low context society we believe that
good effective professional
communication is a communication that's
very explicit it's very simple and very
clear in a low conduct society we're
trained that if I want you to understand
blue then I have to say blue literally
we're trained in a low context culture
that if I give a presentation I should
tell you what I'm going to tell you and
then I should tell you and then I should
tell you what I've told you why do I
tell you the same thing three times
because we're focused overall on making
sure that the message was passed simply
and clearly in a high context society
while we're communicating we assume or
consider that we have a larger body of
shared context that we have the same
reference points body of knowledge
information and because we assume all of
this shared context in a high context
society we believe good effective
communication is a communication that's
more implicit or layered or nuanced I
had a German individual who said to me
you know Aaron in Germany at the end of
a meeting we almost always do a recap
first we do a verbal recap and then we
do a written recap that's low context
right clarification clarification
clarification he said now that I've been
working frequently with the French I
often find that at the end of a meeting
I'll get ready to do a recap and my
French colleagues will just stand up and
someone will say eh voila there it is
and I'll think to myself but voila what
and then I'll be very surprised to see
that it just seems that people know
what's been
sited that they know what's supposed to
happen next without going through all of
those levels of clarification that I'm
so used to in my own culture I had a
second example I was doing some work a
while ago in Istanbul and I had a
Turkish client who was telling me about
all of these issues that he was having
with his new American boss and I said
when your boss was here did you tell him
what you're telling me now and he said
well you know Aaron I made it known so
that he could see it if he wanted to see
it and I thought to myself he probably
didn't see it right I'll give you a
third example from China I was giving a
presentation at a conference in China
last year and all the people in the room
worked for the same multinational
American company before I worked within
the Chairman who was this American from
New York City gave a presentation that
went very well and then he left
afterwards when I was working with the
group we were talking about this and I
had the Chinese human resource director
raise his hand and he said you know
Aaron this concept is very interesting
to me because the whole time the
chairman was talking I was trying to
make sure that I was listening with all
of my senses that I was picking up all
of the levels of meaning that he might
be trying to pass now that I look at
this I'm asking myself the question is
it possible that there was no meaning
beyond that you know first those simple
words that he was saying and I thought
to myself that that chairman would have
been really surprised to note think that
anyone was trying to understand his
message beyond the first degree
</key>
<qa>
<qs>When you give a presentation in a low context culture you should tell people what you're going to tell them, then you should tell them, and then you should tell them what you've told them.
</qs>
<ans>✓ true
→ you tell the same thing three times because you are focused overall on making sure that the message was passed simply and clearly
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>In a low context culture you are focused overall on making sure that the message was passed simply and clearly because while you are communicating you assume you have a large body of shared context.
</qs>
<ans>〆false
→ you assume you haven't got a large body of shared context
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>In a high context society people believe good effective communication is more explicit.
</qs>
<ans>〆false
→ it is more implicit
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Germany has low context culture because (for example) at the end of a meeting they almost always do a recap first, then do a verbal recap, and then do a written recap.
</qs>
<ans>✓ true
→ low context clarification

〆excessive clarification may put people off
= reminiscent of condescending approach
→ treating audience in a childish manner
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>In Istanbul, a Turkish client had problems with his new American boss, so he made it known so that his boss could see it if he wanted to see it. His American boss probably got the message.
</qs>
<ans>〆false
→ the American boss is probably not used to reading implicit, high context clues
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>5</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_title>Avoiding communication breakdown</activity_title>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_type>edit_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_ol_qa</activity_type>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-cafe-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<instructions><![CDATA[Look at the table. Explain why what the British say and mean has been misinterpreted by foreigners.

→ suggest alternative language and/or body language cues to help communicate across cultures
]]></instructions>
<instructions02><![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img src="pix/lewis_model_what_the_british_say_vs_mean_vs_what_foreigners_understand.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>
 ]]></instructions02>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions_demo> -->
<qas>
</qas>
<key>
</key>
<qa>
<qs>I hear what you say.
</qs>
<ans>✓ I'm afraid I can't agree &amp; would rather not continue this discussion.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>With the greatest respect | With all due respect.
</qs>
<ans>✓ It doesn't seem to be a very reasonable | sensible idea.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>That's not bad.
</qs>
<ans>✓ Thumbs up!
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>That is a very brave proposal.
</qs>
<ans>✓ It doesn't sound like a good idea at all.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Quite good.
</qs>
<ans>✓ (Perhaps) you should try harder.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I would suggest
</qs>
<ans>✓ Please do so, unless you can provide a better solution.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Oh, incidentally / By the way
</qs>
<ans>✓ What is important is that... (cleft sentence)
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I was a bit disappointed that
</qs>
<ans>✓ I'm sorry to say I'm annoyed with...
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Very interesting.
</qs>
<ans>✓ I don't think it makes sense.
✓ I think you've lost me.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I'll bear it in mind.
</qs>
<ans>✓ We probably needn't spend too much time on that.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I'm sure it's my fault.
</qs>
<ans>✓ A mistake has been made.
✓ There's a mistake in your solution.
✓ It seems you have omitted some important facts.
! might be a polite way to avoid your interlocutor losing face
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>You must come for dinner.
</qs>
<ans>✓ It's been a pleasure to meet you.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I almost agree.
</qs>
<ans>✓ Let's agree to disagree (on that one).
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>I only have a few minor comments.
</qs>
<ans>✓ You'll probably need to rewrite after reading my comments.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Could we consider some other options?
</qs>
<ans>✓ I don't think we should stop at that - we must do better.
✓ We should find some alternatives.
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_support_material>
<clog_book_title></clog_book_title>
<clog_book_level></clog_book_level>
<clog_book_unit>Cross-cultural communication</clog_book_unit>

<!-- see h5p -->
<clog_activity>
<mdlid>4</mdlid>
<activity_id>3</activity_id>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-collaboration-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_title>High context and low context countries</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor> 
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<display>3</display> 
<activity_type>xml_multi_dd_row</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>Are the following countries more high context or low context?
</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[→ discuss together
→ match the descriptions with the categories
→ search the internet if relevant
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions_demo><![CDATA[We need more money <span style="background-color: DarkSeaGreen; box-shadow: 0px 4px 4px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);">in order to</span> finish the project
→ expressing a purpose / result]]></instructions_demo>  -->
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[
]]></instructions02> -->
<column_width_percentage>20</column_width_percentage>
<column_height_em>16</column_height_em>
<column_float>left</column_float>
<targets><![CDATA[
(very) low context culture
low context culture
high context culture
(very) high context culture
]]></targets>
<js_droppables>
1;2;3;4;5
6;7;8;9
10;11;12;13;14;15;16
17;18;19;20;21;22;23
</js_droppables>
<activity_contents>
USA
Canada
Australia
Netherlands
Germany
Poland
Finland
Denmark
UK
Argentina
Brazil
Spain 
Italy
France
Russia
Singapore
Kenya
India
Iran
Saudi Arabia
China 
Korea
Japan
</activity_contents>
<key><![CDATA[
<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/map_of_cultures_low_context_high_context_range_per_country.png" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"></div>
]]></key>
</clog_activity>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>3</mdlid>
<activity_id>4</activity_id>
<activity_title>Communication breakdown</activity_title>
<session_date></session_date>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<methodology>How to avoid and/or mitigate communication breakdowns using the low context and high context culture approaches</methodology>
<hw_anchor></hw_anchor>
<activity_status>active</activity_status>
<activity_icon>pix/icons8-microscope-100_white.png</activity_icon>
<activity_type>edit_2columns_2qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>prep_2columns_2qa</activity_type>
<activity_type>edit_1qa</activity_type>
<activity_lead_in>How can you use the high context vs low context approach to cultures to avoid a communication breakdown?</activity_lead_in>
<instructions><![CDATA[→ read the following conversation excerpted from 'Map of cultures' by E.Meyer
→ answer the questions

Pablo Díaz - Spanish executive who worked in China for a Chinese textile company for fifteen years
Mr Chen - Chinese employee
]]></instructions>
<!--<instructions02><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img class="zoom_1_5" src="pix/university_of_Al_Qaraouiyine.jpg" width="80%" border="1" alt="visual aid"><br /></div>]]></instructions02> -->
 <!--<instructions02><![CDATA[ ]]></instructions02>-->
<instructions_demo><![CDATA[
Mr Diaz: It looks like some of us are going to have to be here on Sunday to host the client visit.
Mr Chen: I see.
Mr Diaz: Can you join us on Sunday?
Mr Chen: Yes, I think so.
Mr Diaz: That would be a great help.
Mr Chen: Yes, Sunday is an important day.
Mr Diaz: In what way?
Mr Chen: It’s my daughter’s birthday.
Mr Diaz: How nice. I hope you all enjoy it.
Mr Chen: Thank you. I appreciate your understanding.
]]></instructions_demo>
<qas>
</qas>
<key></key>
<qa>
<qs>Explain what went wrong on both sides.
</qs>
<ans>Díaz was quite certain Mr Chen had said he was coming.
Mr Chen was quite certain he had communicated that he absolutely could not come because he was going to be celebrating his daughter’s birthday with his family.</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
<qa>
<qs>Suggest how the manager could have avoided this misunderstanding.
</qs>
<ans>〆after 15 years in China, Mr Diaz should have taken for granted that using only a low context approach is not the best solution
→ as a senior manager, Mr Diaz should be held responsible for communicating with his staff members
✓ need to paraphrase to avoid a closed question such as 'Can you join us on Sunday?'
e.g. ask about Mr Chen's plans, describe what needs to be done more thoroughly with the client
e.g. should explain that since Mr Chen is a specialist in this area, he really has to be present...
= provide the big picture
→ don't put Chinese (and more generally Asian) employees in a situation where they can't say no
</ans>
<hint>
</hint>
</qa>
</clog_activity>

</clog_support_material>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>2</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
Some things may be <strike>hide</strike> <strong>hidden</strong>
They have no <strike>any</strike> emotional components
He gave <strong>him</strong> this possibility <strike>for him</strike> to see and <strike>listen</strike> <strong>hear | understand</strong>
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
explicit /ɪksˈplɪsɪt/
component /kəmˈpəunənt/
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>



<clog_session>
<clog_session_number></clog_session_number>
<clog_session_date>20260112</clog_session_date>
<clog_session_date_cancelled></clog_session_date_cancelled>
<clog_session_date_rescheduled></clog_session_date_rescheduled>
<clog_session_time>09:45-10:45 MSK | 10:45-11:45 SAMT</clog_session_time>
<clog_session_ach>1.5</clog_session_ach>
<clog_session_rate>2500</clog_session_rate>
<clog_session_credit></clog_session_credit>
<clog_session_credit_date></clog_session_credit_date>
<clog_session_balance></clog_session_balance>
<clog_session_status>lc</clog_session_status>
<clog_session_print></clog_session_print>
<clog_session_title></clog_session_title>
<clog_session_title>Kvass</clog_session_title>
<clog_session_comment>By the end of this session you will have studied </clog_session_comment>
<clog_session_hw><![CDATA[
<img src="pix/icons8-movie-100.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="video"> Leadership Speaker Erin Meyer: Low Context vs. High Context Societies
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYfhTC9lIQ</a>

Watch the video.
→ are the statements below true or false?

<img src="pix/zoom_meeting.png" width="35em" border="0" alt="zoom_meeting.png"> Zoom meeting details
Profi.ru - D.Potter Zoom Meeting (recurring)
Meeting ID: 765 1187 4648
<strong>Password: pFGjq3</strong>  
<a class="clog" target="about_blank" href="https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1">https://us04web.zoom.us/j/76511874648?pwd=pqq81L5Zbdw6lT8hToYVMKUIJsisYn.1</a>
]]></clog_session_hw>

<clog_activity>
<mdlid>1</mdlid>
<clog_deco><![CDATA[
]]></clog_deco>
<clog_pig>
</clog_pig>
</clog_activity>
</clog_session>

</root>
